Category: Nursing

  • nr 326 ccggg

    please answer the question using the screen shot.

    Requirements: 1-2

  • health informatics kaban board

    You are the manager of a Pizza restaurant. Currently, your restaurant pre-makes pizzas that are ordered the most to increase the number of pizzas being made on time for your customers. Over time, many customers have complained that their pizzas were cold upon delivery and not fresh, requesting refunds or remakes of their pizza. Your location is losing money from these wasteful practices; therefore, you want to create a Kanban based on the following basic principles:

    1. A later process tells an earlier process when new items are required. This means that unless a customer orders a pizza, no pizzas will be made. Pull!
    2. The earlier process produces what the later process needs.
    3. No Items can be made without a Kanban card (order request). This allows the process to be transparent, so everyone knows what is going on.
    4. Defects are not passed on to the next stage.

    PART 1: Create a Kanban board for your pizza company that delivers. You must have 4-6 columns with headings for each. Decide what your Kanban cards will represent. Set Rules for your Kanban. Examples: criteria to move between columns? How to flag issues?

    A few strategies for success

    1. Normalize the size of incoming work by breaking up big orders into smaller ones.
    2. Set each Kanban card to represent 1 pizza as opposed to 1 order. For example, one order may represent 2 large pizzas for one family or 20 large pizzas for a party.
    3. Support multiple types of Kanban. For example, a Red Kanban can represent a type of pizza or perhaps the size of the pizza.

    PART 2:

    Mark up the attached floor plan illustrating the following:

    1. The flow of the Kanban pull system
    2. Identifying how many Kanban squares or supermarkets are at each location.
    3. Show and describe how each station receives a signal to replenish

    Requirements:

  • USING THE WALDEN LIBRARY

    Where can you find evidence to inform your thoughts and scholarly writing? Throughout your degree program, you will use research literature to explore ideas, guide your thinking, and gain new insights. As you search the research literature, it is important to use resources that are peer-reviewed and from scholarly journals. You may already have some favorite online resources and databases that you use or have found useful in the past. For this Discussion, you explore databases available through the Walden Library.

  • Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 3: R…

    Using the Module 3 | Part 3 section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:

    • Your topic of interest.
    • A correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.
    • Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.
    • Analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template
    • Write a 1-paragraph justification stating whether you would recommend this article to inform professional practice.
    • Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:
    • Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.
    • Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.
    • Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.

    Note: Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Module 1 Assignment, which was built from the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Part 3 Walden.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 3: R…

    Using the Module 3 | Part 3 section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:

    • Your topic of interest.
    • A correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.
    • Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.
    • Analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template
    • Write a 1-paragraph justification stating whether you would recommend this article to inform professional practice.
    • Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:
    • Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.
    • Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.
    • Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.

    Note: Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Module 1 Assignment, which was built from the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Part 3 Walden.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Threat to Validity

    1. Carefully read Chapter 8 of your LoBiondo & Haber text.
    2. Review videos (on a site such as YouTube) explaining threats to validity in quantitative research
    3. Choose the best video you found, and construct a one-two paragraph (and no more than one page) explanation of why you think the video chosen was the best.
    4. Be sure to include the link of your video within your submiss.
    5. Module 3, Chapter 2: Threats to Validity (REL Central) :- this the title of the video

    https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=b2c114a8c809171bb152a0d20765846f5868fc5178716f989052cd6601a055c8JmltdHM9MTc3MTYzMjAwMA&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=4&fclid=22f91143-f6c1-68c6-1b88-0295f760694c&u=a1L3ZpZGVvcy9yaXZlcnZpZXcvcmVsYXRlZHZpZGVvP3E9dGhyZWF0K3RvK3ZhbGlkaXR5K3lvdXR1YmUrdmlkZW8rbG9iaW9uZG8rdmlkZW8mJm1pZD1GRTcxRUVDQkIxNDI1QzE0NDYwM0ZFNzFFRUNCQjE0MjVDMTQ0NjAzJkZPUk09VkFNR1pD

  • Interpersonal process h

    complete health records

  • Public health and safety improvements by nonprofit/governmen…

    Research a selected local, national, or global nonprofit organization or government agency to determine how it contributes to public health and safety improvements, promotes equal opportunity, and improves the quality of life within the community. Submit your findings in a 35 page report. Collapse All Introduction Many organizations work to better local and global communities’ quality of life and promote health and safety in times of crisis. As public health and safety advocates, nurses must be cognizant of how such organizations help certain populations. As change agents, nurses must be aware of factors that impact the organization and the services that it offers. Familiarity with these organizations enables the nurse to offer assistance as a volunteer and source of referral. This assessment provides an opportunity for you gain insight into the mission, vision, and operations of a community or public health resources organization from the list provided. Preparation As you begin to prepare this assessment, it would be an excellent choice to complete the Nonprofit Organizations and Community Health activity to gain insight into promoting equal opportunity and improving the quality of life in a community. The information gained from completing this activity will help you succeed with the assessment. After completing this activity, select one of the local, national, or global nonprofit organizations or government agencies presented in the Assessment 2 Supplement: Community Resources [PDF]. You may find the organization’s website in the Community Organizations reading list or in the Assessment 2 Supplement: Community Resources [PDF]. Scenario You are interested in expanding your role as a nurse and are considering working in an area where you can promote equal opportunity and improve the quality of life in your local or global community. You are aware of several nonprofit organizations and government agencies whose work contributes to this effort in some way. You are particularly interested in one of these organizations but would like to know more about its contribution to public health and safety improvement. You would also like to report the results of your research in a scholarly paper that you could submit for publication. Instructions Research a selected local, national, or global nonprofit organization or government agency from the document provided. Determine how the organization or agency contributes to public health and safety improvements, promotes equal opportunity, and improves the quality of life within the community. Submit your findings in a 35 page report. The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions in the scoring guide for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. Explain how an organizations mission and vision enable it to contribute to public health and safety improvements. Provide examples of ways a local and/or global initiative supports the mission and vision and promotes public health and safety. Evaluate an organizations ability to promote equal opportunity and improve the quality of life in a community. Consider the effects of social, cultural, economic, and physical barriers. Be sure to go beyond simply describing what the organization does in these areas but evaluating the impact. Assess the impact of funding sources, policy, and legislation on an organization’s service delivery. Consider the potential implications of funding decisions, policy, and legislation for individuals, families, and aggregates within the community. Remember to actually include the policies, legislation, and funding avenues for your chosen organization. Explain how an organizations work impacts the health and/or safety needs of a local community. Consider how nurses might become involved with the organization. How are nurses involved within this organization? Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling. Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format. Write with a specific purpose and audience in mind. Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards and APA formatting requirements. Additional Requirements Document Format and Length Format your research article using current APA style. Refer to the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] to help you in writing and formatting your paper. Be sure to include: A title page and references page. An abstract is not required. Appropriate section headings. Your paper should comprise 35 pages of content plus title and references pages. Supporting Evidence Cite at least three credible sources from peer-reviewed journals or professional industry publications published within the past 5 years that support your research findings. Before submitting your paper, proofread it to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it difficult for them to focus on your research findings.
  • Health Promotion Plan Presentation

    Create a slide presentation of the health promotion plan you developed in Assessment 1.

    Introduction

    Health education is any combination of learning experiences designed to help people in a community improve their health by increasing their knowledge or influencing their attitudes (WHO, n.d.). Education is key to health promotion, disease prevention, and disaster preparedness. The health indicator framework identified in Healthy People 2030 prompts action in health services accessibility, clinical preventive services, environmental quality, injury or violence prevention, maternal, infant, and child health, mental health, nutrition, substance abuse prevention, and tobacco use cessation or prevention.

    Nurses provide accurate evidence-based information and education in formal and informal settings. They draw upon evidence-based practice to provide health promotion and disease prevention activities to create social and physical environments that are conducive to improving and maintaining community health. When provided with the tools to be successful, people demonstrate lifestyle changes (self-care) that promote health and help reduce readmissions. They are better able to tolerate stressors, including environmental changes, and enjoy a better quality of life. Also, in times of crisis, a resilient community is a safer community (Flanders, 2018; Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, n.d.).

    This assessment provides an opportunity for you to apply teaching and learning concepts to a hypothetical presentation of a health promotion plan.

    Note: This is the second part of a two-part assessment. You must successfully complete Assessment 1 before completing this assessment.

    References

    Flanders, S. A. (2018). Effective patient education: Evidence and common sense. Medsurg Nursing, 27(1), 5558.

    Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (n.d.). Healthy People 2030. https://health.gov/healthypeople

    World Health Organization. (n.d.). Health promoting schools. https://www.who.int/health-topics/health-promoting-schools

    Scenario

    In this assessment, you will develop your presentation of the health promotion plan based on the research you conducted for Assessment 1. You will plan the presentation for the community you focused on for Assessment 1.

    You will resume the role of a community nurse tasked with addressing the specific health concern in your community. This time, you will present, via educational outreach, your health promotion plan you completed research for in Assessment 1 to your chosen community. In this presentation, you will simulate the presentation as though it would be live and face-to-face. You must determine an effective teaching strategy, communicate the plan with professionalism and cultural sensitivity, and evaluate the objectives of the plan. Please remember the nursing process. You must evaluate and revise the plan, as applicable, and propose improvement for future educational sessions. To engage your audience, you need to include any handouts with your presentation and a voice-over recording and speaker notes to communicate your plan.

    Instructions

    Complete the following:

    • Prepare a 1214 slide PowerPoint presentation with a voice-over and detailed speaker notes that reflects your presentation. This presentation is the implementation of the plan you created in Assessment 1. The speaker notes should be well-organized and submitted as a separate Word document. Be sure to include a transcript of the voice-over (please refer to the PowerPoint resources in the Academic Resources). The transcript must be submitted on a separate Word document.
    • Simulate the face-to-face educational session, addressing the health concern and health goals of your selected community individual or group.
    • Imagine collaborating with the participants in setting goals for the session, evaluating session outcomes, and suggesting possible revisions to improve future sessions.

    The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion in the scoring guide to see how your work will be assessed.

    • Present a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or group within a community.
    • Tailor the presentation to the needs of your chosen community audience.
    • Adhere to scholarly and disciplinary writing standards and APA formatting requirements.
    • Evaluate educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants.
    • How do you think participants would react to the session?
    • Which aspects of the session would you change?
    • How might those changes improve future outcomes?
    • Evaluate educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and leading health indicators (LHIs).
    • What changes would you recommend to better align the session with Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs?

    Additional Requirements

    Presentation Format and Length

    You may use Microsoft PowerPoint or other suitable presentation software to create your slides (PowerPoint recommended). If you choose an application other than PowerPoint, check with your instructor to avoid potential file compatibility issues.

    The number of slides in your presentation will be dictated by nature and scope of your health promotion plan. Title and references slides are required as follows:

    • Title slide.
    • Health promotion plan title.
    • Your name.
    • Date.
    • Course number and title.
    • References (at the end of your presentation). Be sure to apply correct APA formatting to your references.
    • Remember to include a separate Word document of your speaker notes; this needs to submitted with your PowerPoint.

    Supporting Evidence

    Support your plan with at least three professional or scholarly references published within the last 5 years, which may include peer-reviewed articles, course study resources, and Healthy People 2030 resources.

    Be sure to proofread your PowerPoint presentation and speaker notes before submitting your assessment to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it difficult for them to focus on the substance of your presentation.

    Competencies Measured

    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    • Competency 2: Propose health promotion strategies to improve the health of populations.
    • Evaluate educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants.
    • Competency 3: Evaluate health policies, based on their ability to achieve desired outcomes.
    • Evaluate educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs.
    • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead health promotion and improve population health.
    • Present a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or a group within a community.
    • Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).
    • Slides are easy to read and error-free. Detailed audio, transcript, and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.

    Scoring Guide

    Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

    Criterion 1

    Present a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or a group within a community.

    Distinguished

    Presents a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or a group within a community. The presentation is professional, evidence-based, and based on specific, identified health needs and goals.

    Proficient

    Presents a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or a group within a community.

    Basic

    Presents a health promotion plan, though it isn’t tailored for a specific individual or group within a community.

    Non Performance

    Does not present a health promotion plan tailored for an individual or a group within a community.

    Criterion 2

    Evaluate educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants.

    Distinguished

    Evaluates educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants. Clearly explains the need for revisions to future educational sessions.

    Proficient

    Evaluates educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants.

    Basic

    Describes educational session outcomes and the attainment of health goals without evaluating them or considering how participants might react to the session.

    Non Performance

    Does not evaluate educational session outcomes and attainment of agreed-upon health goals, anticipating potential input from participants.

    Criterion 3

    Evaluate educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs.

    Distinguished

    Evaluates educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs. Clearly explains the need for revisions to better align future sessions with Healthy People 2030 objectives.

    Proficient

    Evaluates educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs.

    Basic

    Evaluates educational session outcomes unrelated to progress toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs.

    Non Performance

    Does not evaluate educational session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and LHIs.

    Criterion 4

    Organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    Distinguished

    Organizes content with clear purpose/goals. Power point slides support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    Proficient

    Organizes content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    Basic

    Organizes content with clear purpose/goals. PowerPoint slides do not consistently support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, and/or recommendations with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    Non Performance

    Does not organize content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

    Criterion 5

    Slides are easy to read and error-free. Detailed audio, transcript, and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.

    Distinguished

    Slides are easy to read and clutter-free. Slides enhance key points, adhere to visual best practices and may utilize graphics. Detailed audio, transcript, and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.

    Proficient

    Slides are easy to read and error-free. Detailed audio, transcript, and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.

    Basic

    Slides are easy to read and error free. No audio or audio is not clear, difficult to hear, or not professionally presented. Transcript and speaker notes are sufficient support for the slides.

    Non Performance

    Slides are difficult to read with multiple editing errors. No audio, transcript, and/or speaker notes provided.

  • Presenting Your PICO(T) Process Findings to Your Professiona…

    Speaking notes needed for a 5-10 minute video based off the provided poster and based on this criteria:

    Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.

    • Explain a diagnosis in terms of outcomes, risks, and complications.
    • Summarize the content of at least three sources of evidence, including the credibility and relevance of the articles to a specific diagnosis issue.
    • Competency 4: Plan care based on the best available evidence.
    • Describe a research question developed using the PICO(T) process to address a chosen issue related to a diagnosis.
    • Explain the answer to a PICO(T) question based on an analysis of the evidence.
    • Describe key steps of care based on the evidence.
    • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Presenting Your PICO(T) Process Findings to Your Professional Peers.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.