Category: uncategorised
-
Article
Arquette, M. (2002). Holistic risk-based environmental decision making: A Native perspective. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110 (2), 259-264. www.ecosensing.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Case-1-Arquette-HolisticRisk-Based-Environmental-Decision-Making.pdf This comprehensive study discusses the benefits of a holistic environmental risk assessment model that is based on Indigenous cultural knowledge when assessing environmental degradation on reserves. With the Akwesasne nation as a case study, this paper examines why current environmental risk-assessment models are inappropriate when applied to Indigenous communities. According to this study, risk assessment methods used by outside investigators remain inadequate. Such methods fail to account for or include a holistic approach to assessing the social, cultural, and spiritual values, beliefs, and practices that link the Akwesasne Mohawks to their environment. Additionally, many community members in Akwesasne believe that concepts of health should include and reflect traditional values, attitudes, beliefs, and practices. As with many Indigenous communities, traditional views of health are integrated making it impossible to consider physical, mental, spiritual, and social well-being in isolation. The study concludes by stating that the integration of traditional attitudes, beliefs, and practices into environmental health definitions, research, and planning is central to achieving healthy individuals, communities, and ecosystems. This approach is consistent with environmental justice. Barre, D. E., Fournie, M., Green, M. E., Hanley, A. J., Harris, S. B., Hayward, M. N., … Zwarenstein, M. (2018). National Survey of Indigenous primary healthcare capacity and delivery models in Canada: the TransFORmation of IndiGEnous PrimAry HEAlthcare delivery (FORGE AHEAD) community profile survey. BMC Health Services Research. Diabetes affects every community, that is not something new. But despite it, this chronic illness is more prominent in Indigenous communities than any other in Canada, 2-5 times higher to be exact. This article focuses on the research team FORGE AHEAD as well Community Profile Surveys (CPS). The research they do is very quantitative in hopes of getting more Indigenous information on this subject out there. They believe that healthcare regarding Indigenous people needs a reform. This includes addressing the root causes of health inequities for Indigenous communities, recognizing Canadas history of colonization, support of self governance, improving patient experience by being culturally sensitive and improving medical transitions. They were inspired by the First Nations Regional Health Survey of 1997 that was created also due to lack of research in the field on Indigenous healthcare. It had 3 phases all the way from 2002-2015. It focused on demographics, community, wellness, early childhood, education, employment/income, nutrition/food security and substance addiction. For the research of FORGE & CPS, the teams collaborated with 6 First Nations communities to create an easy, 8-page long survey to send out to 440 Indigenous communities in Canada. 84 of these communities completed this survey. It was specified in diabetes research and how to improve it. It was a 5-year long program based in the provinces as the territories have different healthcare systems. Research concluded that across the provinces, in Indigenous communities, 83.3% have health centers, 3.6% have a community hospital, 4.8% have no healthcare facility, 40.5% have a diabetes registry, 92.9% have computer access and 94% have internet access. Only 57.1% have on site diabetes services. They did multiple forms of survey testing to get these numbers. This article may only focus on numbers but that is the starting point into showing how steep the problems are. Battle, K. (2007). Child poverty: The evolution and impact of child benefits. In Covell, K., & Howe, R. B. (Eds), A question of commitment: Children’s rights in Canada (pp. 21-44). Wilfrid Laurier University Press. Ken Battle draws on his research as an extensively-published policy analyst, and a close study of some government documents, to explain child benefits in Canada. He outlines some fundamental assumptions supporting the belief that all society members should contribute to the upbringing of children. Drawing on data from Canadas annual Survey of Consumer Finances, the author considers whether each family had one or two parents, the age of single parents, and the number of children in each household. He analyzes child poverty rates in light of these demographic factors. Battles comparison of Canadian child poverty rates to those in other countries provides a useful wake-up to anyone assuming Canadian society is doing a good job of protecting children from want. He attempts to ascertain whether it is currently possible for an individual to live on a minimum wage in America. Taking jobs as a waitress, a maid in a cleaning service, and a Walmart sales employee, the author summarizes and reflects on his work, relationships with fellow workers, and financial struggles in each situation. The author pays particular attention to the National Child Benefit (NCB), arguing that it did not deserve the criticism it received from politicians and journalists. He outlines the NCBs development, costs, and benefits, including its dollar contribution to a typical recipients income. He laments that the Conservative government scaled back the program in favour of the Universal Child Care Benefit (UCCB), and clearly explains why it is inferior. However, Battle relies too heavily on his own work; he is the sole or primary author of almost half the sources in his bibliography. He could make this work stronger by drawing from the perspectives of others’ analyses. However, Battle does offer a valuable source for this essay, because the chapter provides a concise overview of government-funded assistance currently available to parents. This offers context for analyzing the scope and financial reality of child poverty in Canada. Lamott, A. (1995). Bird by bird: Some instructions on writing and life. Anchor Books. Lamott’s book offers honest advice on the nature of a writing life, complete with its insecurities and failures. Taking a humorous approach to the realities of being a writer, the chapters in Lamott’s book are wry and anecdotal and offer advice on everything from plot development to jealousy, from perfectionism to struggling with one’s own internal critic. In the process, Lamott includes writing exercises designed to be both productive and fun. Lamott offers sane advice for those struggling with the anxieties of writing, but her main project seems to be offering the reader a reality check regarding writing, publishing, and struggling with one’s own imperfect humanity in the process. Rather than a practical handbook to producing and/or publishing, this text is indispensable because of its honest perspective, its down-to-earth humor, and its encouraging approach. Chapters in this text could easily be included in the curriculum for a writing class. Several of the chapters in Part 1 address the writing process and would serve to generate discussion on students’ own drafting and revising processes. Some of the writing exercises would also be appropriate for generating classroom writing exercises. Students should find Lamott’s style both engaging and enjoyable. -
Article Critique 2
Requirements of Article Critique Assignment. IN YOUR OWN WORDS Use research terms (being professional) Use your textbook notes Explain your thinking Article Critique Analysis #1 Instructions: This week, you will need to find 2 journal articles using qualitative research methodology. When you have your journal article, please ask ChatGPT (or other AI tools you like to choose) to write a 1500-2000 words article critique review. When you have AI’s article critique review, please analyze and evaluate AI’s article review using our textbook and the article critique review guide I provided in this assignment. For example, you can evaluate what parts AI did great and whether it already covered the basic criteria from the guide. What AI is missing, but you want to add it based on our textbook notes and guide. Your evaluation paper needs to use APA format. (No page requirements, but the ideal page numbers of this assignment should be 4). Please attach the articles you used and the critique review from AI when you submit your assignment. article critique guideline 2026.pdfDownload article critique guideline 2026.pdf Rubric Contains all the required components and provides the summary according to instructions. 2.5 points Discuss research design, writing quality or method of study, providing specific examples from the article and textbook or external sources to support discussion. 2.5 points Analyze the effectiveness of the study, providing specific examples from the article and textbook or external sources to support discussion. 2.5 points Meets all writing standards; presents a well-organized essay with clear introduction and conclusion; is free from errors in grammar and punctuation. 2.5 points -
EA302MAA Evaluating Human Error and Designing Resilient Syst…
- Word Limit: 15002000 words (maximum 20 pages including references).
- Referencing: Harvard style is mandatory.
- Formatting for Part 1:
- Maximum 12 pages (A4, 12pt font, 1.5 line spacing).
- Include a title page with your details, chosen article, and word count.
- Number all pages.
- Use clear headings (e.g., “Question 1: Foundations and Frameworks”).
- Integrate in-text citations in Harvard style for both the chosen article and relevant course
concepts/case studies.
- A separate reference list for Part 1 is required at the end of this section.
- Formatting for Part 2:
- Maximum 8 pages (A4, 12pt font, 1.5 line spacing).
- Use the clear headings provided above (A, B, C and numbered questions).
- Integrate in-text citations in Harvard style for accident reports, course materials, and
supporting literature.
- Include a separate reference list for Part 2 at the end of this section.
- Use the clear headings provided above (A, B, C and numbered questions).
- Integrate in-text citations in Harvard style for accident reports, course materials, and
supporting literature.
- Include a separate reference list for Part 2 at the end of this section.
Requirements:
-
Accounting group project presentation/simulation
This is all based off of the go venture simulation. Please create two slides and make sure to add speaker notes for each slide answering all the questions in the file below and use all the information that Im giving you below as well. I am the second student meaning I should be started after the barbershop called cut and clutch my barbershop name is Atlas barbershop. PowerPoint link. Im the PowerPoint put me as student 2 after cuts and clutch
In the google doc Im number 3.
googl doc with analysis
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Financial Analysis Project with GoVenture (1) 3.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
Cara mengembangkan pertanian di era krisis moneter.
Bagaimana cara kita mengembangkan pertanian dalam keadaan krisis ekonomi?
Requirements:
-
Hysterectomy, Exercise and Depression
I have attached a template that can be used along with some necessary uploads.Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Template Format.docx, The Effects of Hysterectomy on Sexual Dysfunction and Depression Final.docx, Exercise and Depression Final May 30 2025.docx, The Effects of Hysterectomy on Sexual Dysfunction and Depression Final.docx, Preliminary Protocol.docx, Leadership Paper 2-20-26.docx, Informed Consent Final.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
Health & Medical Question
See attached
Requirements: see attached
-
Week 8: Rhetorical Analysis Final Submission
RHETORICAL ANALYSIS: to be completed along with the third unit project in this course The Advocacy Text Rhetorical Analysis is an essay that explores the question How did I make my decisions to create the Advocacy Text based on the rhetorical situation I was responding to? Your analysis should show that you made your rhetorical choices from an informed and reflective point of view, so in the Rhetorical Analysis, you should: Articulate the history or definition of your cause, its scope or significance (whos impacted, when, where, why, how, and to what extent?), and the recency or relevance of the cause. Please cite any relevant outside research that you had to consult to create your Advocacy Text. For instance, if you had to learn more about your topic in order to choose content for your Advocacy Text, explain and cite that research in your Rhetorical Analysis. Identify the features of the rhetorical situation in which your Advocacy Texts operated and narrate how you shaped your decisions based on those features. Use specific examples of details from the Advocacy Text itself to explain how you made your rhetorical decisions, addressing the elements that make up your rhetorical situation: the message itself (how you chose the message elements, including the mode or channel, conventions, and graphic, visual, or design elements), the rhetorical purpose (what change you were trying to evoke from the audience and how you think your choices helped you do that), and the audience (including the intended audience, the actual literal audience, and how you got the message to reach these audiencesboth figuratively and literally). Reflect about how your identity or experiences related to your choice of cause, how you experienced the composition process, and what you might be realizing or learning from these connections. Reflect on the affective (or emotional) experiences of this composition process and what you might be realizing about or learning from those experiences. Technical Requirements You must use (4) total outside sources in the creation of the Advocacy Text and Rhetorical Analysis project. Thinking about source literacy from previous units, you want to select high quality and credible source material to build your advocacy text. (i.e. consider using the CRAAP assessment). Advocacy Text and evidence of submitting your Advocacy Text to the intended audience must be submitted as a PDF file Length requirement for the Advocacy Text should be approximately 1-page or more depending on the genre selected Rhetorical Analysis must be submitted at a .doc/.docx file o For the Rhetorical Analysis, the essay and document should use MLA style and to reach the level of depth expected, the essay should be no shorter than about 1,000 words but may be longer -
Week 8: Advocacy Text Final Submission
Assignment Description: ADVOCACY TEXT: Your work in the third unit of this course builds to an Advocacy Text project: the Advocacy Text is a text that has a rhetorical purpose of creating positive, productive change for a cause in the world, with an audience that reaches beyond your instructor and classmates. Remember that a text can take many shapes, but to give you a guideline to work with, please create a document that could fit onto a one-sided, standard 8.5 by 11 sheet of paper (or smaller). The text can involve any combination of message elements that fit your rhetorical purpose: these elements may include the mode or channel you use to share the text with your intended audience, the conventions or genre of the document, and graphic, visual, or design elements. You may need to conduct outside research to learn more about your cause or to find up-to-date information to include in your Advocacy Text (and keep in mind that if you use any information thats not yours and is not common knowledge, you will need to find a way to communicate the source of your information to consumers of your text). Youre encouraged to let your text advocate for a cause that suits your personal interests and passions. It might, for instance, seek to do one of the following: to raise awareness about an issue, to inform or educate an audience about an issue, to persuade for a particular perspective on an issue, or to make a call to action (to encourage an audience to take a concrete step to help). To identify an opportunity that might fit this project well, you could consider either: creating a text that you have the authority to share with your intended audience (such as a postcard you could send to members of an organization you lead, an infographic you could share on your social media account, or a letter to a government representative) … or… creating a text that you can propose to an existing organization, group, or individual outside our class who is already advocating for your cause and might be able to use your text (for instance, you could propose a new poster to a local nonprofit that they could use to advertise their hours and services or you could propose an informational sign to your employer that they could add to the recycling bins to educate coworkers on what materials can be recycled) The Advocacy Text must be shared with the intended audience or shared with the organization, group, or individual youre proposing it to before the project is due: this is an important requirement of the project because it gives you as a student the opportunity to exercise your power as a writer-citizen. When you submit your final project, you must include evidence that you’ve shared your Advocacy Text with your intended audience or audience you proposed it to, such as a photograph of the text wherever youve posted it or a screenshot of a sent timestamped email in which you proposed the text to the audience you proposed it to. If you propose your text to an existing organization, group, or individual, whether or not that audience chooses to use your text is beyond your control and will not affect your grade. -
jelaskan bagaimana cara menggambar yang sangat bagus dan pre…
saya ingin bisa mengetahui cara menggambar dengan baik dan presisi. saya ingin menjadi orang yang berbakat dalam seni
Requirements: