Category: Research & Summaries

What was the highlight of this course for you? How has this course extended your understanding of decision making? Ensure that your response to the questions is a minimum of 120 words total.

Attached the proposal that done by me and also the template that shared by the supervisor

I want you to use the template and prepare the proposal based on the proposal that done by me and make sure that u followed the guidelines that mentioned in the template and fill the missing information from your side.
i will not specify how many pages i will just put 6 cause i havent count how many pages should be. Just follow the guidelines please

10 minute long class presentation based on my Paper (attached)
Make it interactive. Something along the lines of Introduction -> philosophers -> content -> examples

1) Papers should be a minimum of 3 full double-spaced pages of content, excluding the
References page; the paper should be as long as it needs to be to answer the prompt
2) Follow APA guidelines (in-text citations and References page)
3) 12-point Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins
4) Use multiple peer-reviewed articles to support your paper
5) Limit the use of direct quotes from the articles (paraphrase and cite)
6) Be free of grammatical, syntactical, and spelling errors
7) Not include the use of personal anecdotes or opinions

Select one criminal justice policy or program currently implemented at the local, state, or national level (e.g., body-worn cameras, drug courts, restorative justice programs)

1. Provide an overview of your selected policy or program including the goals and intended outcomes
2. Describe the evaluation methodology used to assess the policy or program (e.g., randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental designs, cost-benefit analysis)
3. Summarize key findings from existing empirical evaluations on the effectiveness of the policy or program
4. Critically analyze the strengths and limitations of the evaluation methods in measuring the impact of the policy or program

Attached are the assignment’s instruction, the required template, and a sample document. I will attach resources from the textbook seperately

Help me complete all remaining chapters, Chapter, 2, 5, 6

You final report should be completed at this time. Presentations are scheduled for November 11th and the 13th. Use document below to complete your final report. the final draft of the complete report is due November 9th.

Issue Analysis Project (Part 1): Rhetorical Landscape Report

Objective

In this first stage of your Issue Analysis Project, you will explore a controversial issue by identifying key perspectives and analyzing how different stakeholders use rhetoric to shape their arguments.

---

Step 1: Choose a Controversial Issue

Select a current, debatable issue that has multiple perspectives. Your topic should:

• Be relevant and timely
• Have clear disagreement among groups
• Be supported by credible sources

Examples: Please select one of the topics from below.

• AI use in college writing
• Student loan forgiveness
• Social media regulation
• Climate change policy
• Healthcare access

---

Step 2: Identify Major Perspectives

Research your issue and identify at least three distinct perspectives.

For each perspective, include:

• Who holds this view (stakeholders)
• Their main claim or position
• Their goals or motivations

Stakeholders may include:

• Government officials
• Corporations
• Advocacy groups
• Scholars/researchers
• Everyday citizens

---

Step 3: Map Rhetorical Strategies

Analyze how each perspective uses rhetoric to persuade its audience.

For each stakeholder group, examine:

1. Rhetorical Appeals

• Ethos (credibility): How do they establish authority?
• Pathos (emotion): What emotions do they appeal to?
• Logos (logic): What evidence or reasoning do they use?

2. Tone and Language

• Is the tone formal, emotional, urgent, neutral, etc.?
• What word choices stand out?

3. Evidence and Support

• Statistics, studies, expert opinions
• Personal stories or anecdotes
• Visual or media elements (if applicable)

4. Audience Targeting

• Who is the intended audience?
• How is the message tailored to that audience?

---

Step 4: Create a Rhetorical Landscape Map

Organize your findings visually or in structured written form.

You may format this as:

• A chart or table
• A concept map
• A structured report with headings

---

Step 5: Write the Rhetorical Landscape Report

Length: 2 pages

Include the following sections:

1. Introduction

• Introduce the issue
• Explain why it is controversial
• Briefly preview the perspectives

2. Overview of Perspectives

• Describe each major viewpoint
• Identify key stakeholders

3. Rhetorical Analysis

• Analyze rhetorical strategies used by each group
• Compare how different perspectives persuade audiences

4. Conclusion

• Reflect on patterns you notice
• Consider which strategies seem most effective and why

---

Optional Template (Student Use)

Stakeholder	Position	Audience	Ethos	Pathos	Logos	Key Strategies

---

Evaluation Criteria

• Depth of research and accuracy
• Clarity in identifying perspectives
• Strength of rhetorical analysis
• Organization and clarity of writing
• Use of specific examples and evidence

Based on your review of the chapter Access Module 1 in your textbook, answer the following questions in Word document:

1. What is database management system? How is Access different from Excel? Explain with examples. 10 points
2. What is the database about in the chapter Access Module 1? – 3 points
3. What is Primary Key and why is it required? Is Primary Key different from unique identifier? 6 points
4. In Access, how is a query different from a form? Does report allow entering data into a table? 6 points
5. What is field? Why do you need to determine data type to add fields in database? 4 points
6. How is design view different from datasheet view? – 5 points
7. Can you import data from external data source like Excel into Access? 2 points

Note: You must cite the text as the source of your answers using MLA Documentation Style. – 4 points

Your task once again is to prepare a briefing on this week’s topic for your management team. You briefing should be submitted as a Word doc of approximately 3-5 pages. Your briefing should describe the technology, benefits and rationale for use, current or future risks associated with the technology, strategies to mitigate these risks, implementation strategies, and any other pertinent information that you believe your team should know.

aslo Once again your assignment is to submit 3-5 Powerpoint slides that you would use to present the content of your written briefing to your management team. Consider these your guide or talking points that you would use when making a presentation to your team.

The NSA Says “Not so Fast”:

Write a research paper on end-of-life considerations for an aging adult. USE CHAPTER 18 of The 3rd edition of Nutrition for the Older Adult by Melissa Bernstein and Nancy Munoz (ISBN 9781284149005), published by Jones & Bartlett. write as a sophomore in college, keep the tone neutral, don’t use unnecessary adjectives or adverbs, avoid technical jargon and complex terms

Instructions:

Would be minimum 10-12 pages in Word (includes cover, abstract and reference page) all in APA format. The research paper will discuss all the aspects of end-of life. You are being graded on format, length, research quality, and content. Writing should be in full paragraphs with intext citations (name, 2025). You should have TONS of these in your paper. DO NOT USE AI

Do not list bullet points, you will receive a zero.

Appropriate sources for current research on this topic are peer-reviewed research articles (try searching in PubMed via the library The Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is an example of a peer-reviewed journal. Everything in your paper should have a citation or its considered plagiarism. Put your full reference list at the end of your paper and also insert your references in Packback’s work-cited tab.

If you dont know already, peer reviewed means that other health professionals have reviewed it and think the document is legit. Non-peer reviewed is someone just writing an opinion in an article or blog, and it is just that…their opinion. Do not use opinions unless it is solely yours. If citing from websites, they must be legit sources. WEB MD and other generic websites are not scientific, but layman information.

Your paper should be written the scientific community. Remember, someday you may have to address this topic with a loved one.

How do you know you are doing it correctly, answer these questions.

Did I cover appropriate topics and are they cited with proper references?

Were appropriate sources (peer-reviewed articles) utilized for research? Minimum of 5. Use the UH librarians can help you, thats their job.

Were all sources cited and included in APA formatted at the end of your paper and cited in the text properly?

Is your paper interesting, did you present new ideas or concerns or find any new references?

The scenario (pages 256-258, Decision-making in Emergency Management) describes how good leadership can sometimes support bad decisions that align with the principle of decisiveness and uncertainty (Chapter 11, Extreme Ownership). Do you see any relationship between the application to business on pages 255-262 Extreme Ownership and the lessons learned on page 256-258 in Decision-making in Emergency Management?