Category: Sociology

  • Topic idea #1

    Instructions

    The Topic Idea & Theory Selection is the first assignment for the Sociological Analysis Project.

    You will select a social problem to research and prepare a written report. You may choose to evaluate a social concern, issue, event, or phenomenon from a sociological perspective; examine the social construction of personal identity; or evaluate the roots of a social movement.

    Your research paper (at the end of the semester) will include key sociological concepts and theories while demonstrating the sociological perspective throughout. There will be individual assignments along the way. Specific grading criteria for each step of the project is provided. See Guidelines for Sociological Analysis Project.’

    1/2 typed page. This can be in formatted like an outline or written as a paragraph.

    Assignment for Step 1 Topic Idea and Theory Selection.

    For this first assignment you will need to choose a social problem specific in its characteristics (see examples in the Guidelines for Sociological Analysis Project), explain why the topic is of interest to you, how it is relevant to sociology, and what sociological theory could be used to explain the topic. Remember you will need to choose a sociological theory to help shed light on your topic — conflict, symbolic interactionism, or functionalism theory.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Guidelines for Sociological Analysis Project SOC155.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Discussion Post Reading and Reply

    Read The Social Construction of Gender by Judith Lorber (Reading 7) and Naming All the Parts by Kate Bornstein (Reading 10). Your journal entry must address all the questions below and be at least 350 words long. Do not include the questions in your answer.

    1. In what ways do you see yourself doing gender?
    2. Lorber argues that gender is a social rather than a biological construct, yet the dominant notion in our society is that gender is linked to biological factors. What would be the implications of accepting the notion that gender is socially constructed and therefore mutable?
    3. Lorber discusses many reasons why a culture maintains constructions of gender differences. What are your own ideas regarding why we maintain such constructs?
    4. What are some of the ideas Bornstein discusses about how constructs of sex and gender are connected to sexuality?

    If needed I will upload readings from book. Will also need to respond to one post from a student I upload.

  • PRACTICE

    Overview

    In this assignment, you will practice writing four research questions.

    Prompt

    In Chapters 1 and 2 of your textbook, you learned about the four types of social research: exploratory, descriptive, explanatory, and evaluative. In this activity, you will formulate four research questions about support for or against capital punishmentone question per research purpose (exploratory, descriptive, explanatory, and evaluative).

    • Exploratory
    • Write an exploratory research question either for or against capital punishment.
    • Descriptive
    • Write a descriptive research question either for or against capital punishment.
    • Explanatory
    • Write an explanatory research question either for or against capital punishment.
    • Evaluative
    • Write an evaluative research question either for or against capital punishment.

    What to Submit

    This assignment must be completed in written format. Any references should be cited in APA format.

  • MILESTONE 3

    Overview

    In this assignment, you will craft three potential research questions for your research problem.

    Prompt

    Now that you have chosen your resources and examined the influence of the methodologies and data-collection types on research, its time to use your resources to craft research questions. In Project Three: Research Questions, which is due in Module Eight, you will need to create a research question that addresses a particular research problem and explain your development process. To prepare yourself to explain your development process, think about your research problem, not a specific study, and then complete the following:

    Crafting Questions

    Craft research questions that would require the researcher to use a particular research methodology. Complete each of the following:

    • Craft a qualitative research question.
    • Be sure your research question captures your research problem and requires using a qualitative approach to answer the question.
    • Craft a quantitative research question.
    • Be sure your research question captures your research problem and requires using a quantitative approach to answer the question.
    • Craft a mixed-methodology research question.
    • Be sure your research question captures your research problem and requires using a mixed-methodology approach to answer the question.

    Examination of Questions

    Now that you have crafted a research question that would require a particular research methodology, answer each of the following to help choose which research question you will examine further in Project Three in Module Eight:

    • Which research question do you think best captures the research problem you would like to explore?
    • Remember: Youre not actually performing this research studyyoure just thinking about the research question that you would like to dig into if you were going to conduct a research study.
    • Does one of your research questions seem to represent the types of research questions in your field of study more than the others?
    • Is there anything you noticed about the creation of these research questions? Was there something that surprised you in their creation? What stood out to you as you were crafting each question?

    Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

    1. Craft a qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methodology research question about a specific research problem.
    2. Examine research questions in order to select a complex question.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): MILESTONE 1 (2) RESEARCH.docx, Milestone 2 RESEARCH.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • FINAL MILESTONE

    Overview

    The final project for this course is the creation of an executive summary report. You will write a summary, conduct a crime assessment, and create a profile of a criminal. You will then develop a conclusion and consider the investigative use of the information you have compiled. Criminal psychology encompasses a wide range of information about someone which can be drawn together, synthesized, and written into a format used by the criminal justice system prior to an arrest. Typically, criminal psychologists are called upon to provide advice and consultation when the crimes are not straightforward. Law enforcement officers are experts at tracking data and looking for crime-related clues to help them solve a case. However, when they need assistance determining who a criminal is, or what a criminals motivation might bein a predictive sensethey rely on the capabilities of professionals who are versed both in criminology and psychology. A criminal profile emerges as data comes together. This is not the same as the information you see on the news; rather, it is a comprehensive look at the biological, psychological, social, and environmental factors that make a person unique to a criminal case. Some of the information is based on empirical data and some is based on educated assumptions made by the criminal psychologist.

    In this executive summary report, you will look at a variety of factors and work to answer the question who is this person? You will examine criminal statistics, lifestyle, upbringing, medical and mental health information, along with a range of other information, that will help you answer the who, what, when, where, and why of your chosen case. It will be your job to draw from your previous education and training to learn how to understand what information is relevant to your case. There is no piece of information that is too small to help you build the mosaic of how past activity can help predict future activity. Your profile will be thorough, addressing all of the areas and questions above for the aim of assisting investigators to understand the criminal and his or her motivations and motives as well as the risk of the criminal activity continuing in the future. Through prompts and independent research outside of the text, youll peer into the world of investigative profiling.

    The project is divided into two milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Three and Five. The final product will be submitted in Module Seven.

    In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:

    • Assess biological, developmental, and environmental factors to determine the impact on criminal behavior
    • Apply relevant psychological theories to criminal behavior in order to analyze motivation
    • Apply psychological methods to the development of a psychological profile that synthesizes relevant data
    • Determine appropriate intervention strategies related to criminal behavior supported by psychological theory and research

    Prompt

    You will complete an executive summary report that includes criminal and psychological aspects of a particular crime to inform the executive team in order to prevent or intervene in criminal behavior. You may choose one of the following three scenarios to complete your final project:

    1. DOMESTIC TERROR

    Specifically, you must address the critical elements listed below. Most of the critical elements align with a particular course outcome (shown in brackets).

    1. Summary
    2. Summarize the case provided. In your summary, include key facts and demographic information.
    3. Develop initial hypothesis about the potential motivation to commit the crime. As you consider the motivation, identify the type of crime that was committed.
    4. Crime Assessment
    5. Compare data and evidence of similar crimes.
    6. Identify patterns found in similar crimes.
    7. Make inferences about motivation of the identified individual based on case evidence and comparison to similar crimes.
    8. Profile
    9. Develop a demographic summary of the individual based on analysis of data from the case.
    10. Explain the impact that biological factors of the case had on the individuals behavior.
    11. Explain the impact that developmental factors of the case had on the individuals behavior.
    12. Explain the impact that environmental factors of the case had on the individuals behavior.
    13. Apply theories to the emerging hypothesis of the motivation of your chosen subject. In your response, consider the biological, psychological, social, and criminal violence theories.
    14. Conclusion and Investigative Use
    15. Develop a global summary based on a synthesis of the inputs, crime assessment, and profile.
    16. Anticipate future behavior based on predictive analysis.
    17. Develop intervention strategies to mitigate future criminal behavior. Be sure to explain how your strategies will impact future behavior.
    18. Discuss limitations of data to developing your report. In your response, consider the information that was missing that you wish you had and reliability and validity of the data you reviewed.
    19. Based on your report, discuss how the information collected contributed to the capture, understanding, and prosecution of the individual.

    Milestones

    Milestone One: Summary and Crime Assessment

    In Module Three, you will submit a draft of your summary and crime assessment. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone One Rubric.

    Milestone Two: Profile

    In Module Five, you will submit a draft of the profile. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Two Rubric.

    Final Submission: Executive Summary Report

    In Module Seven, you will submit your final project. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements of the final product. It should reflect the incorporation of feedback gained throughout the course. You will add the conclusion and investigative use section to the final project submission. This submission will be graded with the Final Project Rubric.

    MILESTONE 2 GUIDELINES:

    Overview

    The final project for this course is the creation of an executive summary report. You will write a summary, conduct a crime assessment, and create a profile of a criminal. You will then develop a conclusion and consider the investigative use of the information you have compiled. Criminal psychology encompasses a wide range of information about someone which can be drawn together, synthesized, and written into a format used by the criminal justice system prior to an arrest. Typically, criminal psychologists are called upon to provide advice and consultation when the crimes are not straightforward. Law enforcement officers are experts at tracking data and looking for crimerelated clues to help them solve a case. However, when they need assistance determining who a criminal is, or what a criminals motivation might bein a predictive sensethey rely on the capabilities of professionals who are versed both in criminology and psychology. A criminal profile emerges as data comes together. This is not the same as the information you see on the news; rather, it is a comprehensive look at the biological, psychological, social, and environmental factors that make a person unique to a criminal case. Some of the information is based on empirical data and some is based on educated assumptions made by the criminal psychologist.

    In this executive summary report, you will look at a variety of factors and work to answer the question who is this person? You will examine criminal statistics, lifestyle, upbringing, medical and mental health information, along with a range of other information, that will help you answer the who, what, when, where, and why of your chosen case. It will be your job to draw from your previous education and training to learn how to understand what information is relevant to your case. There is no piece of information that is too small to help you build the mosaic of how past activity can help predict future activity. Your profile will be thorough, addressing all of the areas and questions above for the aim of assisting investigators to understand the criminal and his or her motivations and motives as well as the risk of the criminal activity continuing in the future. Through prompts and independent research outside of the text, youll peer into the world of investigative profiling.

    For this Milestone Two task, you will complete a draft of the profile portion of the final project assessment.

    Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

    1. Profile
    2. Develop a demographic summary of the individual based on analysis of data from the case.
    3. Explain the impact that biological factors of the case had on the individuals behavior
    4. Explain the impact that developmental factors of the case had on the individuals behavior.
    5. Explain the impact that environmental factors of the case had on the individuals behavior.
    6. Apply theories to the emerging hypothesis of the motivation of your chosen subject. In your response, consider the biological, psychological, social, and criminal violence theories.

    Critical ElementsExceeds Expectations

    Meets Expectations

    Partially Meets Expectations

    Does Not Meet Expectations

    Criterion Score

    Summary: Summarize the Case

    18 points

    Exceeds expectations and response demonstrates an advanced ability to distill key details from a provided case study

    15.3 points

    Summarizes the case study and includes key facts and demographic information

    9.9 points

    Summarizes the case study but summary is missing key facts or demographic information

    0 points

    Does not summarize the case study

    Score of Summary: Summarize the Case,

    9.9 / 18

    Criterion Feedback

    You didn’t really give any background of the case. Much more is needed here to provide evidence that leads you to your hypothesis.

    Summary: Initial Hypothesis

    18 points

    Exceeds expectations and response demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of the potential motivation to commit the crime

    15.3 points

    Develops initial hypothesis about the potential motivation to commit the crime

    9.9 points

    Develops initial hypothesis about the potential motivation to commit the crime but the hypothesis is cursory or lacks detail

    0 points

    Does not develop an initial hypothesis about the potential motivation to commit the crime

    Score of Summary: Initial Hypothesis,

    18 / 18

    Criterion Feedback

    Great job identifying your hypothesis and providing supportive evidence, though there were no sources provided.

    Crime Assessment: Compare

    18 points

    Exceeds expectations and comparison is exceptionally clear and includes exceptional detail

    15.3 points

    Compares data and evidence of similar crimes

    9.9 points

    Compares data and evidence of similar crimes but comparison is cursory or contains inaccuracies

    0 points

    Does not compares data and evidence of similar crimes

    Score of Crime Assessment: Compare,

    15.3 / 18

    Criterion Feedback

    I think you did well comparing Cho to other lone-actor domestic terrorists in general. However, using a specific case would have been beneficial in that it would give a concrete example.

    Crime Assessment: Identify Patterns

    18 points

    Exceeds expectations and demonstrates keen ability to identify patterns

    15.3 points

    Identifies patterns found in similar crimes

    9.9 points

    Identifies patterns found in similar crimes but response is cursory, illogical, or lacks detail

    0 points

    Does not identify patterns found in similar crimes

    Score of Crime Assessment: Identify Patterns,

    9.9 / 18

    Criterion Feedback

    You identified Cho’s patterns, but didn’t connect those to any other offenders. The point here is to demonstrate a pattern of behavior demonstrated by multiple people that have committed the same types of crimes.

    Crime Assessment: Motivation

    18 points

    Exceeds expectations and inferences show advanced ability to draw connections from evidence in multiple cases

    15.3 points

    Draws inferences about the motivation of the individual to commit the crime based on evidence in multiple cases

    9.9 points

    Draws inferences about the motivation of the individual to commit the crime but response is cursory, illogical, or lacks justification

    0 points

    Does not draw inferences about the motivation of the individual to commit the crime

    Score of Crime Assessment: Motivation,

    15.3 / 18

    Criterion Feedback

    I think you did a good job of discussing how Cho’s childhood and adolescent experiences could have led to his violent and antisocial behavior. I would like to see you expand a bit into how you believe those experiences led him to murder. There are plenty of people that get bullied or need to acculturate to a new land, but rarely does that lead to homicide. How is Cho different? What do you think about his case tipped the scales toward actually carrying out his hateful thoughts?

    Clear Communication

    10 points

    Exceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understanding

    8.5 points

    Consistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audience

    5.5 points

    Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understanding

    0 points

    Shows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication

    Score of Clear Communication,

    8.5 / 10

    Criterion Feedback

    Your work was well organized and easy to read. No issues with spelling, grammar, or structure. Your citations looked great! I think moving forward you need to cite more in-text, there were many paragraphs that had no citation despite the fact that you’re discussing learned information.

    Also, make sure you are using scholarly sources.

    TotalScore of PSY 310 Milestone One Rubric,

    76.9 / 100

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Journal 1-2 Domestic Terror (2).docx, MILESTONE 1 FINAL (1).docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Sociological analysis paper

    For this assignment, you are tasked with writing a 5-7 page research paper that applies sociological theories and concepts to a real-world scenario in South Florida. You will analyze how various sociological elementssuch as culture, socialization, inequality, deviance, power structures, and social changeinteract within a local context. The goal of this paper is to demonstrate your understanding of sociological principles by applying them to a contemporary social issue or event in South Florida.

    Important: Your research must be substantiated with scholarly sources. You are expected to conduct original research using academic journals, books, and other credible sources. Use the available in this course. The use of AI tools (including ChatGPT, Googles AI, or any other automatic content generation tools) for content creation is strictly prohibited in this assignment. This assignment will be graded on the basis of research, critical thinking, sociological application, and clarity of argument.

    Assignment Instructions

    Read the following sociological scenarios that reflect current social issues or phenomena within South Florida and choose ONE for your paper.

    The Impact of Immigration on Local Communities: Analyze how the influx of immigrants from Latin America and the Caribbean influences social dynamics, integration, and identity in South Florida, considering race, class, and cultural practices.Housing Inequality and Gentrification in Miami: Explore the impact of gentrification on low-income communities, particularly marginalized racial and ethnic groups in neighborhoods like Little Haiti or Overtown. Analyze how urban development reshapes social networks and inequalities.Social Media and Youth Culture in South Florida: Investigate how social media influences the socialization of young people in South Florida, particularly how it shapes issues of identity, self-presentation, and deviance.Climate Change and Social Inequality in Coastal Communities: Examine how communities in South Florida are affected by the rising sea levels and climate change, particularly low-income neighborhoods or communities of color. Analyze the intersectionality of environmental justice with social class and race.

    Provide a sociological overview of your chosen scenario. Discuss the historical, social, and cultural context relevant to South Florida. Include information about the regions demographics, its unique cultural landscape, and its social challenges.

    Apply Sociological Theories: Choose at least three sociological concepts/theories that relate to your topic. These might include:

    1. Social Stratification (e.g., class, race, or gender inequality)
    2. Socialization (e.g., agents of socialization like family, media, or peer groups)
    3. Power and Authority (e.g., the role of government, law enforcement, or corporations in shaping societal norms)
    4. Cultural Identity (e.g., how identity is shaped in South Florida, considering multiculturalism)
    5. Deviance (e.g., norms, laws, and responses to deviant behavior)
    6. Social Change (e.g., environmental or technological changes impacting social relations)

    Use empirical research to support your analysis. This could include:

    • Academic journal articles
    • Government reports (e.g., census data, studies by local organizations)
    • Credible news sources (e.g., reports on social movements, interviews with local leaders or activists)

    Paper Structure

    Your paper should be organized and clearly written, adhering to the following structure:

    Introduction:

    Introduce the sociological issue or phenomenon you are analyzing. Provide a brief overview of South Floridas context related to the issue. State your thesis: What is your central argument about the issue and its sociological implications?

    Literature review and analysis:

    Provide an overview of existing research on your topic, specifically focusing on studies related to South Florida.

    Summarize key sociological concepts or theories that are relevant to your topic. Then:

    1. Apply the sociological theories and concepts to analyze your chosen issue in the context of South Florida.
    2. Discuss the implications for local communities, drawing on specific examples from the region (e.g., local demographics, events, news stories).
    3. Address any sociological phenomena such as power, privilege, or resistance that may emerge.

    Conclusion:

    Summarize your findings and discuss the larger implications of the issue youve explored.

    Offer recommendations or possible solutions, if applicable.

    Citations and References:

    Use APA or MLA format for citations and references. Include a minimum of 2 scholarly sources (books, journal articles, credible reports). Make sure to include a local source that discuss South Florida specifically. Do not use AI-based tools for generating content, and ensure all sources are properly cited.

    Additional GuidelinesLength: The paper should be 5-7 pages, not including the title page or reference page.Formatting: Use standard 12-point Times New Roman font, double-spaced with 1-inch margins.*** Plagiarism: Any instances of plagiarism (including using AI tools to generate content) will result in a grade of “F” for the assignment and may lead to further academic consequences.Grading Criteria

    Your paper will be graded based on the following criteria:

    • Understanding and Application of Sociological Concepts: How well do you integrate sociological theories and concepts into your analysis of the issue?
    • Depth and Clarity of Analysis: How thoroughly do you analyze the social issue, and how clearly do you present your argument and evidence?
    • Use of Research and Evidence: Are your arguments supported by relevant, credible research and data? Are your sources properly cited?
    • Organization and Writing Quality: Is the paper well-organized and clearly written? Does it follow the correct format, with no grammatical errors or awkward phrasing? Is it 5-7 pages long?
  • Discussion 1

    500 words of substantive content use 2 quotes from the readings (citations needed)
  • Workbook sociology of gender

    SOC M162: Sociology of Gender

    WORKBOOK #1

    Name & Student ID # : __________________________________________________________

    Google Doc Link/URL: __________________________________________________________

    Workbooks provide opportunities to relate course materials to media, experiences, and empirical works in a personal/reflective manner. Full credit responses meet length requirements, adhere to format/citation specifications, and sufficiently address every component of each prompt – while citing two concepts or quotes from assigned materials. A typical paragraph includes 4-8 sentences. Length specifications indicate the minimum expected, but you will not be marked down for longer replies. Insights should be original, well thought out, and supported by materials. Responses can either be elaborated on in a short essay that is 4 paragraphs long or as short answers which address each prompts components in bullet point format of the same length. Overall, Workbook #1 should come out to a total of 4 prompt responses, 16 paragraphs, and 8 cited concepts.

    No cover page or References section are necessary. When citing materials, only note the author(s), publication year, and relevant page numbers or resource details in the parentheses (i.e. Lucal, 1999, p.794). To cite any concept from a lecture, guide, or slides just include my surname, the course number, and resource or date. Examples: Plaek, 2026, SOC M162 Week #1 Guide; Plaek, 2026, SOC M162 Lecture 1-7-2026; or Plaek, 2026 SOC M162 Recorded Lecture on Identity Development). You can apply any relevant concept from any week’s materials but do not reuse the same concepts. For example, do not cite grounded theory” more than once. You may cite two different concepts from the same resource – hence, you can define and apply “biogovernmentality and “stereotype threat” for prompt #2 even though both are drawn from the Week #2 Guide. Cited materials are limited to content from slides, guides, recorded lectures, live lectures, and mandatory resources (handouts, readings, videos). Do not cite resources that were supplemental or not assigned.

    Every prompt must be initially and entirely written in a Google Doc. Make sure that our access is not restricted by clicking the blue share button (top right). In the “general access” dropdown either select anyone with the link or add me and your Grader in the “people with access” section. Do not delete any of work until your final grade has been processed by the Registrar. Grade deductions and/or referrals to the Dean may result due to failure to complete all work in a Google Doc and/or if any portion appears to be AI generated, plagiarized, your own work submitted to another class, or insights that we already covered in class (thus not your own).

    Type replies using a single-spaced standard font and size on numbered pages with 1-inch margins. List your name, student ID, and the shareable link/URL for your Google Doc followed by your response to each prompt. Make sure that directions & rubrics for each prompt are removed. Please view the example prompt response in Canvas to see how this assignment and citations should be structured. If theres any prompt that youre uncomfortable with, discuss alternative options with me at least one week before the deadline. Upload as a Google Doc to its allotted space in the Assignments tab of Canvas by Wednesday 2/11 @ 11:59pm.

    TOTAL POSSIBLE = 25 points

    -0.75 points will be deducted for each missing or incorrectly applied citation;

    -6 if there are no course materials properly cited in all 4 prompts (8 total are required)

    Unless there are documented/exigent circumstances, 3% (-0.75) will be subtracted from the overall score for each day its late. 30% (-7.5 pts) will be deducted if 10+ days past due

    -10% off any prompt with lengthy quotes, titles listed in responses, or redundant content

    -3 points for not adhering to format (standard font/size, numbered pages, single spaced, 1-inch margins)

    PROMPT #1 SOCIALIZATION (+5.5 points)

    (#1) Reflect on these aspects related to your childhood experiences, and elaborate on the following points:

    • What are some of your earliest memories about gender socialization experiences?
    • How did these practices represent a form of borderwork/boundarywork?
    • How did these practices reinforce the binary gender system?
    • How can such interactions/ideologies contribute to 3 inequalities or differential outcomes throughout ones life?

    up to 5.5 points (+1.25 childhood gender socialization experiences; +1 how these practices reflect borderwork; +1 how practices reinforce binary gender system; +0.75 x 3 inequalities/outcomes)

    PROMPT #2 BIOGOVERNMENTALITY (+6.5 points)

    (#2) Consider how your own experiences within grade school relate to our class discussions about Martins research and the scenes from Kindergarten Cop. Then address each of these components:

    • What is hidden curriculum and how does it differ from explicit lessons or formal rules?
    • Summarize 3 ways that gender was constructed interactionally by teachers from your school
    • What may such practices teach kids about gender norms related to identities, behaviors, ideals and/or beliefs?
    • How may these biogovernmental practices discipline bodies in ways that serve 3 institutional/school interests?

    up to +6.5 points (+0.5 define hidden curriculum; +0.5 how this differs from explicit lessons or rules; +0.75 x 3 constructions of gender reinforced by your teachers; +1 what these practices convey about gender; +0.75 x 3 specific institutional interests these practices served to your school)

    PROMPT #3 IDENTITY (+5.5 points)

    (#3) Reflect on these aspects related to your gender performances, and elaborate on the following components:

    • Describe an instance when you have in some way engaged in trying on gender
    • What have been some core aspects with how you choose to do and display gender? How do expressions or adornments (i.e. clothing, hairstyles, accessories, embodiments) contribute to your sense of gender identity?
    • How has your identification with gender in some way changed at any point/s in your life, and what do you think influenced these shifts? Examples to consider when responding to this component include: Was there any moment/s when gender felt less or more important to you? Did performing certain gender displays feel more necessary in specific contexts than others? Was there some aspect of your gender expression that you altered?
    • What and/or who do you think might have inspired some of the ways that you have chosen to do gender? Influences can include family members, friends, subcultures, celebrities etc.

    up to +5.5 points (+1 trying on gender; +1.5 doing & displaying gender; +1 some change within gender identification and/or performance; +1 what might have influenced change; +1 inspirations)

    PROMPT #4 MEDIA & THEORIES (+7.5 points)

    (#4) Watch a TV show, TV episode, or film (that has not already been discussed in this class) which portrays a social problem related to gender. Select 3 different perspectives from the Feminist Theories Handout which I posted in the Week #5 module. First describe the social problem related to gender, and how the character/s are impacted by it. Then provide a detailed summary of how the source/s of the problem would be understood each feminist perspective, and what solutions each theory would specifically recommend for addressing the problem.

    TV SHOWS: Glow, Transparent, Pose, Orange is the New Black, The Deuce, Jasmine, Marvelous Mrs. Maisel, Handmaids Tale, Good Girls Revolt, Mad Men, The Fosters, Adolescence, Looking, Euphoria

    FILMS: Monster, Precious, Frida, Mean Girls, Moxie, Set It Off, Hidden Figures, Persepolis, Girl Interrupted, Confirmation, She Said, League of Their Own, Boys Dont Cry, Thelma & Louise, Hustlers, American Psycho, Fight Club, Easy A, Real Women Have Curves, Fire Island, The Color Purple, Joy Luck Club, North Country, Maria Full of Grace, Dallas Buyers Club, Brokeback Mountain, The Danish Girl

    • Describe social problem related to gender
    • How this problem impacts the lives of some character/s
    • How feminist theory #1 would explain the problem
    • Solutions theory #1 would propose to address the problem
    • How feminist theory #2 would explain the problem
    • Solutions theory #2 would propose to address the problem
    • How feminist theory #3 would explain the problem
    • Solutions theory #3 would propose to address the problem

    up to +7.5 points (+0.75 describe social problem related to gender; +0.75 how problem impacts the character/s; +1 x 3 how each theory explains the problem; +1 x 3 solutions from each theory)

    WORKBOOK #1 RUBRIC

    PROMPT #1 (TOTAL / +5.5)

    /+1.25 gender socialization experiences in childhood

    /+1 how these practices function as borderwork

    /+1 how practices reinforce a binary gender system

    /+0.75 x 3 how this may contribute to inequalities/differential outcomes

    PROMPT #2 (TOTAL /+6.5)

    /+0.5 define hidden curriculum

    /+0.5 how hidden curriculum differs from explicit lessons or rules

    /+0.75 x 3 constructions of gender that are taught/reinforced in this educational setting

    /+1 what these convey to kids about gender

    /+0.75 x 3 specific institutional interests these practices served to your school

    PROMPT #3 (TOTAL / +5.5)

    /+1 experience with trying on gender

    /+1.5 experiences with doing & displaying gender

    /+1 some change within gender identification and/or performance

    /+1 what might have influenced this change

    /+1 inspirations of your gender expressions

    PROMPT #4 (TOTAL / +7.5)

    /+0.75 describe social problem related to gender

    /+0.75 how problem impacts the character/s

    /+1 how theory #1 explains the problem

    /+1 solutions proposed by theory #1

    /+1 how theory #2 explains the problem

    /+1 solutions proposed by theory #2

    /+1 how theory #3 explains the problem

    /+1 solutions proposed by theory #3

    ____ citation penalties (-0.75 for each missing or incorrect citation; -6 if none; 8 total required)

    ____ late penalties (-0.75 per day late; or -7.5 for 10+ days late)

    _____ formatting penalties (-3)

    _____ -10% from any prompt with lengthy quotes, titles listed in responses, or redundant content

    SOC M162 WORKBOOK #1 RUBRIC
    SOC M162 WORKBOOK #1 RUBRIC
    Criteria Ratings Pts
    PROMPT #1 – gender socialization experiences in childhood (+1.25)

    1.25 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 1.25 pts

    how these practices function as borderwork (+1)

    1 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 1 pts

    how practices reinforce a binary gender system (+1)

    1 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 1 pts

    how this may contribute to inequalities/differential outcomes (+0.75 x 3)

    2.25 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 2.25 pts

    PROMPT #2 – define hidden curriculum (+0.5)

    0.5 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 0.5 pts

    how hidden curriculum differs from explicit lessons or rules (+0.5)

    0.5 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 0.5 pts

    constructions of gender that are taught/reinforced in this educational setting (+0.75 x 3)

    2.25 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 2.25 pts

    what these convey to kids about gender (+1)

    1 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 1 pts

    specific institutional interests these practices served to your school (+0.75 x 3)

    2.25 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 2.25 pts

    PROMPT #3 – experience with trying on gender (+1)

    1 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 1 pts

    experiences with doing & displaying gender (+1.5)

    1.5 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 1.5 pts

    some change within gender identification and/or performance (+1)

    1 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 1 pts

    what might have influenced this change (+1)

    1 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 1 pts

    inspirations of your gender expressions (+1)

    1 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 1 pts

    PROMPT #4 – describe social problem related to gender (+0.75)

    0.75 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 0.75 pts

    how problem impacts the character/s (+0.75)

    0.75 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 0.75 pts

    how theory #1 explains the problem (+1)

    1 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 1 pts

    theory #1 solutions proposed (+1)

    1 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 1 pts

    how theory #2 explains the problem (+1)

    1 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 1 pts

    theory #2 solutions proposed (+1)

    1 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 1 pts

    how theory #3 explains the problem (+1)

    1 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 1 pts

    theory #3 solutions proposed (+1)

    1 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 1 pts

    CITATION PENALTIES (-0.75 for each missing or incorrect citation; -6 if none; 8 total required)

    0 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 0 pts

    LATE PENALTIES (-0.75 per day late; or -7.5 for 10+ days late)

    0 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 0 pts

    FORMATTING PENALTIES (-3)

    0 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 0 pts

    -10% from any prompt with lengthy quotes, titles listed in responses, or redundant content

    0 pts

    Full Marks

    0 pts

    No Marks

    / 0 pts

    Total Points: 0

    Requirements: 16 paragraphs

  • CT#4

    These will cover the reading material for that week in which they are listed. Check the reading assignment calendar for exact dates these are due. The papers will be about 2+ pages, single-spaced, Times New Roman, 12-point font, 1 margins, no heading.

    They must be between 1200-1300 words in length. I only want your name at the top and nothing else; again, you need to meet the word requirement. Points will be deducted if you use larger font, spread out your font, adjust your margins, dont meet the word count, etc.These papers will include your thoughts on the assigned reading (there is no formal prompt). It is expected that the assignment will be well edited, thoughtful, and written in true essay format. Points will be deducted for short papers, poor grammar, bullet points, and the like.The papers will be checked with Turnitin.com, so do not collaborate with others.

    You are NOT allowed to use AI, Grammarly, ChatGPT, Guru, Synthesis or any other word spinner or outside software for these papers. If so, a 0 will be given!

    Think of these writing like a journal. If I asked “what was the reading about this week”, you will then write….. Again, nothing formal, just you typing your thoughts, feelings, personal experiences, etc. about the week’s readings.

    Quotes from the book can be used but should not be the majority of your paper and should be marked as quotations so as not to plagiarize. The paper should not show more than 10% match with other sources in Turnitin.com. These papers can include personal stories of experiences you have had related to this section, information from the research you found in the books that sheds more light on the topic, questions/arguments about the reading you want to bring to light, thoughts on applications of the material to your own life, etc. This is your time to show you thoroughly read the material, understand it and can apply it. Late assignment will be given a 0

  • 8030 week 4

    In this assignment, research the funding sites given in this and previous weeks to find a source that might fund your project. Provide specific details on the funding source, including the name, type (public or private), affiliations, mission, amount of grant, list of requirements, and eligibility. You may not find all this information (especially for non-government grants) on the grant search sites. You may need to search the Internet for information on the organization. It is always best to know as much as you can about the funding sources before applying.

    In a 35 page paper, identify the steps you took to identify a funding source, describe in as much detail as is available the parameters of the grant, and evaluate the fit between your project’s needs and the grant’s target. Finally, evaluate whether there are any potential ethical issues between the grant’s parameters and requirements and the NASW code of ethics. Consider where these factors align, but also where they diverge. Use scholarly sources to back your arguments regarding fit.

    Submission Requirements

    Your paper should meet the following requirements:

    • Written communication: Develop accurate written communication and thoughts that convey the overall goals of the assignment and do not detract from the overall message. Your paper should demonstrate graduate-level writing skills.
    • References: 48 references to text, peer reviewed journal articles, and/or credible websites (no more than 2 web sources).
    • Number of pages: 35 double-spaced pages. Note: Page count does not include cover page or references. Abstract not required.
    • Formatting: Use 12-pt, Arial or Times New Roman font; MS Word documents only.
    • APA style and formatting: Use current APA style and formatting.

    CDC.gov, SAMHSA.gov, and NIH.gov.

    During our conversation last week, I highlighted the issue of the “funding cliff” and how grants aimed solely at short-term crises often neglect the long-term, trauma-informed counseling that students truly require. To address this issue, we need to change our focus from merely responding to “crisis events” to confronting the persistent trauma that impacts student success. In order to persuade a funding entity that this is a critical and local issue in Massachusetts, I would utilize the following five data sources:

    • Massachusetts Youth Risk Behavior Survey (MYRBS): This biannual survey provides state-level data on student health, including rates of “feeling sad or hopeless” and suicidality. Using the most recent 2025 or 2023 reports allows for a direct comparison between student needs and current staffing levels.
    • Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) School Resource Ratios: Data from 20242025 indicates that the school social worker to student ratio in Massachusetts remains significantly lower than the recommended 1:250 ratio. This quantitative gap is essential for proving that existing staff are too stretched to provide long-term care.
    • Childhood Trauma Task Force Annual Reports: Reports from 2024 and 2025 detail the prevalence of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) among Massachusetts youth, showing that over a third of students have experienced at least one form of significant trauma. This justifies the move from “crisis” to “trauma-informed” sustained funding.
    • District-Level Student Health Assessments (e.g., SHAPE or SELIS): Local tools like the Social and Emotional Learning Indicator System (SELIS) or district-specific YRBS results (like those from Burlington or Newton) provide the granular, “hyper-local” data funders often prefer over generic state averages.
    • Safe and Supportive Schools Framework Self-Reflection Tool: This DESE-endorsed assessment helps schools identify gaps in their multi-tiered systems of support (MTSS). Citing this demonstrates that the school has already done the internal “grant readiness” work and identified long-term counseling as a specific strategic deficiency.

    Requirements: 1-2