View the video (5:52min) by KnowledgeMT and answer the following questions.
Requirements: no AI
PART 1
Create 5 line based compositions of the same subject (a representational subject that is made of or suggests line) using any method you wish, drawing, photography, computer, etc. Be sure it is well designed employing line, value, positive/negative shapes rules of composition and balance.
Explore the subject to its fullest potential. For example: How many different ways can you photograph a telephone pole and it’s wires? Poles and wires can represent lines in a composition, like branches, railings, etc. Get creative!
Each composition should be different from the next. The more you work with one subject and get to know it the more you see it objectively. So you can do 10-20 photos or drawings and pick the best 5 to present. You should never just settle on the first composition you create. Always consider all the possibilities! At least 4 x 5″ or larger.
Critique at least 2 other student’s sketches by Friday end of day of the same week so that the notes can be referenced while preparing the final art.
PART 2-
This discussion board is part of your Attendance and Participation grade. To earn full credit, you must: **Reminder you can not make this discussion board up after Sunday 2/22
In Chapter 1 of the Berns text, you will begin to explore what makes the child. Development is shaped by many factors, brain development, temperament, family, culture, and the broader environment. Children both influence and are influenced by their surroundings, and this dynamic relationship is central to their growth.
Traditionally, childrens environments are fairly stable and guided by parents and close relationships. However, in todays world, rapid social and technological changes, along with global events like the COVID-19 pandemic,have reshaped how children grow, learn, and socialize.
For this discussion, reflect on:
Use your readings, observations, and experiences to support your response.
Be a good group mate, post early so your peers have time to interact with your ideas. Early and thoughtful contributions help create deeper, richer discussions for everyone.
To unlock the next page in this module you must view this page and check the “next” button at the bottom of this page.
Requirements: Please place each part in a different attachment. NO AI USE.
Read the presentation and write a reflective essay with what you liked, what you didn’t like, what surprised you and any doubts or confusion.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Lecture 5 Oral complications of cancer treatment Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy treatment complications.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Write a 500- to 750-word essay that addresses the following:
Time Management
Sales Territory Strategies
Technology Integration
Sales Outcome Improvement
Obfuscation is frequently used to mask something important, like a URL. URL syntax is unique and often used when searching for suspicious sites and activity. By masking URLs, attackers can avoid detection, confuse users, and generate hidden functionality within payloads. Research some examples of obfuscation techniques. Why is Metasploit Framework (MSF) used by attackers?
The primary response must be at least 300 words in length and fully address the topic, demonstrating critical thinking and understanding.
Requirements: NO AI
Obfuscation is frequently used to mask something important, like a URL. URL syntax is unique and often used when searching for suspicious sites and activity. By masking URLs, attackers can avoid detection, confuse users, and generate hidden functionality within payloads. Research some examples of obfuscation techniques. Why is Metasploit Framework (MSF) used by attackers?
The primary response must be at least 300 words in length and fully address the topic, demonstrating critical thinking and understanding.
Requirements: No AI use
Please put 55 days if you wnat bid to be selected
Requirements: as above
Quantum-Accelerated Pattern Analysis for Signal Intelligence
Applying quantum algorithms to pattern recognition in defense-relevant signals (e.g., radar, sonar, RF spectrum) to detect anomalies or threats more efficiently than classical methods, including quantum clustering and quantum support vector machines.
Tell the writer:
No simulation-only papers
No architecture-only discussion
No review/survey style
Require:
The paper should look like classical Shannon theory but quantum.
Instruct them to follow this structure:
Tell them:
The manuscript must contribute at least one of:
Incremental extensions of known results will be rejected.
They must compare against major quantum information results and show how this work advances beyond:
Explicit comparison section required.
Tell them:
Ask the writer to verify:
All entropy identities are correct
All inequalities are justified (data processing, strong subadditivity, etc.)
No unproven assumptions
All proofs logically complete
All claims mathematically supported
Follow IEEE TIT guidelines:
Tell the writer the reviewers will ask:
If the answer to any is weak rejection likely.
For IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, the paper must answer:
“What new fundamental limit of quantum information transmission does this work establish?”
If it cannot answer that clearly it will not be accepted.
Requirements: 100000
For this assignment, I am asking you to:
These are rather long debates/hearings. If you’re choosing one of the 4 hour debates/hearings and plan on tapping out before it ends, I’m telling you to watch at least an hour and a half + the end of the debate/hearing you chose.
Here are the debates/hearings you may choose from:
Here is the outline for the comparative rhetorical prcis
In the [title of debate, hearing, or texts], A argues that A while B argues that B. A supports their argument through [2 strategies] while B supports their argument through [2 fallacies]. While [identification of appeals for strategies of each party], A is [value statement – who is more successful] in their argumentation as As argument is based in A while B bases their argumentation on B.
Here is a comparative rhetorical prcis based on the silly video ” if you need an example:
In the video Wow, Everyones Flirting with Me, Marovitch argues that everyone wants her while The Boys argue the opposite. Marovitch supports her argument through false equivalency & slippery slope conclusions while The Boys support their argument through the use of direct statements and physical avoidance. While Marovitch attempts to appeal to her audiences pathos, The Boys attempt to appeal to their audiences ethos. Marovitch is less successful in her argumentation as her argument is based in delusion and lack of proof, while The Boys base their argumentation on personal experience with Marovitch in their storied history of friendship.
If you can’t remember rhetorical fallacies, take a look at the list here:
Requirements: as much as the directions is asking for