Category: Public Health

  • Public Health Question

    READ CAREFULLY, choose a topic and then write the essay over that topic. Only pick one topic ur doing the paper over one topic so pick only 1. Make sure the reference page actually goes to the correct journal article. Follow rubric correctly. Thank you

    1. Title page (1 page)
    2. Main narrative of discussion paper (3-5 pages)
    3. References (1 page)

    Option 1 Topic: Obesity Prevention and Treatment Programs

    There are several obesity prevention and treatment programs in the literature. Please identify three journal articles describing obesity interventions (including nutrition, or exercise, or mindfulness or a combination of nutrition, exercise, and mindfulness) designed for a specific population (e.g., ethnic group, age group, and gender group. For each article, include the following in any essay:

    1. What is or are the primary objectives/goals/research questions of this study?
    2. What is or are the study’s hypotheses?
    3. Who is the target population? Who are the study subjects? Be descriptive.
    4. What are the measures to assess the impact of intervention?
    5. What are the results of the study? What are the findings of the research

    Option 2 Topic: Virtual Health Programs

    Virtual health programs have proliferated since the onset of the Covid pandemic lockdown. Identify three virtual nutrition or physical activity programs designed for a specific group (e.g., ethnic group, age group, and gender group). For each article, include the following in any essay:

    1. What is or are the primary objectives/goals/research questions of this study?
    2. What is or are the study’s hypotheses?
    3. Who is the target population? Who are the study subjects? Be descriptive.
    4. How was the study conducted? What were the components of the intervention that the participants engaged in?
    5. What are the measures to assess the impact of intervention?
    6. What are the results of the study? What are the findings of the research?

    Guidelines

    Content and Organization

    The discussion main narrative paper is brief (at least 3 pages, no more than 5 pages) and succinet, but comprehensive and contains arguments supported by credible and reputable references and sources (e.g., CDC, academic journals like Body Image). The discussion paper must provide relevant information that is presented in a logical order while thoroughly addressing each point. The ideas are arranged logically to support the central argument. They flow smoothly from one to another and are clearly linked to each other.

    Using APA 7″ ed. guidelines, discussion paper must include the following content:

    1. Title page (1 page)
    2. Main narrative of discussion paper (3-5 pages)
    3. References (1 page)

    Format

    • Document: Word
    • Length: title page (1 page), main narrative (3 min., 5 max. pages), and references (up to 2 pages) Margins: 1 inch each side and double-spaced lines
    • Font: Times Normal Roman Style: APA 7th ed.
    • References: APA Publication Manual, Seventh Edition (2020) or the following links for correct citation formatting for citation list and in-text references (e.g., parenthetical)
      APA Author-Date Citation System (in-text/parenthetical)
      Common Reference Examples Guide of APA 7th edition (bibliography):
  • Public Health Question

    Hi, I need help completing a public health program evaluation assignment. This is a group project, but I am responsible for one quantitative outcome.

    My assigned outcome is: Increased awareness regarding mental health struggles
    I will be using quantitative data (pre/post analysis) to measure this.

    Program assumptions:

    • Program has 50 participants
    • Each group member has 1 unique outcome
    • Each member must have a unique dataset, measurement tool, analysis, interpretation, and recommendations
    • I must use mock Excel data provided by my professor

    MOST IMPORTANT REQUIREMENTS

    • You MUST use my raw quantitative data (Excel file)
    • You MUST use the Pre/Post Analysis Excel Template provided by my professor
    • My analysis must be based on pre-test and post-test data
    • My work must reflect my unique dataset and outcome (not shared with other group members)
    • Do NOT create your own dataset, variables, or methods

    Important: Materials to Use

    You must base everything on my previous work:

    • Assignment 1
    • Assignment 2
    • Evaluation Tool Development Worksheet

    These must guide my outcome, measurement tool, data analysis, and interpretation. Do NOT introduce new ideas that are not consistent with my previous assignments.

    What I need help with:

    Part 1: Data Analysis (1 paragraph – one per outcome/student – 10 points):
    Depending on how you are measuring your outcome, respond to the corresponding section below.

    A. Quantitative Outcome

    Using Group Assignment 2 and the Quant Methods lecture as a guide, describe your data and how you analyzed it. Include the following:

    • Statistical tests: what statistical tests did you use (e.g., descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, t-tests) and why?
    • Software: Identify the analytical program(s) you used (e.g., SPSS, Excel, R, Stata)

    Part 2: Results / Findings (1 paragraph)
    After analyzing your data using Dr. Blooms Excel templates ():

    • Summarize main findings for each outcome in a clear narrative form.
    • Describe what the data show not just the numbers, but their meaning as it relates to your outcome.
      • Example (quantitative): Post-test scores were significantly higher than pre-test scores (p = .02), suggesting improved knowledge of tobacco harms.
      • Example (qualitative): Participants frequently described feeling more connected to peers, reflecting an increase in perceived social support.
    • Include one visual per outcome (e.g., table, pie chart, or bar chart). Do NOT use a screenshot of your SPSS or Excel output. You must create a visual yourself. Be sure to label your visuals correctly.
      • Example: Figure 1. Change in Knowledge Scores Pre- and Post-Program)

    Part 3: Connect Findings to Literature (1 paragraph)

    Report your findings and discuss how your findings relate to existing research and evaluation studies. Be sure to cite 1-2 peer-reviewed articles per outcome to support your discussion (use in-text citations).

    • Reiterate whether your outcome was met successfuly or not.
    • Are your results similar to or different from prior findings? How?
    • Identify remaining gaps and provide a recommendation / future direction for program planners and evaluators based off of your findings.

      Example: Participants reported higher levels of confidence in talking about consent and setting boundaries with romantic and sexual partners. Our results are consistent with Bloom et al. (2021), who found that comprehensive consent education programming increases students confidence discussing sexual boundaries. Future sex education programming should spend additional classroom time role-playing boundary setting, which may help build confidence to set boundaries in the real world with a real romantic or sexual partner.”


    Part 4: Strengths and Limitations (1 paragraph)

    Describe the major strengths (minimum 2) and limitations (minimum 2) of your evaluation.

    Think about your evaluation design, sample, measurement tool, data quality, and analysis methods. How might these factors have influenced your results or their generalizability? Consider common limitations that might have influenced your results or their generalizability.


    Part 5: Overall Summary (1 paragraph)
    Provide an overall conclusion stating whether the program was successful or not, and clearly explain why based on the findings.

    Submission Requirements (MANDATORY):

    • Must be written in paragraph form only (no bullet points)
    • Single-spaced, 12-point font (Times New Roman, Calibri, or Arial)
    • Maximum 3 pages (excluding figures and references)
    • Must be completed in a Google Doc (live link submission required)
    • I must show my work using version history
    • I must add my professor and TA as editors to the Google Doc
    • Must include in-text citations
    • Must submit PDFs of all sources, labeled with author + year, in a Google Drive folder

    Additional Notes (VERY IMPORTANT):

    • Use simple, clear wording
    • Writing must sound natural and like student work

    Please do NOT use AI or ChatGPT-generated language and do not plagiarize. My professor is very strict about originality and academic integrity. All responses must be written in original wording.

    If you have access to Turnitin, please run the assignment and provide the report.

  • Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Prevention

    1. Select one of the listed substances.

    • National Institute on Drug Abuse. (n.d.). . National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
      • .
      • .
      • .
      • .
      • .
      • .
      • .
      • .
      • .

    2. Write a response.

    Discuss the differences between primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of substance abuse disorders. Include the following subheadings:

    1. Provide a definition for primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of substance abuse disorders. Include at least two in-text citations to support your answer.
    2. Provide an example of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention for the substance you selected from the list above. Include at least two in-text citations to support your answer.
    3. Watch and provide statistics (use rates, number of people affected, etc.) regarding your selected substance from the list above.
    4. Discuss how the Affordable Care Act relates to primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of substance abuse disorders. Include at least two in-text citations to support your answer.
    5. Include a word count before the reference section. At least 1,500 words (not including title and reference pages) are required.
    6. References: At least six references are required. In-text citations and reference list should be in APA style. References should come from peer-reviewed and scientifically-based sources.1. Select one of the listed substances.
      • National Institute on Drug Abuse. (n.d.). . National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
        • .
        • .
        • .
        • .
        • .
        • .
        • .
        • .
        • .

      2. Write a response.Discuss the differences between primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of substance abuse disorders. Include the following subheadings:

      1. Provide a definition for primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of substance abuse disorders. Include at least two in-text citations to support your answer.
      2. Provide an example of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention for the substance you selected from the list above. Include at least two in-text citations to support your answer.
      3. Watch and provide statistics (use rates, number of people affected, etc.) regarding your selected substance from the list above.
      4. Discuss how the Affordable Care Act relates to primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of substance abuse disorders. Include at least two in-text citations to support your answer.
      5. Include a word count before the reference section. At least 1,500 words (not including title and reference pages) are required.
      6. References: At least six references are required. In-text citations and reference list should be in APA style. References should come from peer-reviewed and scientifically-based sources.
  • Discussion Question #1

    1. Explore
    2. Answer the following questions:
      • List five lessons you learned from the data
      • Contrast the statistics provided in the dataset with more recent ones
      • Discuss how could you use what you learned from this data in the design of a substance use prevention program
      • Post a question from the data that you would like your classmates to answer
      • References used to support your statements- At least two references
  • Public Health Question

    Grant Writing

    PHHA 579w

    The following questions can be answered using one or more of the following websites:

    Foundationsearch.com (use your subscription)

    Candid.org

    NOTE: With each search, make sure to set Type of Granting Foundation to All Foundations.

    1-3) What are the largest foundation grants since 2005 that went to entities in the following cities:

    (3 points, foundationsearch.com)

    • Who received ii. How much iii. Who from

    1. San Antonio, TX _________________ ___________ ___________________

    2. Medford, OR _________________ ___________ ___________________

    3. Paradise, CA _________________ ___________ ___________________

    4) Since 2010, what foundation provided the biggest grant to the Central Asia Institute? (foundationsearch.com)

    _____________________________

    5-6) How many board members have the last name Moore at the Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation in the most recent report, and how much in total assets does the entity have? Do the same search for the William Randolph Hearst Foundation, and provide answers. (2 points, foundationsearch.com report or guidestar.org).

    Number of board members named Moore: _______________ Total assets: ____________________

    Number of board members named Hearst: _______________ Total assets: ____________________

    7-8) Since 2015, how much was the largest grant from The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and what entity received it, and how much was the largest grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and what entity received it. (2 points, foundationsearch.com)

    ____________________________________ _____________________________________________

    ____________________________________ _____________________________________________

    9-10) Name four foundations that provided grants related to the COVID-19 pandemic. (2 points, foundationsearch.com or Candid.org)

    ____________________________________ _____________________________________________

    ____________________________________ _____________________________________________

    11-12) For Butte County, California, what were the largest grants in the following categories since 2016: (2 points, foundationsearch.com)

    11. Arts and culture: From: To: Amount:

    12. Comm. Development: From: To: Amount:

    13. Environment: From: To: Amount:

    14. Health: From: To: Amount:

    NOTE: Candid appears to have removed content required to answer this next question! Everyone gets a free pass on this one, and you dont have to provide an answer to get the points. 15) Use the Candid.org Foundation Landscapes section to call up top funders in the Advancing Human Rights category. Name three foundation funders that fund related topics.

    ________________________________________

    ________________________________________

    ________________________________________

    16-20) How much is the largest grant since 2020 at the following entities, and what foundation gave it:

    16) Monterey Bay Aquarium

    17) Catalyst

    18) North Valley Community Foundation

    19) Chico State Enterprises

    20) Boys and Girls Clubs of the North Valley (was previously Boys and Girls Club of the North Valley, and make sure to add that s to club.

  • Health Misinformation

    Assignment Overview

    Health misinformation is common on social media and can impact people’s decisions and behaviors. In this assignment, you will identify a real example of health misinformation, explain why it is misleading, and rewrite it using accurate, easy-to-understand information.

    Instructions

    Step 1: Find an Example of Misinformation

    Find a real example of health misinformation from:

    Social media (TikTok, Instagram, X, Facebook, etc.)

    A website, blog, or video

    Requirements: Topic must be related to public health (examples: vaccines, nutrition, mental health, COVID-19, vaping, sexual health). Include a screenshot, link, or copy of the post.

    Step 2: Describe the Misinformation (1 paragraph)

    Explain what the post is saying.

    Include:

    What is the main claim?

    Who is it aimed at?

    Why might people believe it?

    Step 3: Explain Why It Is Misleading (1 paragraph)

    Describe what is wrong with the information.

    Consider:

    Is it false or exaggerated?

    Is it missing important facts?

    What could happen if people believe it?

    Step 4: Provide Correct Information

    Use at least 2 credible sources to explain the correct information.

    Examples of good sources:

    CDC

    WHO

    Government or university health websites

    Requirements:

    Clearly explain the correct information in your own words

    Include APA citation list

    Step 5: Rewrite the Message

    Rewrite the original message so it is accurate and easy to understand.

    Your version should:

    Be clear and simple

    Avoid complicated terms

    Be appropriate for the same audience

    Include a helpful takeaway or advice

    You can write this like a social media post, short paragraph, or script.

    Formatting Requirements:

  • Length: About 1-1.5 pages (double-spaced)
  • Font: 12-point Times New Roman
  • Include your sources per APA format requirements
  • Attach or link the original example
  • Grading Rubric (20 Points Total)

    Criteria

    Points

    Clear example of misinformation

    5

    Explanation of why it is misleading

    5

    Use of credible sources

    5

    Clear and effective rewritten message

    5

  • 2 discussion posts

    Week 10 Discussion Activity

    In Chapter 11, you learn about mental health and illness, which remains a major public health issue. After reading chapter 11, answer the questions below.

    1) Define mental health. (respond in 1 sentence)

    2) Think of one of your recent stressors (you do not need to tell me your stressor). What healthy coping strategy have you engaged in to help you deal with this stressor? If you haven’t engaged in a coping strategy, what do you think are the barriers to doing so? (respond in 2-3 sentences)

    **Your grade will be based on your response to the questions above and commenting on a response posted by one of your classmates. Your response to your classmate should be at least 1-2 sentences.**

    **Avoid using ALL CAPITALS, use proper grammar, spelling, and complete sentences, and keep in mind that you will not be able to edit or delete your response once it has been submitted. Once you submit your response, other students in the class will be able to see your response.**

    **See syllabus for online student etiquette. Please remember to stay on topic, avoid strong language, and be polite. Responses that do not follow online student etiquette will not be given credit.**

    **Please note late submissions will not be accepted.**

    i will send students’ responses for replying after initial post is posted

    Discussion Forum 8 Instructions

    It provides an opportunity for you to virtually connect, ask questions, and comment on the assigned podcast and other posts for week 10

    • Initial Substantive Posts:

    Students are expected to listen to the assigned podcast and discuss at least TWO separate themes/points by making thoughtful comments and/or questions regarding the selected themes/points in the assigned podcast (350-400 words) in the discussion forum each week. For example, you may describe the key points and/or core arguments made by the presenters and/or explain new pieces of information that you learned from the podcast followed by your own reflections on these points/arguments. Moreover, at least 1 outside source (you may NOT include your textbook) cited (in proper APA format) in your posting to support your rationale and thoughts. A reference listing in proper APA format at the end of your posting is also required.

    • Required Replies:

    In addition, students are also required to respond to their classmates posts (e.g., comments, opinions, and questions). Your replies should build on the concept discussed, offer a question to consider, or add a differing perspective, etc. Rather than responding with, “Good post,” explain why the post is “good” (why it is important, useful, insightful, etc.). Or, if you disagree, respectfully share your alternative perspective. Just saying “I agree” or “Good idea” is not sufficient for the posts you would like graded.

    i will send students’ responses for replying after initial post is posted

  • HOMEWORK QUESTIONS FOR 3 CHAPTERS ALL NEED TO BE HANDWRITTEN

    Chapter 6 questions:

    Define in your own words the following terms:

    ecologic study

    ecologic fallacy

    cross-sectional study

    case-control study

    2. Compare ecologic, cross-sectional, and case-control studies with respect to their strengths and weaknesses, and advantages and disadvantages.

    3. The following question lists examples of observational studies. Indicate the type of study design that is being described.

    A. A study examined the effect of hormone replacement therapy on cancer; cancer cases were identified by using a cancer registry in northern California. Controls were selected from a random sample of Bay Area cities.B.

    B. Data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Survey were used in a secondary data analysis to examine the effect of income inequality and race on preventive health practices.

    C. The level of unemployment was used as a measure of economic distress in Germany. Researchers examined the association between distress and general anxiety syndrome across states (e.g., Saxony) in Germany.

    7-9 AS SHOWN IN SCREEN SHOT FOR CHAPTER 6

    12. Why would you exclude as controls in a case-control study of gynecologic cancer women who cannot develop the disease?

    CHAPTER 7.

    Define in your own words the following terms:

    Cohort

    Cohort effect

    Comparison groups in cohort studies

    Prospective cohort study

    Retrospective cohort study

    Ambispective cohort study

    3. Explain what is meant by the term relative risk and explain how it is used in cohort studies.

    5. A cohort study was conducted to study the association between coffee drinking and anxiety in a population-based sample of adults. Among 10,000 coffee drinkers, 500 developed anxiety. Among the 20,000 noncoffee drinkers, 200 cases of anxiety were observed. What is the relative risk of anxiety associated with coffee use?

    11. Summarize the strengths and weaknesses, and advantages and disadvantages of the various types of observational study designs: ecologic, cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort.

    CHAPTER 8

    1.Define the following terms:

    Experimental study

    Quasi-experimental study

    Intervention study

    Controlled clinical trial

    3.Explain the purposes of blinding and randomization in clinical trials.

    4.Describe the phases of a clinical trial to license a vaccine or new medicine.

    8.Epidemiologic studies of the role of a suspected factor in the etiology of a disease may be observational or experimental. The essential difference between experimental and observational studies is that in experimental studies: (Choose one answer.)

    The study and control groups are equal in size.

    The study is prospective.

    The study and control groups are always comparable with respect to all factors other than the exposure.

    The investigator determines who shall be exposed to the suspected factor and who shall not.

    Controls are used.

    9. From the descriptions provided, identify the type of study design:

    Smoking histories are obtained from all patients entering a hospital who have lip cancer and are compared with smoking histories of patients with cold sores who enter the same hospital.

    The entire population of a given community is examined, and all who are judged free of bowel cancer are questioned extensively about their diet. These people are then followed for several years to see whether their eating habits will predict their risk of developing bowel cancer.

    To test the efficacy of vitamin C in preventing colds, army recruits are randomly assigned to two groups: one given 500 mg of vitamin C daily, and one given a placebo. Both groups are followed to determine the number and severity of subsequent colds.

    The physical examination records of the incoming first-year class of 1935 at the University of Minnesota are examined in 1980 to see whether the freshmens recorded height and weight at the time of admission to the university were related to their chance of developing coronary heart disease by 1981.

    A total of 1,500 adult men who worked for Lockheed Aircraft were initially examined in 1951 and were classified by diagnostic criteria for coronary artery disease. Every three years, they have been reexamined for new cases of the disease; attack rates in different subgroups have been computed annually.

    A random sample of middle-aged sedentary women was selected from four census tracts, and each subject was examined for evidence of osteoporosis. Those found to have the disease were excluded. All others were randomly assigned to either an exercise group, which followed a two-year program of systematic exercise, or a control group, which had no exercise program. Both groups were observed semiannually for incidence of osteoporosis.

    Questionnaires were mailed to every 10th person listed in the city telephone directory. Each person was asked to provide his or her age, sex, and smoking habits and to describe the presence of any respiratory symptoms during the preceding 7 days.

    please make sure all of these are hand written answers please even if it is on an ipad but cant be typed at all thanksksksks

  • Public Health Question

    Watch the film and then compose a 3-page paper in which you:

    • Reflect on how the issues raised in Super Size Me show up in your community, your family, or your school/work environment.
      Do you feel Morgan Spurlocks experience reflects what you see around you, or does your own environment tell a different story?
    • Give concrete, real-world examples (e.g., a restaurant near you, something youve witnessed, a habit you or people you know have, a school policy, a workplace trend, a local issue, etc.).
    • Finish by explaining whether the film changed anything about your personal views or choices even if the answer is that it didnt, and why.

    Watch for free:

  • Public Health Question

    Instructions for submission:

    • Assignment must be submitted with properly filled cover sheet (Name, ID, CRN, Submission date) in word document, Pdf is not accepted.
    • Text size 12-Times New Roman with 1.5-line spacing.
    • Heading should be Bold
    • The text color should be Black
    • Do proper paraphrasing to avoid plagiarism with proper references/sources.
    • References must be in APA format
    • Required Textbook

      • Title: Organizational behavior (13 ed.)
      • Authors: Uhl-Bien, M., Schermerhorn, J. R., and Osborn, R. N.
      • Publisher: 2014
      • ISBN: 9781118517376