Category: uncategorised

  • Criminal Profiling: Real Science or Just Wishful Thinking

    Read the article “Criminal Profiling: Real Science or Just Wishful Thinking?” In the article, the author critically examines the highly suspect and sensational group of practices that can be collectively known as criminal profiling, and discusses whether they meet the two criteria for a science.

    In a short, 200-300 word essay, briefly describe the two most common practices of criminal profiling, and what type of offender is usually the subject of those practices. Additionally, discuss the two criteria for a science, and whether the two practices of criminal profiling discussed in the article meet these criteria. Finally, according to Muller (2000), “When considering a subject such as criminal profiling, it is easy to get lost in the hype and difficult to distinguish the fact from the fiction” (p, 262). Compare some of “facts” about criminal profiling from the article with some of the “fiction” of criminal profiling as discussed in the video, “The Minds Behind Mindhunter (Criminal Profiling).”

    VIDEO LINK

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): muller-2000-criminal-profiling-real-science-or-just-wishful-thinking.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Final Project Analysis

    • Minimum word count: 1,200, max 1,500
    • Minimum of 6 sources (APA citations)- must be less than 10 years old

    Describe connections you have made between your prior knowledge of the topic(s)

    you chose and what you have learned in this course. How has this course helped

    you to understand the ideas/process/structure/procedure etc. in new or different

    ways? Will you be able to utilize your updated/new knowledge in your current or

    future career? What do you see as obstacles or advances in the topic that are

    significant and why? Think out of the box of what re-learning this material means

    for you, your career, family and community.

    Topics to choose from:

    Texas Political Culture

    Texas Constitution

    Texas Political Parties/Elections/Campaigns

    Texas Interest Groups

    The Texas Legislature

    The Texas Plural Executive and Bureaucracy

    The Texas Judicial System

    Texas Local government

    Some recommended sites:

    • Center for Responsive Politics https://www.opensecrets.org/
    • Vote Smart https://votesmart.org/
    • Texans for public justice http://www.tpj.org/
    • Library of Congress https://www.loc.gov/rr/main/alcove9/usgov/intgroups.html
    • TAMUC library databases: http://www.tamuc.edu/library/
  • reflection of being a team member

    reflection on being a team member of an early childhood program.
  • The Role of the Family Nurse in End-of-Life Decision-Making…

    I want this assignment to be edited and made AI-free.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): The Role of the Family Nurse in End-of-Life Decision-Making Following Anoxic Brain Injury.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • NSG5110

    Assignment Overview:

    This week, you will explore how social determinants of health (SDOH) affect individuals’ ability to access and benefit from healthcare services. You will analyze the life circumstances of a fictional or de-identified real person from an underserved population and apply your understanding of SDOH, population health, and the nurses role in promoting equity.

    This case-based assignment gives you the opportunity to develop critical thinking and advocacy skills through a population health lens.

    Instructions:

    Step 1: Select or Create a Patient Persona

    Choose one of the following underserved patient populations (or a similar population approved by your instructor):

    • A member of a marginalized racial, ethnic, or LGBTQ+ community

    Create a brief narrative of their daily life, focusing on challenges related to housing, food access, employment, safety, healthcare, and social support.

    Step 2: Analyze the Impact of SDOH

    In a 23 page paper (not including title and reference pages), address the following:

    1. Describe the patient persona and their background (no real names or PHI).
    2. Identify and explain at least three social determinants of health that impact their well-being.
    3. Discuss how these determinants affect their access to care and health outcomes.
    4. Propose at least two nursing interventions or community resources that could help improve their situation.
    5. Include a reflection on how this case study informs your future role as a masters-prepared nurse in promoting population health and equity.

    Step 3: Format and Submit

    • APA 7 formatting (title page, in-text citations, reference page, double-spacing)
    • Minimum of two scholarly sources, including at least one from course materials
    • Submit as a Word document or PDF in Canvas

    Rubric

    Week 6 Rubric A Day in the Life Social Determinants Case Study

    Week 6 Rubric A Day in the Life Social Determinants Case Study

    CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Persona Description

    30 to >28.0 pts

    Excellent

    Rich, realistic background with detailed context about living conditions, health barriers, and environment.

    28 to >22.0 pts

    Good

    Basic context provided; generally realistic but may lack depth or specificity.

    22 to >0 pts

    Needs Improvement

    Vague, unrealistic, or lacking critical contextual information.

    30 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Identification of SDOH

    30 to >28.0 pts

    Excellent

    Identifies and explains 3+ social determinants; clearly articulates how they interact to affect the case.

    28 to >22.0 pts

    Good

    23 SDOH identified; explanation may be adequate but not fully developed.

    22 to >0 pts

    Needs Improvement

    Fewer than 2 SDOH addressed; vague or missing connections.

    30 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Impact on Health & Access

    25 to >23.0 pts

    Excellent

    Clearly explains how SDOH influence access to care, health outcomes, and long-term wellness.

    23 to >18.0 pts

    Good

    Some discussion of impact; lacks depth or specificity.

    18 to >0 pts

    Needs Improvement

    Discussion is limited, unclear, or missing altogether.

    25 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Interventions/Resources

    20 to >18.0 pts

    Excellent

    Proposes 2+ realistic, culturally appropriate, and evidence-informed interventions/resources.

    18 to >14.0 pts

    Good

    At least one intervention mentioned, but may lack clarity, evidence, or feasibility.

    14 to >0 pts

    Needs Improvement

    Strategies are vague, impractical, or missing.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Scholarly References

    10 to >9.0 pts

    Excellent

    Uses 2 or more scholarly/professional sources that support the analysis and are clearly cited.

    9 to >6.0 pts

    Good

    Includes 1 scholarly source; may be underutilized or loosely related.

    6 to >0 pts

    Needs Improvement

    No scholarly or professional source included.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Writing Quality & APA Style

    10 to >9.0 pts

    Excellent

    Writing is clear, well-organized, and free from errors; APA 7 formatting is correct.

    9 to >6.0 pts

    Good

    Minor errors in grammar, structure, or APA formatting.

    6 to >0 pts

    Needs Improvement

    Frequent grammar or APA errors interfere with clarity.

    10 pts

    Total Points: 125

  • Proposal for a Research Paper on Sustainable Development Goa…

    Final Research Paper is a capstone course that allows students to integrate and demonstrate the knowledge and skills acquired throughout the Masters program. It represents the demonstration of your academic maturity and the acquisition of the knowledge, skills, and competencies developed throughout your studies. Passing this subject is an essential requirement for obtaining your official degree.

    The project may take the form of a research paper in the field of personal leadership and negotiation, an innovative proposal for an idea or prototype, or the design of a team or system within the students area of competence. Emphasis is placed on applying scientific rigor in the interpretation of bibliographic sources, designing structured research or project plans, and proposing strategies for the continuous improvement of negotiation practices. The course culminates in the defense of the final work before an academic committee, providing students with the opportunity to showcase both their analytical and practical capacities in leadership and negotiation.

    Roles of Tutors and Coordinators

    • The director of the program assigns topics and tutors, sets the calendar of submissions, and supervises the process in Canvas.
    • The tutor/supervisor guides your work in each phase, provides feedback, reviews progress, evaluates partial submissions, and determines eligibility for the defense.

    The tutor guides you, but the main responsibility lies with you: your commitment and consistency are key to success.

    Evaluation

    The tutor and later the academic committee will assess aspects such as:

    • Formal presentation, writing, and coherence.
    • Structure and achievement of objectives.
    • Methodology, analysis of results, and conclusions.
    • Citations and references.
    • Academic quality and originality.
    • Inclusion of sustainability criteria.

    The tutors assessment (eligible/not eligible) at the deposit stage is binding for access to the oral defense.

    Dissertation Guidelines 2025-2026

    1. GENERAL INFORMATION

    The 10 ECTS of the Master’s Final Project have to be passed through the submission of a work

    (individual or group mximum 3 pax) in order to show the student’s research skills.

    1.1 Objective

    The Master’s Final Project has the objective to prove the intellectual maturity and the research

    skills of the student. It has to be an original project, as a result of the personal work of the student

    under the guidance of a supervisor.

    2. FORMAL REQUIREMENTS

    2.1 Cover and first page

    All types of final project must include:

    1. Cover page with:

    Title of the document

    Author or authors’ name

    Supervisor

    Publication date: Academic Year 20–/–

    The name of the collection: Research Project of the Master in ….

    Name of the University:

    First page with:

    Abstract: maximum 150-word length in the same language of the Project

    Keywords: a list of keywords about the content, with a maximum length of 200

    characters

    Type of the project (PhD proposal, Research Dissertation, Theoretical Dissertation,

    Journal Article)

    5

    2.2 Digital file

    The document must be uploaded in PDF or DOC format. If there are some annexes, they must

    be embedded in the text file. The size limit per file must be inferior to 100MB.

    4. TYPES OF FINAL MASTER DISSERTATION

    There are four eligible types of dissertation. Students must adhere to one type:

    Type 1. PhD Proposal

    Type 2. Theoretical Dissertation

    Type 3. Research Paper

    Type 4. Journal Article

    The four types aim for the student to acquire the following knowledge:

    Disciplinary knowledge

    Methodological knowledge

    6

    The capacities and skills acquired by the student in any modality must be as follow:

    The ability to gather, select, systematize and manage information, documentation, and

    bibliographical materials

    The capacity to design, structure, and articulate a research project or academic paper

    The capacity to pose and form original proposals to solve relevant research problems

    The capacity to articulate a complex discourse

    The capacity for criticism and self-criticism

    The capacity for analysis and synthesis

    The capacity to work alone in a group

    Rigour in the presentation of the written material

    What follows are the requested structure for each type:

    Type 1. PhD Proposal

    This consists of a research proposal devised to expand later as a doctoral thesis. This type of

    dissertation does not involve the collection of data nor the production of results, discussion or

    conclusion, since its aim is to design a future PhD research. For this reason, it is expected that

    the state of the art and methodology sections are much more developed than in the rest of

    dissertation types. This type of dissertation must include at least the following sections:

    a) Introduction to the specific topic chosen and a justification of its importance, novelty,

    and academic relevance.

    b) State of the art of the topic (literature review & theoretical framework).

    c) Research problem, research questions, and/or hypotheses, objectives.

    d) Methodology, specifying the particular tools to be used as research techniques.

    e) Structure and contents of the research to be carried out, definition of the main

    concepts around which the research is to be constructed.

    f) Bibliography, documentation and materials to be used for the aims of the research

    (note this is not the references list for the project but a reflection on what main sources

    you will use in your research).

    g) Timeline of execution of the project

    i) List of references used in the dissertation

    Length: The Dissertation must be between 9,000 and 12,000 words. This translates to

    approximately 30 to 50 pages of 1.5 spaced text (references included; appendixes not included).

    Type 2. Theoretical Dissertation

    A theoretical, or non-empirical, dissertation focuses on secondary research you use data

    collected and presented by other researchers to develop an argument. This type of dissertation

    doesnt have any data youve generated at all; rather, it is entirely literature-based. This is likely

    to be the methodology of theoretical analysis: selection and discussion of theoretical material

    and descriptive material, in context, and detailed comparison of theories in terms of their

    applicability. Here, the focus of attention is not so much to discover something about the social

    world, as to reach a judgement about the value of key concepts or theories in understanding that

    world. This type of dissertation is less constrained in terms of format, but theoretical essays

    should include the following sections:

    a) Introduction to the specific topic chosen and a justification of its importance, novelty,

    and academic relevance; introduction of your argument, overview of structure of the

    dissertation.

    7

    b) Literature review, showing how your work fits within the context of others work;

    selection and comment on the relevant literature.

    c) Development of your argument in the context of the literature review, topic, case

    study, etc.

    d) Conclusion and/or discussion.

    f) List of references.

    Length: The Dissertation must be between 9,000 and 12,000 words. This translates to

    approximately 30 to 50 pages of 1.5 spaced text (references included; appendixes not included).

    Type 3. Research paper

    This consists of an empirical research conducted on a topic and delivered in the form of a

    typical research paper. This dissertation contains empirical results of any sort (from text/image

    analyses, surveys, interviews, documentary observation, ethnography, etc.). It shall include at

    least the following sections:

    a) Introduction to the specific topic chosen and a justification of its importance, novelty,

    and academic relevance.

    b) Literature review.

    c) Research design:

    – Research problem, research questions, and/or hypotheses, objectives.

    – Methodology, specifying the particular tools used in the research.

    d) Results.

    e) Conclusion and/or discussion.

    f) Reference list.

    Length: The Dissertation must be between 9,000 and 12,000 words. This translates to

    approximately 30 to 50 pages of 1.5 spaced text (references included; appendixes not included).

    Type 4. Journal article

    This consists of a theoretical or empirical work with the same features as type 2 and 3 but

    delivered in the form of a journal article. To this end, students must select an academic journal

    for publication in accordance with the supervisor. The final format and length must be therefore

    adapted to the journals submission guidelines. For the sake of providing context to the

    assessment committee, this type of dissertation must attach an introduction to the paper

    including:

    Full name and website address of the journal to which the paper will be submitted

    Aims and scope of the journal where the paper will be submitted (you can just copy

    their aims and scope)

    Indexing: the journals you have chosen must be an indexed journal with blind peer

    review, include any relevant details regarding where it is indexed (it is enough to report

    on the top indexing, for instance if the journal is indexed in SJR or JCR for instance)

    Similar papers previously published in this journal that your paper complements or

    quotes.

    Adequacy of your paper to the journal (why your contribution will be of interest for this

    journal)

    Length: Follow the journal instructions (plus add one page maximum with the above-requested

    details about the journal)

    8

    REGARDING THE TOPICS OF CHOICE:

    Please note that all dissertations must be an innovative contribution to the topics of leadership

    and negotiation as addressed in this programme regarding the field of international

    relations, diplomacy, international business, etc.

    Note: The reference system to be used is APA, 7th edition (2020).

    Initial Submission

    • Objective: define the scope and focus of your project.
    • Submission: Word or PDF file including title, introduction/theoretical framework, objectives, and methodology or high-level planning.

    Topic:

    Integrating Sustainable Development Principles into International Negotiation Strategies: A Long-Term Perspective

    Research Question: To what extent does the integration of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) into economic and trade negotiations enhance long-term institutional stability, and under what conditions might such integration introduce complexity that constrains timely agreement formation?

    important Note: This is only a proposal – Initial draft including title, introduction/theoretical framework, objectives, and methodology or high-level planning.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Dissertation rubric 2025-26.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Writing Question

    Requirements: Mentioned

  • week 3 assig

    • Answer all even-numbered “Review Questions” at the end of Chapters 3 (page 134) and 4 (page 176) from Information Systems Today: Managing the Digital World in complete, grammatically correct sentences. Number each question to correspond to the number on the question being answered and submit a single Microsoft Word compatible document with all answers. Submit via the appropriate week one assignment link as an attachment before Sunday 11:59 PM.
    • Submit your assignment below by clicking on the “paperclip” icon to upload your paper.
    • Answer all even-numbered “Review Questions” at the end of Chapters 5 (page 218) and 6 (page 266) from Information Systems Today: Managing the Digital World in complete, grammatically correct sentences. Number each question to correspond to the number on the question being answered and submit a single Microsoft Word compatible document with all answers. Submit via the appropriate week one assignment link as an attachment before Sunday 11:59 PM.
    • Submit your assignment below by clicking on the “paperclip” icon and uploading your paper.

    Week Class Talk Discussion

    Social Savvy

    Social networking sites are fast becoming corporate resources. Consider how an organization may use Facebook. Can you think of different ways in which organizations such as Coca-Cola, KFC, or Bank of America can use social networking? What are network effects?

    If you were the chief executive officer of a Fortune 500 company, would you be comfortable using social media sites like Facebook or LinkedIn as part of your CRM strategy? Why or why not?

    different paper

    Complete ONE of the following application exercises to complete from the text Information Systems Today: Managing the Digital World:

    OPTION 1: Spreadsheet Project:

    • 6-42 Spreadsheet Application: Travel Loan Facility(page 268)
    • Follow the directions in the text
    • There is NO starting data file for this option. You will build an Excel workbook from scratch.
    • Submit the completed Microsoft Excel spreadsheet (.xlsx) as the final deliverable.

    -OR-

    Option 2: Database Project (must be completed using Microsoft Access)

    • 6-43 Database Application: Tracking Regional Office Performance at Campus Travel (pages 268-269)
    • Follow the directions in the text
    • Use FY2012.mdb Access database file as the starting data file
    • Submit the completed Microsoft Access database file (.accdb) as the final deliverable.

    Requirements: …

  • Data assignment 4

    Instructions are in the video and using excel

    Include a 3-4 sentence write-up explaining what you found.

    https://www.census.gov/acs/www/data/data-tables-and-tools/data-profiles/