Category: Sociology

  • Ethics Essay

    I have uploaded the ethic essay instructions. Please read the scenario and answer the questions with at least 500 words.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Ethic Essay Instructions.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Answer two questions. 100 word response for each question

    Prompt:

    Respond to both questions using approximately 100 words per response.

    Questions:

    1. According to Lukcs, why does treating Marxism as a set of conclusion miss the point of orthodox Marxism?

    2.How does Lukcs help

    Requirements:

    Spellcheck before submitting.

    Minimum 100 words or more per question

    Do not use any outside sources/references other than the ones listed

    Resources:

  • Social Final Paper Case Manager

    Organization: Division of Family and Children Services (DFCS)

    Unit: Caregiver Recruitment and Retention Unit (CRRU)

    As practitioners, I would like you to conduct an in-depth sociological analysis of inefficiencies, gaps, or opportunities for improvement within your current workplace in human services/case management for Sociological Practice. Please draw on your professional experience, sociological theory or literature, and comparative organizational research (as needed) to identify structural, procedural, and/or communication/cultural challenges that affect service delivery, worker well-being, and client outcomes.

    Please then propose evidence-informed and sociologically grounded recommendations for improvement. The goal is to bridge theory and practice, demonstrating how sociological insights can meaningfully inform organizational change in human service settings.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): SOCI Final paper Case management analysis.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Social stratification (Written Exam)

    So basically you read the prompt she provided. Then we have to figure out 3 concepts from the concept list that were brought up in the prompt. Theres a concept and a reflection section, for each of the 3 concepts we have to write whats under concept section a and concept section b and concept section c Finally, we have to write the reflection section. Here, we write about how we have a different understanding of 1 of the sociological concepts. At the end we should have: Concept section: 1a. 1b. 2a. 2b. 3a. 3b. Reflection section: A.

    No use of AI or ChatGPT

    REQUIRED TEXTS

    Doob, Christopher B. (2019), Social Inequality and Social Stratification in U.S. Society, Second Ed.

    Routhloudge: New York. ISB :978-0-367-23342-6

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Exam22025SOC4000.pdf, ConceptsinModulesList-Exam22025.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Discussion 3

    Rewrite without use of AI or ChatGPT Initial Post minimum requirements: 500 words of substantive content Use two quotes from the readings (citations needed)

    Textbook :

    Herda, D. E. (2023). The Sociology of Immigration: Crossing Borders, Creating New Lives.

    SAGE Publications. (ISBN: 978-1071817698)

    one discussion prompt:

    • VIDEO: Do you agree with Ben Huh’s assessment that the biggest obstacles to immigration have shifted from “natural” to “man-made”? Why or why not? What are some examples of both types of challenges that immigrants face today? Reflecting on your own understanding of immigration, have you observed or experienced examples of these “man-made” challenges? How do these observations shape your perspective on the current immigration debate?

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): LakoffandFerguson-2006-TheFramingofImmigration.pdf, Cohen-FromStatustoAgencyDefiningMigrants.pdf, Manohar-2019-GenderedAgencyinSkilledMigrationTheCaseof.pdf, Discussion 1 Reponse.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • first journal

    Now that you have been introduced to the three major sociological theories (conflict, functionalist, and interactionist), reflect on these three theories. Answer the following prompts in your reflective 250500-word reflective journal assignment:

    1. Compare and contrast how each of these sociological theories views the social world and social interaction.
    2. Which theory do you identify with the most? Explain why you identify with this theory
  • Sociology Question

    Using reading and study resources for this week, develop a comprehensive budget based on the funding source guidelines and your logic model. Funders will not award you the grant unless you can account for a reasonable budget that allows for strategies to be accomplished, personnel to be paid, supplies, travel, indirect costs, et cetera. An Internet search using terms such as “Preparing a Budget for a Grant Proposal” will yield a number of example budgets from which you can draw. In addition, discuss any ethical dilemmas that might arise as you plan your budget. Refer to the NASW Code of Ethics as a guide to resolve these ethical dilemmas.

    Using the resources provided, create a budget for your project using the guidelines from your funding source and the information from the resources. If the funding source does not supply you with a budget template, choose one that fits your needs from online sources. Your budget must add up to the allocation in the grant for each of the years the grant covers. The budget needs to cover all necessary expenditures. Finally, address any ethical issues that arise during the creation of the budget. When your budget is complete, defend each line item’s inclusion and parameters. This section should be written in narrative form.

    • Submit your assignment using the following file naming format: Your Name_AssignmentNumber_Assignment Title (example: Ima_Learner_u02a1_Proposed Project).
    • book read this weekFunded! : Successful Grantwriting for Your Nonprofit

      Richard Hoefer

    • attached are past assignments
    • Your paper should meet the following requirements:
      • Written communication: Develop accurate written communication and thoughts that convey the overall goals of the assignment and do not detract from the overall message. Your paper should demonstrate graduate-level writing skills.
      • References: 48 references to text, peer-reviewed journal articles, and/or credible websites (no more than two web sources).
      • Formatting: Use 12-pt, Arial or Times New Roman font; MS Word documents only.
      • APA style and formatting: Use current APA style and formatting.
  • Reading Notes 3 (SOC OF IMMIGRATION)

    I just need my Notes rewritten without the use of ChatGPT.

    1. Using your own words, explain the following concepts:

    • Herda
    • B1/B2 Visas
    • Conditional Permanent Residence
    • F-Visas
    • Green Card
    • H-1B Visas
    • H-2A/H-2B Visas
    • Lawful Permanent Residents
    • Lakoff and Ferguson
    • Security Frame
    • Economic Frame
    • Moral Frame
    • Nation-as-a-House Frame

    2. Discuss 2 KEY IDEAS from each required reading and 2 KEY IDEAS from one article of your choice from the supplemental readings list. (6 key ideas in total)

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): LakoffandFerguson-2006-TheFramingofImmigration.pdf, Cohen-FromStatustoAgencyDefiningMigrants.pdf, Manohar-2019-GenderedAgencyinSkilledMigrationTheCaseof.pdf, Reading Notes 3.docx, READINGNOTESTEMPLATEv7.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • short essay

    Question/prompt(s):

    How do right-wing movements and organizations conceive of gender? What are some of the ways in which femininity and masculinity are practiced? Your discussion should utilize the film “Bad Faith” (screened in class) and at least 4 of the following 5 required readings: Spierings et al, Love, Sunderland, Perry & Whitehead, and Mikkelson & Kornfield. You may include additional readings if you like, but must include at least 4 of those listed here to receive full credit.

    • Short Essay Instructions

    Each short essay is worth 12 points, and you may complete all five if you like, or can opt to complete fewer. If specific course materials are required for a particular essay, the essay question/prompt will specify. Otherwise, you may choose which course materials most support your discussion. You may, but do not need to include any outside materials. Your essay(s) should be a minimum of 800 words (no maximum), and should conform to the formatting instructions in the course assignment guidelines. Although some of the essays correspond to a time period in the course schedule, as indicated in the assignment guidelines, you may receive full credit for completing an essay at any point during the term.

    • Formatting, Citations and Submission:

    For written assignments, please use double-spacing, 12-point font, and insert page numbers. When citing materials, you may use any academic citation style (e.g. APA, MLA, ASA), as long as you use it consistently, and cite all materials you use. You may either use in-text citation with a bibliography, or you may use footnotes or endnotes instead. Uploads may be in PDF or Word only. Bruin Learn will not open documents uploaded in Pages, or other alternate word processing software.

    Grammar and writing skill are not part of the grading criterion, although proofreading is strongly recommended.

    There is no grade penalty for exceeding the minimum word count, but there is a grade penalty for writing less than the minimum specified in the assignment.

    All assignments should be in either Word or PDF format and must be submitted through Bruin Learn. Please do not submit assignments in any other formats, as they are likely to be incompatible with Bruin Learn viewing. If an assignment has been submitted and graded, please note that you may not submit it again for re-grading. No assignments are accepted by email.

    For all assignments, there are no hidden or unstated requirements. There are no expectations regarding style or formatting beyond those explicitly indicated in the syllabus and/or Bruin Learn. If the assignment instructions do not indicate that you have to follow a particular essay format or writing style, then you do not need to. Please review the instructions carefully.

  • Explore Postmodernism and Social Constructionism

    • Please answer the following questions based on the articles uploaded in your own words:
    • Explain what you find very clear and compelling in the ideas of postmodernism.
    • Determine the relationship between systems theories and postmodernism.
    • Explain how postmodernism and social constructionism inform your work as a marriage and family therapist.
    • Explore how postmodernism helps to facilitate conversations related to diversity, equity, and inclusion.
    • Explain how the ideas of postmodernism relate to the recovery model.
    • Indicate anything you find confusing in the ideas of postmodernism.
    • Identify specific questions or concerns you have regarding the connections between postmodernism and MFT.

    Length: 3-5 pages, not including title or reference pages

    References: Include a minimum of 3 scholarly resources.

    Your reflection should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards.