Category: Nursing

  • Basic Cell Artwork

    This assignment offers an opportunity to deepen your understanding of cell biology through a combination of creative and analytical approaches. You will engage with current scholarly resources and clinical guidelines to prepare for a comprehensive review of basic cell structure and function. The process involves creating an original, labeled drawing of the cell, which encourages you to visualize and articulate the roles of each cellular component. Afterward, you will compare your work to an AI-generated cell diagram, critically evaluating the accuracy and completeness of the AIs representation. The reflective component of the assignment will prompt you to consider the strengths and limitations of both human and AI-generated work, fostering a nuanced appreciation for foundational cell biology and the value of evidence-based learning. Submit an original drawing of the different parts of the basic cell, labeling the parts and function. Capture and upload as an image (jpeg).

    After completing the artwork, ask an AI platform of your choosing to do the same. After reviewing the AI constructed and labeled cell, construct a brief reflection of what you learned from this process, answering the following questions:

    • Was AI accurate?
    • What did it miss?
    • Why is this activity worthwhile to strengthen your foundational knowledge?

    Submit two documents:

    1. Image of original artwork
    2. Written Reflection

    You must also submit a completed AI Assessment Template document, found in this Assessment’s Learning Resources

    Independently locate and reference information from the required textbook rather than relying on provided excerpts or summaries. This approach will help strengthen your research skills and deepen your understanding of cell biology by engaging directly with authoritative scholarly sources.

    • Rogers, J. L. (2023). McCance & Huethers Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (9th ed.). Elsevier.
      • NOTE: Utilize this text as a clinical reference to aid your analysis. See the Nurses Bookshelf and Study Questions for relevant areas.

    .rubric

    Accuracy and Completeness

    25 to >22.4 ptsExcellentIncludes all major components accurately placed and represented; no errors in structure or function.

    19.9 to >17.3 ptsFairSeveral required structures missing or incorrect; understanding appears partial.

    25 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLabeling and Functional Descriptions

    25 to >22.4 ptsExcellentAll structures clearly labeled with accurate, concise function explanations.

    25 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArtwork Clarity and Creativity

    15 to >13.4 ptsExcellentVisual or written elements demonstrate originality, thoughtful design, and purposeful choices that enhance understanding of the cell. Creativity elevates the work without compromising scientific accuracy.

    15 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluation of AI-Generated Diagram and Reflection

    20 to >17.8 ptsExcellentProvides a detailed, evidencebased evaluation of AI accuracy, identifies omissions with strong justification, and offers an insightful reflection on the learning value of comparing human vs. AI work.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis and Source Integration

    5 to >4.4 ptsExcellentDemonstrates strong critical analysis and synthesis of course concepts and module readings.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Attribution and APA Formatting

    5 to >4.4 ptsExcellentAll sources are cited in APA format without any errors. Includes a complete AI template in the appendix.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Mechanics, and Punctuation

    5 to >4.4 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

  • Nursing Question

    ntegrating Instructions: Assignment on Heart Failure Guidelines

    For the Integrating section of the module on the Cardiovascular System, you will engage in an assignment focused on heart failure guidelines, compensatory mechanisms, and their limitations. Follow these instructions to complete the assignment:

    Assignment #1: Heart Failure Guidelines and Compensatory Mechanisms

    Instructions:

    1. Locate Heart Failure Guidelines:
      • Begin by researching and locating established guidelines for staging (class) and management of heart failure. You can use reputable sources such as medical associations, clinical practice guidelines, or healthcare institutions that provide recommendations for heart failure management. Ensure that you have access to the most current and credible guidelines.
    2. Outline Compensatory Mechanisms:
      • In your assignment, outline the role of the compensatory mechanisms that the body employs to improve cardiac output in response to heart failure. Describe how these mechanisms work to initially maintain cardiac function. Provide specific examples of these mechanisms.
    3. Define Compensatory Mechanism Failure:
      • Define what ultimately causes the compensatory mechanisms to fail. Discuss the limitations of these mechanisms and the factors that lead to their breakdown in the context of heart failure. Include information about how chronic heart failure progresses.
    4. Submit Your Assignment:
      • Compose a well-structured essay that addresses the above points. Your essay should consist of a minimum of four (4) paragraphs and adhere to APA format for academic writing. Properly cite your sources within the text and include a reference list at the end of your assignment.

    Submission: Submit your completed essay in APA format to your instructor for grading.

  • Powerpoint presentation for one or more stakeholder or lead…

    Knowing who to include in your project plan presentation is important. Is your plan focused on an organization, a patient population, or a community? The purpose of the project will guide identification of the population. Who are the stakeholders? Are they patients? Health and human services providers, government officials, influencers, workers whose jobs are impacted by the proposed plan? Community activists? Or affected local businesses? (Harris et al., 2023). These are all important considerations as you plan a presentation for stakeholders.

    You are encouraged to complete the Evidence-Based Practice: Basics and Guidelines activity before you develop the presentation. This activity consists of six questions that will check your understanding of the fundamentals of evidence-based practice as well as ways to identify EBP in practice. The information gained from completing this activity will help promote success in the Stakeholder Presentation assessment and demonstrate courseroom engagementit requires just a few minutes of your time and is not graded. Please note, you are not actually presenting your PowerPoint to a group, but you are preparing it as if you were.

    Reference

    Harris, J. L., Roussel, L. A., Dearman, C., & Thomas, P. (2023). Project planning and management: A guide for nurses and interprofessional teams (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. This assessment is an opportunity to sharpen your ability to create a professional presentation for stakeholders. By using this presentation, the stakeholders will have tools to expand on these ideas in their workplace, and to drive change and improve processes to solve an interprofessional collaboration problem. This two-part assessment focuses on developing and presenting an interdisciplinary plan proposal to address an organizational or patient care issue. You will first create a comprehensive plan using a structured template, then develop a professional PowerPoint presentation designed to generate stakeholder buy-in and support for your proposal.

    Leadership and collaboration are critical aspects of nursing practice. This assessment provides an opportunity to demonstrate effective leadership skills and interprofessional collaboration by creating an evidence-based plan that could drive meaningful change in a healthcare setting. You will think critically about project implementation, resource management, and evaluation strategiesessential components of successful healthcare improvement initiatives.

    Your presentation will serve as an educational and persuasive tool that stakeholders can use to expand on your ideas, drive organizational change, and improve processes related to interprofessional collaboration. While you will not execute the project, carefully examining implementation and evaluation strategies will develop the critical thinking skills required for leading healthcare improvement efforts.

    Your presentation should be tailored for stakeholders at a specific healthcare organization, with language and messaging appropriate for leaders and decision-makers who will evaluate and potentially approve your proposal. While not actually presented, this is a graded presentation. Before beginning this assessment, consider the following:This assessment consists of two interconnected parts that must be submitted together.

    Part 1: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal (Template)

    Using the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template [DOCX], create a comprehensive plan that addresses an organizational or patient care issue through an interdisciplinary team approach.

    Template Completion Guidelines:

    Complete each section of the template thoroughly and concisely.

    Apply APA format to all in-text citations for evidence and best practices that inform your plan.

    Include an APA-formatted reference list at the end of the template.

    A title page is optional since you are using a template.

    Your plan proposal should address:

    The specific organizational or patient issue requiring attention.

    Why an interdisciplinary team approach is most appropriate for this issue.

    Evidence-based strategies and interventions to address the issue.

    Implementation considerations and resource requirements.

    Evaluation criteria and success metrics.

    Part 2: Stakeholder Presentation (PowerPoint)

    Create an 812 slide PowerPoint presentation designed to generate interest and buy-in from stakeholder or leadership groups for your interdisciplinary plan proposal.

    Presentation Structure:

    Your presentation should include the following components (use one or two slides per section as needed):

    Part 1: Organizational or Patient Issue

    Explain the issue you are trying to solve or improve.

    Articulate why the audience should care about addressing this issue.

    Describe how a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal.

    Part 2: Relevance of an Interdisciplinary Team Approach

    Justify why using an interdisciplinary team is relevant or the best approach.

    Explain how this approach will help achieve improved outcomes or reach the goal.

    Part 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Summary

    Summarize your evidence-based interdisciplinary plan.

    State the objective clearly.

    Discuss the likelihood of success.

    Describe what the interdisciplinary team will do.

    Part 4: Implementation and Resource Management

    Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented.

    Describe how human and financial resources would be managed.

    Explain how the plan ensures effective use of resources and prevents waste.

    Justify the resource expenditure.

    Part 5: Evaluation

    Propose evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree to which the project achieves the improvement goal.

    Describe what a successful outcome would look like.

    Explain how these criteria could measure and demonstrate the degree of success.

    Part 6: References

    Include a final reference slide in APA format.

    Download copies of your references (articles) for submission with your presentation.

    Presentation Development Guidelines:

    Create slides that are easy to read, visually appealing, and error-free.

    Use concise talking points on slides (bullet points, not full sentences).

    Include detailed speaker notes that flesh out the bullet points on each slide.

    Remember that another person may ultimately deliver this presentation, so your speaker notes should be comprehensive.

    Organize content with clear purpose and goals.

    Support your content with relevant, evidence-based sources.

    Tailor language and messaging to your specific stakeholder audience.

    All parts must be submitted together: Submit your completed Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template, your PowerPoint Presentation, and a PDF of each of the journal articles used.

    Complete this assessment’s Evidence-Based Practice: Basics and Guidelines activity (optional but encouraged). This six-question activity will help you check your understanding of evidence-based practice fundamentals and identify EBP in practice. It takes just a few minutes and will promote your success in this assessment.

    Review the Capella Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint Presentations [PPTX] to ensure your slides are professional and visually effective. For more information review the Capella University Library: PowerPoint Presentations.

    Familiarize yourself with the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template [DOCX] that you will use for Part 1.

    Reflect on these key questions:

    How do organizational leaders impact project success, sustain practice change, and share evidence-based findings?

    Which technologies might help evaluate a project’s impact within a healthcare system?

    Who are the relevant stakeholders for your proposed plan (patients, healthcare providers, administrators, community members, etc.)?

    Gather evidence-based sources published within the past five years that support your proposed plan and approach. You will need to submit these. Create an 8-12 slide PowerPoint presentation for one or more stakeholder or leadership groups to generate interest and buy-in for the plan proposal you develop for the assessment. You will not be giving this presentation to actual group. Before beginning this assessment, consider the following:

    • Complete this assessment’s Evidence-Based Practice: Basics and Guidelines activity (optional but encouraged). This six-question activity will help you check your understanding of evidence-based practice fundamentals and identify EBP in practice. It takes just a few minutes and will promote your success in this assessment.
    • Review the to ensure your slides are professional and visually effective. For more information review the .
    • Familiarize yourself with the that you will use for Part 1.
    • Reflect on these key questions:
      • How do organizational leaders impact project success, sustain practice change, and share evidence-based findings?
      • Which technologies might help evaluate a project’s impact within a healthcare system?
      • Who are the relevant stakeholders for your proposed plan (patients, healthcare providers, administrators, community members, etc.)?
    • Gather evidence-based sources published within the past five years that support your proposed plan and approach. You will need to submit these.

    Capella University Library

    The library research guide will be useful in guiding you through the Capella University Library, offering tips for searching the literature and other references for your assessments.

    • . use this library for articles
  • Capstone Project Objectives/Content/Outline/Strategies/Refe…

    In this assignment, you will describe the subject, problems, or issues you want to address. You will answer the following questions:

    • How do we know this is a problem or issue?
    • Who needs the information about the problem or issue?
    • What are possible solutions?
    • How will dissemination of this researched information impact behavior?
    • What changes to practice or workplace procedures may occur because of your Capstone project?
  • Nursing Question

    For your signature assignment, compose a 3- to 4-page case analysis (in addition to a title page, abstract, and reference list page) written in APA Style citing at least 3 references with one non-Internet reference. The following should be covered in the paper:

    • Title Page: Case Title, Full Name, Section, Date, Instructor, and Campus
    • Abstract: Summarize the case o One non-indented paragraph on a separate page. This will be page 2.
    • Introduction: The physiological importance of the liver, pancreas, and kidneys for the proper functioning of the human body
    • Body: Response to the prompts: Organize your analysis with headings that thoroughly answer the prompts (e.g., Abnormal Glucose Levels for question 1).
      • Explain each prompt in depth with physiological concepts and provide sufficient evidence from the literature for each prompt. o Include normal physiological ranges (if it applies).
      • Maintain the order of questions when answering.
    • Conclusion: Summarize the paper in a paragraph.

    Support your opinions with evidence from your readings and research. Review the rubric for complete grading criteria.


    Case: End-Stage Kidney Disease

    Cynthia, a 53-year-old female presented to the emergency room due to feeling constantly tired, hungry, thirsty, and with frequent urination. Her past medical history is significant for cirrhosis and end-stage kidney disease. Physical examination had revealed yellowish discoloration to the skin, multiple bruises, bilateral edema, and weakness lasting more than three weeks. Laboratory tests were ordered (results provided below) after which she was prescribed metformin and informed to contact a doctor if she starts experiencing nausea, vomiting, fast breathing, and/or lethargy, as metformin has been known to cause metabolic acidosis.

    Complete Blood Count (CBC)
    Sodium 126 mEq/L
    Glucose 220 mg/dl
    Calcium 7.1 mg/dl
    Red blood cell count 3.9 million cells/ul
    Iron 40 mcg/dL
    Albumin 2.5 g/dl
    Vitals
    Blood pressure 86/56 mmHg
    Hormone Panel
    Renin Low
    ADH Elevated
    Aldosterone Low
    Vitamins
    Vit D Low
    Vit K Low
    Vit E Low
    Vit A Low
    Urine and Stool Sample
    Stool color Gray
    Stool content Increase fat content
    Urine color Clear
    Glucose Present

    Answer the following questions regarding Cynthias case:

    1. What hormone is not functioning properly causing Cynthias glucose levels to be abnormal? Furthermore, explain in depth how this hormone regulates blood glucose levels.
    2. What other hormone(s) are responsible for maintaining normal glucose levels? Explain in depth how they work.
    3. Explain why Cynthia is presenting with excessive thirst (polydipsia), tiredness and hunger (polyphagia), and frequent urination (polyuria).
    4. Explain why Cynthia is experiencing hypotension. How does the body and its various organ systems bring the blood pressure back towards homeostasis?
    5. What do you expect Cynthias heart rate and end-diastolic volume (EDV) to be (elevated, normal, or low) and justify your expectation with cardiovascular formulas such as cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume (SV).
    6. What is the importance of iron in the body and the consequence of it being 40 mcg/dL?
    7. Explain in detail what gluconeogenesis is and where in the body it occurs? Knowing that gluconeogenesis helps maintain blood glucose level, what is the effect of metformin on the management of diabetes mellitus type 2?
    8. Looking at Cynthias albumin levels, what effect does it have on her (a) blood osmolarity (b) glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and (c) urine volume?
    9. Explain how glucose is normally reabsorbed by the kidneys? What is happening in Cynthias kidneys resulting in glucosuria and what effect does glucosuria have on her blood pressure?
    10. If Cynthia ends up developing metabolic acidosis, what would the levels of her pH, CO2, and HCO3 be in the blood? Furthermore, how would the body compensate and address both renal and respiratory compensation (optional: show the compensation via a flow chart)?

    Message me your price and please make sure ai cannot detect it.

  • Discussion

    Please select ONE question to answer:

    1. Using Box 4-2 (p.95) in Chapter 4 of Schmidt and Brown -give an example of a research problem statement, purpose statement, and research questions using ONE topic of interest to you for a research study verses a quality improvement project.
    2. Propose a PICO clinical question. Using Exhibit 5.1 (pp. 130-131) in Chapter 5 of Schmidt and Brown. Use the Worksheet to Formulate a Search Strategy in answering a proposed question.
    • Initial Post: Post your answer to the question by 11:59 PM on Thursday.
    • Response Posts: Respond to another colleague’s posts by 11:59 PM on Sunday.

    Discussions Guidelines:

    • Address all parts of a question.
    • All posts must have at least two references (Beyond your Book) from the literature to support the post.
      • Use APA format for references (check spelling and grammar).
    • Use a word document to address the discussion board question and response to a colleague and then Copy and Pasteyour information into the discussion board. Please Do Not add as a file link.
    • Respond to One colleague and the response should be well developed with references.
  • emotional intelligence leadership SWOT analysis

    • Use Microsoft PowerPoint to create a PowerPoint presentation.
    • Download the Emotional Intelligence Leadership SWOT Analysis assignment .
      • Insert images and text as appropriate. Customize colors and fonts if you like. Do not change any headings or the number of slides. Create slides that are professional in appearance and tone and balanced spatially, including words and graphics.

    Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric). Answer the questions under each section with explanation and detail.

    Section 1: Introduction

    1. Title slide.
    2. Explain the purpose of the presentation (i.e., The purpose of this presentation is to explain the results of the Emotional Intelligence assessment and my SWOT plan).
    3. What is emotional intelligence? You must use at least one outside scholarly source and provide in-text citation(s) to support your answer.
    4. Why is your reflection on your EI score important in leadership development? You must use at least one outside scholarly source and provide in-text citation(s) to support your answer.

    Section 2: Strengths

    1. What do you do well?
    2. What do others see as your strengths?
    3. What abilities or values set you apart?

    Section 3: Weaknesses

    1. What are others likely to see as weaknesses?
    2. What are your negative habits?
    3. What could you improve?

    Section 4: Opportunities

    1. What opportunities are open to you?
    2. What trends could you take advantage of?
    3. How can you turn your strengths into opportunities?

    Section 5: Threats

    1. What obstacles to professional growth do you currently face?
    2. Could any of your weaknesses lead to threats?

    Section 6: Final Reflection

    1. Summarize results
    2. Are they accurate?
    3. How will this exercise help you in achieving your SMART goal formed in week 2? Include your SMART goal statement that includes all SMART elements and at least one specific thing you have learned from this assignment that will help you reach it.

    Section 7: Adherence to Assignment Guidelines

    1. Includes reference list in APA format. You may use the lesson as a reference in addition to outside scholarly sources.
    2. Includes in-text citations.
    3. Answer all questions/criteria with appropriate explanation and detail.
    4. Presentation/infographic is clear, organized, and professional.
  • emotional intelligence leadership SWOT analysis

    • Use Microsoft PowerPoint to create a PowerPoint presentation.
    • Download the Emotional Intelligence Leadership SWOT Analysis assignment .
      • Insert images and text as appropriate. Customize colors and fonts if you like. Do not change any headings or the number of slides. Create slides that are professional in appearance and tone and balanced spatially, including words and graphics.

    Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric). Answer the questions under each section with explanation and detail.

    Section 1: Introduction

    1. Title slide.
    2. Explain the purpose of the presentation (i.e., The purpose of this presentation is to explain the results of the Emotional Intelligence assessment and my SWOT plan).
    3. What is emotional intelligence? You must use at least one outside scholarly source and provide in-text citation(s) to support your answer.
    4. Why is your reflection on your EI score important in leadership development? You must use at least one outside scholarly source and provide in-text citation(s) to support your answer.

    Section 2: Strengths

    1. What do you do well?
    2. What do others see as your strengths?
    3. What abilities or values set you apart?

    Section 3: Weaknesses

    1. What are others likely to see as weaknesses?
    2. What are your negative habits?
    3. What could you improve?

    Section 4: Opportunities

    1. What opportunities are open to you?
    2. What trends could you take advantage of?
    3. How can you turn your strengths into opportunities?

    Section 5: Threats

    1. What obstacles to professional growth do you currently face?
    2. Could any of your weaknesses lead to threats?

    Section 6: Final Reflection

    1. Summarize results
    2. Are they accurate?
    3. How will this exercise help you in achieving your SMART goal formed in week 2? Include your SMART goal statement that includes all SMART elements and at least one specific thing you have learned from this assignment that will help you reach it.

    Section 7: Adherence to Assignment Guidelines

    1. Includes reference list in APA format. You may use the lesson as a reference in addition to outside scholarly sources.
    2. Includes in-text citations.
    3. Answer all questions/criteria with appropriate explanation and detail.
    4. Presentation/infographic is clear, organized, and professional.
  • discussion

    Advanced practice nurses apply continuous quality improvement (CQI) processes to improve client-centered outcomes. Select one of the following client-centered care initiatives that you would like to improve in your practice area: client clinical outcomes, client satisfaction, care coordination during care transitions, or specialty consultations for clients.

    Include the following sections:

    1. ApplicationofCourseKnowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.
      • Identify the selected client-centered care initiative and describe its application to your future practice.
      • Select one CQI framework that can be applied to the selected initiative. Explain each step of the framework.
      • Describe how the framework can improve client-centered care for the selected initiative.
      • Describe how you would involve interprofessional team members in the CQI process.
    1. Integration of Evidence: Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by :
      • Cite a scholarly source in the initial post.
      • Cite a scholarly source in one faculty response post.
      • Cite a scholarly source in one peer post.
      • Accurately analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles from evidence with no more than one short quote (15 words or less) for the week.
      • Include a minimum of two different scholarly sources per week. Cite all references and provide references for all citations.
    1. discussion 1

      I attached the previous discussion with the pico question

      After studying , discuss the following:

      • Discuss the purpose defining the purpose of the PICO question for the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner.
      • Explain the purpose of your selected PICO question advanced practice psychiatric nurses or the patients or the populations they treat.

      Submission Instructions:

      • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in the current APA style.
      • Provide support for your work from at least five academic sources less than 5 years old
      • Students may not duplicate the PICO question of another student at St. Thomas University.
      • Your initial post is worth 8 points.