Category: uncategorised

READ THE INSTRUCTOR NOTES AND MAKE CHANGES TO THE PAPER AS NEEDED

Thank you for your submission but your paper is only being returned for revision (considering available attempts and course end date) – this is not a 0 grade nor do you have to start over. You need to provide at least 3 academic references – you only provided 2. See the Assessment 3 feedback and new course video (link listed below) for additional support with developing the required criterion for this paper as well.

Watch the Assessment development video Announcement for insight into developing your Assessment submissions:

——————————-
Reason 1)
TO EFFECTIVELY UPDATE YOUR PAPER: Using the template provided in the directions (including the section headings provided with adding the other criteria requirements as section headings as well) while also applying the Scoring Guide requirements under Distinguished. Applying the insight provided below will help towards earning a Distinguished grade For Assessment 4 grading criteria, I recommend you provide the following content identified by appropriate section headings:

• Identify the specific team members who will join the team for developing the mission statement
• Identify each team member’s skills that will make each valuable and why, and then
• Explain the ethical decisions for updating the mission statement
• Describe critical thinking decisions (not just including questions) to consider when updating the mission statement

Then add an overall Introduction at the beginning and a Conclusion at the end focusing on the Assessment 4 criteria presented for this Assessment. Then provide APA formatted academic references with citations (from Capella Library recommended) specifically supporting the required criteria from the Scoring Guide. Providing solid research to support your points, especially resources from the Capella library (not just the web), will also go a long way in supporting the overall value these organizational departments provide within the structure of the company.

NOTE: See the attached PDF I previously emailed to everyone – scroll to the end of this PDF for assistance with developing your template for each Assessment.

Reason 2)
You did not present and utilize at least 3 unique academic references, along with citations, in proper APA format (see Capella library for examples and assistance) that support the required criteria as stated in the Scoring Guide. It is also best to avoid generic company websites, such as About pages, as they do not provide academic information to specifically support the graded criteria as directed in the Scoring Guide. You can still use company references, but you still need at least 3 different academic references to support the criteria in your paper you can use as many references as you choose so you are not just limited to 3. However, this paper is not about a company review but rather is based on business concepts with then using a company to show how these business concepts are applied. Each reference listed should be used at least once as a citation to support the specific criteria as required that is stated in the Scoring Guide within your updated submission. Providing solid research to support your points, especially resources from the Capella library (not just the web), will also go a long way in supporting the overall value these organizational departments provide within the structure of the company.
Also, If you utilize a textbook as a reference, be sure to also include the chapter and page number as well – however, best to avoid using textbooks in favor of the library journals instead. Utilizing Capella library journal references (not just web references) and presenting your references in proper APA format will add value to your writing, utilizing each of these references within your paper as citations (recommend at least one citation per section) to support the required criteria in the Scoring Guide.
——————————-

IMPORTANT: Be sure to carefully review the course Announcements for details about preparing your Assessment writing. Use the template (including the section headings) provided in the directions and pay close attention to detail to the required criteria provided in the Assessment Scoring Guide to see exactly what you need to include in your writings, especially for a Distinguished grade. The section headings will help keep your content focused on the required criteria for that section, instead of scattered throughout your paper. I suggest you provide at least 2 solid paragraphs (4-5 sentences each) supporting each concept as directed to maximize your credit – I recommend you consider using one of these paragraphs to focus on the specific Distinguished criteria as directed. You may include up to one additional page over the stated maximum page count requirement listed. Once you become comfortable applying the Scoring Guide grading rubric, writing becomes much easier because the rubric provides the outline of your paper for you and then just include a solid Introduction and Conclusion just be sure to include all the criteria under Distinguished. add

Keep in mind that this is not just about reviewing a selected company – the goal is to explain the business concepts that could apply to any business through the use of the references you select (preferably some from the Capella library for Distinguished), and then apply how your selected company applies these concepts in their business practice.

Be sure to provide at least 3 different academic references (not just company resources) to support the required criteria as stated in the Scoring Guide (not from the same resource nor the same company website) as directed (recommend utilizing Capella library journal referencing whenever possible to be eligible for Distinguished) – each reference listed should be used as a citation within your paper. Some website use is OK but avoid using any pedia sites as well as blogs.

Should you have any further questions about developing your paper for this Assessment, you can contact the Graduate Assistant Course Tutor Team (see Announcement) for additional assistance. For additional insight about the feedback I provided, you can reach me via text message. Your updated grading rubric score will replace this one.