Category: uncategorised

  • 501 solve 3

    Critical Thinking Assignment: Delegating Tasks Memo (110 points)

    Review the case study in your textbook, I Cant Do it All! located on page in the integrative case studies starting on page 412. There are advantages and disadvantages of decentralized decision-making, and this case study provides a few examples. A CEO must be able to delegate tasks to others to efficiently lead the facility.

    For this case study assignment, create a company memo addressed to the company President and Human Resources Director in which you discuss Mr. Brices position at Healthdyne, including the decisions he must make as outlined in the case study.

    Your memo should address the following substantive requirements in an order you find most appropriate, but all elements must be included:

    • Describe the need to delegate tasks and the importance of teams.
    • Explain how Mr. Brice should organize the work at Healthdyne.
    • Address specifics such as detailing Vice Presidents job descriptions.
    • Describe in detail how managers will report to other departments.
    • Include information as to advantages and disadvantages of decentralized decision making.

    Your memo should meet the following structural requirements:

    • Four-to-five pages in length, not including the cover sheet and reference page.
    • Formatted according to APA 7th edition and Saudi Electronic University writing standards
    • Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from a minimum of four scholarly articles. Two of these sources may be from the class readings, textbook, or lectures, but the other two must be external. The Saudi Digital Library is a good place to find these references.
    • You are strongly encouraged to submit all assignments to the Originality Check prior to submitting them to your instructor for grading.

    Requirements: 0 plagrasim

  • Ethical & Professional Practices

    1-Instructions

    Complete the assignment posted by your instructor.

    Identify and define business, white-collar, and cyber crimes.

    Choose a crime from one of these areas and offer a brief overview.

    Discuss your thoughts on the crime and was it really a crime?

    2-Instructions

    Respond to the Discussion Question posted by your instructor (by Thursday) and respond to at least two peer’s posts (by Sunday).

    Describe a Cyber Piracy case that you were not aware of.

    What was the outcome?

    Was the penalty fair in your opinion?

    Was there a cost to society for this crime?

    3-Instructions

    Complete the assignment posted by your instructor.

    If a business owns a trademark and finds that someone is holding it hostage as a domain name until you pay a large sum for it, the company may be the victim of cybersquatting.

    • Explain what cyber squatting is
    • Offer some history of when and why cyber squatting started to show up.
    • What steps a company can take against the person or company that is holding the domain name hostage

      4-Instructions

      Respond to the Discussion Question posted by your instructor (by Thursday) and respond to at least two peer’s posts (by Sunday).In assignment one for this week, you submitted information about cyber squatting.Find a story about a company that had this problem and how they chose to pursue a resolution to someone or a company holding their trademarked name hostage with a domain name. What was the outcome?Offer your opinion on whether you think the outcome was fair?Offer some ideas about what can be done or if governments and trademark offices are trying to help.

    Requirements: 1000

  • SOC 334

    Complete the answers complete the questions from both files with the correct article. Make sure to write the answers to the questions in a different in a Google Docs. For example, question 1- b, question 2-c and so on. Because if you circle the answers or highlighted it, I wont be able to see it.. thank you

    Requirements: Read my instructions

  • Psychological test technical information

    Next week, you will be summarizing technical information regarding each test you have chosen from the test publisher’s website and from the Mental Measurements Yearbook (MMY) or PsycTESTS. You can use this week to begin to locate this information. Refer to the following: Database Guide: Mental Measurements YearbookLinks to an external site.. Database Guide: PsycTESTSLinks to an external site.. You are encouraged to use the PSY7610 Research GuideLinks to an external site. to assist your search. The library has also prepared the Psyc Tests and Measures media to help you though common hurdles with searching the library for this course. Please also reach out to the library and make an appointment with a librarian if you have questions concerning your searches.For this assignment, you will continue building on the information you’ve compiled previously about your eight selected tests by gathering the available technical information from the publisher’s website and the MMY or PsycTESTS. The MMY is a resource that you can use for the rest of your career to look up tests to determine the norming and validation of a test. Instructions Describe and assess the technical information about your eight tests from the test publisher’s website (if there is one) and from the MMY or PsycTESTs. Important: When searching the library for the MMY, know that the MMY is a database in the library, not a book or article. Complete the following: Describe how the test was developed. Distinguished assignments will provide detail or examples to illustrate. Describe how it is administered. Distinguished assignments will provide detail or examples to illustrate. Assess the validity information. Distinguished assignments will fully explicate each measure’s validity and why the test is valid. Assess the reliability information. Distinguished assignments will fully explicate each measure’s reliability and why the test is reliable. Assess strengths of the test. Assess weaknesses of the test. Distinguished assignments will fully delineate the weaknesses as well strengths. Analyze the administration, scoring, and interpretation technology of the tests. This can include listing the things that the computer does for you on a test, such as scoring, interpretation, and administration. The assessor needs to make a judgment about whether that’s appropriate. For instance, how useful or appropriate do you think it would be if the entire test is computerized? Acknowledge some of the drawbacks of the technology if you see them. A distinguished assignment would compare the different ways of administering the test. Evaluate the legal, ethical, and professional issues related to each measure. A distinguished assignment would fully explicate two key issues and their impact. One’s own bias as a tester could be one of those issues. Additional Requirements Your assignment should also meet the following requirements: References: A minimum of eight references (a minimum of one source per test). Length of paper: At least six double-spaced pages, not including the title page or references. Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point. APA format: Current APA format and style is required throughout. Use Academic WriterLinks to an external site. for guidance in citing sources and formatting your paper in proper APA style. See the Writing CenterLinks to an external site. for more APA resources specific to your degree level. Competencies Measured By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria: Competency 1: Apply terminology, principles, statistical concepts, and psychometric features related to the construction and application of psychological tests. Describe how each test was developed and how it is administered. Competency 2: Analyze key psychometric properties related to tests and measurement, with an emphasis on reliability and validity. Assess each measure’s reliability and validity. Competency 3: Evaluate the properties, techniques, and applications used in psychological evaluation. Assess each measure’s strengths and weaknesses. Competency 4: Evaluate the legal, ethical, and professional issues related to test usage. Evaluate the legal, ethical, and professional issues related to each measure. Competency 5: Analyze the impact technology has had on the techniques and applications used in psychological testing. Analyze the administration, scoring, and interpretation technology of the tests. Competency 7: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the psychological profession. Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references. Convey clear meaning through appropriate word choice and usage.
  • Ece

    Assignment Title: Reflecting on Historical Influences Purpose: This assignment helps you explore how historical ideas about children and education have influenced your own beliefs and values as a future early childhood educator. Instructions: Write a 2-3 page reflection paper that explores how history has shaped your beliefs about children, families, and education. Your paper should include: Part 1: Your Current Beliefs (about 1 page) How do you view children? (Are they capable? Do they need strict control? Should they have choices? Are they naturally good or do they need to be taught to be good?) What do you believe children need to develop and learn well? What do you think is the purpose of early childhood education? Part 2: Historical Connections (about 1 page) After reading Chapter 1, identify at least 2 historical influences (from sections 1.2-1.6) that connect to your beliefs Examples: religious teachings about children, ideas from philosophers like Rousseau or Locke, contributions from educators like Froebel or Montessori, or contemporary influences. Requirements: 2-3 pages, double-spaced 12-point font (Times New Roman or Arial)
  • Management Analysis

    Instructions:

    For the Management Analysis assignment, you are asked to select ONE of the two options listed below. Please review the grading rubric carefully before you attempt this exercise.

    Option 1 is an exercise on Whos Most Qualified to be Recruitment and Retention Director? [available in Blazeview under Module 6 assignments]. This exercise is from the book Public Personnel Management: Context and Strategies written by Jared J. Llorens and Heather Getha-Taylor (Page 119-124). Although the exercise mentions group work, you will work independently on this exercise. The exercise contains a postscript, which you are encouraged to read AFTER completing the first segment (i.e. ranking the candidates) and answering questions 1-13 on page 120. The resumes of the three candidates are included at the end of the exercise. After completing the first segment, you can read the postscript and respond to the questions at the end of the postscript (1-3) on page 123

    deadline is February 22 no page limit was indicated

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Management Analysis Memo 1 – Human Resource Management.pdf, Management Analysis Exercise (Option 1).pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Data visualization and analysis using Tableau

    Instructions Proof of Data Selection and Upload into Tableau (40 Points Total) In this assignment, you will demonstrate successful upload of your selected dataset into Tableau and begin to analyze the dataset’s structure and potential for visualization. Part 1: Upload and Screenshot (10 Points) Select a dataset that contains clear and measurable Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) suitable for analysis. Recommended sources include Data.gov and Kaggle, though you are welcome to use other reputable sources. Upload your chosen dataset into Tableau Desktop. Submit a screenshot clearly showing the data loaded into Tableau. This serves as proof of successful upload. If you encounter any issues during the upload (e.g., formatting problems, missing values), provide a brief written summary describing the problem and how you resolved it. Note: References are not required for this portion. Part 2: Data Visualization Planning (30 Points) In a well-written summary, respond to the following: Visualization Techniques (15 Points) What types of visualizations will you use to explore and present your data (e.g., bar charts, scatter plots, line graphs, heat maps)? Justify your choices based on the type of data and intended audience. Include at least one scholarly or professional reference to support your use of visualization techniques. Key Data Items (15 Points) Identify and describe the key data fields or variables in your dataset. Explain how these variables relate to your KPIs or business research question. Indicate any planned calculated fields, groupings, or filters you anticipate using in Tableau. Deliverables: Screenshot of data uploaded into Tableau Summary of upload issues (if applicable) Written discussion of: Visualization techniques (with references) Key data items for analysis 10/10 Upload your selected data to Tableau (Show screenshot) 15/15 Discuss visualization techniques you will use on this data? 15/15 Discuss the key data items in the data that you will use?

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Assignment Instructions data visualisation.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • ljh 900words

    The four films we have watched are the four that I circled in red in the two screenshots: Marcel Camuss Black Orpheus (1959), Roberto Farias Assalto ao Trem Pagador (1962), Anselmo Duartes Pagador de Promessas (1962), and Macunama (1968).You may choose Week 4s Macunama (1968) and Vidas Secas, Deus e Diabo na Terra do Sol, Terra em Trans as one film and one clip. Clip is the audiovisual material screened in class. If you choose to write the third question, you may also compare two films or compare one film with one clip. Based on the requirements, you must cite at least 2 of the readings assigned so far to support your points. and I have put all the reading materials in the files.

    Requirements: 900words

  • Research presentation

    Use the Research paper that you are currently writing for me to make a presentation of the research paper. I am going to submit a temple so you can see how it needs to look. use the information from the research paper that you are writing, include the information in the presentation.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Powerpoint poster templates for research poster presentations.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Military veterans transitioning to civilian careers

    Overview

    What You Will Learn: In this Touchstone, you will use the critical thinking skills that you learned in this unit by finding a credible source. You will practice those skills by determining why the source you chose should be considered credible evidence and then reflecting on your process. The goal of this Touchstone is to help you get comfortable with locating and evaluating research.

    Why It Matters: Learning how to find credible sources and evaluate information is one of the most valuable skills you can develop. Whether you’re making a case at work, deciding how to vote, or researching a big personal decision, being able to spot reliable information and understand different perspectives gives you the power to think clearly and make informed choices.

    What You Will Hand In: A 12-page paper that describes your research process, reflects on your experience as a researcher, and includes a reference page with an APA-formatted citation for the credible source you found.

    Keys to Success:

    • Use research strategies that demonstrate critical thinking.
    • Choose a source that is credible, trustworthy, and reliable.
    • Answer the reflection questions.
    • Develop and submit your own original work. While AI tools can be helpful for brainstorming or organizing ideas, this assignment is meant to strengthen your own skills in research, reading, and critical thinking. Using AI to write your reflection or find and summarize sources takes away your opportunity to grow in these areas and can also lead to plagiarism flags. To stay within academic guidelines and get the most from this assignment, be sure all of your writing and analysis is your own.

    Instructions

    Step 1: Select and Evaluate One Credible Source

    Review the tutorial for more help on how to find a topic. Locate one credible source that provides reliable, relevant information about your topic. Choose either:

    • A scholarly source such as a peer-reviewed journal article, a book published by a university press, or research from a reputable organization.
    • A credible popular source such as a feature article from a major newspaper, a report from a respected magazine, or a publication by a professional organization.

    Consider what kind of source fits best for the early stage of your research. You’ll need to use the same topic for Touchstones 1.1 and 1.2, but you can change your topic for your final paper.

    Step 2: Write a Reflection (150250 words)

    Your reflection should include 3-4 paragraphs:

    • Topic Selection: How or why did you select this topic to research?
    • Research Process & Decision Making: What search terms did you use? What platform did you use to find the article or source? Why did you select the article you did? What is the journal or other source where the article was published? How did you determine that this source is credible?
    • Critical Thinking: What made this source stand out as credible or useful? How did reading this source challenge or reinforce what you already believed? What is one thing from the source you didnt fully understand at first, and how did you clarify it?
    • Personal Learning & Application: What goals do you want to achieve in your writing and research? What did you learn from this experience about your own research habits? How has this process changed the way you think about finding credible information? What is one skill you used or developed in this assignment that you can apply in other courses or at work?

    Step 3: Create an APA Citation for Your Reference

    • Create an APA-formatted reference for the article you read.

    Step 4: Submit Your Source, Reflection, and Citation

    • Review the rubric to confirm that you have met all the requirements of the touchstone. Once you are happy with it, you can submit it as a Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) file. Your submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your assignment.

    Rubric Advanced (100%)Proficient (85%)Acceptable (75%)Needs Improvement (50%)Non-Performance (0%)Credible Source Selection

    Assesses the relevance, credibility, and appropriateness of the source selected. Students must choose a source aligned with their topic and demonstrate that it comes from a trustworthy publisher or organization. (20%)

    Selects a source published by a recognized authority (e.g., academic journal, professional organization, or reputable media outlet); source is clearly aligned with the topic and useful at this stage of research.Selects a source published by a generally credible outlet; relevance to topic and stage of research is clear but may be limited.Selects a source with some relevance or usefulness, but with limited credibility (e.g., lacks publication transparency, author credentials, or recency).Selects a source that lacks credibility, relevance, or appropriateness for academic use (e.g., commercial blog, non-expert opinion piece).No source is submitted, or the source has no discernible credibility or relevance.Research Process & Decision Making

    Evaluates the explanation of the search strategy and decision-making process. This includes the tools used, and how the source was chosen. (20%)

    Describes search process, terms used, and rationale for selection; explains how credibility was determined using at least two specific criteria (e.g., author, publication, evidence).Describes search process and reasoning, with some reference to credibility criteria, though one may be missing or vague.Mentions some elements of the search and rationale but lacks specificity or clear explanation of credibility.Reflection is vague or incomplete; may list steps without explanation or overlook credibility.No reflection, or reflection is unrelated to the process.Critical Thinking

    Ability to evaluate the credibility and usefulness of the source. (20%)

    Evaluates credibility using at least two characteristics of trustworthy sources (e.g., objectivity, evidence, expertise); identifies a belief challenged or reinforced and explains how understanding was deepened or clarified.Evaluates credibility and engages with the content; may touch on belief or learning, but with limited detail or only one evaluation factor.Gives a general statement about credibility or learning but lacks evidence of deep engagement or evaluation.Minimal critical thinking; general or unrelated observations with no clear link to the source.No evidence of evaluation or engagement with the source.Personal Learning & Application

    Connection of this research experience to future academic or professional goals. (20%)

    Identifies and describes one specific research skill gained and how it will apply to future academic or professional tasks; links reflection to personal learning goals.Generally describes what was learned and makes broad connection to future goals or tasks.Identifies learning with vague or underdeveloped connection to future relevance.Reflection is unclear or superficial; lacks connection to goals or future use.No reflection on learning or future application.Conventions and Proofreading

    Demonstrates command of standard English grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage. (10%)

    There are few, if any, negligible errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are occasional minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are some significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are frequent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are consistent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.APA Citation

    Formatted citation in APA style. (10%)

    Citation is complete and error-free, following APA guidelines (e.g., author, date, title, source, DOI/URL if applicable).Citation is mostly correct; contains no more than two minor errors.Citation includes several errors in APA format but includes required elements.Citation is present but has major formatting or content issues.Citation is missing or not in APA format.