Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • The Machinist (2004)

    Research one-three (1-3) outside credible independent technical analysis and/or cinematography analysis and complete the following steps for your review

    1. Write a paragraph clearly stating your technical analysis of the film. Begin the paragraph with a topic sentence that includes what technical aspect(s) of the film you will discuss.
    2. Write an additional 1-2 paragraphs supporting your opinion/analysis. This is where you emphasize specifics from your first paragraph and outside sources: You can focus on one element of the film or write about a broad breakdown in general.
    3. Provide a links and bibliography citation to your credible outside sources. MLA Style

  • Education & Teaching Question

    Assignment 1: ACEs Reflection

    (Parts 1, 2A, and 2B)

    Purpose

    This assignment is designed to deepen your understanding of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACES) and how trauma shapes learning, behavior, and teacher decision-making. You will engage with the foundational science presented in Dr. Nadine Burke Harris TED Talk, complete the ACE assessment twice, and analyze how trauma-informed principles apply to both personal insight and a realistic classroom scenario.

    Instructions

    Your reflection must include all three sections below. Organize your submission using these headings.

    Part 1 Learning from Dr. Nadine Burke Harris

    After watching the TED Talk, respond to the following:

    1. Identify one idea from the talk that expanded, challenged, or clarified your understanding of trauma.
    2. Explain how toxic stress affects learning, emotional regulation, and classroom behavior.
    3. Describe why trauma awareness is essential for educators and how it influences instructional and relational decisions.

    Part 2A Personal ACE Assessment (No Disclosure Required)

    After completing the ACE test for yourself:

    1. Without naming your score or personal history, describe what the experience of taking the assessment taught you about the ACES framework.
    2. Explain how understanding ACE science may influence your empathy, expectations, or responses as an educator.
    3. Discuss one professional insight or shift in thinking you gained from completing the assessment.

    You will not disclose your ACE score, personal trauma history, or private experiences.
    Your reflection must remain professional, not personal.

    Part 2B Scenario ACE Assessment (Marcus)

    Using the Marcus scenario provided in this module, complete the ACE assessment again and respond to:

    1. Identify at least three adversity indicators you noticed in the scenario that may affect Marcuss learning or behavior.
    2. Discuss any differences you observed between taking the ACE assessment for yourself versus taking it for a student case.
    3. Explain how understanding Marcuss likely trauma exposure should influence:
      • your instructional decisions,
      • your behavior management approach, and
      • your efforts to create emotional safety.

    Formatting Requirements

    • Length: 500700 words
    • Double-spaced, Times New Roman 12 pt
    • APA 7 formatting for any citations (TED Talk or Harvard resource)
    • Submit as a PDF or DOCX file only

    Submission Instructions

    Upload your completed reflection to Canvas under Assignment 1: ACEs Reflection.

    Grading (100 points total)

    • Part 1 TED Talk Reflection: 25 points
    • Part 2A Personal ACE Assessment Insight: 25 points
    • Part 2B Marcus Scenario ACE Application: 50 points

    Standards Alignment

    • InTASC Standards 2 & 3
    • CAEP Standard 1
    • GSU Conceptual Framework: Knowledge, Skills, and Dispositions
    • LAER Domains 2 & 3

    Requirements: Completed Assignment

  • The Constitution and its critics

    For section three, the question is: Were critics of the Constitution – most citizens and the Jeffersonian Republicans – correct? Was the Constitution a “betrayal of the American Revolution? Or were the Federalists right? Was the colonial model of democratic political culture unsustainable as a national model, and did America need a strong, centralized, governmental authority to survive? Did checks and balances and the Bill of Rights present enough safeguards and limitations to authority to ameliorate the criticisms of the Constitution that were prevalent in the late 1780s? Or were these “devices merely legislative wishful thinking? Notes: There are three basic questions in this essay problem. First, did the solutions presented by the Constitution “betray the principles of the Revolution, by implementing the same forms of government that the colonists rebelled against? Second, were the Federalists correct in claiming that the colonial model of democracy, as represented by the Articles of Confederation, simply couldn’t work in a unified, democratic nation? And third, did Federalist attempts to preserve individual rights and limit the authority of the new Constitutional government succeed? Or put another way: Was colonial democracy actually sustainable, now that America was an independent nation faced with serious emergencies, such as the economy? If not, was the solution a government such as the one proposed in the Constitution? If so, would the “fixes represented by “devices such as checks and balances and the Bill of Rights preserve an acceptable semblance of individual rights and local democratic culture in the new nation? These questions can serve as a basic outline or approach to the essay problem; answer each one, linking them together as they relate to each other, and you’ve got a reasonable essay format, in three or four parts, depending on what you conclude. Of course, it’s not enough to state opinions on the questions above; you’ll need to present factual material relevant to each, analyze that factual material, and give conclusions. These would involve, direct, specific use of the basic reading materials in the section, and – if you choose – your own research, online or in the library. Don’t hesitate to directly reference the Articles of Confederation, Constitution, Bill of Rights, Federalist Papers, etc. Now is your chance, without straying into “TLDR territory…. There are no “right or “wrong answers to this essay problem; it’s inviting your analysis and opinion – and credible opinions range widely. The grade won’t depend on your interpretation, but on whether you’ve done the effort and can sustain that interpretation on a credible analysis of existing facts. I’ve got nothing invested in whether you come down on the side of the Federalists, the Jef-Reps/Democratic Republicans, both, or neither; I’m looking for a good argument, with facts. There isn’t necessarily a “sequence of answers for this essay problem. You can, for example, argue that the majority of citizens and the Jeffersonian Republicans were right; the Constitution was a “betrayal of the Revolution, and then argue that the Federalists were also right; the colonial democratic model couldn’t work in a national democracy. (Both sides being right, you’d be arguing, isn’t actually a contradiction.) Or you could argue that both sides were in error, and a third way – perhaps an extensive reform of the existing Articles of Confederation – was available and would’ve worked. There are some other, credible arguments you could offer as well. The point is, at first reading, this essay problem may imply that either the Federalists were right, or the Jeffersonian Republicans and the majority of American citizens who were opposed to the Constitution were right – but you, the essay writer, don’t necessarily have to accept that implication. Both sides or neither side could be right or wrong; you decide, and then construct your case. While that does present a somewhat “unstructured approach to the essay problem, it also frees you up to try some interesting things. Finally, you’re probably already aware that there is a lot here that is relevant to partisan politics and issues in the United States today. I won’t go through the myriad issues that original, political questions of “authority, “individual rights, “local democracy and “limitations of power affects or adds context to; a few minutes of thought and an awareness of recent events and issues will get you there. If you want to bring up some of those issues in the context of this essay problem, that’s fine. If you don’t, that’s equally fine. It’s entirely up to you, and the only way it’ll influence your grade is if your comments lend credence to your analysis or heft to the obvious effort you’ve put into the essay. But you can also lend credence or add heft in other ways without referencing current affairs – so again, it’s up to you. One thing I can promise you with certainty: Whatever your point of view, you very likely won’t offend me. As always, I will be looking for essays that show obvious effort, have cogent, coherent analyses of the issues the essay problem raises, use factual material in support of the analysis, are written clearly and effectively, use citations and have a bibliography – in that order or priority. Let me know if you have any questions. JM

  • Ecological systems Theory Framework and Application to Resea…

    PROFESSORS INSTRUCTION:

    Theoretical framework. 1. Identify the name of the theory that you want to

    use as a guide. Describe the theory you select for your project, including the

    components mentioned and use one or more references of those who

    originally created and developed the theory. For example, if using Systems

    Theory, then describe the theory at the micro, mezzo and macro levels. 2.

    Then write a sub-section entitled: Application of Theory (NAME THE

    THEORY), pose your main research question here in the form of a question.

    A. In other words, what is your research question? B. Then, use the

    components or parts of the theory(s) to apply to your research question.

    Sometimes, only one component or part of the theory applies to your research

    question. It is acceptable to have only a partial theory application and the

    reason authors may use a second theory to fill or explain another part of the

    research question not fully addressed by the first theory. Use the theory(s)

    you have selected and describe how it applies or guides your research

    question. Keep in mind that I am only requiring and even suggesting that you

    use only one theory even if it doesnt apply very well to your research

    question because I would rather you learn how to describe and apply one

    theory well than describe and apply two or more theories poorly.

    THE OUTLINE I MADE

    Theoretical Framework (Suggested: 1-2 pages)

    Identify ONE Theory

    Describe Theory

    o Components

    o Reference creator/developers

    Application of [Theory] (Suggested: Half page)

    o What is your research question?

    Use the components or parts of the theory to apply to your research question

    1. Identity Theory: ecological systems theory:

    2. Describe theory :

    A) (components)

    B)

    C) Reference the creators / developers

    3. Application of theory to research question

    What is your research question

    What is the relationship between participation in Head Start programs and educational outcomes for families?

    4. Use the parts or components of theory to apply to your research question:

    A microsystem (classroom/ family)

    Mesosystem (family -teacher interaction) health interventions

    Ecosystem (community resources) nutrition. parenting resources referrals

    Macro system (social policies)

  • Module 6 EVidence Data-Informed Instruction and Literacy Sup…

    Module 6 Evidence Portfolio

    In this module, you will submit a Module Evidence Portfolio that examines how data-informed planning and literacy support systems guide instructional and intervention decisions. This portfolio should document how multiple data sources are used to plan instruction, design supports, and promote equitable literacy outcomes.

    The target evaluation lens for this module is LAER Domain I Planning and Preparation.

    Portfolio Requirements

    Your Module 6 Evidence Portfolio must include all four sections outlined below.

    Section 1: LAER Target Statement

    Identify the primary LAER domain and relevant indicators addressed in this module. Clearly explain how your planning and data use align to LAER Domain I Planning and Preparation.

    Section 2: Artifacts (Two Required)

    Submit two authentic artifacts drawn from your residency practice that demonstrate data-informed planning and literacy support.

    • Artifact 1: Planning or data-analysis artifact
      (e.g., lesson plan informed by data, data summary, intervention plan, progress-monitoring tool)
    • Artifact 2: Evidence of instructional or intervention response
      (e.g., revised plan based on data, mentor feedback on planning, reflection notes tied to student progress)

    Artifacts must be clearly labeled and briefly explained to demonstrate alignment to the target LAER domain.

    Refer to the Acceptable Artifacts by LAER Domain page in Module 0 for guidance.

    Section 3: Leadership Reflection

    Length: 300400 words

    Write an analytical reflection aligned to LAER Domain I. Your reflection must:

    • Reference both artifacts
    • Analyze how data informed planning and instructional decisions
    • Examine how literacy support systems addressed student needs equitably

    Section 4: Professional Action Step

    Length: Up to 200 words

    Identify one specific, actionable step you will implement to strengthen data-informed planning or literacy support systems. Explain how this step supports growth aligned to LAER Domain I.

    Submission Format

    • Submit one document (Word or PDF)
    • Use the Module Evidence Portfolio exemplar as a guide
    • Ensure all student and school information is de-identified

    Evaluation Criteria

    This assignment is evaluated for completion, alignment to the target LAER domain, quality of evidence, and depth of analysis. Instructional performance is evaluated using LAER during observations.

    Requirements: Completed assignment

  • Privatization and Capital Punishment

    The purpose of this is to help people consider opposing points of view with regard to crime in society and criminal behavior

    Instructions:

    Write a response paper demonstrating position and the depth of understanding about the following issues (Chose one):

    • Should Private Corporations Be Allowed to Run U.S. Prisons?
    • Is Capital Punishment a Bad Public Policy?

    Format/Content Requirements:

    • The paper is to be clear and concise and with proper grammar, punctuation and spelling.
    • The paper is to be no shorter than 3 pages in length. Will automatically lose points if these limits are not followed.
    • Journal articles and books should be referenced according to APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).
    • This assignment will be assessed through Turnitin.

    Requirements: 3 pages

  • A Sociological Analysis of Identity and Role Conflict

    he Book for this assessment is please let me know if you can or cannot find a copy as the information we will be writing about will require this book: Khan, Shamus, Patrick Sharkey, and Gwen Sharp. 2024. A Sociology Experiment, 3rd Edition

    aper

    1. Formatting & Technicals (Non-Negotiable)

    • Length: You must write at least 2.5 full pages, but do not exceed 3 pages. Anything less than 2.5 pages loses points immediately.
    • The Header: Put the name James Biney in the “Header” section of the Word document (double-click the very top of the page). It must be “outside” the main body margin. Do not include the date, professor name, or class title.
    • Title: Do not use “Social Structure Essay.” Create something creative like The Invisible Architecture: Navigating My Status Set in Modern Society.
    • Font: 12-point, double-spaced.

    2. The Thesis Paragraph (5 Points)

    • Requirement: Do not just “introduce” the topic. You must provide a clear roadmap.
    • Instruction: Write a paragraph that explicitly states you will be analyzing your ascribed and achieved statuses, the dilemma of the master status, the internal dynamics of a specific social institution, and the inevitable role conflicts that arise from these structures.

    3. Definitions and Citations (Crucial for 40+ Points)

    • Instruction: For every sociological term (Ascribed Status, Achieved Status, Master Status, Social Group, Social Role, Role Conflict), you must:
    1. Provide a formal definition.
    2. Include an in-text citation from the textbook: (Author, pg#). Note: Even if you paraphrase, you must cite the page number to hit the “Highly Competent” criteria.

    4. Content Breakdown for “Highly Competent” Marks

    Ascribed & Achieved Status (10 Points)

    • Define both with citations.
    • Provide at least three (3) clear examples of ascribed statuses (e.g., race, age, sex) and three (3) achieved statuses (e.g., college student, employee, athlete).
    • Briefly explain why each fits the definition.

    Master Status & The “Dilemma” (10 Points)

    • Define Master Status with a citation.
    • Identify yours.
    • The Critical Part: You must discuss the “dilemma.” Contrast how you identify yourself versus how society/others might implicitly label you. Explain the sociological importance of this gap (e.g., how it affects your life chances or social interactions).

    Social Group & Roles (20 Points)

    • Pick one specific institution (e.g., your University or your workplace).
    • Identify the social positions (statuses) within it and the corresponding roles (the behaviors expected of those statuses).
    • Instruction: You must explain the relationship between these roles. Don’t just list them; explain how they interact to make the institution function.

    Role Conflict (10 Points)

    • Define Role Conflict with a citation.
    • Provide a “compelling” personal example. For instance, describe a time your role as a Student (needing to study for an exam) conflicted with your role as an Employee (being called into a shift) or a Family Member.

    5. The “So-What” Conclusion (10 Points)

    • Instruction: Do not just summarize the paper.
    • Reframe your findings. Address the “sociological significance”: explain how understanding these structures changes how we view human interaction. Your “take-away” should be that social structure isn’t just a list of labels, but a framework that dictates the flow of our daily lives.

    6. Final Polish (5 Points)

    • Transitions: Ensure every paragraph flows logically into the next (e.g., moving from the individual “status” to the broader “institution”).
    • Grammar: Zero run-on sentences or spelling errors.
    • No Outside Sources: Use only the textbook. If you use Google for a definition, you will likely lose points for “outside resources.”

  • What is called the mid point of graph and plans?

    The mid point of graph is called origin and there are two plans – (i) abscissa (x-axis ) & (ii) ordinate ( y-axis).

    Requirements:

  • Procedural Justice using Pasadena(Tx) police department

    Consider all you have learned about Procedural Justice as you create the following paper: 1. Identify a police or law enforcement agency you are familiar with; describe the community and the agency with relevant demographics and/or statistics related to size; community served; number of officers; diversity of force; etc. (1 page in length) 2. For both internal and external procedural justice, identify one strength and one weakness that law enforcement agency has. Explain how each of these strengths and weaknesses affect the agency’s legitimacy. (2-3 pages in length) 3. Finally, design at least one new policy or program that will address a weakness you describe above. Explain how your policy or program will strengthen both internal and external procedural justice using relevant research. (1-2 pages in length) Your paper should fully address each of the items above, be typed in 12-point type, and use APA format to cite resources. Length requirement: 4-6 pages

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): CJUS 21st Century Policing.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • GRAPHICAL COMPARISON CHART

    Week 6

    For this assignment, each student is asked to evaluate the governance policy of a firm they might consider working for and then comparing that to an organization considered the students chosen firms top competitor. The main purpose of the exercise is to help make a connection between different governance elements (e.g., board composition, equity holdings by directors, executive compensation) and a firms financial performance. Each student is asked to prepare NO MORE THAN A Three to Four PAGE (title page, chart or graphical representation, short paragraph for your choice of company to work for, and references page) GRAPHICAL COMPARISON CHART that addresses the following questions (You should use a chart format):

    • Summarize what you consider are the key aspects of the firms governance mechanisms (compare and contrast in chart format).
    • Based on your review of the firms governance, did you change your opinion of the firms desirability as an employer? Why, or why not? (Just because you are giving your opinion does not mean that you give it in the first or second person)! Be professional in your communications! Remember your Individual Written Assignment # 1 paper!!
    • (Do not use first person pronouns (I), second person (you), or some third person pronouns (we and our) when writing this assignment. See the Formatting & Writing Styles Guide document.

    Therefore, this assignment should be two pages minimum, but not more than three pages (and no narratives)!! Your paper should be in proper APA format. Submit your paper to the Assignments # 5 tab on Canvas, only! There is no TurnitIn portal for this assignment!

    1. Title page (It is assumed that the assignment will be in APA format).
    2. New Times Roman font face type, this includes the page numbers and headers.
    3. Page numbers should be in the upper right hand corner of your paper.
    4. 12 pt font type size, including page numbers and headers.
    5. An APA formatted reference page. If you use a website link, you should be able to find the author and a publication date.
    6. Your title page should include the Assignment title, your name, the date, the class and the instructor, which is; Dr. Jimmie S. Warren, Sr. (All should be in proper APA format). Your papers should be double-spaced (See the Formatting & Writing Styles guide for properly setting the parameters in Microsoft Word for your papers).
    7. (Do not use first person pronouns (I), second person (you), or some third person pronouns (we and our) when writing this assignment. See the Formatting & Writing Styles Guide document.