Category: uncategorised
-
Research Paper
This learning experience will complement the material covered through class lectures, assigned readings, and writing. The exploration project focuses on human transformation based on the practical nature of biblical wisdom. This can serve as an aid toward becoming a better person. From biblical point of view, God extends kindness and forgiveness to human beings because they are morally prone to sin. Divine instruction provides guidance for the work of transformation that is communal based. We do not grow by ourselves but in honest relationships with others.
What You Should Do
- Conduct a research online for information about the most effective programs dealing with changing addictive behavior. You will want to learn about the history and philosophy of the sponsoring organization you plan to visit, its objectives and approach, its success rates, etc. This should be done before you attend a group meeting.
- Attend a regular group meeting of a Twelve-Step Program engaged in human transformation such as Alcoholic Anonymous (AA). For a list of organizations see List of twelve-step groups in Wikipedia. The group does not need to be affiliated with Christianity. Your presence at the meeting is obligatory. Be informed that no recording is allowed in the meetings of anonymous groups. In your report you must provide the time, the date, and the address of the meeting which you attended.
- Write a summary of your research (step 1, above), followed by an abbreviated report of what was said and done during the meeting (step 2, above). The results of your research plus the report from the meeting should be 700 or more words in length. Then write your personal reflection of no less than 300 words. Your complete report will total at least 1,000 words. There is no maximum limit to word count. At the end of the report you will provide a list of at least three (3) online and/or published sources used to prepare yourself for the visit. All information used in your report must be acknowledged with quotes enclosed in quotation marks. A failure to observe these standards or submitting the work of another as ones own may result in a failing grade.
Standards for Grading (max. 50 points)
- Quality and completeness of your advanced preparation for the group meeting (10).
- Clarity of the summary about the meeting (20).
- The length and level of mature informed reflection and critical analysis on relevant issues and information by each person submitting an exploration report (20).
Please follow the instructions regarding minimum word count. Deductions for inadequate word count will be made on a pro-rated basis. You are expected to use a clear writing style in Standard English and follow the assignments instructions in order to receive full credit.
-
Literature
Literature Review Paper
Literature review paper
One of the main learning exercises in the course is a Literature review paper. The literature review paper’s purpose is to answer a significant clinical question. Most of your discussions and activities in this course are created to build the skills need it to write this paper. To do this paper you need to work each week on assignments, that will help you build your skills for the successful completion of this assignment.
Your paper should be 5-6 pages long (double-spaced, 12 font) not including the references and title page). You should have a reference page of at least eight (8) academic sources, including at least five (5) primary research sources that specifically answer the review question. Use APA format for references and citations. All papers must be submitted to be reviewed for similarity, any paper with a score of 20% or higher in the similarity index, will receive an automatic 0, and will not be reviewed until the similarity score is below 20%.
Step by step directions and a rubric is posted below. After your paper has been corrected and graded, you have the option to revise your literature review paper in order to improve your writing and correct your mistakes. If there is a significant improvement, the grade will be increased. Revisions are due a week after receiving feedback.
Instructions:
Your paper needs to follow the following criteria:
1 Choose a problem faced by clients in your practice area that you think is important and would like to learn more about (Use Activity 1 to identify the problem).
2 Use your knowledge of PICO to develop a well-built narrow clinical question. For example: In adult patients with total hip replacements (P), how effective is pain medication (I) compared to aerobic stretching (C) in controlling post-operative pain (O)? (the development of the PICO question should not be included in the paper) (Use discussion 2 & 3).
3 Write a five (5) to six (6) page literature review paper on the standing knowledge of the chosen question.
4 Include a minimum of five (5) journal articles, at least three (3) from nursing journals. However, make sure that the (5) journals are the ones analyzed and synthesized in the results and discussion sections.
5 The body of the paper should be made of the following titled sections: Title (introduction), Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion.
6 Provide a specific and concise tentative title for your literature review paper (You may use the results or at least the variables in the title).
7 The abstract is not required
8 Include a 1-page introduction of your topic (background information), the focus/aim of your review. The introduction should include a statement of the problem, briefly explain the significance of your topic study, and act to introduce the reader to your definitions and background. Must include your main statement (i.e. the purpose of this review is…{PICO Question}).
9 The method section should include sources, databases, keywords, inclusion/exclusion criteria, levels of evidence, and other information that establishes credibility to your paper (Use discussion 4 & 5).
10 The results should summarize the findings of studies that have been conducted on your topic. For each study, you should briefly explain its purpose, procedure for data collection, and major findings. This is the section where you will discuss the strengths and weaknesses of studies (Use discussion 6 and activity 2).
11 Submit a table of the studies as per the matrix development (see discussion 7).
12 The discussion should be like a conclusion portion of an essay paper. It serves as a summary of the body of your literature review and should highlight the most important findings. Your analysis should help you to draw conclusions. In this section, you would discuss any consensus or disagreement on the topic. It can also include any strengths and weaknesses in general of the research area. If you believe there is more to research, you may include that here.
13 Finally, you will need to conclude your paper. At this point, you have put substantial effort into your paper. Close this chapter with a summary of the paper, major findings, and any major recommendations for the profession.
14 In general, your paper should show a sense of direction and contain a definite central idea supported with evidence. The writing should be logical, and the ideas should be linked together in a logical sequence. The ideas need to be put together clearly for the writer and for the reader.
15 Papers will be graded by rubric. When preparing to work on an assignment it is a good idea to review the rubric for the assignment. The rubric identifies the important points that will be graded as well as the description of the information that should be provided to receive all of the points in each section of the assignment. Reviewing the rubric before you begin a paper and then once again as you complete the paper will give you confidence that you included the required information and will receive maximum points for each section. See the grading rubric for this assignment.
16 Format references and citations using APA
-
Module 5 Assignment
You will be asked to complete 7 written assignments. This includes 4 written assignments The assignment will be listed under each module. For the 6 written assignment they need to be at least 1000 words in length, double spaced, 12 font, Microsoft Word document. PDF files and Pages are not accepted and will be given a 0 with no opportunity to resubmit. Documents will not be accepted in Works, Wordpad, or Wordperfect. Please do not submit papers in Microsoft Works Word Processor. It will be given a grade of a zero. No excuses. Please make sure you indent your paragraphs, double space your paper and include three sentences a paragraph. Please include an introduction and conclusion. Assignments should include a minimum of 2 references. When you make reference to research material in your paper, you must use appropriate source citations as found in the APA Publication Manual. Citing the book and author at the bottom of a posting is not enough. We need to be able to decipher your thoughts from the material. Consequently, please make sure to cite your textbook, cited examples from the Internet or scholarly sources from the library within the text in APA and include your works cited at the end of the post in APA. Please review and utilize the APA Publication Manual. Assignments are to be submitted by 11:59 pm central by the module deadline. Assignments will not be accepted late At the top of the paper please indicate your name and then skip a space and address the assignment How do you think your perspective on the number of children you want to have in your lifetime would differ if you lived in western Europe, as compared to living in sub-Saharan Africa? What are the arguments for and against the idea that fertility control is a moral dilemma rather than preventive medicine? Why is the status of women in society so important to determining the level of fertility? MUST BE 1,000 Words -
DISCUSSION POSTS 206 & 213
DISCUSSION POST 206
VIDEO DISCUSSION III
Watch videos below and make a comment based on the following questions.
VIDEOS: https://youtu.be/ti5ZFmglzV4?si=G2BvJCnfr3Gq2I7E
VIDEOS: https://abcnews.com/video/50033176/
VIDEOS: https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/100000004818663/peanut-butter-jelly-and-racism.html?smid=url-share
VIDEOS: https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/100000004818668/check-our-bias-to-wreck-our-bias.html?smid=url-share
1. What are your thoughts on prejudice in the U.S., and how does it relate to stereotypes? Include examples from the videos (What Would You Do? Racism in America, Latino men met with prejudice, Peanut Butter, Jelly, and Racism, and Check Our Bias to Wreck Our Bias).
2. How is prejudice and discrimination (two different concepts) manifested by people and/or institutions in the U.S? What examples of implicit bias have you noticed, and how do media portrayals contribute to it? Does social media factor in?
3. Have you ever felt that someone had prejudice towards you? If so, did it change your view or perspective of society? Have you ever had prejudice or bias against other people? Why?
4. Below is a link for a implicit bias test, it has a color skin and race test. Complete the short test (on first screen check yourself as a guest and then click on accepting terms, then take the race test among the options shown). Were you surprised at the results?
Answers should be minimum 350 words total. Please reply to at least one classmate for full points.
*Remember to always be respectful of others thoughts and opinions.
********************************************************************
DISCUSSION POST 213
Discussion Week 4
- Select one of the following topics: two-career family, death penalty legislation, or unemployment. Write down the name of your topic.
- Using a search engine on the web, such as Google or Yahoo, do a search for research on this topic by searching for an exact phrase thats of interest (such as death penalty legislation) and the word research.
- How many results did you obtain in your search? If you ended up with more than a few hundred items, narrow down your topic in some way. Describe what you did to narrow the search. Describe the number and quality of the results you obtained.
- Check out at least three of the sites that you found in your search. Identify the website, describe the information on the site, and evaluate the usefulness of this information for you and/or other researchers.
-
awakening , please dont use plagio
Awakening the DNP Spirit of Scientific Underpinnings Assignment Dropbox – Step 3
Requirements:
-
Pre-law Vigilantism: The Legality and Ethics of Taking the…
I have attached the grading rubric along with the Demichele and Bateson readings. Use those sources back up an original idea answering the prompt below.
The assignment is to produce a 6 page thesis-driven paper using the materials in our reading and viewing (not a
research paper). Students are to make quote and paraphrase use of the DeMichele and Bateson reading while
analyzing John Q.
Option 1: Repositioning back to legality: Should John Q go to jail for what he has done? How do you believe the
hospital, courts, and society could productively respond to his actions?Reference the part of the movie in the end where the judge reads out the indivdual charges. you can search how much time each charge comes with and argue why or why not he should be held guilty/innocent.
Use time stamps when referencing scenes in the movie JohnQ
Do not use AI and attach an AI report at the end.
6 pages double spaced.
Requirements:
-
Letter writing
The university of Sierra Leone has been struggling in keeping with the academic calendar on the commencement of classes for the first year students in October. Write a letter to the vice chancellor of the university discussing four steps in tackling this challenge.