Category: Social Science

  • Standard Analysis (any type) in Social science – 3 pages – D…

    Write a policy memo analyzing one issue related to Generative AI (GenAI). The memo should define a specific policy problem and evaluate possible government responses.

    The memo should be written for an educated policymaker or public official who is not a technical expert.

    Length:

    • Maximum 3 double-spaced pages
    • 12-point Times New Roman
    • 1-inch margins
    • PDF submission

    (A Works Cited page, citations, tables, or graphs do not count toward the 3-page limit.)

    Required Sections

    1. Problem Definition

    Clearly define the policy problem using one of the following frames:

    • Too much / too many
    • Too little / too few
    • Missed opportunity

    You must:

    Quantify the problem

    Provide data showing the scale or growth of the issue.

    Diagnose the problem

    Explain underlying causes and contributing factors.

    Justify government involvement

    Explain why public policy action is necessary rather than leaving the issue to the private sector.

    State a policy goal

    Identify at least one objective policy alternatives should aim to achieve.

    2. Policy Alternatives

    Describe and compare two alternatives:

    A. Status Quo

    Explain what happens if current policies and trends continue unchanged.

    B. One Policy Alternative

    Propose one specific government intervention.

    Identify what policy tool it represents, such as:

    • Taxes
    • Subsidies
    • Safety nets / social insurance
    • Rules, rights, and regulations
    • Government supply
    • Facilitated markets
    • Conducting research

    Explain how and why this alternative would address the problem.

    Research & Sources

    You may use credible academic, government, or policy research sources.

    Avoid advocacy materials or biased opinion sources.

    All factual claims that are not common knowledge must be cited using in-text citations.

    Works Cited Requirement

    You must include a Works Cited page at the end of the memo.

    Requirements:

    • Use APA citation format
    • Include all sources referenced in the memo
    • List sources alphabetically by author
    • The Works Cited page does not count toward the 3-page memo limit

    Examples of acceptable sources:

    • Government reports
    • Academic journal articles
    • Policy think tank research
    • Reputable data organizations

    Writing Style & Tone

    • Professional and policy-focused
    • Concise and analytical (not a general essay)
    • Written for a non-specialist policymaker audience
    • Define technical terms when necessary

    Policy Problem Frame

    Too much labor market disruption caused by Generative AI automation

  • AFA2000 Final Paper

    Prompt: How did the language of equality in the Declaration of Independence shape African American political activism in the 19th century? Seven sources, chicago style citation and bibliography.

  • Reflective learning journal

    Structure of the learning diary:

    Cover page

    1. Learning objective

    2. What is qualitative research?

    3. Qualitative research materials

    4. Qualitative research analysis

    5. Researcher positions and research ethics

    6. Assessment of one’s own learning

    Should remember the following things in this work;

    critical reflection

    new questions

    broader social perspective

    own thinking goes beyond the materialcritical reflection

    new questions

    broader social perspective

    own thinking goes beyond the material

    :The way to complete the lectures is to write a reflective learning diary based on the lectures and course books;

    :

    References;

    • lectures at the University of Turku
    • Waller, V., Farquharson, K. & Dempsey, D. (2016) Qualitative Social Research: Contemporary Methods for the Digital Age. London: SAGE
    • Tietoarkiston laadullisen tutkimuksen verkkoksikirja.
    • Ruusuvuori, J., Nikander, P. & Hyvrinen, M. (toim.) (2010) Haastattelun analyysi. Tampere: Vastapaino.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): raaka-aineisto_pohkislevalle_oppimispaivakirjalle.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • writing 4 pages with two topics

    Part A:

    How has product differentiation and advertising adopted by corporations increased environmental pressures and unsustainability?

    Part B:

    What markets in the US economy – because of economies of scale, barriers to entry, and other factors – are so highly concentrated that smaller, more environmentally-conscious firms can’t enter and remain competitive? Can anything be done to overcome this?

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Directions_ Answer from Part A and B.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Social Science Question

    Person-focused pay programs are not really new. Various early forms of these programs appeared in the 1980s. Organizational adoption was slow partly because they can very quickly drive labor costs up. Why is this changing? Explain the reasons for this change. Consider Susan Jacksons situation. Susan is a young professional in her 8th year of her technological manufacturing career since graduating from college. She is frustrated by the lack of opportunity to showcase her talent and skillset. Susan feels like she has so much more to offer than is asked of her. Consequently, she is once again on the job market. If she succeeds in her search, Susan will join her third organization in 8 years. Explain why a job with a person-focused pay program might help alleviate her frustration. Finally, what are the potential advantages and disadvantages of these programs for the organization? For the employee?

    INSTRUCTIONS

    Respond to the discussion questions provided. Each assignment requires 3 4 full pages and at least 5 peer-reviewed resources within 5 years to substantiate your position in your answer. You must carefully read the requirements below, noting the expectations beforehand. These exercises are meant to foster your comprehensive research and writing skills.

    The specific requirements are as follows:

  • As a graduate student, the expectation is quite high for your required quality and effort.
  • Your work must be written near the standard and quality of journals and other published materials.

  • Cover page, abstract, and reference page do not count toward the minimum page length requirement.
  • Add biblical integration which contain 1) a quoted Bible verse that is correctly cited and
  • 2) integration that ties verse to topic by using a minimum of 3 sentences.
  • At least 5 peer-reviewed sources within the last 5 years are required.
  • Correctly cite your sources and quotations using current APA format.
  • The use of sources such as Wikipedia, Investopedia, blogs, personal, consulting or corporate websites are discouraged and will not count toward the required 5 references
  • Use of term papers or solutions-type websites is not allowed and will be treated according to the terms of academic honesty requirements.
  • Use of headings is required to differentiate distinct sections of the paper; however, students should not use the questions as a heading/subheading.
  • Note: Meeting the minimum specifications will result in the minimum passing grade. You are

    expected to provide an in-depth, analytical review of the topic. Assignments that do not meet

    the minimum criteria will not receive a passing grade.

    Requirements: 14

  • Questions

    Based On the article, anwser following questions with details 1. How was the Great Strike described and what was work and life like in Homestead after the strike? 2. What were your perceptions of the work performed in the mills and the conditions? Wages, hours, etc. 3. What was the make-up of the town? Who lived there? What were the living conditions? 4. What was family life like? How did the mill work affect family life? 5. What are the tolls the mill takes on the families and communities of the mill workers? 6. How do the workers respond now, after the breaking of the strike? 7. How do you think Margaret Byington would have liked politicians, policy makers, labor leaders, journalists or other influential people to respond to this? What actions would she have found helpful to the people of Homestead?

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Chapter 5 OCR.pdf, Chapter2 OCR.pdf, Chapter 4 OCR.pdf, Chapter 13 OCR.pdf, Chapter 1 OCR.pdf, Chapter 3 OCR.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Social institutions

    When you’re ready to make your first post respond to the following prompt: Consider the eight key social institutions in societies around the world as described by the text. Identify the two institutions which you think are the most critical to your life. Assume you have unlimited power to change anything in your chosen institutions to improve the your life, your family and your community. What would you change about this particular institution and how would your change improve your life, family and community? Provide a rationale for your decisions.
  • Call of Duty

    About a 1000 words/ use call of duty as the game
  • Discussion Board Participation and Critical Thinking in Soci…

    Deepen your knowledge of the course texts and materials through rigorous intellectual exchanges with classmates through the sharing of unique insights, ideas, and perspectives. Apply concepts to your own experiences and observations. Share judgements and evaluations supported through logical argumentation, correct application of concepts, and presentation of evidence. Practice effective written communication. Discussion Board Guidelines The Discussion Board is not an informal chat room. Your answers and replies should be thoughtful, considerate, and use college-level language and grammar. I strongly recommend that you carefully compose your answers on a word processing program. Before posting your answers, check them for spelling and grammatical errors, then save them, and then copy and paste them to the Discussion Board. It is important that you save your document in your word processing program before you paste it to the discussion board. If, for whatever reason, the Discussion Board “eats” or “loses” your answer, you can just cut and paste it on the Board again if your answer has been saved on your computer. The three cardinal rules for Discussion Boards: Please remember that the cultural of mutual respect that is part of this course extends into the virtual classroom environment. Participation in these discussion boards is required. Participation alone is not enough; a thoughtful and meaningful approach in your posts is required. (Quality counts!) Your Original Contribution Post Each week, the instructor will write a prompt that will be available by Monday 9am. You are responsible for creating and submitting an original reply post (which becomes a new thread) in response in full sentence and paragraph form by Wednesday 11:59am. Write in paragraph form unless you are asked specifically for a list. The majority of your post must be your original words, thoughts, and ideas (very short quotations only). Be sure to identify all the sources of information that you refer to. Write at least 200 words (no more than 500). Recall the general objectives of the discussion board when composing your posting: 1) Deepen your knowledge of the course texts and materials through rigorous intellectual exchanges with classmates through the sharing of unique insights, ideas, and perspectives, 2) Apply concepts to your own experiences and observations, 3) Share judgements and evaluations supported through logical argumentation, correct application of concepts, and presentation of evidence, and 4) Practice effective written communication. Your post must be written on the discussion page, not attached as a document. Responses to the Postings of Your Classmates In addition to writing your own answer to the instructor prompt each week, you will compose a response to at least two other students posts by Friday 11:59pm. Your responses should be at least 100 words (no more than 250) and comply to expectations of discussion board post guidelines above. In your replies to other students you can: 1) Expand on or clarify a point made in the student post/answer. 2) Offer an additional argument to support a position taken in an answer 3) Suggest ways in which an idea could be more clearly expressed. 4) Identify passages where you think the writer misunderstood a concept, applied it incorrectly, or has an interpretation different than yours. 5) Disagree with a point or position made in an answer. 6) No I agree or +1 posts explain why you agree or disagree If you are disagreeing with the views of another student, please be constructive and respectful. You may criticize a position but not the author. Just writing (for example) “Your position on abortion stinks” will not do! State precisely the point you disagree with. (Make sure you have not misinterpreted the writer’s position.) Offer reasons why you think their view is incorrect and support your position by citing the text or other sources. A good answer or response will have some or all of the following features: There are virtually no errors in punctuation or spelling, grammar or usage. All parts of the question are completed answered. Sentences are smooth and carefully constructed. The words chosen are clear, accurate, and precise. Vague or ambiguous terms are clearly defined. The answer avoids triteness and unsupported generalizations. Use of supporting information is superior: the evidence clearly supports the positions and the evidence is sufficient and specific. The ideas reflect critical thinking and insight. There is some originality in the writer’s response. The content has depth and substance. The answer or response holds the reader’s interest. Student Responsibilities The purpose of the Discussion Board Assignments is for students to reflect thoughtfully and exchange ideas on the social, cultural, and historical concepts and topics covered in this course. As a class, you will benefit from this assignment only as much as you put into it. Last minute posts that are inaccurate, sloppy, unorganized, and unclear help no one. If you find that a post is unclear or inaccurate, it is your role to ask your classmate for further clarification or to point out the inaccuracy. If someone replies to your post with a question, you owe him or her the courtesy of a response. You are also responsible for posting your answers and replies on time. Each week I will read all the answers and replies posted to the Discussion Board. I will comment, where appropriate, on those posts or discussion threads that contain inaccuracies or where there seems to be some confusion. I will also point out those posts or discussions that I thought were particularly thoughtful, insightful, or well written. SUMMARY You are expected to post on at least 3 times. You should begin at least one thread and provide at least two posts in response to other participants threads. Posting should be a minimum of one short paragraph and a maximum of two paragraphs. Word totals for each post should be in the 200-500 words range for your original post and 100-250 for each of your two responses. Whether you agree or disagree explain why with supporting evidence and concepts from the readings or a related experience. Include a reference, link, or citation when appropriate. Be organized in your thoughts and ideas. Incorporate correlations with the assigned readings or topics. Stay on topic. Provide evidence of critical, college-level thinking and thoughtfulness in your responses or interactions. Avoid summarizing. Contribute to the learning community by being creative in your approaches to topics, being relevant in the presented viewpoints, and attempting to motivate the discussion. Be aware of grammar and sentence mechanics. Use proper etiquette. Remember that being respectful is critical.
  • Discussion Board Participation and Critical Thinking in Soci…

    Deepen your knowledge of the course texts and materials through rigorous intellectual exchanges with classmates through the sharing of unique insights, ideas, and perspectives. Apply concepts to your own experiences and observations. Share judgements and evaluations supported through logical argumentation, correct application of concepts, and presentation of evidence. Practice effective written communication. Discussion Board Guidelines The Discussion Board is not an informal chat room. Your answers and replies should be thoughtful, considerate, and use college-level language and grammar. I strongly recommend that you carefully compose your answers on a word processing program. Before posting your answers, check them for spelling and grammatical errors, then save them, and then copy and paste them to the Discussion Board. It is important that you save your document in your word processing program before you paste it to the discussion board. If, for whatever reason, the Discussion Board “eats” or “loses” your answer, you can just cut and paste it on the Board again if your answer has been saved on your computer. The three cardinal rules for Discussion Boards: Please remember that the cultural of mutual respect that is part of this course extends into the virtual classroom environment. Participation in these discussion boards is required. Participation alone is not enough; a thoughtful and meaningful approach in your posts is required. (Quality counts!) Your Original Contribution Post Each week, the instructor will write a prompt that will be available by Monday 9am. You are responsible for creating and submitting an original reply post (which becomes a new thread) in response in full sentence and paragraph form by Wednesday 11:59am. Write in paragraph form unless you are asked specifically for a list. The majority of your post must be your original words, thoughts, and ideas (very short quotations only). Be sure to identify all the sources of information that you refer to. Write at least 200 words (no more than 500). Recall the general objectives of the discussion board when composing your posting: 1) Deepen your knowledge of the course texts and materials through rigorous intellectual exchanges with classmates through the sharing of unique insights, ideas, and perspectives, 2) Apply concepts to your own experiences and observations, 3) Share judgements and evaluations supported through logical argumentation, correct application of concepts, and presentation of evidence, and 4) Practice effective written communication. Your post must be written on the discussion page, not attached as a document. Responses to the Postings of Your Classmates In addition to writing your own answer to the instructor prompt each week, you will compose a response to at least two other students posts by Friday 11:59pm. Your responses should be at least 100 words (no more than 250) and comply to expectations of discussion board post guidelines above. In your replies to other students you can: 1) Expand on or clarify a point made in the student post/answer. 2) Offer an additional argument to support a position taken in an answer 3) Suggest ways in which an idea could be more clearly expressed. 4) Identify passages where you think the writer misunderstood a concept, applied it incorrectly, or has an interpretation different than yours. 5) Disagree with a point or position made in an answer. 6) No I agree or +1 posts explain why you agree or disagree If you are disagreeing with the views of another student, please be constructive and respectful. You may criticize a position but not the author. Just writing (for example) “Your position on abortion stinks” will not do! State precisely the point you disagree with. (Make sure you have not misinterpreted the writer’s position.) Offer reasons why you think their view is incorrect and support your position by citing the text or other sources. A good answer or response will have some or all of the following features: There are virtually no errors in punctuation or spelling, grammar or usage. All parts of the question are completed answered. Sentences are smooth and carefully constructed. The words chosen are clear, accurate, and precise. Vague or ambiguous terms are clearly defined. The answer avoids triteness and unsupported generalizations. Use of supporting information is superior: the evidence clearly supports the positions and the evidence is sufficient and specific. The ideas reflect critical thinking and insight. There is some originality in the writer’s response. The content has depth and substance. The answer or response holds the reader’s interest. Student Responsibilities The purpose of the Discussion Board Assignments is for students to reflect thoughtfully and exchange ideas on the social, cultural, and historical concepts and topics covered in this course. As a class, you will benefit from this assignment only as much as you put into it. Last minute posts that are inaccurate, sloppy, unorganized, and unclear help no one. If you find that a post is unclear or inaccurate, it is your role to ask your classmate for further clarification or to point out the inaccuracy. If someone replies to your post with a question, you owe him or her the courtesy of a response. You are also responsible for posting your answers and replies on time. Each week I will read all the answers and replies posted to the Discussion Board. I will comment, where appropriate, on those posts or discussion threads that contain inaccuracies or where there seems to be some confusion. I will also point out those posts or discussions that I thought were particularly thoughtful, insightful, or well written. SUMMARY You are expected to post on at least 3 times. You should begin at least one thread and provide at least two posts in response to other participants threads. Posting should be a minimum of one short paragraph and a maximum of two paragraphs. Word totals for each post should be in the 200-500 words range for your original post and 100-250 for each of your two responses. Whether you agree or disagree explain why with supporting evidence and concepts from the readings or a related experience. Include a reference, link, or citation when appropriate. Be organized in your thoughts and ideas. Incorporate correlations with the assigned readings or topics. Stay on topic. Provide evidence of critical, college-level thinking and thoughtfulness in your responses or interactions. Avoid summarizing. Contribute to the learning community by being creative in your approaches to topics, being relevant in the presented viewpoints, and attempting to motivate the discussion. Be aware of grammar and sentence mechanics. Use proper etiquette. Remember that being respectful is critical.