Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • Value of health information technology

    CASE Study: The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate the value of health information technology in the prevention and detection of errors, as well as analysis of unintended consequences and human factors through quality improvement strategies.

    1. Review the following video and documents on the case study. *
    2. RaDonda Vaught speaks out l GMA [Video file]. Retrieved from
    4. . (4:56).
    5. Lusk, C. (2022). Reconsidering the application of systems thinking in healthcare: the RaDonda Vaught case. Available at
    7. State of Tennessee vs. RaDonda Vaught: Discovery request response. Available at
    9. Note pages 5-6, 50-51.
    10. Apply one of the Quality Improvement Models discussed in the course, or choose an approach from the literature, or the one used in your workplace to analyze the case.
    11. Summarize the case in one paragraph, highlighting the role of HIT.
    12. Describe briefly the model chosen for the analysis.
    13. Provide a rationale for using the selected model over other options.
    14. Follow the model steps and processes to identify the quality, safety, security, privacy, and unintended consequences issues in the case.
    15. List interprofessional team members who may be consulted on this process and their expected role.
    16. Design strategies for your workplace to mitigate the issues identified from the case.
    17. Provide at least one visual of the process and proposed changes (i.e., flow chart, process map, data quality, pareto chart, control chart, data visualization).
    18. Identify changes if needed to policies, EHR, equipment, and other HIT applications.
    19. Create a communication/transition plan.
    20. Develop a staff education plan on changes.
    21. What change theory would be best for this program?
    22. What educational deliver method (s) would be most effective?
    23. Compose metrics for evaluating the plan in each of the learning domains:
    24. Cognitive
    25. Psychomotor
    26. Effective
    27. Reflect on the ramifications of criminalizing the nonintentional reporting of mistakes on your own advanced practice, the nursing profession, and Quality Improvement practices.
    28. Submit the written report in APA 7th ed. format, 10-12 pages in length, not including title page, the 1-page reflection and references. Use headers to distinguish the sections of the paper.

  • Restructure Org Powerpoint

    Hello,

    Could you please redo Slides 1 and 2 exactly as they are, without changing the structure or content? Id like them to be cleaner, more organized, and properly sized to fit the slides so they look polished and easy to read. Size of the boxes should be even. Just overall better looking

    Please keep the formatting fully editable so I can make updates at any time on a powerpoint.

    Requirements: NA

  • Bail system in the United States

    Bail in the United States is currently a hot-button issue. Typically, people are required to pay money to be released on bail, meaning that only people who have access to money are able to be freed prior to their trial. This has contributed to the overpopulation issues that many American prisons are facing, since many people are unable to receive bail. Some jurisdictions have attempted to alleviate the problem by eliminating cash bail altogether and releasing those awaiting trial without payment. This has led to other issues, including releasing violent criminals who end up committing more crimes before they appear in court. This is an ongoing issue, and no jurisdiction has come up with a perfect solution. For this discussion, address the following: What are the pros and cons of the current bail system in the United States? What could make the bail system more just? Why does there appear to be a disparity in justice for rich people vs. poor people? For which crimes, if any, should bail be eliminated regardless of a person’s wealth? In your responses, bring in specific examples about disparity in bail based on differences in wealth or status. Before you continue, read the following: &page=1

  • 5.4 Short Paper: Social Media & Development

    In what ways does social media Facebook, Snapchat, Instagram, even texting have an impact on teenagers development? You should consider all three domains: physical (e.g. weight, activity, geographical access, etc.), social (e.g. identity, bullying, sexual content, friendships, etc.), and cognitive (e.g. attention, bias, content, etc.). (I NEED THE PAPER INFORMAL AS POSSIBLE PLEASE)

  • Online practice(using standards)

    Using Standards in the Classroom – using the book: Llama Llama Red Pajama

    Purpose: Practice creating an activity using standards.

    Summary: You will create an independent activity using the English Language Arts & Reading (ELAR) Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) for kindergarten.

    Instructions:

    • Select one of the books below to use as a theme for your manipulatives/materials.
    • Review the kindergarten ELAR TEKS (found in the chart below)
    • Choose one standard/skill that will be practiced with your activity.
    • Create an engaging activity that promotes literacy development.
    • Identify the goal and objective.
    • Determine what the child will do from start to finish.
    • Describe the activity in detail.
    • The activity should include material/manipulatives that the child can interact with.
    • Include pictures of the material that will be used in the activity.
    • You can use screenshots or produce a computer generated example of the manipulative(s).
    • Canva is a free, user-friendly graphic design website.
    • Provide an explanation of how the activity promotes literacy development.

    Worksheets are not acceptable.

    Supplemental Information

    • The target age is 5 – 6
    • The activity should be one that can be completed independently and without the assistance of the teacher.
    • Use only the literacy standards found in the chart below or in the Kindergarten ELAR TEKS.

    Kindergarten ELAR TEKS

    Developing and sustaining foundational language skills: listening, speaking, reading, writing, and thinking–beginning reading and writing. The student develops word structure knowledge through phonological awareness, print concepts, phonics, and morphology to communicate, decode, and spell. The student is expected to demonstrate phonological awareness by identifying and producing rhyming words Developing and sustaining foundational language skills: listening, speaking, reading, writing, and thinking–beginning reading and writing. The student develops word structure knowledge through phonological awareness, print concepts, phonics, and morphology to communicate, decode, and spell. The student is expected to demonstrate phonological awareness by identifying syllables in spoken wordsDeveloping and sustaining foundational language skills: listening, speaking, reading, writing, and thinking–beginning reading and writing. The student develops word structure knowledge through phonological awareness, print concepts, phonics, and morphology to communicate, decode, and spell. The student is expected to demonstrate phonological awareness by blending spoken onsets and rimes to form simple wordsDeveloping and sustaining foundational language skills: listening, speaking, reading, writing, and thinking–beginning reading and writing. The student develops word structure knowledge through phonological awareness, print concepts, phonics, and morphology to communicate, decode, and spell. The student is expected to demonstrate and apply phonetic knowledge by recognizing that new words are created when letters are changed, added, or deleted such as it – pit – tip – tapResponse skills: listening, speaking, reading, writing, and thinking using multiple texts. The student responds to an increasingly challenging variety of sources that are read, heard, or viewed. The student is expected to retell texts in ways that maintain meaningComposition: listening, speaking, reading, writing, and thinking using multiple texts–writing process. The student uses the writing process recursively to compose multiple texts that are legible and uses appropriate conventions. The student is expected to edit drafts with adult assistance using standard English conventions, including singular and plural nounsComposition: listening, speaking, reading, writing, and thinking using multiple texts–writing process. The student uses the writing process recursively to compose multiple texts that are legible and uses appropriate conventions. The student is expected to edit drafts with adult assistance using standard English conventions, including verbsComposition: listening, speaking, reading, writing, and thinking using multiple texts–writing process. The student uses the writing process recursively to compose multiple texts that are legible and uses appropriate conventions. The student is expected to edit drafts with adult assistance using standard English conventions, including punctuation marks at the end of declarative sentencesUse the template to submit the following information.

    • Title of the Book
    • Include the author and the illustrator
    • Standard
    • Provide the TEK
    • Include the strand, knowledge and skills statement and the student expectation (see screenshot below).
    • Goal and Objective
    • Description of the activity
    • Describe in detail what the children will do.
    • What will the child do from start to finish?
    • How will they use the materials?
    • List of materials
    • Identify all of the materials that will be needed to construct this activity.
    • Reflection
    • How does this activity support literacy development?

    Resources Needed

    Children’s Literature Choices:

    Llama Llama Red Pajama or Chica Chicka Chicka Boom Boom

    for Llama Llama Red Pajama

    for Chicka Chicka Boom Boom

    Standards:

    TEKS –

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Online Practice Using Standards – Activity Template.docx, Kindergarten ELAR TEKS.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Incivility in the Workplace

    Incivility in the Workplace Paper Resources & Rubric Review the entire Incivility in the Workplace Rubric criteria here to understand the full assignment. Please make sure your 6-8 page paper includes the following: Write an introduction with a minimum of two detailed paragraphs, and at least five in-depth sentences per paragraph, introducing incivility in the workplace within the healthcare metaparadigm. Ensure that the information demonstrates a strong understanding through clear, logical, and professional organization. All information should be relevant and accurate, based on credible sources. Write a minimum of two detailed paragraphs identifying how incivility impacts an individual nurses ability to use high-level clinical judgment. Each paragraph should contain at least five in-depth sentences. Include a minimum of two specific, in-depth examples of how incivility in the workplace impacts the nurses ability to use high-level clinical judgment, considering emotional factors, stress, and patient care needs. Ensure that the information is presented in a clear, organized, and professional manner. All information should be relevant and accurate, based on credible resources provided. Identify a minimum of two common issues that occur with workplace or clinical site incivility. Provide a minimum of three in-depth sentences for each common issue identified, explaining how and why each common issue negatively affects the workplace or clinical site and how they can be eliminated. Write a minimum of two detailed paragraphs discussing how workplace or clinical site communication is or was affected due to incivility. Consider whether patients suffered or if patient treatments were missed. Each paragraph should contain at least five in-depth sentences, providing a thorough examination of how workplace or clinical site communication is or was affected by incivility. Write a minimum of two detailed paragraphs identifying current health initiatives that organizations are implementing to decrease incivility within the workplace or clinical sites. Review relevant information from the ANA, ONA, and/or Joint Commission, as well as your organizations policies and procedures. Identify a minimum of three current health initiatives that healthcare organizations are implementing to decrease incivility within the workplace or clinical site. Provide a thorough examination, using a minimum of two in-depth sentences for each initiative, with a strong emphasis on how it relates to incivility in the workplace or clinical site. Write a closing or conclusion paragraph that ties the paper together. Provide a minimum of five in-depth sentences as a conclusion paragraph that summarizes all the important key points within the paper. Include two (2) APA Style formatted references and citations. For more information on how to cite and reference in APA Style, visit the APA Resources page at the Hondros Online Library. Use a minimum of two research articles/resources, which should be submitted with the assignment. Ensure that all resources/references are cited and listed using appropriate APA formatting with no errors noted. Evaluate spelling and grammar, make sure the paper is in APA Style format. Use the Sample Hondros College APA Paper as a guide and the APA 7th ed Paper Format Template to write your paper. Accurately use terminology and aim for two or fewer MUGS (Mechanics, Usage, Grammar, Spelling) errors. The Week 6 Incivility in the Workplace Paper is an APA Style-formatted assignment that must be submitted in Microsoft Word (.doc, .docx). Assignments containing handwritten answers will not be accepted. Paper assignments are to be completed by each individual student, not as a group or shared assignment. Assignments submitted in any other format including .pdf or .pages will not be accepted and will receive a zero grade. In the Submit Assignment area below, click the Add File button and click Upload to browse the files on your computer to locate the document you wish to attach. Select the document, and then click Open. Verify your submission is correct, and click the X next to the document if you would like to remove and attach a different file. When you have the correct document, click the Add button. When you are ready to submit the file you must click the Submit button. Turnitin icon Turnitin This assignment will be submitted through Turnitin, which checks the originality of your submission against other sources. Make sure to review your Originality Report to help ensure that you are not plagiarizing. Click the colored icon next to Turnitin Report toward the top of the assignment submission page to review your Turnitin report. It may take 10-15 minutes for your report to process. Remember that you can re-submit your assignment until the deadline passes. Additionally, some of your instructors may provide feedback through Turnitin; to view this feedback, open the Turnitin report, and click on the GradeMark button at the top of the page. For more information, click here for a guide on using Turnitin. Using Turnitin in MyClassroom and Reading Similarity Reports.pdf Assignment due time date icon Assignment Due You must submit your assignment on or before 11:59 pm ET Sunday of this week.

  • Philosopher Profile

    Philosopher Profile Assignment Instructions

    Overview

    Students will complete a philosophy profile of a historical thinker that has had a profound impact on western thought. This will require that the student understand both the cultural/philosophical context in which the chosen figure emerged and what impact his/her contribution has had to the development of western thought since. This exercise will help students appreciate how he/she is standing on the shoulders of those who have gone before them, even when it comes to thinking critically.

    Instructions

    Part 1

    In part one of this profile, students need to identify their chosen philosopher and describe the historical milieu in which they emerged. This will require that the student highlight major influence and/or experiences that shaped the way this philosopher thought. Also, as part of part 1, the student should identify several major contributions this philosopher has made to western thought (be specific). This portion of the analysis needs to take up at least 4 pages (double-spaced using Times New Roman 12-pt font with 1-inch margins) and include proper, current Turabian format for any references used.

    Part 2

    In part two of this profile, students will discuss the reaction the greater philosophical community had/has toward their chosen philosopher. To satisfy this part of the profile, students will need to answer the following questions: Is the impact the philosopher made still being felt today? Has/have the argument(s) the philosopher made evolved over time? If so, how? In what way can this philosopher and his/her contribution still be applied today? This portion of the analysis needs to take up at least 4 pages (double-spaced using Times New Roman 12-pt font with 1-inch margins) and include proper, current Turabian format for any references used.

    Front and Back Matter

    The student must include a Title Page and Bibliography of sources used in the paper (properly formatted according to current Turabian format). The Title Page and Bibliography are NOT included in the page count.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Philosopher Profile Assignment Instructions.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Module 5 EBP Assignment Worksheet: Literature Search & Evide…

    Assignment Overview:

    This assignment will guide you in applying evidence-based practice (EBP) skills through a focused literature search to support your approved PICO or PIO question. You’ll use scholarly databases (not Google) to locate and evaluate high-level research evidence relevant to your topic.

    This activity will help you:

    • Identify strong sources of evidence
    • Organize findings using a standardized tool
    • Prepare for your final paper by practicing synthesis and documentation

    Youll complete the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice (JHEBP) Appendix G: Evidence Summary Table, which youll also use in your Signature Assignment. This is your opportunity to practice using this tool and connect research findings directly to nursing practice.

    What You Will Do:

    • Complete the Module 5 EBP Assignment Worksheet by typing directly into the provided spaces.
    • Use scholarly databases such as CINAHL, PubMed, or the Cochrane Library to locate high-quality research related to your approved PICO/PIO question.
    • Refer to the Directions for Completing the Appendix G Evidence Summary Tool for guidance as you complete the evidence table.
    • Use the Appendix D: Evidence Level and Quality Guide to determine the strength of the evidence you find.
    • Cite all sources in APA 7th edition format.
    • Submit the completed worksheet by the due date.
    • Review the grading rubric provided in the assignment module for evaluation criteria.

    My approved PIO question: In hospitalized adult patients on a medical-surgical floor at high risk for skin breakdown with a Braden score below 18 (P), what is the effect of implementing twice-daily Kamishibai Card (K-Card) audits (I) on the rate of hospital-acquired pressure injuries (O)?

    This assignment is designed to facilitate the achievement of: MOs 1, 2, & 3

    Rubric

    Module 5 EBP Assignment Grading Rubric

    Module 5 EBP Assignment Grading Rubric

    CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Section 1: PICO/PIO Question (10 points)

    10 to >7.0 pts

    Meets Expectations

    Clearly written, specific, and appropriate for an EBP focus. Addresses population, issue, and outcomes well.

    7 to >0 pts

    Needs Improvement

    Vague, incomplete, or lacks alignment with EBP. May be missing one or more PICO/PIO components.

    10 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Section 2: Search Strategy (20 points)

    Databases Used (5 points)

    Search Terms/Boolean Operators (5 points)

    Filters Applied (5 points)

    Narrowing & Article Selection (5 points)

    20 to >15.0 pts

    Meets Expectations

    At least 2 scholarly databases used. Logical, relevant terms and operators. Appropriate filters used. Clear explanation of how articles were chosen.

    15 to >0 pts

    Needs Improvement

    Fewer than 2 databases used or includes non-scholarly. Incomplete, irrelevant, or incorrect operators. Inappropriate or missing filters. Vague or missing explanation.

    20 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    Section 3: Evidence Summary Table (60 points)

    For each article (x3):

    Author and Date (1 point)

    Evidence Type & Design (3 points)

    Sample Size & Setting (2 points)

    Findings Relevant to EBP (3 points)

    Measures Used (2 points)

    Study Limitations (3 points)

    Evidence Level (3 points)

    Quality Rating (3 points)

    60 to >49.0 pts

    Meets Expectations

    Evidence table includes complete and mostly accurate information for all 3 articles.

    49 to >0 pts

    Needs Improvement

    Evidence table is missing required elements, contains multiple inaccuracies, or lacks clarity.

    60 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

    APA Format of References (10 points)

    10 to >7.0 pts

    Meets Expectations

    References are properly formatted in APA 7th edition.

    7 to >0 pts

    Needs Improvement

    APA formatting is incomplete or incorrect.

    10 pts

    Total Points: 100

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Johns Hopkins Nursing – Evidence Level and Quality Guide-6.pdf, Directions for Appendix G Evidence Summary Tool-2.pdf, Module 5 EBP Assignment Worksheet – Literature Search Evidence Synthesis-2.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Creationism in a new tuxedo? (NO AI)

    Proponents of “Intelligent Design” insist that institutions of higher learning should permit, but not require, scientists and philosophers to develop hypotheses of divine origins for mankind. They argue that the concept of Intelligent Design implies nothing about beliefs, and only implies that “life had an intelligent source.” Basing your answer on the readings and course material, do you think Intelligent Design should be taught as legitimate course of study? Why or why not? Finally, why do you think a significant portion of the U.S. population today still doubts evolution, despite all of the evidence?

    Your answer should be limited to 300 words (approx 1 page). After you post your reply, don’t forget to respond to at least one other student’s post. Your responses to other students must be substantive and thought-provoking. In other words, do not simply post “I agree” or “I disagree.”

    Requirements: 300

  • Discussion post

    Assessment is a critical part of teaching, but planning assessments for elementary students requires more than simply choosing a test or activity. Young learners bring diverse developmental, linguistic, cultural, and academic needs to the classroom, and these factors must shape how teachers design, administer, and interpret assessments.

    For this weeks discussion, respond to the following question:

    When planning assessments for elementary students, why must teachers consider additional factors such as developmental readiness, language proficiency, cultural background, learning differences, and students emotional needs?

    In your response, you might reflect on:

    • How young childrens developmental stages influence what they can reasonably demonstrate
    • How language and communication skills affect assessment performance
    • How cultural experiences shape students understanding of tasks
    • How learning differences or exceptionalities require flexible assessment options
    • How stress, anxiety, or confidence levels impact assessment outcomes