Category: Research & Summaries

  • Introduction

    Hi, the study is about the “Use of negative inspiratory force to determine the need for positive pressure ventilation in patients post extubation” will attachedI want to convert the protocol introduction into a manuscript introduction. I will attach the NIF protocol. I will also attach directions and examples of each and how protocol introduction differs from manuscript introduction. please DON’T Use AI generation or ChatGPT.

    Requirements: 4-5 paragraphs

  • manuscript introduction

    Hi, the study is about the “Use of negative inspiratory force to determine the need for positive pressure ventilation in patients post extubation” will attached

    I want to convert the protocol introduction into a manuscript introduction. I will attach the NIF protocol. I will also attach directions and examples of each and how protocol introduction differs from manuscript introduction. please DON’T Use AI generation or ChatGPT.

    Requirements: 3-5 paragraphs

  • Research & Summaries Question

    General Paper Requirements:

    1) Papers should be a minimum of 3 full double-spaced pages of content, excluding the
    References page; the paper should be as long as it needs to be to answer the prompt
    2) Follow APA guidelines (in-text citations and References page)
    3) 12-point Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins
    4) Use multiple peer-reviewed articles to support your paper
    5) Limit the use of direct quotes from the articles (paraphrase and cite)
    6) Be free of grammatical, syntactical, and spelling errors
    7) Not include the use of personal anecdotes or opinions

    Prompt: Choose a real-world case or some type of offending behavior and:

    a. Identify two criminological theories that could explain the behavior(s) involved

    b. Compare and contrast how each theory accounts for the behavior

    c. Evaluate which theory offers the strongest explanation and why

    d. Propose one program or effort from your selected strongest theory to address the

    behavior or reduce offending

    Requirements: 3 FULL pages

  • Final Draft of Proposed project

    Correct all the annotations given in the PDF attachment. Also, attached is the project template that has to be used exactly. No additional titles, all titles and table of contents from the template have to be exact. Conclusion part of the project show not have outcomes, as this is a proposed change project.

    Requirements: length of attached rough draft

  • Extra Credit

    Kennedy, Ashley Graham. (2024). Science and public policy: A philosophical introduction. Routledge. ISBN 9781032317403

    McDavid, James C., Huse, Irene & Hawthorn, Laura R.L. (2019). Performance evaluation and performance measurement: An introduction to practice (3rd edition). Sage Publications, Ltd. ISBN 9781506337067

    1. Kennedy (2024), in Scientific evidence, argues that “contemporary science” relies on methodological naturalism. What does this mean for program evaluation? Moreover, how do the expectations of methodological naturalism shape discussions about program evaluation? Leverage examples from McDavid et al. (2019) to support your discussion.
    2. According to Castillo & Strunk (2025), what is CritQuant? How does this approach differ from traditional practices in quantitative research?

    Requirements: 200

  • Data Sources Program Evaluation

    McDavid et al. (2019). Chp. 4.

    McDavid, James C., Huse, Irene & Hawthorn, Laura R.L. (2019). Performance evaluation and performance measurement: An introduction to practice (3rd edition). Sage Publications, Ltd. ISBN 9781506337067

    Review each question and answer accordingly. For short answer responses, use full sentences and leverage the resources in the module to guide your responses. If you cite or closely paraphrase the readings or videos, make sure you adequately cite that material.

    1. Measurement validity types do not exhaust the possible types of construct validity. True/False
    2. According to McDavid (2019), what is a unit of analysis? Second, provide three examples of unit of analysis that could be part of an evaluation.
    3. Instruments drafted by the evaluator should be pretested before they are used in a program evaluation. True/False
    4. Among the four levels of measurement, nominal measures have two properties: they categorize, and they rank. True/False
    5. Fundamentally, measurement is the process of developing and applying instruments that translate constructs into observables. True/False
    6. Annual income expressed in dollars is a good example of a measure that has all the properties of a ratio level of measurement. True/False
    7. To be valid, a measuring instrument must have no random error in the data that are collected using it. True/False
    8. Proxy measurement is where program outcomes are measured as a proxy for program outputs. True/False
    9. What are the key characteristics of ordinal measures? Give three examples.
    10. Interval measures have all the properties of nominal and ordinal measures. True/False
    11. Describe a process that you would use, including the measuring instrument and the actual data collection procedure, to measure the level of formal education of program participants in an evaluation of an employment training program. How would you know whether the measure was reliable? How would you assess the validity of the measure?
    12. According to McDavid et al. (2019), what are the key characteristics of nominal measures? Give three examples.
    13. If people are the main unit of analysis in an evaluation of an employment training program, then their employment status (currently employed versus currently not employed) is an example of a construct that could be measured for each person in the study. True/False
    14. To calculate test-retest reliability, an evaluator must be using a before-after research design where program participants are measured before and after they receive the program. True/False
    15. What are the key characteristics of interval measures? Give three examples.

    Requirements: 500

  • META ANALYSIS (MEDICAL RESEARCH)

    Need help from a meta-analysis expert!!!

    Recreate all forest plots from the primary analysis (pages 2225). Then, replicate the secondary analysis from page 26 in Stata, presenting its forest plots with the same structure, options, columns, labels, model and formatting as the primary analysis. use Stata software

    my paper, surpass cvot, surpass 4, surpass j-mono attached. for surpass 2, 3, and 6; these are the links

    Requirements: complete forest plots

  • Research & Summaries Question

    For this assignment, you will complete the Research Paper project outlined in Creating a Research Paper (Word Module 2, Pages WD 2-1 to WD 2-63) in your textbook. The research topic, along with all necessary content, is provided in the textbook. Your task is to format and structure the paper according to the MLA documentation style, ensuring that you follow all guidelines and instructions specified in the textbook.

    In addition to completing the research paper as directed, you will add a concluding paragraph as the final paragraph of the essay and provide a summary in your own words, demonstrating your understanding of the topic.

    Save your completed assignment as a Word document using the following file name format: SP26OL_A1_YourFirstName.docx

    Important:

    • Assignment must be completed using the instructions given in the text, and completed assignment must be submitted in MS Word format (.docx). Assignment submitted in any other format will not be graded, and the student will receive a grade of 0 (zero) on the assignment.
    • The project must be completed by you. Giving or receiving aid unauthorized by the instructor on assignments is a form of academic dishonesty. Refer to the student handbook or course syllabus for additional information.

    Grading Rubrics

    1. Followed MLA Documentation Style (margin, header, author and course information, line spacing, title format) – 10 points
    2. Use of MS Word features (first line indentation, footnote, in-text (parenthetical) citations, and inserting sources) – 10 points
      • Note: In Office 365, Insert Citation under References is not available. In such cases, manually add the in-text citations. Make sure you have followed the MLA Documentation Style.
    3. Sources are properly cited and listed on the Works cited page – 8 points
      • Note: In Office 365, Bibliography under References is not available. In such cases, manually add the sources on the Works Cited page. Make sure you have followed the MLA Documentation Style.
    4. No syntax and mechanical errors. – 8 points
    5. File name in the SP26OL_A1_YourFirstName.docx format – 4 points

    Requirements: na

  • In-depth Theory Analysis

    Points: 100

    Length: Minimum of 5 full pages (not including title page and references)
    Format: APA (7th edition)

    Assignment Overview

    In this assignment, you will select one communication theory and conduct an in-depth scholarly analysis of it. The goal is for you to become an expert on your chosen theory by engaging deeply with its origins, evolution, applications, and limitations. This is not a surface-level overview; rather, you are expected to demonstrate mastery of the theory through careful reading, synthesis, and critical evaluation of scholarly research.

    You must locate and read the original article or book in which the theory was first introduced and use it as a foundation for your analysis. In addition, you will incorporate current peer-reviewed research to show how the theory has been applied, tested, critiqued, and extended over time. You may choose a theory you plan to use in your final paper, and doing so is encouraged.

    Content Requirements

    Your paper should address the following components:

    • Background of the Theory and Theorist(s):
      Explain the historical context in which the theory emerged, key assumptions, core concepts, and the scholar(s) who developed it.
    • Foundational and Scholarly Research:
      Engage directly with the original theoretical work and integrate additional peer-reviewed sources that help explain and support the theory.
    • Current State of Research:
      Discuss how the theory is being used, tested, or expanded in contemporary communication research.
    • Critiques and Limitations:
      Identify and analyze scholarly critiques, weaknesses, or limitations of the theory.
    • Future Directions and Relevance:
      Explore where the theory may be headed, its continued relevance, and potential areas for future research or application.
    Evaluation Criteria (100 points total)

    Your paper will be evaluated based on the following criteria (see attached rubric):

    • Understanding & Background of the Theory
    • Use of Foundational & Scholarly Research
    • Discussion of Current Research
    • Critiques & Limitations
    • Future Directions & Relevance
    • Writing Quality (clarity, tone, grammar, and style)
    • Organization & APA Format
    Expectations

    Your writing should be clear, well-organized, and professional. Claims must be supported with scholarly evidence, and all sources must be cited correctly using APA format. This assignment is designed to strengthen your research skills and deepen your theoretical understanding, so thoughtful analysis and synthesis are essential. I HAVE ATTACHED A EXAMPLE AND THE LESSON POWERPOINT FOR THIS WEEK.

    Requirements: 5-6 pages