Bright Academic Experts

Category: Nursing

  • Nursing Question

    PART I

    Debriefing: Discover and Deepen

    1. You are encouraged, but not required, to complete at least one i-Human Virtual Patient Encounter attempt before participating in the debriefing.
    2. Include a citation from the weekly lesson (Explore pages) in your response and reference list.
      • Here is an example of how to cite the lesson:
        • Chamberlain University College of Nursing. (2024). NR-305 Week 2: Conducting a Holistic Assessment [Online lesson].
    3. Answer all questions below with explanations and details.

    Paragraph one: Reflect on your experience conducting cardiovascular, respiratory, or peripheral vascular assessments. Discuss challenges and barriers when performing these assessments in a clinical setting and describe how you can address them effectively. Reflect upon a time you encountered an unexpected assessment finding and describe what you learned from that experience related to the assessment.

    Paragraph two: Answer the questions based on the first letter of your last name below.

    How would you approach a respiratory physical assessment differently if you were evaluating a pregnant client in her third trimester experiencing shortness of breath in the clinic setting? Address inspection, palpation, and auscultation.

    Paragraph three: Provide an example of something you learned from the simulation and/or this weeks lesson and how you will apply this to your nursing practice. How will your new knowledge of health promotion help you advocate for early recognition and intervention in your nursing practice?

    Posts should meet the following criteria:

    • Integrate Evidence: Cite evidence from the weekly lesson at least once in weekly posts.
      1. Integrate evidence from the weekly lesson.
      2. Cite and provide a complete reference for the evidence from the weekly lesson.

    Posts should meet the following criteria:

    • Integrate Evidence: Cite evidence from the weekly lesson at least once in weekly posts.
      1. Integrate evidence from the weekly lesson.
      2. Cite and provide a complete reference for the evidence from the weekly lesson.

    PART II

    Discussion: Apply Knowledge

    Step 1: Answer the discussion prompts below with explanation and detail.

    Paragraph one: Discuss the ethical dilemmas related to pain management in treating musculoskeletal disorders, including balancing the need for pain relief with the risk of opioid dependence. What is the nurse’s role in assessing pain and opioid use?

    Paragraph two: Explore cultural factors that influence the perception and treatment of pain and how nurses should navigate these complexities ethically. Based on the letter of your last name, research your assigned cultures perception of pain and common practices in treating pain. Discuss how their beliefs impact musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, or genitourinary assessment.

    Last Name :P. ( Japanese Culture)

    Paragraph three: What challenges have you experienced in conducting gastrointestinal assessments? How can nurses ensure that clients are actively involved in their gastrointestinal health?

    References: Provide complete references for all citations.

    1. Integrate Evidence: Cite at least two sources of evidence in weekly posts.
      • Integrate evidence from assigned reading(s) OR lesson.
      • Integrate evidence from at least one outside scholarly source as directed in the discussion directions.
      • Integrate evidence that supports the discussion.
      • Cite all scholarly sources, reading(s), OR lessons in an in-text citation within the post and include a complete reference at the bottom of the post.
      • Use sources no more than five years old unless they are historical references.

    Requirements: Not too longe

  • Nursing Question

    As the DNP that is leading the Nurse Practice Council that will conduct translational projects in your healthcare organization, you must help the group to choose and adopt an EBP model/framework that will be used to guide projects. Describe the setting of your organization and discuss your considerations when choosing a model /framework for your Nurse Practice Council.

    Participation Requirements

    The student must answer the graded discussion with a substantive reply to the graded discussion question(s)/topic(s) posted by the course instructor by Thursday, 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time. Two scholarly sources references are required unless stated otherwise by your professor.

    The student provides a substantive response to the discussion question or topic on Thursday and posts a minimum of two additional responses to peers on another day(s). The answers to classmates must be posted by Sunday, 11:59 pm Eastern Time. We expect each student to participate in the discussion board in a respectful manner.

    Remember that a new discussion rubric was approved by the professors, committee members, and a majority of the students. Please review the rubric before posting to ensure a maximum of points.

    Here are the categories of the new discussion rubric:

    Initial Post relevance to the topic of discussion, applicability, and insight. (20%)

    Quality of Written Communication Appropriateness of audience and words choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic, and varied. Grammar, spelling, punctuation. (20%)

    Inclusion of DNP essentials explored in the discussion as well as the role-specific competencies as applicable.(10%)

    Rigor, currency, and relevance of the scholarly references. (Use articles that are below 5 years). (20%)

    Peer & Professor Responses. The number of responses, quality of response posts. (20%)

    Timeliness of the initial post and the answers to the peers. (10%)

    Requirements: 00

  • Video Question

    Instructions = Complete Step 1, Step 2 & Step 3

    1. Watch the chosen Video from below;

    2. Post the Video Reflection in the Discussion Board

    3. Comment to 2 peers by replying to their posts in the same Discussion Board

    Step 1.

    Please WATCH BOTH VIDEOS but pick one to post and write about.

    Video Option 1:

    Why Medicine Often Has Dangerous Side Effects for Women | Alyson McGregor | TED Talks

    TED Description: You might not know this: Many of the medicines we take — common drugs like Ambien and everyday aspirin — were only ever tested on men. And the unknown side effects for women can be dangerous, even deadly. Alyson McGregor studies the differences between male and female patients; in this fascinating talk she explains how the male model became our framework for medical research … and what women and men need to ask their doctors to get the right care for their bodies.

    For a written transcript of this TED Talk, use this link:

    Video Option 2

    Paula Johnson: His and hers … healthcare

    TEDWomen 2013

    TED Description: Every cell in the human body has a sex, which means that men and women are different right down to the cellular level. Yet too often, research and medicine ignore this insight — and the often startlingly different ways in which the two sexes respond to disease or treatment. As pioneering doctor Paula Johnson describes in this thought-provoking talk, lumping everyone in together means we essentially leave women’s health to chance. It’s time to rethink.

    For a written transcript of this TED Talk, use this link:

    Step 2.

    In the , post a new thread and answer the following questions:

    Name the video you selected.

    What specific parts of the video could you connect with or relate to? How?

    Was there anything surprising you learned in the video? What was it and why?

    How does this video relate to our course textbook/material?

    Click Publish

    Step 3.

    Requirements: As directed

  • Health Promotion

    1. Under the general and eating practices section of the HRA, reflect on your self-awareness in this area. Have you reflected on these items previously? Were there any topics of concern that you havent considered before? You do not have to go into specifics if you are not comfortable. Just think about your level of self-awareness about the general and nutritional areas of your health.
    2. Under mental and social health, reflect on any concerns. Did the answers surprise you? Do you feel you need additional professional support in this area?
    3. Under safety and preventive exams, reflect on the nearest required preventive exam for your age group. What does it look like to prepare for this? What steps do you need to take to be ready for safety or preventative health care?
    4. There are 17 health indicators at the end of the HRA. If you meet the health indicator, you score a point. The higher the score, the healthier your lifestyle. The national average health score is 9.4. How does your personal health score measure against this average?

    Requirements: 2-3 paragraphs total

  • Health Promotion Proposal Part 1

    For this assignment you will submit Part One of your proposal, detailing a health problem that is

    prevalent within your selected group and demonstrating your research of health promotion strategies for

    addressing this specific health problem.

    This is the topic that was selected as a specific health problem : Mental & Behavioral Health- Topic 15: Workplace Burnout and StressReduction Strategies

    What Youll Do in Part 1

    1. Begin with a strong opening (1+ paragraph) Do not label this section Introduction.

  • Clearly describe the health problem youve selected.
  • Use current data and statistics to show why this issue matters.
  • Explain exactly what aspect of the problem your health promotion program will address.
  • Make sure your proposed outcome is realistic, measurable, and meaningful.

  • 2. Describe your vulnerable population (13 paragraphs) Help your reader understand who you are focusing on and why they need support.

  • Identify the risk factors that make this group vulnerable.
  • Support your points with credible evidence, research, reports, or national data.

  • 3. Review the evidence (45 paragraphs total) Youll conduct a brief literature review of at least two scholarly journal articles that discuss evidencebased interventions for your chosen health problem.

  • Write one paragraph per article summarizing the intervention and its relevance.
  • Then write 23 paragraphs evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of the interventions you found.
  • What works well?
  • What gaps or limitations exist?
  • How does this evidence guide your own program?

    • 4. Choose a guiding theoretical or conceptual model (23 paragraphs) Select a health promotion or diseaseprevention model that will anchor your proposal.

  • Explain the model clearly.
  • Describe why it is the best fit for your program.
  • Show how it will guide your planning and implementation.

    • A conclusion paragraph is not required for this assignment.

    Writing Requirements

  • 35 pages maximum (not including title page, references, or appendices)
  • Be concise, focused, and scholarly.
  • APA format throughout.
  • Minimum of 6 references (scholarly and current).
  • REFERENCES Must have DOI Numbers for me to look them up- If I am unable to verify the references points will be deducted.

    • Requirements: large

  • Role of a Nurse Practitioner

    Research the role of the Nurse Practitioner.

    1. Select and describe an Advanced Nurse Practitioner role.
    2. Why are you becoming a Nurse Practitioner?
    3. Find one research article, expert opinion about the Nurse Practitioner role and summarize the article.
    4. What does the Institute Of Medicine (IOM) say about the need of Nurse Practitioners?
    5. Identify and describe the effects that you will have as an advanced practice nurse in terms of healthcare industry and patient outcomes.

    Requirements: Submission Instructions: The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling. The paper is to be no shorter than 4 pages; nor longer than 5 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract an

  • NUR 643, Common

    Topic: Sickle Cell Disease on Advanced Genetic Cures

    Your paper should demonstrate depth, rigor, and scholarly synthesis, rather than a simple summary of information.

    Scholarly Requirements

    • Length: 810 double-spaced pages (body only)
    • Font & Formatting: 12-point font, 1-inch margins, APA 7th edition
    • Abstract: Required (APA format)
    • References:
      • 1015 professional, peer-reviewed sources
      • Databases may include CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, etc.
      • Unpublished or general internet sources may not exceed 10% of references
    • APA 7th Edition formatting is required throughout (title page, abstract, headings, citations, references)

    Students are expected to review and adhere to the course AI policy prior to beginning this assignment.

    Required Paper Components

    Your paper must include the following sections, clearly labeled using APA headings:

    1. Abstract
      • Significance of the clinical problem
      • Epidemiology, demographics, prevalence/incidence
      • Impact on quality of life
      • Financial costs to patients and/or society
      • Relevance to advanced nursing and NP practice
    2. Review of the Literature
      • Integration of nursing, medical, and allied health literature
      • Emphasis on current, evidence-based findings
      • Scholarly synthesis (not article-by-article summaries)
    3. Definition of the Clinical Issue
      • Pathophysiology as appropriate
      • Symptoms and clinical presentation
      • Relevant physical findings
    4. Differential Diagnosis
      • 4 Common and high-risk differentials
      • Incidence and prevalence
      • Distinguishing clinical features
    5. Diagnostics
      • Appropriate laboratory tests, imaging, or diagnostic studies
      • Rationale for selection
      • Interpretation of findings
    6. Holistic Management
      • Pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic management
      • Patient education and shared decision-making
      • Role and scope of the Nurse Practitioner
    7. Summary Statement
      • Concise synthesis of key clinical and evidence-based points
    8. References
      • APA 7th edition format

    Optional Enhancements (Encouraged)

    To strengthen scholarly impact and clinical relevance, you may include:

    • Tables or boxes summarizing evidence or guidelines
    • Charts or graphs representing epidemiologic data
    • Figures or illustrations of relevant anatomy or physical findings
    • Credible patient or provider educational resources
    • A brief case study to contextualize the clinical problem

    All visual elements must be appropriately cited and integrated into the paper. Please use the Rubrics.

    Requirements: 10 double spaced pages

  • powerpoint

    Develop a PowerPoint presentation that includes the following criteria:

    • Slide 1: Title Page.
    • Slide 2: SBIRT overview – Describe the history of SBIRT, the SBIRT process and how it is used in clinical practice settings using US research articles.
    • Slide 3: Case Presentation – Do not include patient identifying information but include demographics i.e. age, gender, race/ethnicity, chief complaint, social history, family psychiatric history, psychiatric history, and risk factors.
    • Slide 4: Screening Tool used – Describe the screening tool, validity (sensitivity and specificity), scoring information, and citation. Your patients score and the interpretation of the patients score are required.
    • Slide 5: Brief Intervention – How was the Motivational Interviewing process applied and shared your clients score and need for behavioral changes.
    • Slide 6: Referral for Treatment – Describe the referral for follow-up treatment plan. Include the name, address and telephone number of the local large organization. Be specific with the department where necessary.
    • Slide 7: Evaluation of the process – Share the patients outcome and your evaluation of the SBIRT process.
    • Slide 8: References 5 references. 7th Edition APA format. Include Screening Tool authors.

    Submission Instructions:

    • The slides are to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.
    • The PowerPoint presentation should be formatted per current APA guidelines and 8-10 slides in length, including the title and references slides. Incorporate a minimum of 5 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. For presentation clarification, students may include the presenters notes.

    Requirements: n/a

  • powerpoint

    Develop a PowerPoint presentation that includes the following criteria:

    • Slide 1: Title Page.
    • Slide 2: SBIRT overview – Describe the history of SBIRT, the SBIRT process and how it is used in clinical practice settings using US research articles.
    • Slide 3: Case Presentation – Do not include patient identifying information but include demographics i.e. age, gender, race/ethnicity, chief complaint, social history, family psychiatric history, psychiatric history, and risk factors.
    • Slide 4: Screening Tool used – Describe the screening tool, validity (sensitivity and specificity), scoring information, and citation. Your patients score and the interpretation of the patients score are required.
    • Slide 5: Brief Intervention – How was the Motivational Interviewing process applied and shared your clients score and need for behavioral changes.
    • Slide 6: Referral for Treatment – Describe the referral for follow-up treatment plan. Include the name, address and telephone number of the local large organization. Be specific with the department where necessary.
    • Slide 7: Evaluation of the process – Share the patients outcome and your evaluation of the SBIRT process.
    • Slide 8: References 5 references. 7th Edition APA format. Include Screening Tool authors.

    Submission Instructions:

    • The slides are to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspelling.
    • The narration is to be fluid with clear enunciation and the volume of speech is appropriate, with no pauses or distracting fillers.
    • The PowerPoint presentation should be formatted per current APA guidelines and 8-10 slides in length, including the title and references slides. Incorporate a minimum of 5 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. For presentation clarification, students may include the presenters notes.

    Requirements: n/a

  • Nursing Research – 2

    Assessment Description

    The focus of this assignment is to apply the principles detailed in the Belmont Report to case studies involving human subjects in research or a quality improvement project.

    Complete this assignment using the “NRS-445 Topic 2: Benchmark – Ethical Conduct of Scholarly Activities” template.

    While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

    Requirements: listed above