part of a 6 source annotated bibliography
Category: uncategorised
-
Week 7 Course Project Final Paper
Week 7: Course Project Final Paper
- Due Sunday by 11:59pm Points 175 Submitting a file upload Available after Feb 14 at 11:59pm
Instructions
The Course Project Final Paper is due this week.
Review the in the Introduction & Resources Module for details about this project (paper).
Action
Select the Start Assignment button to begin.
Once you have uploaded your file, select Submit Assignment.
Rubric
HRM330 Week 7 Course Project Rubric
HRM330 Week 7 Course Project Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Documentation and Formatting
The paper should follow instructions as outlined under the guidelines. Include a title and reference page. At least three scholarly resources with in-text citations in the paper.
20 to >15.0 pts
Excellent
The paper completely follows the instructions as outlined under the guidelines. The title and reference pages are included. At least three scholarly resources with in-text citations were provided in the paper.
15 to >10.0 pts
Competent
The paper competently follows the instructions as outlined under the guidelines. The title and reference pages are included. At least two scholarly resources with in-text citations were provided in the paper.
10 to >5.0 pts
Fair
The paper somewhat follows the instructions as outlined under the guidelines. The title and reference pages are included. At least one scholarly resources with in-text citations were provided in the paper.
5 to >1.0 pts
Poor
The paper poorly follows the instructions as outlined under the guidelines. The title and reference pages are not both included. At least one scholarly resources with in-text citations were provided in the paper.
1 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The student did not meet the requirements.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Organization and Cohesiveness
The paper should have topical flow with like subjects in each paragraph. Paragraphs should flow and link from one topic to the next. Instructor feedback from throughout the session should be integrated. Paragraph transitions should be present and logical. Page count should follow guidelines.
20 to >15.0 pts
Excellent
The paper clearly had topical flow with like subjects in each paragraph. Paragraphs flowed and linked from one topic to the next. Instructor feedback from throughout the session was integrated. Paragraph transitions were present and logical. Page count followed the guidelines.
15 to >10.0 pts
Competent
The paper competently had topical flow with like subjects in most paragraphs. Paragraphs flowed and linked from one topic to the next. Instructor feedback from throughout the session was integrated. Paragraph transitions were present and logical. Page count mostly followed the guidelines.
10 to >5.0 pts
Fair
The paper somewhat had topical flow with like subjects in a few paragraphs. Paragraphs somewhat flowed and linked from one topic to the next. Instructor feedback from throughout the session was somewhat integrated. Paragraph transitions mostly present and logical. Page count somewhat followed the guidelines.
5 to >1.0 pts
Poor
The paper had poor topical flow with few subjects in some paragraphs. Paragraphs did not flow and link from one topic to the next. Instructor feedback from throughout the session was not completely integrated. Paragraph transitions were not clearly present and logical. Page count did not follow the guidelines.
1 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The student did not meet the requirements.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Introduction
The introduction provided sufficient background on the topic and previews the major points to be defined in the body of the paper.
25 to >20.0 pts
Excellent
The introduction clearly provided sufficient background on the topic and previews the major points to be defined in the body of the paper.
20 to >10.0 pts
Competent
The introduction competently provided background on the topic and previews most of the major points to be defined in the body of the paper.
10 to >5.0 pts
Fair
The introduction somewhat provided background on the topic and previews some of the major points to be defined in the body of the paper.
5 to >1.0 pts
Poor
The introduction did not provide sufficient background on the topic and previews very few points to be defined in the body of the paper.
1 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The student did not meet the requirements.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Content
The paper content should be thorough, yet concise. Information included should be relevant to the topic and provide depth and clarity of theories, as well as theory application. All key elements of the assignment should be covered in a substantive way. Concepts should be reviewed clearly, supported by specific details (examples or analysis), and organized logically. The paper should link theory to relevant examples of current concepts and industry practice. There should be correct use of vocabulary and theory.
65 to >45.0 pts
Excellent
The paper content was very thorough and concise. Information included was relevant to the topic and provided depth and clarity of theories, as well as theory application. All key elements of the assignment were covered in a substantive way. Concepts were reviewed clearly, supported by specific details (examples or analysis), and organized logically. The paper linked theory to relevant examples of current concepts and industry practice. The paper had the correct use of vocabulary and theory.
45 to >25.0 pts
Competent
The paper content was thorough and concise. Information included was relevant to the topic and provided depth and clarity of theories, as well as theory application. Most key elements of the assignment were covered in a competent way. Concepts were reviewed, supported by adequate details (examples or analysis), and organized logically. The paper linked theory to some examples of current concepts and industry practice. The paper had the correct use of vocabulary and theory.
25 to >10.0 pts
Fair
The paper content was somewhat thorough and concise. Information included was somewhat relevant to the topic and mostly provided depth and clarity of theories, as well as theory application. Some key elements of the assignment were covered in an adequate way. Concepts were somewhat reviewed, supported by some details (examples or analysis), and organized logically. The paper somewhat linked theory to a few examples of current concepts and industry practice. The paper mostly had the correct use of vocabulary and theory.
10 to >1.0 pts
Poor
The paper content was not thorough and concise. Information included was not completely relevant to the topic and did not provide depth and clarity of theories, as well as theory application. Few key elements of the assignment were covered. Concepts were not clearly reviewed, supported by details (examples or analysis), and organized logically. The paper did not clearly link theory to examples of current concepts and industry practice. The paper did not have the correct use of vocabulary and theory.
1 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The student did not meet the requirements.
65 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Conclusion
The conclusion is restating the importance of the topic by synthesizing the major points, include final thoughts of what is next, and state the significance of any findings. Conclusion is logical, flows from the body of the paper.
25 to >20.0 pts
Excellent
The conclusion thoroughly restated the importance of the topic by synthesizing the major points and included clear final thoughts of what was next, and stated the significance of any findings. Conclusion was very logical, flowed from the body of the paper.
20 to >10.0 pts
Competent
The conclusion competently restated the importance of the topic by synthesizing the major points and included final thoughts of what was next, and stated the significance of any findings. Conclusion was mostly logical, flowed from the body of the paper.
10 to >5.0 pts
Fair
The conclusion somewhat restated the importance of the topic by synthesizing the major points, included a few thoughts of what was next, and stated the significance of any findings. Conclusion was somewhat logical, flowed from the body of the paper.
5 to >1.0 pts
Poor
The conclusion did not completely restate the importance of the topic by synthesizing the major points, include final thoughts of what was next, and state the significance of any findings. Conclusion was not logical, flowed from the body of the paper.
1 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The student did not meet the requirements.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Editing
Sentences should be complete, clear, and concise. Sentence transitions should be present and maintain the flow of thought. Rules of grammar and punctuation should be followed. Spelling should be correct. Sentence structure to be clean and clear. The writing style should follow appropriate undergraduate-level writing within current APA style guidelines.
20 to >15.0 pts
Excellent
Sentences were complete, clear, and concise. Sentence transitions were be present and maintained the flow of thought. Rules of grammar and punctuation were followed. Spelling was correct. Sentence structure was clean and clear. The writing style completely followed appropriate undergraduate-level writing within current APA style guidelines.
15 to >10.0 pts
Competent
Sentences were competently complete, clear, and concise. Sentence transitions were be present and competently maintained the flow of thought. Rules of grammar and punctuation were followed. Minimal spelling errors were present. Sentence structure was clean and clear. The writing style followed appropriate undergraduate-level writing within current APA style guidelines.
10 to >5.0 pts
Fair
Sentences were somewhat complete, clear, and concise. Sentence transitions were be present and somewhat maintained the flow of thought. Rules of grammar and punctuation were followed. Several spelling errors were present. Sentence structure was somewhat clean and clear. The writing style somewhat followed appropriate undergraduate-level writing within current APA style guidelines.
5 to >1.0 pts
Poor
Sentences were not complete, clear, and concise. Sentence transitions were not clearly present to maintain the flow of thought. Rules of grammar and punctuation were not completely followed. Spelling errors were present. Sentence structure was not clean and clear. The writing style did not follow the appropriate undergraduate-level writing within current APA style guidelines.
1 to >0 pts
Unacceptable
The student did not meet the requirements.
20 pts
Total Points: 175
My Topic is The Future Viability of the United Auto Workers (UAW) with some information coming from the 2024 strike.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Week_3_Course_Project_Topic_Proposal_ID_10250236-17691955036151335.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
wEEK 6 ISSES ADULT
APA FORMAT
SCOTT
- Conceptualize and describe your client’s issues based on a theory of career development.(CHOOSE ANY THEORY)
- 4 PARAGRAPHS
Requirements: 4 PARAGRAPHS
-
Transcultural Nursing
Create a response for both discussion post with a positive view and understanding of the topic with 2 references and citations each in APA style from the attachments. Additional references can be used from outside sources. 150 words each
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Discussion posts feb 21.docx, Health disparities.docx, Transculture of Nursing.pdf, Transcultural Nursing Summary.docx, Transculture of Nursing.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
Old Knowledge
You will need to reread the sections on the excerpt and the section on deadly Old Knowledge to answer these bulleted questions. Answer these questions in bullet form. Do not retype each question. Each answer should imply the question.
- What was the source of Old Knowledge that got seventeenth century Galileo in trouble?
- Who popularized the Old Knowledge produced by neuroscientist Paul D. Maclean? What two mediums did he use to popularize this Old Knowledge?
- How many paragraphs are excerpted from Brooks and Winfrey’s book? How many of those explain Old Knowledge. How many explain New Knowledge? Why is one having more paragraphs than the other unimportant?
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): AcademicResearchandHigherEducation (1).docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
2C A1 26W 02
You will receive a selection of questions. Your task is to write a reflection essay on one of these questions. The assignment is a reflection paper not a demonstration of your ability to repeat the thoughts of the course instructor. You are asked to provide your own thoughts.
You must refer to lecture videos or updates. Your paper should be in conversation with the lecture material. I am not particular about citation styles. According to lecture… is an adequate way of citing lecture. You should feel encouraged to write in the first person.
Question Prompt Choices (Choose One Question)
1. Comedy films, of recent years, often rely on the mockery of other human beings (often the unrepresented or disenfranchised). What do you think the social psychological meaning of modern film humor suggests about how we co-exist with other people? If humor provokes a private response that is natural, (that we laugh without it necessarily being willed), what is it within our personal psychology that our modern comedies are stimulating, confronting, or encouraging? Are comedy films changing, or are they still mostly on the same path? What does your response say about the state of our social psychology?
2. In the last decade with the massive success of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, we have been provided with figures who are largely super human (inhuman in relation to people like you and me) and are mostly defenders of our North American system. We have also, in the last few years, been presented with heroes who were older and consistently identified as male. In many cases these heroes challenged corruptions within systems but left the systems in the place. What do these representations of heroes, and its difference from the hero that questioned society and power, tell you about the ways we are encouraged to think of fighting evil or power? Are the battles that are fought on the screen battles that matter to you. Is the understanding of heroic changing, and if so, or not, what does this say about our shifting social psychology, and does this touch how you think on a personal level?
3. Fantasy films were once cinematic representations of a desire for personal and social psychological hope in something more and better than what is generally provided in adult life. This hope, in fantasy films, tends to be supported and/or offered by magical or spiritual forces. What do you think the popularity of fantasy films says to us, as a social psychology, about the absence of spirituality or mystery in our modern understanding of the psychological self? What do you think the cost would be to popular cultures relationship to our social psychology if fantasy films, of the sort described above, faded from our screens? Is this already occurring? Given that many fans of fantasy films do not actually believe in the power of magic, is our escape to this genre a sign of promise in something other than ourselves or is it an escape into a temporary delusion where we imagine we live somewhere else, for a little while?
4. Traditionally, dystopian films have presented future worlds where natural disasters or the growing divide between those who are powerful and those who are not have led to paranoia and the need to protect yourself and your dependents to survive. Recently we have been given films where individuals are dependent on artificial intelligence technologies that are superior not only in terms of intelligence but also in basic ideas of moral goodness. What do dystopian films seek to tell us about our current reality? Why, given their often negative and condemning comments about humanity, are they popular? From feeling paranoid, to the desire for self-protection (which breeds further paranoia), to new appreciations of non-human guidance (Artificial Intelligence, what can we theorize about the social psychology of dystopian films in terms of personal warnings or social criticism?
5. In my lectures on horror films (video) I suggested horror films are largely about disorders that threaten our fragile faith in order. In the past few years, we have films focused on trauma caused by fractured social structures, including the family, mental illness, and media identity (the development and presentations of media influences as representations of oneself). We have been fearfully wondering about who we really are and whether we are the good people we want to think ourselves to be. More recently, we have had a number of horror films about threats to tight knit communities and to our children. What do you identify as a main trend in recent horror films (the past few years) and what do you think it shows about our shared fears or concerns? Are our fears about real threats or are we hiding from those?
6) All these film genres, discussed in this class (with the possible exception of fantasy films), have become more violent and graphic than they have been in the past. Many comedy films have characters badly hurt and bleeding, hero films demand violent solutions to problems, and dystopian and horror films have become more violent than they have ever been. Are we starting to change our views on the value of violence. Is it funny? Is it becoming necessary? Why is body horror such a component of many popular films? What sort of social psychological theory can you initiate based on your observations about our appreciation for more violence in our entertainment?
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Social Psychology of Popular Culture Winter 2026 First Assignment 1 (1).docx, 2C03 Penner Winter 2026.pdf, Sample Paper.docx, Comedy and Hero Films Lecture Update.pdf, SOCPSY 2C03 Sample Paper.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
Workplace performance problem and behavior analysis interven…
Overview For behavior analysts, determining the function of problem behavior is necessary to develop effective intervention plans. This is common practice not only in clinical applications but within organizations as well. In this assignment, you will pinpoint a workplace performance problem, assess the reason why the problem exists, and identify strategies to improve performance. Instructions Review the scenario provided by your instructor, then use the template provided by your instructor to complete the following: Pinpoint the performance problem. Precisely define the problem behavior so that it is clear, concise, and countable. (You may make up some details to fill in the blanks to create an ideal definition.) Conduct a PDC assessment to determine the factors contributing to the performance problem (review the chosen scenario to determine how to answer these questions). List the domain and describe the area within the domain that is responsible for the performance issue. Review the scholarly literature and identify one strategy that would address the performance problem based on the results of the assessment. Describe generally how you would implement the strategy. Visit MS in Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Research GuideLinks to an external site. for help with research. This should be a 23 paragraph description and/or brief description with example. This part should not exceed one page. Your strategies should demonstrate compassionate supervisory practices. Additional Requirements Written Communication: Writing should be free of errors that detract from the overall message. APA Formatting: References and citations are formatted according to APA style guidelines. Use Academic WriterLinks to an external site. for guidance in citing sources in proper APA style. See the Writing CenterLinks to an external site. for more APA resources specific to your degree level. Resources: At least two scholarly or professional resources. Competencies Measured By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria: Competency 1: Apply the principles of behavior analysis to supervisory practices. Pinpoint a performance problem. Complete a PDC assessment and provide a summary of the results. Competency 3: Apply compassionate approaches to supervisory practices. Identify a strategy to address the performance problem, using scholarly sources to support decisions. Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly and consistent with expectations for professionals in the field of psychology. Demonstrate an academic writing style through well-organized prose that follows assignment guidelines. Demonstrate compliance with APA citation and referencing guidelines.Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Updated Unit 6 Assignment Template Q4 2025 (1).docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
Literary Ethnography
Read a short story and complete ethnographic field notes as if you were a researcher embedded in the social space in which the characters find themselves! You will select your short story, and you will need to be sure it is detailed enough for you to make clear notes. This assignment is both a creative one and a technical one, as you will take on the role of researcher and act as if you are living among the characters. You may add to/embellish the details of the story to fill out your field notes.
You will use the following format and template to make one sample field note entry or approximately 850 words total:
Field Note Entry Template
In addition to that entry, you will add a final section at the end of approximately 350 words about the ethnical obligations an ethnographer faces when becoming part of a community of people upon which they are conducting research.
Use the documents attached for reference
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Strategies for Interpreting Qualitative Data.pdf, BIS400_FieldNoteEntryTemplate.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
Effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions for anxiety…
Evidence-Based Practice Paper (Topic; Effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions for anxiety in college students) Rationale: Social workers are expected to understand evidence-based practices (EBP)s and then to educate, network and evaluate as part of their profession. Having updated research knowledge and updated community resource knowledge about problems addressed by social workers ensures efficacious practice. Instructions: Students will write a paper on an evidence-based practice for a problem in an area of interest to the student, and then critique their community resources using the literature review as a guide. Use paper outline to write paper. Criteria for Assignment: 8-10 page paper APA style format Title page, Abstract, & Reference page 10 references minimum Paper Outline: A brief description of the problem. This section should describe the scope of the issue within your community include relevant statistics and data. A literature review of articles describing evidence-based practices for the problem. This section should be based on articles taken directly from the original research (i.e. peer reviewed journals). NOTE: Information from the articles should be synthesized, not simply described one by one. Please describe the research that establishes your chosen practice as evidence based. Include if the EBP has been researched within a diverse group. You must include 2 different groups (age, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, religion, class). At least one group has to be based on intersectionality-for example African American women, older White males, refugees, LGBTQ2IA+). If you have a difficult time finding enough articles for a particularly narrow problem (i.e. cutting/self-mutilating behaviors among Native American adolescent males), consider looking at related articles (i.e. cutting among other populations). While this may or may not be perfectly relevant, use good judgment in how would apply the findings. (By the way, your problem does NOT have to be that narrow!) A description of the services for the problem in your community. Include a listing and BRIEF description of agencies, professions employed at the agency including key professional values and orientations, practitioners, websites, support groups, community activities, etc. Identify what EBPs are utilized by the agency. You should specifically address if the agency utilized the EBP you researched above as well as any other EBPs utilized. A critique of the services in your community based on the literature review. Be sure to: Develop and use clear criteria for your critique. Focus on whether or not the service/agency utilizes the EBPs described above. You may also assess availability of services, outcome data, and other of indicators of effective practice. Give a grade for how you think your community measures up to what we know works (EBP). Give a rationale for your grade. -
Journal article analysis
Description Pick 1 Journal article on Coursepoint and write up a summary. Summary Guidelines: 1 page The summary should be written with enough detail so that a reader would not have to look at the original research to understand all the main points. A well-written summary should cover three main points: why the research was done, what happened in the experiment, and what conclusions the author drew. Why was the research done? The first section of your summary should include all the important background information and context. It should also include the authors purpose for doing the research and the goal or hypothesis. You should typically be able to pull all this information from the introduction. What happened in the experiment? Next, cover what happened in the methods and results sections of the paper. This is important for letting the reader know what happened in the experiment. Do not mix the authors analysis with this section: simply state the facts first. This will keep your summary organized. Also, try not to include too many specific numbers or details. Only offer what is necessary or helpful in explaining what happened. What conclusions did the author draw? Lastly, write about the authors analysis and everything they concluded from the experiment. Go over all the main points that the author makes here, including their conclusion, limitations, and future directions. Remember that the conclusion is not the same thing as the results. Results are the outcomes of the experiment, and conclusions are what the author says the results mean. Analysis How is this research relevant or important? **Contents All required elements are fully addressed, easily identified, and integrated into assignment. Why the research was done, what happened in the experiment as why conclusions the author drew. **APA citations and References Journal article is cited on a reference page at the end of the paper. There are no errors in formatting.Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): jounal pain.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.