Category: Research & Summaries

  • Research & Summaries Question

    I have a research that I need you to do please in Criminal Behavior Class. please look at the Lectures and all the information in the attachments as we need to do the research according to th lectures we learn through the term. Please do the research in according to the instructions and the syllabus from the class. All of the information is in the attachments. The reposer papers must be the same as the instructions and the professor wants,

  • Discussion

    In order to complete assignment #1 you will need to answer the below questions. Please complete the questions in a Word document and then upload the assignment for grading. When assigning a name to your document please use the following format (last name_Assignment #1). Use examples from the readings, lecture notes and outside research to support your answers. The assignment must be a minimum of 1-full page in length with a minimum of 2 – outside sources. Please be sure to follow APA guidelines for citing and referencing source. Assignments are due by 11:59 pm Eastern time on Sunday.
    On your first day on the job as an IT intern, you attend a meeting with several department heads regarding proposed budget reductions. One of the department heads suggests that money for information security be cut by at least 40 percent because the company has not been infected with a virus in the last three months, proving that the current defenses are adequate. What would you say in response? 200 words max

  • RES 873- Qualitative Data Collection and management

    Preparing interview questions for a research study can seem daunting for the novice researcher. In this assignment, you will draft several interview questions that may be suitable for your dissertation study.

    General Requirements:

    Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

    • Locate and download “Preparing the Interview Guide Worksheet” attached to this assignment.
    • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
    • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
    • Refer to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association for specific guidelines related to doctoral-level writing. The Manual contains essential information on manuscript structure and content, clear and concise writing, and academic grammar and usage.
    • This assignment requires the inclusion of at least two scholarly research sources related to this topic and at least one in-text citation from each source.
    • You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

    Directions:
    Locate and download “Preparing the Interview Guide Worksheet” attached to this assignment.
    Complete the assignment as directed in the worksheet.

    Attachments

    Here are the notes from a recent RES-873 office hours session where members were present. Unfortunately, for FERPA reasons, I cannot share the recording. I hope the notes convey the details expected when completing the assignment. There is a significant amount of information to be presented in the Week 3 assignment, which also aligns with critical risk and feasibility rubric criteria you are expected to meet in the dissertation template.

    1. Assignment Tasks: The two main parts of the Week 3 assignment

  • Draft the Semi-Structured Interview Instrument:
  • Prepare a first draft of the interview guide that will be used for your dissertation.
  • Write the Sources of Data Section for Chapter 3:
  • Complete this required section using the dissertation template.
  • 2. Interview Instrument Development

    First Column: Enter Your Research Questions (not Topics)

  • Enter your studys research question(s) at the start. These should exactly match what is in Chapter 1 of your dissertation template.
  • If you have more than two research questions, reconsider for manageability; one or two are ideal.
  • Use Research Questions, Not Topics:
  • Instead of breaking down by topics, as suggested in the worksheet, organize your instrument by research question to ensure alignment.
  • Second Column: Enter Your Interview Questions

  • For each research question, draft aligned interview questions (e.g., 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2). Add rows to the worksheet to account for the full list of interview questions.
  • For a typical 60-minute interview, 1215 open-ended questions total is appropriate (roughly 35 minutes of discussion per question).
  • Balance the number across research questions, if applicable.
  • Avoid closed-ended, double-barreled, leading, or overly complex questions.
  • Use neutral, clear wording. Avoid jargon or theory-driven phrasing, especially in descriptive/phenomenological approaches.
  • Third Column: Justify Your Questions

  • For each interview question, provide a brief (23 sentences) justification with a literature citation. Avoid highly conceptual terminology from theoretical frameworks unless methodologically required.
  • Fourth Column: Probing Questions

  • Prepare 23 follow-up (probe) questions for each main interview question. These are for prompting more detail during interviews but dont have to all be used.
  • Warm-up and Closing Questions:
  • Start with a warm-up (e.g., Tell me a bit about your background).
  • End with a closing question (e.g., Is there anything else youd like to share?).
  • 3. Demographic Data and IRB Considerations

    Select 35 Demographics

  • Examples include years of experience, educational degrees, gender, etc.
  • How to Ask

  • Present options as drop-downs or checkboxes (e.g., Years of experience: 35, 68, 912), not as narrative input or questions validating inclusion criteria.
  • Do Not Re-Validate Inclusion Criteria:
  • Do not ask participants to confirm eligibility requirements (e.g., Have you been a teacher for 3 years?); rely on self-selection per the IRB.
  • Value of Demographic Data (asked for in the instructions)
  • For qualitative studies, demographics allow readers to determine transferability of findings, not to establish statistical significance, patterns, or correlations.
  • Also useful for profiling the sample and suggesting future research if certain groups are over/underrepresented.
  • Administration of Demographic Data

  • Demographic information should be collected through an electronic survey (e.g., SurveyMonkey) prior to interviews, not verbally during interviews.
  • Electronic consent and scheduling can also be incorporated for efficiency.
  • Recruitment and IRB

  • Eligibility/inclusion criteria should be listed on recruitment flyers and match whats in the informed consent and IRB documentation.
  • 4. Aligning Interview and Research Questions

  • Keep clear mapping between interview questions and research questions.
  • Track and summarize how interview questions are designed to directly answer RQs.
  • 5. Using AI Tools Ethically

    AI for Drafting & Refinement

  • Use tools like Claude, Gemini, Copilot, or ChatGPT to review and improve interview questions (clarity, neutrality, avoiding biases). Refer to the Interview Insight Inspector prompt in the AI Skills Lab (demonstrated in the video). I will be using this prompt to provide guidance back to you. Get ahead of me. :^)
  • Mosaic (GCUs own tool) and other prompt generators will be available in the near future.
  • Transparency & Learning

  • Acceptable to use AI for the dissertation and for developing instruments, but not to submit AI-generated discussion posts for regular class assignments.
  • Always reflect on and disclose how AI was used.
  • AI Prompts Provided:
  • AI tools can assist by suggesting clearer, better-sequenced, more open-ended questions, and alignment checks. Students should evaluate the accuracy and relevance of AI recommendations, revise accordingly, acknowledge genuine learning, and be transparent about its use in your Week 3 assignment. There is an AI Disclosure Appendix in the updated dissertation template, which you are required to complete(Appendix H).

    6. Writing the Sources of Data Section

    Use the Qualitative Companion Guide (Chapter 3) and Template

  • Follow template structure and guidance in the guide closely.
  • Main sub-headers: Research Data Source 1 (interviews), Data Source 2 (if applicable: focus groups, journals, etc.), and Additional Data: demographics.
  • Expected Length

  • 1,0001,400 words (up to 4 pages); less may mean insufficient detail.
  • What to Address:

  • Justification for each data source
  • How the source/instrument was designed and developed
  • Type and value of data collected
  • How the sources of data questions are sequenced and aligned with the research question
  • Appropriateness of the data source(s) for the methodology and research questions
  • Demographics: restate what/why, value for transferability, and rationale for selection
  • 7. Key Numbers and Expectations

  • Interview Questions: 1215 for a 60-minute session
  • Probes: 23 per interview question
  • A minimum of two references/citations per the instructions. You should have many more related to the Justification column in the worksheet and the Sources of Data section in the template.
  • Demographics: 35, not for inclusion validation
  • Sources of Data Section: 1,0001,400 words
  • Note: DO NOT submit the entire dissertation template with the worksheet. Copy and paste the Sources of Data section into the worksheet and upload a single document.

    8. Final Encouragement

    Alignment and Manageability

  • Focus on manageable scope (ideally 12 RQs), clear alignment, and quality over quantity in interview questions.
  • Leverage Resources

  • Use templates, guides, and new technologies, but ensure your own understanding and ethical academic practice.
  • Resumen de Psicologa General

    Resumen de Psicologa General, materia de primer ao de la carrera Licenciatura en psicologa de la universidad Santo Toms de Aquino

  • Research & Summaries Question

    I submitted the final draft and I have alll the commments to improve the paper. it needs improvment and more expanded I have the requirements and the imprvoments comment ready, along with the paper I need A Powerpoint slides based on the paper. 🙂 The comments: Change Proposal (First Draft

    Change Proposal (First Draft)
    Criteria Ratings Points

    Introduction

    10 to >7.5 pts

    7.5 to >5 pts

    5 to >0 pts

    0 pts

    9.5/10 pts

    CommentYour introduction effectively sets up the problem at Starbucks and explains why it matters for both employees and customers. The opening paragraphs draw the reader in by showing how communication breakdowns affect the entire organization. To strengthen this further, consider adding a brief statement of your proposed solution or the specific change model you will use. This would give readers a clearer roadmap of what to expect in your paper.

    Conclusion

    10 to >7.5 pts

    7.5 to >5 pts

    5 to >0 pts

    0 pts

    9/10 pts

    CommentYour conclusion brings the paper to a strong close by restating the core solution and emphasizing why it matters. The final sentence about Starbucks’ future is memorable and ties back to your opening. Consider adding one sentence that briefly acknowledges the expected outcomes or impact of implementing these changes. This would make your closing statement even more complete.

    Analysis

    20 to >15 pts

    15 to >10 pts

    10 to >0 pts

    0 pts

    15/20 pts

    CommentYour analysis shows solid understanding of Kotter’s model and you apply it thoughtfully to Starbucks’ situation. Your observations about the stress of peak times and communication breakdowns feel grounded in real experience. To deepen your analysis, consider explaining more fully how each step of Kotter’s model specifically addresses the communication problems you identified, or discuss potential obstacles to implementing these changes and how leaders might overcome them. Additionally, you should be using the most updated version of Kotter’s framework instead of the current one used here. His model has significantly changed in the past 30 years. Please use our textbook for a more viable reference point.

    Support

    20 to >15 pts

    15 to >10 pts

    10 to >0 pts

    0 pts

    5/20 pts

    CommentYour paper presents reasonable ideas about improving communication at Starbucks, but it needs much stronger support from course materials and external research. You cite Kotter once, although it is not his current work, but the assignment requires you to cite the course textbook, other course readings, and at least three peer-reviewed sources. Add citations throughout your paper. For example, when you discuss staff feedback, scheduling, or manager training, cite relevant research or course materials that support these recommendations. Meeting with Professor Jon Bull, the embedded librarian, could help you locate peer-reviewed articles on employee communication and organizational change.

    Structure

    5 to >4 pts

    4 to >2 pts

    2 to >0 pts

    0 pts

    4.5/5 pts

    CommentYour paper flows well and readers can easily follow your argument from problem to solution. The way you move from identifying communication breakdowns to proposing Kotter’s model and then to specific actions is logical and clear. One small improvement: consider adding a brief transition sentence before the ‘References’ section to signal that you are concluding and moving to your sources. This would make the ending feel even more polished.

    APA Format

    5 to >4 pts

    4 to >2 pts

    2 to >0 pts

    0 pts

    2.5/5 pts

    CommentYour paper makes a good start with APA formatting. Your Kotter citation is correct (although outdated). However, your reference list needs work. The Starbucks reference is too vague and does not follow APA format; if you are citing company reports, include a specific URL or DOI. More importantly, you need to add at least three peer-reviewed journal articles to your references and cite them in your paper. Check the Purdue Online Writing Lab, visit the Writing Center, or ask Professor Bull for help formatting corporate and journal sources correctly in APA style.

    Writing Quality

    5 to >4 pts

    4 to >2 pts

    2 to >0 pts

    0 pts

    3.5/5 pts

    CommentYour writing is clear and your ideas come through well. The conversational tone works for engaging readers on this topic. Watch for a few grammatical issues: for example, “staff frustration isn’t just a personnel headache it threatens both customer loyalty” needs a semicolon or period between the two independent clauses, also please remove contractions per APA guidelines. Also, review sentences like “Bad moods behind the counter spill over, and customers notice,” While effective, make sure each statement is a complete sentence. Overall, your style is appropriate for an academic paper; these small corrections will polish it further

  • I want an analysis and discussion for research

    Discussion for research about pharmacy preceptors and I will include all details ASAP ONCE I FIND TUTORS

  • Information Security Laws

    I have a question i need a 2-3 pargraphs discussion on. It says; W1: What is Information Security?”

    PART 2 (Graded Portion)

    Answer the following:

    I would like your thoughts, insights, and ideas of what is comprised in information security. Discussions

    Please join the discussions each week. Students must post a reply to each weekly discussion and reply to at least 2 other students for each Discussion. This means that each week you should have 1 initial post and 2 responsive posts. Replies must be posted in the week due and replies after the end of the each week will not be graded. The Discussions are for student interaction and input should be submitted before the week ends in order to fully participate in the discussions. Students should demonstrate their own knowledge in the discussions and avoid copying and pasting from websites.

    Guidelines:

    Post the initial response to each discussion by Wednesday. That will give your Classmates a chance to respond back to you.

    Initial responses are to be original in content and demonstrate a thorough analysis of the topic.

    Read your Classmates’ posts and respond to a minimum of two of them on Sunday. You are encouraged to participate in the discussion with your peers throughout the week.

    Responses to classmates are significant to advance the discussion.

    All discussions can be accessed in the Discussions section of the course.

    Communicating on the Discussion

    Discussions are the heart of the interaction in this course. The more engaged and lively the exchanges, the more interesting and fun the course will be. Only substantive comments will receive credit. Although there is a final posting time after which the instructor will grade comments, it is not sufficient to wait until the last day to contribute your comments/questions on the discussion. The purpose of the discussions is to actively participate in an on-going discussion about the assigned content.

    Substantive means comments that contribute something new and hopefully important to the discussion. Thus a message that simply says I agree is not substantive. A substantive comment contributes a new idea or perspective, a good follow-up question to a point made, offers a response to a question, provides an example or illustration of a key point, points out an inconsistency in an argument, etc.

    As a class, if we run into conflicting view points, we must respect each individual’s own opinion. Hateful and hurtful comments towards other individuals, students, groups, peoples, and/or societies will not be tolerated. Rubric Name: ISSC Forum Grading Rubric

    CriteriaExemplary

    Accomplished

    Developing

    Beginning

    Did Not Attempt

    Criterion Score

    Substance

    45 points

    Student answered/addressed all aspects of the topic/question posed in the Forum; analysis of concepts and theories clearly demonstrates superior knowledge and a clear understanding of the topic; relevant and scholarly resources were located and used appropriately; facts and examples are used in support of presentation.

    38.25 points

    Student answered/addressed most aspects of the question/topic posed in the Forum; a basic understanding of relevant concepts/theories is demonstrated; relevant sources were located; minimal or no facts/examples were used in support of presentation.

    33.75 points

    Posting and/or presentation evidences some confusion concerning topics under discussion; analysis may be lacking and/or elements of the question are not answered; support may be lacking.

    29.25 points

    Presentation is unclear; a basic understanding of the topic and issues is not evident; explanation is lacking; segments of the required answer are lacking; sources and supporting facts are not utilized; length requirements may not have been met.

    0 points

    Student failed to respond to the question(s)

    Score of Substance,

    / 45

    Collaboration

    35 points

    Replies were substantive, thoughtful responses and contributed to the discussion; student exceeded minimum requirements by answering all queries posed to him by others and remained present and actively engaged in the discussion throughout the week; student led the discussion by raising complex issues, connecting concepts, and illuminating the discussion with examples.

    29.75 points

    Evidence shows an understanding of the discussion topic and the views of colleagues. Student failed to respond to specific queries posed to him by colleagues or by the Instructor. Student did not take initiative in advancing the discussion throughout the week.

    26.25 points

    22.75 points

    Student completed minimum requirements.

    0 points

    Student filed none of the required replies.

    Score of Collaboration,

    / 35

    Writing

    10 points

    Student demonstrates a quality of writing consistent with scholarly works in the relevant discipline; student is facile in the use of subject-matter vocabulary and terminology consistent with the level of instruction; student applies concepts with ease; writing style and organization are designed to successfully convey the message and the related information to the reader with maximum effect.

    8.5 points

    Student demonstrates consistent and correct use of the rules of grammar usage, punctuation, and spelling. Language is clear and precise throughout all submissions. Sentences display consistently strong, varied structure and organization is excellent.

    7.5 points

    Student demonstrates consistent and correct use of the rules of grammar usage, punctuation and spelling, with a few errors; there is room for improvement in writing style and organization.

    6.5 points

    Writing contains several grammatical, punctuation, and/or spelling errors. Language lacks clarity or includes some use of jargon and /or conversational tone; sentence structure is awkward. Please include two references in apa within 2021-2026 period with DOI

  • Module 7 – IoT and Security

    Your task is to prepare a briefing on this week’s topic for your management team. You briefing should be submitted as a Word doc of approximately 3-5 pages. Your briefing should describe the technology, benefits and rationale for use, current or future risks associated with the technology, strategies to mitigate these risks, implementation strategies, and any other pertinent information that you believe your team should know.

    Alos Once again, your assignment is to submit 3-5 PowerPoint slides that you would use to present the content of your written briefing to your management team. Consider these your guide or talking points that you would use when making a presentation to your team.

    A GREAT OVERVIEW OF IOT:

    Nist Cybersecurity for LOT Program:

    Specific LoT Security Challenges:

  • Finalizing Research Proposal – Content Integration & Tem…

    Hi,

    I have provided all the necessary content in the attached files (Assignment 2, Assignment 1, and the analysis plan). I need you to organize and integrate all this information into the official MSIS894 Template I sent you.

    Please pay attention to the following points:

    1. Template Filling: Please distribute the sections (Introduction, Literature Review, Methodology, etc.) into their correct places within the Template.

    2. The “Survey” Issue: Ensure that any mention of “Survey” or “Questionnaire” is completely removed. Use “Secondary Data Analysis” or “Dataset Analysis” instead.

    3. Complete the Missing Parts: * Research Timeline: Please fill out the Gantt Chart (Appendix B) with realistic dates for the research phases.

  • Keywords: Add 5-6 relevant keywords under the Abstract.
  • Data Analysis Plan: Make sure to include the SPSS and Regression analysis part from the “answer_9” file.
  • 4. Appendices: Since we are using secondary data, Appendix A should describe the Global Findex data fields/sample rows, NOT a survey form.

    Please ensure the final document looks professional and consistent. Let me know when it’s ready.

  • Finalizing Research Proposal – Content Integration & Tem…

    Hi,

    I have provided all the necessary content in the attached files (Assignment 2, Assignment 1, and the analysis plan). I need you to organize and integrate all this information into the official MSIS894 Template I sent you.

    Please pay attention to the following points:

    1.Template Filling: Please distribute the sections (Introduction, Literature Review, Methodology, etc.) into their correct places within the Template.

    2.The “Survey” Issue: Ensure that any mention of “Survey” or “Questionnaire” is completely removed. Use “Secondary Data Analysis” or “Dataset Analysis” instead.

    3.Complete the Missing Parts: * Research Timeline: Please fill out the Gantt Chart (Appendix B) with realistic dates for the research phases.

  • Keywords: Add 5-6 relevant keywords under the Abstract.
  • Data Analysis Plan: Make sure to include the SPSS and Regression analysis part from the “answer_9” file.
  • 4.Appendices: Since we are using secondary data, Appendix A should describe the Global Findex data fields/sample rows, NOT a survey form.

    Please ensure the final document looks professional and consistent. Let me know when it’s ready.