Information Security Laws

I have a question i need a 2-3 pargraphs discussion on. It says; W1: What is Information Security?”

PART 2 (Graded Portion)

Answer the following:

I would like your thoughts, insights, and ideas of what is comprised in information security. Discussions

Please join the discussions each week. Students must post a reply to each weekly discussion and reply to at least 2 other students for each Discussion. This means that each week you should have 1 initial post and 2 responsive posts. Replies must be posted in the week due and replies after the end of the each week will not be graded. The Discussions are for student interaction and input should be submitted before the week ends in order to fully participate in the discussions. Students should demonstrate their own knowledge in the discussions and avoid copying and pasting from websites.

Guidelines:

Post the initial response to each discussion by Wednesday. That will give your Classmates a chance to respond back to you.

Initial responses are to be original in content and demonstrate a thorough analysis of the topic.

Read your Classmates’ posts and respond to a minimum of two of them on Sunday. You are encouraged to participate in the discussion with your peers throughout the week.

Responses to classmates are significant to advance the discussion.

All discussions can be accessed in the Discussions section of the course.

Communicating on the Discussion

Discussions are the heart of the interaction in this course. The more engaged and lively the exchanges, the more interesting and fun the course will be. Only substantive comments will receive credit. Although there is a final posting time after which the instructor will grade comments, it is not sufficient to wait until the last day to contribute your comments/questions on the discussion. The purpose of the discussions is to actively participate in an on-going discussion about the assigned content.

Substantive means comments that contribute something new and hopefully important to the discussion. Thus a message that simply says I agree is not substantive. A substantive comment contributes a new idea or perspective, a good follow-up question to a point made, offers a response to a question, provides an example or illustration of a key point, points out an inconsistency in an argument, etc.

As a class, if we run into conflicting view points, we must respect each individual’s own opinion. Hateful and hurtful comments towards other individuals, students, groups, peoples, and/or societies will not be tolerated. Rubric Name: ISSC Forum Grading Rubric

CriteriaExemplary

Accomplished

Developing

Beginning

Did Not Attempt

Criterion Score

Substance

45 points

Student answered/addressed all aspects of the topic/question posed in the Forum; analysis of concepts and theories clearly demonstrates superior knowledge and a clear understanding of the topic; relevant and scholarly resources were located and used appropriately; facts and examples are used in support of presentation.

38.25 points

Student answered/addressed most aspects of the question/topic posed in the Forum; a basic understanding of relevant concepts/theories is demonstrated; relevant sources were located; minimal or no facts/examples were used in support of presentation.

33.75 points

Posting and/or presentation evidences some confusion concerning topics under discussion; analysis may be lacking and/or elements of the question are not answered; support may be lacking.

29.25 points

Presentation is unclear; a basic understanding of the topic and issues is not evident; explanation is lacking; segments of the required answer are lacking; sources and supporting facts are not utilized; length requirements may not have been met.

0 points

Student failed to respond to the question(s)

Score of Substance,

/ 45

Collaboration

35 points

Replies were substantive, thoughtful responses and contributed to the discussion; student exceeded minimum requirements by answering all queries posed to him by others and remained present and actively engaged in the discussion throughout the week; student led the discussion by raising complex issues, connecting concepts, and illuminating the discussion with examples.

29.75 points

Evidence shows an understanding of the discussion topic and the views of colleagues. Student failed to respond to specific queries posed to him by colleagues or by the Instructor. Student did not take initiative in advancing the discussion throughout the week.

26.25 points

22.75 points

Student completed minimum requirements.

0 points

Student filed none of the required replies.

Score of Collaboration,

/ 35

Writing

10 points

Student demonstrates a quality of writing consistent with scholarly works in the relevant discipline; student is facile in the use of subject-matter vocabulary and terminology consistent with the level of instruction; student applies concepts with ease; writing style and organization are designed to successfully convey the message and the related information to the reader with maximum effect.

8.5 points

Student demonstrates consistent and correct use of the rules of grammar usage, punctuation, and spelling. Language is clear and precise throughout all submissions. Sentences display consistently strong, varied structure and organization is excellent.

7.5 points

Student demonstrates consistent and correct use of the rules of grammar usage, punctuation and spelling, with a few errors; there is room for improvement in writing style and organization.

6.5 points

Writing contains several grammatical, punctuation, and/or spelling errors. Language lacks clarity or includes some use of jargon and /or conversational tone; sentence structure is awkward. Please include two references in apa within 2021-2026 period with DOI

WRITE MY PAPER