Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • Mgt422-w3

    422

    No Plagiarism , No Matching will be acceptable .clear and presented using APA Style Reference .

    All answers must be typed using Times New Roman ( Size12 , Double-space)font .

    No pictures containing text will be acceptable and will be considered plagiarism.

    proper examples and explanations for each questions.

    – No short answer as it’s not acceptable for this assignment

    the answer should be sufficient

    Textbook

    Trevino, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2016). Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk about How to Do It Right. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Management Question

    Complete in your own words. It will be run through a plagiarism checker. Thanks.

    Management liked your teams presentation about expanding the organization to your recommended country and would like to learn more about identified issues with that country.

    Using your resources and recommendation from Week 3(attached), identify 3 human resource considerations with your selected country, such as labor laws and safety. Provide a recommendation for dealing with the identified issues. For each identified issue, include the following:

    • A description of the issue
    • An explanation of why that issue could arise if Southwest were to expand into the chosen country
    • A recommended strategy for dealing with the issue, including enough detail that specific tactical actions could be developed

    Create a 10- to 12-slide presentation on your expansion recommendation along with potential issues for the Southwest Board of Directors. Include speaker notes detailed enough so a colleague can give the presentation without previous knowledge.

    Cite all sources.

    Format your citations according to APA guidelines.

    *****there is nothing else thanks**

  • Fixing mistakes for systematic Literature Review ” The Effec…

    Hello, your task is to fix mistakes for a systematic literature review over the topic “The Effect of Tennis-Specific Injury-Prevention Programs on Musculoskeletal Injury Incidence, Severity, and Athlete Availability Among Professional Tennis Players: A Systematic Review.”

    Here is feedback on what must be fixed:

    • Several cited sources are not used in the LR.
    • The conclusions from your studies do not match the reported purposes and are written in highly unprofessional language.
    • Many statement throughout are not supported with a citation.
    • Results of the literature search are not included.
    • Studies are not evaluated although you indicate that you did this using Cochrane’s tool.
    • Many of your conclusions appear to be based on a single study (or very few studies) not the body of literature.
    • You mention 31 articles are analyzed but only 21 are mentioned and cited.

    But this is not everything. All the mistakes and feedback you can find in the first PDF file uploaded below

    Also, ensure the literature review is in a Word document and that all pages have page numbers. If you have any questions about the handwriting feedback in the 1 PDF file, let me know. All the sources you can find on the citations page at the end of my literature review. Let me know if you can’t access them, and I will provide you artucles what needed


    Everything must be written without AI and no plagiarism.

    Here are the rubrics for this Lit review:

    Goal To synthesize literature on a specific topic to draw conclusions and make recommendations.

    For this class, each student will write a literature review over a topic of interest. For this assignment we will blend elements of a systematic literature review and those of a practical literature review. The purpose of this is to establish a systematic process for selecting, evaluating, and including articles to answer the research question, while also providing practical recommendations for using the information in the literature review. This assignment should be written following research writing and systematic literature review format guidelines presented in class. This assignment will include the following sections of a systematic literature review (plus one for this class only; #7):

    1. Ancillary pages (cover page and table of contents)
    2. Abstract
    3. Introduction
    4. Methodology including search strategy and inclusion criteria
    5. Results including a table
    6. Discussion
    7. Practical Applications/Recommendations
    8. Reference list

    Requirements:

    • Topic:
      • Your topic must be one from a sub-discipline within exercise science. Nutrition or wellness topics should not be considered.
      • Your topic must be approved in advance by the instructor in writing (email is appropriate). There is not a due date for this, but well in advance is recommended to give you sufficient time to complete the assignment.
    • Sources:
      • A minimum of 25 scholarly sources are required for this assignment.
      • At least 20 must be primary sources (as defined by APA) reviewed in the literature review.
    • Proper Citation
      • Sources must be properly cited in APA format. The reference list must match in-text citations. All articles cited in text must be cited in the reference list. All articles in the reference list must be cited in text.
      • Failure to properly cite all sources used in the literature review is considered plagiarism.
    • Format
      • APA format as described in the Publication Manual (7th edition) is required for all parts of this assignment.
      • Written in the format of a systematic literature review with the addition of recommendations for practice
    • Submission
      • The assignment should be saved in MS Word

    Literature Review

    Complete

    Cover Page & Table of Contents

    Abstract

    • 150-250 words
    • Includes purpose, method, results, conclusions

    Introduction

    • Clear statement of the problem to be addressed in the literature review worded as a purpose statement or research question
    • Brief overview of the importance of the problem
    • Organization of the literature review

    Method

    • Literature search strategy is clearly explained
    • Selection criteria are outlined in detail
    • Quality standards are explained

    Results

    • Results of the literature search are reported
    • A minimum of 20 studies (primary sources) evaluated and synthesized
    • All studies are synthesized and finding reported clearly and concisely, yet in sufficient detail to understand the relevant findings in the literature. This section should not be a series of abstracts over each article.

    Table for Data Analysis

    • A minimum of 20 primary studies are included
    • Table includes relevant information (study type, objective, population, methods, outcomes, comments and conclusion; see Table 14.2 in textbook)

    Discussion

    • Major findings are summarized and explained
    • Limitations are reported
    • Gaps in the literature are addressed and recommendations for future study are given
    • Conclusions are based on literature, not on opinion or judgment.
    • Conclusions relate to the primary problem to be addressed

    Practical Applications/Recommendations

    • Gives 3 specific recommendations or ways the information in the review can be used
    • Recommendations are specific, practical, and clearly based on the results of the review
    • One recommendation can be for future study or a clear statement of what we cannot recommend at this point.

    Format

    • Minimum of 25 sources are cited; at least 20 of those are primary sources included in the results section.
    • Topic approved in advance; all articles relate to the topic and to each other.
    • Well-written, easy to read, logically organized; flows well from topic to topic.
    • APA format is used throughout including the reference list, in-text citations, headings, abbreviations, statistical results, etc.
      • Sources must be properly cited in APA format. The reference list must match in-text citations. All articles cited in text must be cited in the reference list. All articles in the reference list must be cited in text.
    • Meets Proofread for Errors Policy see syllabus for details
    • Meet AI Policy see syllabus for details

  • Management Question

    Respond to each of the following in a minimum of 250 -300 words each. They will be run through a plagiarism checker.

    Imagine you are the HR Director for an organization that is planning to do business in one of the countries listed in Table 15.2 of your textbook(Japan….See my reasons for Japan below in bold)

    Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

    • Which of those countries fascinates you the most, and why?
    • According to the information in that table, what are the key cultural differences between the United States and the country you chose? In that other country, how effective do you think each of the following practices will be, and why?
    • Extensive assessment of individual abilities for selection
    • Individually based appraisal systems
    • Suggestion systems
    • Self-managing work teams
    • *********My reasons for Japan are below**************************************************


    Table 15.2 to prepare our organization for global expansion, Japan would fascinate me the most because of the deep interplay between culture, work ethic, and organizational behavior.

    Japans business environment is shaped by a unique blend of tradition and modernity. What captures my attention most is the collectivist mindset that influences everything from decisionmaking to conflict resolution. In Japan, harmony (wa) is not just a cultural valueits a guiding principle for workplace interactions. As an HR leader, this would require rethinking how we approach leadership development, communication styles, and performance management. For example, Western-style direct feedback might be perceived as confrontational, so coaching managers on more indirect, relationshipcentered communication would be essential.

    Another fascinating aspect is Japans emphasis on long-term employment relationships. Loyalty between employer and employee is traditionally strong, and job-hopping is far less common than in the United States. This would influence how we design retention strategies, career pathways, and onboarding programs.

    Finally, Japans commitment to precision, quality, and continuous improvement (kaizen) aligns well with organizations that value operational excellence. Integrating these principles into our HR practices could elevate our global standards.

  • Journal review

    Overview

    The written part of the Final deals with looking at a given research article and using your knowledge of the terms and concepts in the first half of the class to address the quality of the methodology in the paper.

    Learning Objective(s)

    • W7 – 13

    Conditional Access

    • You must submit W7-12 homework before you can access the Final.

    Grading Criteria

    • 2 to 4 pages
    • Double spaced with 1 inch margins
    • Make sure to label each section that corresponds to the topic you are addressing one for each of the following:
      • Data types
      • Sample Selection methodology
      • Validity and Reliability
      • The hypotheses
      • Data analysis selection
      • Power analysis
    • Citations in APA style
    • Proofread for spelling, grammar, and readability

    Due Date

    • By 11:59 PM on Tuesday

    Instructions

    1. Access the following article:
      Wardle, J., Carnell, S., Haworth, C. M., Farooqi, I. S., O’Rahilly, S., & Plomin, R. (2008).. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 93(9), 3640-3643.
    2. Read the article. In a word document, comment on the quality and usage of the statistical methods utilized in the article. You should address everything that we have learned thus far in the course about
      • Data types
      • Sample Selection methodology
      • Validity and Reliability
      • The hypotheses
      • Data analysis selection
      • Power analysis
    3. Your discussion must include the following:
      1. Did the author(s) make use of the concepts listed above?
      2. How were the concepts applied?
      3. Did the author(s) apply the concepts appropriately and completely?
    4. Submit the word document.

    Rubric

    Final P2 Rubric

    Final P2 Rubric
    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics

    5 ptsLevel 4Paper uses proper spelling, mechanics, and appropriate punctuation. Includes APA citations as required.4.5 ptsLevel 3Paper includes minor mechanical, punctuation, or spelling errors. May have APA citation errors.

    4 ptsLevel 2Paper includes many mechanical, punctuation, or spelling errors. Contains APA citation errors or lacks citations.0 ptsLevel 1Paper includes multiple errors that distract readers from the message of the content. Does not cite sources.

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDocument format

    5 ptsLevel 4All formatting guidelines were met4.5 ptsLevel 3Most formatting guidelines were met

    4 ptsLevel 2Some of the formatting guidelines were met0 ptsLevel 1None of the formatting guidelines were met

    5 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Types

    11 ptsLevel 4Were correctly and accurately addressed9.8 ptsLevel 3

    8.7 ptsLevel 2Werent fully addressed and/or some were incorrect.0 ptsLevel 1Data types werent addressed

    11 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSample Selection

    11 ptsLevel 4Were correctly and accurately addressed9.8 ptsLevel 3Were mostly correctly and accurately addressed

    8.7 ptsLevel 2Werent fully addressed and/or some were incorrect.0 ptsLevel 1Measure of center or spread werent addressed

    11 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeValidity and Reliability

    11 ptsLevel 4Were correctly and accurately addressed9.8 ptsLevel 3Were mostly correctly and accurately addressed

    8.7 ptsLevel 2Werent fully addressed and/or some were incorrect.0 ptsLevel 1Sampling wasnt addressed

    11 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHypotheses

    11 ptsLevel 4Were correctly and accurately addressed9.8 ptsLevel 3Were mostly correctly and accurately addressed

    8.7 ptsLevel 2Werent fully addressed and/or some were incorrect.0 ptsLevel 1Graphs werent addressed

    11 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis Selection and Power Analysis

    11 ptsLevel 4Were correctly and accurately addressed9.8 ptsLevel 3Were mostly correctly and accurately addressed

    8.7 ptsLevel 2Werent fully addressed and/or some were incorrect.0 ptsLevel 1Reliability and Validity wasnt addressed

    11 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDocument format

    5 ptsLevel 4All formatting guidelines were met4.5 ptsLevel 3Most formatting guidelines were met

    4 ptsLevel 2Some of the formatting guidelines were met0 ptsLevel 1Sections were not labeled.

    5 pts

    Total Points: 70

  • Mgt325week3

    325

    No Plagiarism , No Matching will be acceptable .clear and presented using APA Style Reference .

    All answers must be typed using Times New Roman ( Size12 , Double-space)font .

    No pictures containing text will be acceptable and will be considered plagiarism.

    proper examples and explanations for each questions.

    – No short answer as it’s not acceptable for this assignment

    the answer should be sufficient

    Textbook

    Schilling M.A (2020),Strategic Management of Technology Innovation (6th Edition) .Mc-Graw Hill Education.

  • WEEK 6 Healthcare Informatics Discussion

    Discussion Topic

    Read and follow the instructions, check guidelines and find the attached rubric, Chapter 24, Powerpoint

    Refer to Chapter 24 for this week’s Discussion Question

    Case Discussion:

    You are a nursing educator within a large academic medical center responsible for the annual competency evaluation of nurses within the hospital and clinics. The senior vice president for quality and safety, the chief information officer, and the chief nursing information officer requested a meeting to discuss identified issues related to the electronic health record (EHR) documentation and patient safety issues regarding medication orders, management of the orders within the EHR, and administration of the medications.

    Events involving patient safety are increasing, and the senior executives believe that this is largely an issue related to competency in using the new EHR (implemented in the past 2 years). They have asked you to recommend a training and competency evaluation strategy that might affect these measures of patient safety and improve competencies related to the documentation errors they are seeing. They are taking responsibility for monitoring the progress on impact and are asking you to come back with recommendations for the education program.

    After meeting with your chief nursing officer, education department staff, directors of nursing on the units, and the staff nurses, all parties agree that it would be helpful to have a training program for the EHR that simulates clinical workflow on some of the common issues concerning medication errors.

    You and your department are responsible for the simulation center, and the following are questions for your team to consider as you design a plan for the implementation of the EHR in the simulation lab:

    1. What strategies will you use to fully implement the practice domain that replicates the EHR production domain with which nurses are currently working? Explain your answers with best practices and scholarly support.

    2. How will you identify cases related to the patient safety events that are occurring and incorporate them into the EHR to simulate what is happening and allow nurses time to practice on workflow and documentation related to these events? Explain your answers with best practices and scholarly support.

    3. How will you evaluate the nurses performance and what assessment tools will you need? Explain your answers with best practices and scholarly support.

    4. How much time do you believe you need per nurse to run through the simulated case, and how will you manage these time constraints and the schedule in the simulation center? Explain your answers with best practices and scholarly support.

    5. Will you manually load data into the EHR representing the clinical data, including data that are clinically representative of the cases in which medication and documentation errors are occurring? Explain your answers with best practices and scholarly support.

    6. What other alternative could you consider in loading clinical data representative of the conditions related to medication and documentation errors? Explain your answers with best practices and scholarly support.

    7. What challenges do you identify in the data-loading strategies? Explain your answers with best practices and scholarly support.

    Please note the grading rubric for the discussion board.

    All discussion posts must be a minimum of 350 words not including references , references must be cited in APA format 7th Edition, and must include a minimum of 2 scholarly resources published within the past 5 years.

    REFERENCES Must have DOI Numbers for professor to look them up

  • Applied Project Proposal & Literature Review Draft

    This assignment is a DRAFT that asks you to construct a clear, evidence-based narrative of your topic by integrating:

    • existing research
    • theoretical perspectives
    • patterns across sources

    Rather than introducing new theory or methods, your goal is to show how different sources interpret evidence and how those interpretations can be organized into a coherent explanation of the issue.

    This assignment builds directly on your previous work by asking:

    • How does evidence become explanation?
    • How do different interpretations shape understanding of the same issue?

    —————-

    Core Task

    You will use your sources (the ones from your annotated bibliography and two-to-three additions, if you choose) to:

  • Identify key patterns in the research
    Compare how different authors interpret similar evidence
    Construct a coherent narrative of the problem
    Show how theory helps organize and explain that narrative

    • Assignment Components

    • Problem Framing (12 pages)

    Define the issue clearly.

    Then answer:

    • How is this problem typically described?
    • What assumptions shape how it is understood?
    • Literature as Competing Interpretations (45 pages)

    This is the most important section. It relies on the work you have done in your Annotated Bibliography. Do NOT summarize one source at a time. Instead

    Organize your review around:

    • patterns in the literature
    • points of agreement and disagreement
    • different interpretations of similar evidence

    Ask yourself:

    • Do different authors explain the same issue differently?
    • What evidence do they emphasize or ignore?
    • What assumptions shape their conclusions?
    • Narrative Construction (23 pages)

    This is the new piece. Construct your own explanation by answering:

    • What is the most convincing interpretation of the issue?
    • How do the sources come together to support that interpretation?
    • What story does the evidence tell when organized coherently?

    You are not inventing new data.

    You are organizing existing evidence into a clear explanation.

    • Connection to Theory (12 pages)

    Briefly reconnect this new writing to your prior work. Explain:

    • How your chosen theory helps make sense of the narrative you constructed
    • Why this theoretical lens is useful for understanding the issue

  • Managing FNP patients

    Topic (Diabetes Mellitus Type 2)

    Submission ChecklisT:

    • 1 graphic organizer (pathophysiology)
    • 12 pages written (signs/symptoms, diagnosis)
    • Management plan (written)
    • Reference list (APA Style format; all sources used)

    Written Components

    1. Graphic OrganizerPathophysiology (1 page maximum)

    • Use a visual format like a flowchart, concept map, or diagram.
    • Ensure accuracy and label all parts clearly.
    • Tools allowed:
      • Microsoft Word or PowerPoint
      • Note: WCU is not responsible for these websites. Some free trials do not permit you to download your finished materials for free. Be sure to check all trial limits in advance. You do not have to use any of them; this is a list to provide other options. You can be creative!

    2. Signs, Symptoms, and Unique Presentations (0.51 page)

    • Describe common clinical features.
    • Include less typical or surprising cases.
    • Address age, gender, or cultural differences relevant to FNP practice.

    3. Diagnosis Process (0.51 page)

    • Explain how this condition is diagnosed in primary care.
    • Include labs, imaging, differential diagnoses, and decision-making tools.

    4. Management Plan

    Choose one format:

    • Written (0.51 page), or
    • Video extension (add 12 minutes) covering:
      • Initial workup (labs, imaging)
      • First-line and alternative medications
      • Patient education, referrals, and lifestyle guidance
      • Follow-up strategy and red flags

    Support with:

    • 1 national guideline
    • 1 peer-reviewed scholarly source (published 5 years ago)

  • Answer one question from a case

    Only answer question 4 ONLY And provide reference