Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • what school does you study?

    name of school and place?

    Requirements:

  • Criminal Justice Question

    Required Reading Walker, S., Spohn, C., & DeLone, M. (2018). The Color of Justice: Race, Ethnicity, and Crime in

    America, 6th edition. Cengage Learning. ISBN

    READING ASSIGNMENT #3-CHAPTERS 5: The Courts: A Quest for Justice during the Pretrial Process & CHAPTER 6: Justice on the Bench? Trial and Adjudication in Criminal Court

    Please respond to ONE of the questions from each chapter. Each response should be 300 words or more. Your responses should be in your own words. Any assignment that shows signs of plagiarism or any tool of cheating will receive a “Zero”.

    DISCUSSION QUESTIONS:

    CHAPTER 5

    1. Assume that racial minorities are more likely than whites to be detained prior to trial. Why is this a matter of concern? What are the consequences of pretrial detention? How could the bail system be reformed to reduce this disparity?

    2. Racial minorities comprise a very small proportion of the lawyers and judges in the United States. What accounts for this? What difference, if any, would it make if more of the lawyers representing criminal defendants were racial minorities?

    3. Do you agree or disagree with the Supreme Courts decision (Grutter v. Bollinger) in the case in which the University of Michigan Law Schools admission procedures were challenged? What is the basis for your agreement or disagreement?

    4. What conclusions can you draw about the fairness of the plea-bargaining process from the recent research conducted by Kutateladze and his colleagues in New York City?

    CHAPTER 6

    1. Why do you think the U.S. Supreme Court decided to intervene in the Ed Johnson case (see Focus on an Issue: The Lynching of an Innocent Man)?

    2. Evidence suggesting the prosecutors use their peremptory challenges to preserve all-white juries in cases involving African American or Hispanic defendants has led some commentators to call for the elimination of the peremptory challenge. What do you think is the strongest argument in favor of eliminating the peremptory challenge? In favor of retaining it?

    3. Why does Paul Butler advocate racially based jury nullification? Why does Randall Kennedy disagree with him?

    4. In this chapter, we present a number of examples of lawyers who played the race card in a criminal trial. Almost all of them involved prosecutors who appealed to the potential racist sentiments of white jurors. Does this represent misconduct? Why or why not? How should the judge respond?

    Requirements: 1000

  • Research paper

    the rough draft needs to be 5 paragraphs

    Introduction: This paragraphs job is to set up the conversation and lead us toward your research question. Oftentimes, in informative papers, the introduction leads us toward the gap you will explore more in-depth by outlining where the conversation has already been. Remember our Everyone is Talking About, No One is Talking About activity? That is often what an introduction does. It might also express the need to ask and answer the research question as well. Is your research question particularly salient at this moment in history? Explain why. Once your research question is set up and stated in the introduction paragraph (usually near the end), you will move on to body paragraphs.

    Body: The point of body paragraphs in an informative paper is to further explore elements of the larger question or present different views/sides on the debate. For instance, if I were exploring the environmental impacts of electric cars, I would certainly have a body paragraph on their potential to reduce levels of CO2 in the atmosphere. After I explored that, I might also need a paragraph acknowledging potential environmental drawbacks, like the mining of lithium for batteries. Body paragraphs in an informative paper should break down the original research question into smaller ones (remember your Question Outline), or it should give a fair overview of different valid opinions on the question. Remember since this is a more informative paper, you arent taking a strong, persuasive stance on the right answer to the question, though you can certainly suggest what different answers might be.

    You will likely need at least three body paragraphs in this paper to properly explore your question. After you feel like you have explored your question thoroughly, using sources, it is time to wrap it up.

    Conclusion: Your conclusion is a place not only to restate your research question and summarize the main views you covered in the paper, but it should also take some time to synthesize the views. It doesnt have to come up with a definitive solution to the question, but it should suggest some kind of progress in the debate. It could do this by making connections between sources, or it could suggest questions for future research.

    • Research question: How do poverty, school dropout rates, and peer group dynamics correlate with gun violence involvement among young males?

    I have attached the resources that can be used, please use as many as you can

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Library Research Log1.docx, Internet Research Log1.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • AMEU public health thesis work.

    I mentioned three thesis topics in my write-up As a community health student, my thesis explores critical and emerging issues in public health through an internet-based research approach. The study examines ethical challenges in large population studiesparticularly concerns around informed consent, privacy, and data protectionwhile also analyzing the growing role of digital public health technologies in improving surveillance, access, and service delivery. In addition, the research investigates why environmental health risks disproportionately affect low-income communities, focusing on structural inequalities, limited infrastructure, and policy gaps. Finally, it evaluates how climate-related displacement places strain on healthcare systems by increasing demand for services, disrupting continuity of care, and overwhelming already fragile health infrastructures. Together, these topics provide an integrated analysis of ethics, technology, environmental justice, and climate change within contemporary global public health.

  • Writing Question

    M3 Assignment: Visual Representation of DEI Term

    Introduction

    Consider the foundational definitions and concepts associated with diversity, equity, and inclusion. A visual can help communicate these complex ideas effectively and promote understanding among diverse audiences.

    Instructions

    Review the PDF of . It is a visual representation of DEI terms. Think about each step of the cycle and compare it to your own experience.

    Describe your own experiences. Use the headings in each shape of the Understanding the Cycle of Socialization as the section headers in your paper.

    Give a detailed explanation of how your upbringing and socialization lead you to form specific attitudes and behaviors toward these DEI terms. Write your analysis using the section headings indicated above.

    Formatting

    • This paper should be 750 words long.
    • All citations should be in APA 7.
    • Please provide complete thoughts and examples.
    • You must use and cite a minimum of 2 credible, high-quality sources in your paper. Include in-text citations and a References page that follows APA 7 formatting.
    • Use the infographic in this to help you evaluate the quality of your sources. This short will help you evaluate whether a website is a valid

    Requirements: 750

  • History Question

    The Changs Next Door to the Diazes

    In The Changs Next Door to the Diazes, Wendy Cheng introduces the concept of regional racial formation in the chapter “Theorizing Regional Racial Formation.” This framework emphasizes how race is not only shaped by national or global structures, but also deeply informed by local and regional histories, politics, and geographies.

    In at least 350 words, not including the prompt or headings, reflect on the theoretical concept of regional racial formation as outlined by Cheng. How does this framework challenge or expand dominant understandings of race and racialization in the United States? In what ways can analyzing race through a regional lens reveal the complexities and contradictions of racial identities, solidarities, and inequalities?

    Use specific examples from the text to support your reflection, and consider how regional racial formation might inform your own critical understanding of race in your community, city, or region.

    Additionally, discuss key points of the AAPI Latinos video.

    Requirements: At least 350 words

  • Business Question

    Important Notice:

    Please read the following requests and terms carefully before proceeding:

    1. Originality and Accountability: All answers must be formulated specifically for me and must be entirely original. Copying, stealing, or plagiarizing content from other students answers or any other sources is strictly prohibited, as I will be held accountable for any such actions. There is only one opportunity to submit the assignment, and no second attempts will be allowed. Please pay close attention to this requirement.

    2. Answer Formatting:

    Question 1: Based on the case study, analyse the ‘Cognitively Complex Problem-Solving’ method employed. Explain its core principles and discuss how it was specifically suited to address the multifaceted nature of the problem presented. (200-250 words) (2-Marks).

    Question 2: Discuss the six models of problem-solving approach that are useful for public service reform. (250-300 words). (3-Marks).

    Question 3: Identify three to four key challenges typically encountered during public service reform initiatives, and suggest a suitable solution? (200-250 words) (2-Marks).

    Question 4: Reflect on the key lessons from this case study and, how it is beneficial for you? (250-300 words) (3-Marks).

    3. Document Formatting: All answers must be typed in Times New Roman font, size 12, with double spacing. Any images containing text will not be accepted and will be considered plagiarism.

    4. Cover Page Requirement: Submissions without the specified cover page will not be accepted.

    5. APA Style: The answers must follow APA style formatting. This includes proper in-text citations and a reference list at the end of the document.

    6. References: A minimum of 5 references must be included in APA style. This is non-negotiable and very important.

    7. Assignment Instructions: Please carefully read and follow the instructions provided in the assignment file as well.

    Note: I added the book in case you need it.

    Requirements: 200-300 for each Question

  • what do you do at your free time?

    what do you do?

    Requirements:

  • IEEE journal article writing

    Quantum-Resilient IoT Architecture for 6G-Enabled Massive Machine-Type Communications (mMTC)

    Why #1?

    • Post-quantum security is urgent.
    • 6G + IoT convergence is a hot area.
    • Fits architecture, networking, protocols, and standards.

    Publishable angle:

    Hybrid framework integrating post-quantum cryptography + quantum key distribution + 6G IoT stack.

    Journal-Specific Requirements (MANDATORY)

    Tell them:

    • The paper must strictly align with IEEE IoT Journal scope:
      • IoT architecture
      • IoT networking protocols
      • IoT enabling technologies
      • 6G-enabled IoT systems
      • Standardization alignment
    • Not a purely theoretical quantum computing paper.
    • Not only cryptography must integrate architecture + networking + system evaluation.
    • Length: 1014 pages (IEEE double-column format).
    • Include performance evaluation (simulation mandatory).

    2. Technical Positioning (Very Important)

    Instruct them clearly:

    The paper must:

    • Propose a layered IoT architecture
    • Integrate:
      • Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC)
      • Optional Hybrid QKD layer
      • 6G mMTC communication model
    • Show backward compatibility
    • Address scalability for massive device density

    The paper must NOT:

    • Overclaim quantum supremacy
    • Assume large-scale practical quantum internet exists
    • Be purely survey-style

    3. Required Technical Components

    Tell the writer the manuscript MUST include:

    1? Clear System Architecture Diagram

    • Device layer
    • Edge layer
    • 6G core network layer
    • Security orchestration layer
    • PQC integration points

    2? Formal Threat Model

    • Quantum adversary model
    • Shor-based public-key break risk
    • Grover-based symmetric attack implications

    3? Post-Quantum Cryptography Integration

    Must include:

    • NIST PQC candidates (e.g., lattice-based schemes)
    • Key exchange comparison
    • Computational overhead analysis

    4? 6G + mMTC Modeling

    Include:

    • Device density assumptions
    • Latency constraints
    • Energy consumption model
    • Network slicing relevance

    5? Performance Evaluation (CRITICAL FOR ACCEPTANCE)

    Must simulate and compare:

    • Classical IoT security vs PQC-based architecture
    • Latency impact
    • Throughput impact
    • Energy overhead
    • Key establishment time

    Simulation tools acceptable:

    • MATLAB
    • NS-3
    • OMNeT++
    • Python simulation framework

    No evaluation = High rejection risk.

    4. Required Sections Structure

    Tell them to follow this structure:

    1. Introduction (Motivation: Quantum threat + 6G IoT scale)
    2. Related Work (Recent 20232026 quantum-safe IoT papers)
    3. Background:
      • 6G mMTC
      • PQC
    4. System Model
    5. Proposed Architecture
    6. Security Analysis
    7. Performance Evaluation
    8. Standardization & Migration Roadmap
    9. Conclusion

    5. Standardization Alignment (Strong Reviewer Signal)

    The paper must mention alignment with:

    • IEEE
    • 3rd Generation Partnership Project
    • Internet Engineering Task Force
    • International Telecommunication Union

    Explain how migration to PQC can fit within current frameworks.

    6. What Reviewers Will Look For

    Tell the writer explicitly:

    The paper must clearly answer:

    1. What architectural gap exists today?
    2. Why is PQC integration non-trivial in mMTC?
    3. What scalability bottleneck does this solve?
    4. What measurable improvement is shown?
    5. How is this different from existing quantum-safe IoT papers?

    7. Acceptance-Boosting Elements

    Ask them to include:

    • Complexity analysis (Big-O for key exchange)
    • Comparative table with 46 recent works
    • Migration roadmap (20262035 vision)
    • Practical deployment constraints

    Critical Warning

    If outsourcing:

    • Ensure plagiarism check (Turnitin < 10%)
    • Ensure figures are original
    • Ensure simulations are reproducible
    • Ensure citations are real and verifiable
    • Avoid AI-detectable generic writing

    IEEE IoT Journal desk rejects:

    • Pure survey papers without depth
    • Overhyped quantum claims
    • No evaluation
    • Weak novelty

    Requirements: 10000

  • Excel Tasks

    Hi,

    You will open each assignment file (A1a, A1b, A1c, A1d). Each file has multiple worksheets. First, read the introduction sheet to understand the goal. Then, review the instructions or demonstration sheet, which shows examples. Finally, go to the last worksheet labeled Assignment and complete the required tasks using Excel.

    In A1a, calculate descriptive statistics (mean, median, standard deviation, etc.). In A1b, follow steps to calculate a sampling distribution. In A1c, calculate the necessary sample size. In A1d, apply probability sampling methods to select a sample. Complete each assignment worksheet accordingly.

    I have uploaded the excel files.

    Requirements: ..