Category: Research & Summaries

• Please rewrite and humanize the uploaded file.
• Remove all AI-generated traces and plagiarism completely.
• Do not change the content, meaning, or formatting of the original file.
• After completion, provide a report showing the AI content score is 0%

This file is highly confidential and must not be shared or copied in any way.

This is more of being proficient with graphics design/powerpoint/canva than writing.

I will share the research proposal that needs a poster done. Please read the “poster.pdf” as that’s the instruction. I’d prefer to see your previous sample of a research poster that you have done.

Zoom “Marking.pdf” to 500x in your browser/pdf reader, to see the 0-100 marking grade

I have attached 3 different samples of what a poster looks like.

I already have a completed original meta-analysis article. Your task is to edit and format the manuscript so that it strictly follows the author guidelines of the Philippine Journal of Cardiology (PJC).

Please carefully review the journals author instructions here:

Scope of Work

1. Manuscript Formatting
   • Reformat the entire manuscript according to the PJC guidelines.
   • Ensure the article does not exceed 5,000 words including references and legends.
   • Structure the paper using the required sections:
     • Title Page
     • Structured Abstract (Objectives, Methods, Results, Conclusion; max 250 words)
     • Keywords (58 MeSH terms)
     • Introduction
     • Materials and Methods
     • Results
     • Discussion
     • Acknowledgements (100 words if applicable)
     • References
     • Tables and Figures with captions.
2. Blinded Manuscript
   • Prepare a blinded version of the manuscript without author names or institutional identifiers for peer review.
3. Title Page Preparation
   • Create a separate title page containing:
     • Full manuscript title and subtitle (if applicable)
     • Author names with degrees and affiliations
     • Corresponding author details (full address, phone, email)
     • Funding acknowledgments if applicable.
4. Abstract and Keywords
   • Ensure the abstract is structured and 250 words.
   • Include 58 keywords derived from MeSH terms.
5. References
   • Convert all references into PJC reference format.
   • Use numbered superscript citations in the text.
   • Arrange references in the order they appear in the manuscript.
6. Tables and Figures
   • Ensure tables and figures are properly numbered and cited in the text.
   • Provide clear titles and legends on a separate page.
7. Language and Technical Editing
   • Improve grammar, clarity, and scientific tone.
   • Ensure proper medical and academic writing style consistent with biomedical journals.
8. Submission Readiness
   • The final output should include:
     • Blinded manuscript
     • Title page
     • Tables and figure legends
     • References correctly formatted
     • Document ready for submission in Microsoft Word format.
     • With similarity report

Introduction : Background,problem statement,objectives, andsignificance, gap,contributions,research questions 23 pages

Literature Review: Key theories,concepts, anddefinitions 45 page

about this variables

1-Hr. practice

2-Employee performance

3-Job satisfaction

4-Organizational support

no AI please

I need to send a copy of the articles you will take from, and it should be free of charge

General Paper Requirements:
1) Papers should be a minimum of 3 full double-spaced pages of content, excluding the
References page; the paper should be as long as it needs to be to answer the prompt
2) Follow APA guidelines (in-text citations and References page)
3) 12-point Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins
4) Use multiple peer-reviewed articles to support your paper
5) Limit the use of direct quotes from the articles (paraphrase and cite)
6) Be free of grammatical, syntactical, and spelling errors
7) Not include the use of personal anecdotes or opinion

Choose an aspect related to inequality (e.g., race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, disability, etc.)

1. Explain how this form of inequality influences experiences within at least one component of the criminal or juvenile justice system
2. Provide examples of how the system may perpetuate or reduce these inequalities
3. Propose one evidence-based reform or policy change that could reduce inequality in your selected area

Primary Source Analysis #2:

In conjunction with our discussion of combatting piracy on the high seas on Wednesday, March

4th, you will be asked to read through an excerpt from the log of the Somerset, one of two vessels

outfitted by local merchants in Barbados to hunt down Bart Roberts. This reading can be found

in the Files module on Canvas and is entitled Document 44: A Skirmish with Bartholomew

Roberts (1720). For your assignment, you will be asked to analyze the primary source reading

and complete the following:

1. Describe the historical context behind the primary source reading. Explain what events

were happening at the time and why they were occurring.

2. Briefly explain what the source is, who the person writing it was, what it is about, and

who the intended audience was.

3. Explain what this document says about the historical time period in which it was

produced and the actors involved, specifically the Golden Age of Piracy in the early 18th

century. You also want to describe what we can learn from this document about the period

and what it can tell us about how pirates were confronted at sea. Essentially, you want to

connect the content of the primary source to the historical context.

A rubric has been attached with the assignment to give you an idea of how I plan to grade it. This

will be your best guide to understanding what I expect for this assignment. Additionally, you are

only allowed to use the book and my lectures as sources other than the documents. DO NOT

USE ANY OTHER SOURCES OR YOU WILL BE SEVERELY PENALIZED!!!

To cite the information you use in your assignment, please use MLA-style in-text

citations/parentheses. When citing the book, put the authors name and the page number in

parentheses. When citing the source, just put the title of the source in the parentheses. When

citing my lectures, put it as follows

(Professor Chadarevian, Lecture, date of lecture)

I strongly recommend you structure your writing into paragraphs as it will make it flow

smoother. Your assignment also needs to be at least 600-700 words long, double-spaced, and in

Times New Roman, 12pt. font. Though I will be accounting for these factors as I grade, I will

primarily be grading you for how sufficient your analysis of the primary source is and the overall

content of your assignment. Please email me if you have any questions about the assignment.

I have a Dissertation that has comments needs to be improved with NO AI, based on a grading Rubric. I need a professional that i can guarantee success.

Would you agree that prioritizing and executing using relaxation, looking around, and making a call is a valid principle in crisis leadership (as defined in Chapter 7, Extreme Ownership)? Also, how does the concept of Silos (Chapter 8, Decision Making for Emergency Managers) impact the principle of prioritizing and execution?

I have uploaded the intentions and a copy of the template for you.

here is the artwork you are going to be using ^^

Primary Source Analysis #2:

In conjunction with our discussion of combatting piracy on the high seas on Wednesday, March

4th, you will be asked to read through an excerpt from the log of the Somerset, one of two vessels

outfitted by local merchants in Barbados to hunt down Bart Roberts. This reading can be found

in the Files module on Canvas and is entitled Document 44: A Skirmish with Bartholomew

Roberts (1720). For your assignment, you will be asked to analyze the primary source reading

and complete the following:

1. Describe the historical context behind the primary source reading. Explain what events

were happening at the time and why they were occurring.

2. Briefly explain what the source is, who the person writing it was, what it is about, and

who the intended audience was.

3. Explain what this document says about the historical time period in which it was

produced and the actors involved, specifically the Golden Age of Piracy in the early 18th

century. You also want to describe what we can learn from this document about the period

and what it can tell us about how pirates were confronted at sea. Essentially, you want to

connect the content of the primary source to the historical context.

A rubric has been attached with the assignment to give you an idea of how I plan to grade it. This

will be your best guide to understanding what I expect for this assignment. Additionally, you are

only allowed to use the book and my lectures as sources other than the documents. DO NOT

USE ANY OTHER SOURCES OR YOU WILL BE SEVERELY PENALIZED!!!

To cite the information you use in your assignment, please use MLA-style in-text

citations/parentheses. When citing the book, put the authors name and the page number in

parentheses. When citing the source, just put the title of the source in the parentheses. When

citing my lectures, put it as follows

(Professor Chadarevian, Lecture, date of lecture)

I strongly recommend you structure your writing into paragraphs as it will make it flow

smoother. Your assignment also needs to be at least 600-700 words long, double-spaced, and in

Times New Roman, 12pt. font. Though I will be accounting for these factors as I grade, I will

primarily be grading you for how sufficient your analysis of the primary source is and the overall

content of your assignment. Please email me if you have any questions about the assignment.

Primary Source Analysis

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContext	20 to >17.0 ptsExcellentThe student shows a detailed and sophisticated knowledge of the historical context, and relates specifics of that history to the specifics of the primary source.17 to >15.0 ptsGoodThe student shows a general knowledge of the historical context, and uses it to examine the specifics in the primary source. 15 to >13.0 ptsLimitedThe student shows only a limited understanding of the historical context of the document, or does not relate that context to the primary source itself.13 to >0 ptsWeakThe student does not discuss and shows little to no understanding of the historical context.	20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource	30 to >27.0 ptsExcellentThe student clearly and specifically discusses the primary source’s author, origins, and likely audience, connects them to specific details in the source, and uses that information in a sophisticated way to deepen understanding of the document.27 to >23.0 ptsGoodThe student discusses the author, origins of the primary source, or the likely audience, and relates them to the source in a general way. 23 to >20.0 ptsLimitedThe student’s discussion of the primary sources author, origins, and audience is limited, and that information is not used to effectively deepen understanding of the document.20 to >0 ptsWeakLittle to no discussion of the primary source’s author, origin, or likely audience.	30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis	40 to >35.0 ptsExcellentThe analysis of the primary source is sharp, sophisticated and insightful, reflecting both an understanding of the general content of the document and and ability to engage with the specifics of the document to gain insight into the source itself, its author and/or the time period35 to >31.0 ptsGoodThe analysis of the primary source is solid and straightforward, showing a good understanding of the content of the document and an ability to use that understanding to illustrate the document, its author and/or the time period. 31 to >27.0 ptsLimitedThe analysis of the primary source shows some insight, but is flawed in some way, because of either failure to properly understand the document, factual errors in understanding the historical context, or unclear statements and/or logic.27 to >0 ptsWeakThere is little to no analysis of the primary source, and discussion of it is largely limited to summarizing the content.	40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics	10 to >9.0 ptsExcellentNo issues with grammar, style, or structure.9 to >7.0 ptsGoodMinor issues with grammar, style, or structure. 7 to >5.0 ptsPoorRecurring issues with grammar, syntax, or structure.5 to >0 ptsWeakMajor issues with grammar, style, or structure.	10 pts