Category: Nursing

84″}

I uploaded the instructor outline file.

Please read the file carefully and prepare the presentation EXACTLY according to these instructions.

Requirements:

– Symposium style presentation

– 810 slides only (excluding references)

– Keywords only, no paragraphs

– Include at least one clinical / nursing example

– Include minimum 2 academic references

– Add title slide and reference slide

– Content must stay within the assigned topic only

– Slides should be simple for speaking, not reading

Important:

The instructor is very strict and the presentation must follow the uploaded file rules exac

Soap Note 1 is based on the Case Study # 1 or #2

You MUST use the one of the case studies as the base of this SOAP NOTE #1

Must use the sample template for your soap note, keep this template for when you start clinicals.

Templates used from another classes will not be accepted. Student must use the template provided in this class which must clearly contain the progress note (in the Assessment section) of the encounter with the patient ( this section is clearly mark in bold, highlighted and underlined). No passing grade will be granted if this section is not completed properly.

Late Assignment Policy

Assignments turned in late will have 1 point taken off for everyday assignment is late, after 7 days assignment will get grade of 0 (zero). No exceptions

Follow the MRU Soap Note Rubric as a guide

Use APA format and must include minimum of 2 Scholarly Citations.

Soap notes will be uploaded to Moodle and put through TURN-It-In (anti-Plagiarism program)

Turn it in Score must be less than 25% or will not be accepted for credit, must be your own work and in your own words. You can resubmit, Final submission will be accepted if less than 25%. Copy-paste from websites or textbooks will not be accepted or tolerated.

Please see College Handbook with reference to Academic Misconduct Statement.

The use of tempates is ok with regards to Turn it in, but the Patient History, CC, HPI, The Assessment and Plan should be of your own work and individualized to your made up patient.

Library Assignment Instructions for Nursing Students

Purpose:

The purpose of this library assignment is to help nursing students to develop their research skills and to become familiar with different credible data sources available through the Library page at the FNU.edu website. In addition, this assignment will help students to apply the PICOT (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Time) question format to develop a research question and to locate and evaluate scholarly sources.

Instructions:

1. Topic Selection: Select a nursing theorist of choice and research him/her. Include a summary of your research and how it correlates to the subject you are studying. Identify their key contribution to nursing and explain its importance in healthcare. Your topic should be broad enough to allow for an in-depth exploration but narrow enough to be manageable within the scope of an 250-500-word (1 page) research paper.
2. Searching for Literature: Use the Library page at the FNU.edu website to search for scholarly sources related to your topic. You must utilize at least 3 scholarly sources that have been published within the last 5 years. You may use databases such as CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, Clinical Key, The Cochrane Library. Be sure to use appropriate keywords and to apply search filters to limit your search to scholarly, peer-reviewed articles.
3. Evaluating Sources: Once you have identified potential sources, use the CRAAP test (Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose) to evaluate their credibility and relevance to your research question. Be sure to select sources that are relevant to your topic, written by credible authors, and based on rigorous research methods.
4. Writing the Paper: Your research paper should follow APA 7 guidelines and include the following sections: Introduction, Literature Review, Methodology, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion. Be sure to use in-text citations and to include a reference list at the end of your paper.
5. Please keep in mind that the paper will be checked for plagiarism, and similarity above 25% will not be accepted for submission.

Grading Criteria: DUE WEEK 6 (10/9)

Your research paper will be graded based on the following criteria:

• PICOT question format (10 points)
• Use of at least 3 scholarly sources published within the last 5 years (10 points)
• Credibility and relevance of sources (10 points)
• APA 7 formatting, including in-text citations and reference list (10 points)
• Introduction (10 points)
• Literature Review (20 points)
• Methodology (10 points)
• Results (10 points)
• Discussion (10 points)
• Conclusion (10 points)
• Plagiarism (10 points)

Create a 15-20 page curriculum evaluation that incorporates the curriculum analysis and course design you created for Assessments 1 and 2.

Introduction:

Nurse educators are responsible for many areas of evaluation, including students, curriculum, and program evaluation. Additionally, they have a responsibility to the internal and external stakeholders when it comes to the evaluation process. There are two types of evaluation: summative and formative evaluation. Formative evaluation takes place during the learning process (Billings & Halstead, 2019). Summative evaluation refers to the outcomes of the learning when the learning environment has ended (Billings & Halstead, 2019.)

Reference

Billings, D. M., & Halstead, J. A. (2019). Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty (6th ed.). Saunders Elsevier.

Preparation:

You will use the work you completed for Assessments 1 and 2 as parts of this assessment. Combine Assessments 1 and 2, and add a section about curriculum evaluation. The evaluation you create should flow smoothly as one cohesive document. When combining the previous assessments, make revisions based on feedback you received from faculty.

As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.

• Who should perform curriculum evaluation: individual faculty, a curriculum committee, or full faculty?
• When should curriculum evaluation be done: each semester, each academic year, at the end of a program cohort, or prior to accreditation visits?
• How can a curriculum be revised to ensure that program outcomes are met without compromising the whole curriculum?
• How can a curriculum be revised to reflect changes in society, nursing, health care delivery, health care needs, educational practice, learner diversity, and emerging technology when curriculum revision entails a lengthy process involving state regulations and accreditation standards?

Requirements:

• Consider curriculum evaluation and address the following:
  • Explain the importance of ongoing curriculum evaluation, why it is important, and for whom it is important.
  • List criteria that are important to consider in curriculum evaluation.
  • Explain how and why pilot testing can be used in curriculum evaluation.
  • Provide examples of both short-term and long-term curriculum evaluations for process improvement and explain why both types are necessary to curriculum development.
  • Describe how to apply evidence-based nursing concepts, theories, and best practices to improve curriculum development.
  • Identify the appropriate accreditation body for a selected curriculum and describe appropriate accreditation evaluation criteria.
  • • For example, a school of nursing might be accredited by CCNE or ACEN, whereas a hospital staff development program might be accredited by JCAHO, HFAP, or other
    • Written communication: Written communication is free from errors that detract from the overall message.
    • APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting.
    • Number of resources: Cite a minimum of five resources that are not included in the resource activities for this assessment.
    • Length of evaluation: 15-20 typed double-spaced pages, excluding the title page and the reference page.
    • Appendix: Included appropriate material from Assessments 1 and 2. The appendix will not be included in the page count.
    • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

    I attached assessments 1 and 2 that you completed for me.

General Instructions

• Answer each of the following questions related to prevalent infection and chronic disease in Northern Virginia, using complete sentences.
• Follow APA grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation rules consistent with formal, scholarly writing.
• Provide an in-text citation from three scholarly sources to support your writing.

Include the following sections

Prevalent Infectious and Chronic Diseases

• a)Describe the selected geographic region.
• b)Identify the prevalent infectious and chronic diseases in the region.
• c)Compare and contrast the prevalence of diseases in the selected region with disease rates and trends in a different geographic area of your choosing, noting similarities and differences.
• d)Discuss the variables that contribute to the noted similarities and differences.
• e)Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing.

Application of the Epidemiological Model

• a)Select and describe one of the prevalent diseases noted in the previous section.
• b)Discuss physical and social determinants of health that influence the disease process.
• c)Identify and explain one epidemiological model that will be applied to the selected disease (i.e., Epidemiological Triangle, Web of Causation, or another legitimate epidemiological model).
• d)Apply the epidemiological model to the selected disease in a well-developed, comprehensive manner, addressing the entire model.
• e)Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing.

Levels of Prevention

1. Explain the levels of prevention used within population health practice.
2. Discuss one primary prevention to address the disease.
3. Discuss one secondary prevention to address the disease.
4. Discuss one tertiary prevention to address the disease.

e. Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing.

Reflection

1. Describe how the advanced practice nurse can monitor the application and efficacy of the prevention strategy.
2. Discuss how you will apply the identified prevention strategies in your practice.
3. Reflect on what you have learned from this assignment.

References

I will share topic after selecting tutor

In this assignment, you will apply the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle to your ongoing DNP project. You will complete two PDSA cycles, one during Week 3 and the other during Week 7 of your implementation phase. This exercise will help you reflect on your project’s progress, identify areas for improvement, and make adjustments in real-time.

You are required to submit your completed PDSA cycle template for each cycle (Week 3 and Week 7), along with a brief reflection on the outcomes and any changes made during the process.

PDSA Cycle Template

Project Title:

Your Name:

Date:

PDSA Cycle 1 (Week 3)

Plan: (15pts)

~What is your objective for this cycle?

(Example: To evaluate the effectiveness of the initial intervention and identify areas needing adjustments.)

~What changes are you testing?

(Example: Implementation of a new rounding protocol or increasing communication frequency.)

~What data will you collect and how?

(Example: Compliance rates, feedback from staff, patient outcomes data.)

Do: (15pts)

~What did you do to carry out the plan?

(Example: Conducted daily rounds according to the new protocol; collected feedback from staff.)

Study:(15pts)

~What were the results?

(Example: Compliance rates increased by 20%, but staff reported confusion on one specific aspect.)

~Did the data meet your expectations?

(Example: Yes, for compliance rates; no, for staff understanding.)

Act: (15pts)

~What will you adapt or revise for the next cycle?

(Example: Provide additional staff training to clarify the confusing aspect.)

~Next steps for Cycle 2:

(Example: Continue rounds with revised protocol; re-evaluate staff feedback.)

Reflection: (20pts)

At the end of each PDSA cycle, provide a brief reflection (1-2 paragraphs) on the process and what you learned during the cycle. Discuss any unexpected outcomes and how you adapted your approach to improve the project.

Format: (20pts) This is not a paper. You can complete this using an infographic, table, or a worksheet/template, but writing and cycle details must be clear.

Rubric

DNPC 785C-WK 3 & WK7 PDSA Cycles (1)

DNPC 785C-WK 3 & WK7 PDSA Cycles (1)

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Plan

15 pts Proficient Objective is clearly defined; change being tested is well-justified with clear alignment to project goals; data collection method is well-designed and relevant.

12 pts Acceptable Objective is mostly clear; change being tested aligns with project goals; data collection method is adequate.

9 pts Developing Objective is somewhat clear; change being tested is somewhat aligned to project goals; data collection method is partially relevant.

0 pts Unsatisfactory Vague or missing. Below the level of a DNP Student

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Do

15 pts Proficient Actions are executed precisely as planned with thoughtful attention to detail; all key activities described comprehensively.

12 pts Acceptable Actions are mostly carried out as planned with minor adjustments; key activities are described but lacking some detail.

9 pts Developing Actions are somewhat carried out as planned but may lack precision or detail; key activities are partially described.

0 pts Unsatisfactory Vague or missing. Below the level of a DNP Student

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Study

15 pts Proficient Results are clearly articulated, with strong analysis of the data; compares actual results to expectations; thoughtful reflection on discrepancies.

12 pts Acceptable Results are described with reasonable analysis; comparison to expectations is made, with some reflection on discrepancies.

9 pts Developing Results are somewhat described; some analysis of data but lacks depth; comparison to expectations is minimal.

0 pts Unsatisfactory Vague or missing. Below the level of a DNP Student

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Act

15 pts Proficient Clear decisions made based on results; specific actions for next cycle are well-justified and aligned with data; demonstrates forward-thinking.

12 pts Acceptable Decisions are made based on results; actions for next cycle are somewhat justified and aligned with data.

9 pts Developing Some decisions made based on results; actions for next cycle are partially justified, with limited alignment to data.

0 pts Unsatisfactory Vague or missing. Below the level of a DNP Student

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reflection

20 pts Proficient Insightful reflection on learning and adaptation, demonstrating critical thinking; reflects on unexpected outcomes and future improvements.

15 pts Acceptable Thoughtful reflection on learning and adaptation; addresses unexpected outcomes and future improvements.

10 pts Developing Basic reflection on learning and adaptation; limited discussion of unexpected outcomes or future improvements.

0 pts Unsatisfactory Vague or missing. Below the level of a DNP Student

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Clarity & Organization

20 pts Proficient Template is thoroughly and clearly completed; responses are well-organized and easy to follow; no spelling or grammatical errors.

16 pts Acceptable Template is mostly complete; responses are organized with minor spelling or grammatical errors.

8 pts Developing Template is partially complete; responses lack clear organization; several spelling or grammatical errors.

0 pts Unsatisfactory Vague or missing. Below the level of a DNP Student

20 pts

Total Points: 100

I would like to write about four types of disease: GERD, Peptic Ulcer Disease, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, and Oral Cancer. I attached the template, so you should fill this template 4 times, each for one disease. Please, please please do NOT use any chat GPT, AI, or Quizlet for the assignment because my teacher has checking software. also, try not to copy any other old assignment

Step 1: You will use the to:

1. Compose a written comprehensive psychiatric evaluation of a patient you have seen in the clinic.
2. Upload your completed comprehensive psychiatric evaluation as a Word doc. Scanned PDFs will not be accepted.
   • For the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Presentation Assignment: You will need to get it signed by your preceptor for the presentation (actual signature, not electronically typed).

Step 2: Each student will create a focused SOAP note video presentation in the next assignment. See for more details.

SOAP is an acronym that stands for Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan.

S =	Subjective data: Patients Chief Complaint (CC); History of the Present Illness (HPI)/ Demographics; History of the Present Illness (HPI) that includes the presenting problem and the 8 dimensions of the problem (OLDCARTS or PQRST); Review of Systems (ROS)
O =	Objective data: Medications; Allergies; Past medical history; Family psychiatric history; Past surgical history; Psychiatric history, Social history; Labs and screening tools; Vital signs; Physical exam, (Focused), and Mental Status Exam
A =	Assessment: Primary Diagnosis and two differential diagnoses including ICD-10 and DSM5 codes
P =	Plan: Pharmacologic and Non-pharmacologic treatment plan; diagnostic testing/screening tools, patient/family teaching, referral, and follow up

After studying , address the following in a well-written discussion post:

• One common dilemma faced by psychiatric nurse practitioners is determining who the client is. Given that children are typically brought for treatment by their parents, describe how the psychiatric nurse practitioner would respond to a child who discloses they are indulging in illicit behavior and asks you not to tell his or her parents.

Submission Instructions:

• Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
• You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)
• All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.

For the Week 4 assignment in the March 2026 session, you will explore the following 20th-century event: Early Licensure Requirements for Registered Nurses (1900-1950). You will compare this event to the Todays Licensure Requirements for Registered Nurses.

The assigned source to use as a reference is above and attached