Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • Entrepreneurship

    For this assignment, develop a 2-page essay by choosing one of the topics below: Option 1: Describe the role and value of an entrepreneur to the economic process Option 2: Profile an actual entrepreneur The essay should be in APA format, but no abstract or cover page needed. If you choose Option 1, it will be more of a theoretical treatment and you would need to discuss things like greater coordination, solving a problem, and resource development. If you choose Option 2, you need to give actual tangible examples and even try to quantify the value your chosen entrepreneur has created or is creating.

  • write a brief regarding a tort dispute

    a. Issue [1 sentence]b. Rule(s) Offer, Acceptance, Awareness (Intent), Consideration, Capacity, and Legality [1-3 sentences]c. Analysis / Application(s) [7-10 sentences]d. Conclusion(s) [2-3 sentences]3. Writing in the inline-text function to enter response. There will be no other formatsaccepted. 4. Plagiarism is not allowed.

    Requirements: 400

  • reply

    REPLY TO THIS POST ABOUT….

    Discussion Post 3: Root Cause Analysis

    Describe an experience with Root Cause Analysis that you had in practice or your clinical practicum using a fishbone diagram or 5 Whys method. What was the adverse event? What was your role? As a nurse leader, how would you prevent the adverse event (or near miss) from happening again?

    Provide at least two references from the required reading and any additional references needed.

    Root cause analysis (RCA) is a structured investigative methodology aimed at identifying and correcting the underlying system-level causes of adverse events (Spath & DeVane, 2022). During my clinical practice, I participated in an RCA following a serious adverse event involving a confused patient who eloped from their home, found by police several hours later, transferred to our inpatient unit, and subsequently passed away. Although uncommon, sentinel events such as this often expose serious vulnerabilities in clinical practices and processes, requiring prompt and comprehensive investigation to prevent recurrence (Huang et al., 2025).

    The adverse event resulted in delayed medical intervention and poor patient outcomes. My organization utilized the Five Whys method to examine the contributing factors leading up to the event. The Five Whys technique enables improvement teams to systematically explore problems by repeatedly asking why, allowing for comprehensive examination of the situation and identification of underlying contributing factors (Spath & DeVane, 2022).

    Using the Five Whys approach, the following contributing factors were identified:

    1. Why did the patient elope?
    2. The patient was confused and left the home unsupervised.
    3. Why was the patient unsupervised?
    4. Caregiver supervision and safety monitoring were inconsistent despite ongoing education provided by staff and the initiation of a behavior contract. An Adult Protective Services (APS) report was filed but was determined to be unsubstantiated.
    5. Why was supervision inconsistent?
    6. The patients sister, who served as the health care surrogate, did not implement recommended interventions despite staff education and encouragement.
    7. Why was the elopement risk not adequately mitigated?
    8. Although standardized risk assessment tools and escalation protocols were used by staff, there was insufficient support from APS and family members to ensure patient safety.
    9. Why were safety protocols not consistently effective?
    10. Gaps existed between staff education and the actions communicated by the family to the care team regarding planned safety measures.

    At the time of the event, I served as the Nurse Director overseeing the nurse responsible for the patients care. My role included supporting staff throughout the RCA process, ensuring transparent reporting, and communicating findings to senior leadership, who subsequently reported to the Chief Clinical Operations Officer (CCOO). I also participated in reviewing system-level failures and contributing factors rather than focusing on individual faults.

    As a nurse leader, preventing a similar adverse event requires a proactive, system-based approach. Key prevention strategies include standardized cognitive and elopement risk assessments for patients receiving home-based care; clear escalation and communication protocols for high-risk patients; enhanced staff education and competency validation related to caring for confused patients in non-inpatient settings; caregiver education and support with explicit supervision expectations; and leadership oversight through auditing and review of near-miss events.

    By addressing these root causes, nurse leaders can help create safer systems that reduce the likelihood of patient elopement and improve outcomes for vulnerable populations. To achieve their full potential, RCAs must be grounded in a psychologically safe and transparent framework that promotes open reporting and collective learning, yields specific and actionable findings, and facilitates meaningful, sustainable improvements in patient safety and organizational safety culture (Behrhorst et al., 2025).

    References

    Behrhorst J, Gale B, Van CM. (2025). The Evolution of Root Cause Analysis. PSNet [internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Department of Health and Human Services.

    Huang, L.-L., Jiang, Y.-H., Yang, J.-H., Hong, W.-W., Chen, H.-F., & Hu, W.-W. (2025). Experience of nurse-guided root cause analysis after a sentinel event: A qualitative study. BMC Nursing, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02787-6

    Spath, P.L., & DeVane, K. A. (2022). Introduction to Healthcare Quality Management (4th ed.). Health Administration Press. https://reader2.yuzu.com/books/978164055413

  • Case study

    Case: Select an organization in health care and review the organizational, reimbursement,or delivery of care issues or problems they are facing and address the following; 1. Provide an overview. 2. Explain the issues, concerns, problems, etc. 3. Determine best course of action to solve the problem (s). 4. Justify your position. Submission Instructions: Describe the case review using research outside of the textbook. Three to five pages, APA formatted ,describing the critical areas of the case. Journal and/or peer reviewed articles required. Industry terminology must be used. Current research, within the last five years preferred.

  • pharmaceutical treatment

    Create a pharmaceutical treatment regimen for each of the following.

    • 50-year-old Russian born female diagnosed with atrial fibrillation. Recent increase in palpitations
    • 62-year-old Black male diagnosed with hypertension. Baseline today 160/100
    • 83-year-old White male diagnosed with Heart Failure and a history of 2 MIs. Stable at present. Primary regimen is managed via cardiology. You support oversight of HTN monitoring and provide other primary care.
    • The patient specific details are yours to develop and consider to support your choices.
    • You will have to assume a current regiment, and then make changes/additions.
    • The non-prescription medication if any, AND the prescription details must be present.
    • For each the drug name, dose, route, frequency of administration and if prescribed, the quantity to dispense must be present
    • Include the drug class details
    • Justify your reasoning
    • What labs will you monitor? Why?
    • Consider aspects of determinants of health in your response such as individual behavior and genetics.

  • Climate change awareness and tourist behaviour

    i will upload an assignment which the power point should be done from. it must be a secondary research integrated instead of a primary on how the assignment is. also use 1000 words max and then I need both a power point and a word document with this. i will upload briefs and also my assignment to get the info from there. i also need a front sheet

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Evaluating the Influence of Climate Change Awareness on Tourist Behaviour in Coa.pdf, Resubmission Assignmnent Brief L6M1 Sept 22 (2)docx.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Research proposal

    At the proposal stage, students should draw from their press kits to introduce: Your chosen company/organization and the service/product/person you plan to promote. Which area of public communication your project fits into and why your work will contribute to that field. Consider the multiple areas including, but not limited to: Integrated Marketing Communication; Business and Organizational Communication; Health Communication; Global and Political Communication; PR and Social Media; Diversity in Public Relations; Educational Communication; Charitable and Nonprofit Ventures; Branding and Marketing; Journalism; Advertising; Popular Culture Communication theories that will support your research into this area of public communication. Students should include at least one communication theory, possibly more. (See attachment with list of communication theories). The chosen communication theories should help to elaborate on any PR techniques used by the company. I want this to be done on JFKIAT

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Communication Theories – Copy – Copy.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Guided Project

    Project Overview Instructions: Strategic Financial Plan Paper This project will focus on the long-term future of the organization, which is essentially the foundation of any organizations planning process. You may choose an existing organization or create an organization. Paper should address: The executive summary which will be due this week. This is a two page overview of the project. Week five, mission, vision, and operating plan. Week seven, organizational goals and financial plan. Week ten, the entire paper. Values statement Mission statement Operating Plan Organizational Goals Financial Plan Budgeting Summary Paper should be a minimum of 10 pages in length, including 5-7 journal or peer reviewed articles.

  • 5-2 Project Draft: Background and Deconstruction

    Module Five Project Draft Guidelines and Rubric

    Overview

    Your local community has decided to create a statue to commemorate an event. As part of this statue, a time capsule will be included, the contents of which will be opened in 50 years. You have been asked, as the community expert on the historical event related to this statue, to create a document that will be included as part of the time capsule that includes information about the event being commemorated. The people opening this time capsule in 50 years will then be able to reflect on your insight into the event as you have described it.

    In this assignment, you will draft a background and historical narrative for the paper. This draft will include the Background of the Topic and Deconstructing the Historical Narrative sections. This assignment is a continuation of the work that youve already submitted in the previous modules. Be certain to review your instructors comments on those assignments to ensure that you are incorporating that feedback as you move forward towards the completion of the project.

    The project consists of multiple draft assignments leading up to a final document. You will complete the following assignments:

    • Module Two Topic Proposal: You will revise your work on this proposal to form Part One (Introduction) of your project.
    • Module Three Collection of Sources: This assignment will inform multiple parts of your evaluation of sources for the project.
    • Module Four Discussion: This assignment will provide a summary of your chosen project topic.
    • Module Five Project Draft: You will revise your work on this draft to form Part Two (Background of the Topic) and Part Three (Deconstructing the Historical Narrative) of the project.
    • Module Six Discussion: You will describe your personal experience with your chosen topic.
    • Module Seven Project: You will submit your revised Parts One through Three along with Part Four (Changing the Narrative of History).

    You will use the Project Template linked in the Supporting Materials section below to complete all drafts and the final document.

    Directions

    Use Part Two and Part Three of the Project Template linked in the Supporting Materials section below to draft the background and historical narrative of the paper. Note that you must adhere to this template in order to be eligible for full credit.

    Specifically, you must address the following parts:

    Part Two: Background of the Topic

    In this section, you will examine the historical background of a particular narrative or discourse relevant to your topic, particularly voices or perspectives that have been overlooked or minimized. As you work on Part Two, keep in mind that your mission in the next section, Part Three, will be to deconstruct and critique the narrative.

    1. Types of Sources: Describe the types of sources that were used to create the most common narrative surrounding the topic. You should address each of the following questions:
    2. What types of media were used to broadcast information about the event as it was occurring?
    3. What types of media were used to publicize the event after it had occurred?
    4. Context: Describe the context of the sources you chose about your chosen topic. You should address each of the following questions:
    5. Are they primary sources or secondhand interpretive accounts?
    6. How is the content in the sources presented? Do the writers appear to take sides or simply give facts?
    7. Components: Explain the components of the narrative of your topic. You should address each of the following questions:
    8. How was the topic portrayed in media as it was unfolding?
    9. How has media portrayed your topic at different points along the historical timeline since?
    10. What information or perspectives could have been presented about your topic but were not?
    11. Perspective: Apply a historical perspective to provide a context for your selected topic. You should address each of the following questions:
    12. What other historical events were unfolding at the same time as your chosen topic?
    13. What other sociocultural historical factors have an impact on how your topic is represented in your selected sources?
    14. Validity: Determine the validity of the traditional historical narrative of the topic. You should address each of the following questions:
    15. How does factual information about your topic affect how the historical narrative is portrayed? Do the facts reinforce the information highlighted in the narrative?
    16. How has the narrative around your topic changed as new information has been discovered?

    Part Three: Deconstructing the Historical Narrative

    In Part Three, you will actively deconstruct the historical narrative concerning your topic and determine the overall validity of the narrative. Your objective here is to write a new narrative that provides a more holistic, inclusive version of history.

    1. Credibility: Determine the credibility of the sources you selected for your chosen topic. You should address each of the following questions:
    2. How do you determine credibility for the sources you chose?
    3. Does it vary from source to source?
    4. Bias: Describe potential bias in your selected sources for your chosen topic. You should address the following question:
    5. How do an authors beliefs and agenda impact the information they present in their account?
    6. Power Structures: Identify the power structures that influence the development of the historical narrative surrounding your chosen topic. You should address each of the following questions:
    7. Who held the power in society when events related to your topic took place?
    8. Who benefits from the traditional version of the story?
    9. Variations: Explain why there are variations in the narrative of the event presented by your selected sources. You should address the following questions:
    10. How do your selected sources present information about the topic in varied ways?
    11. What information is presented in some sources but omitted in other sources?
    12. Information Gaps: Explain why information gaps occur in the sources you selected for your chosen topic. You should address each of the following questions:
    13. Why was information included or excluded about this topic in your selected sources? What purpose does this serve?
    14. When new information about an event related to the topic came to light, was there any opportunity for your selected sources to include or correct excluded information in what they originally presented?

    What to Submit

    Your submission should be a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. Use at least three sources from the Shapiro Library, remembering that one of them must be a primary source. Sources should be cited according to APA style both throughout and at the end of your draft.

    Although Brightspace allows the addition of video notes in assignment submissions, you may not use the Video Note tool to complete this assignment.

    Supporting Materials

    The following resource supports your work on the project:

    Template:

    This template provides an outline for Parts One through Four of your paper.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): HIS 217 Project Template (2).docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • 5-2: Module Five Assignment Two

    CJ 120 Module Five Assignment Two Guidelines and Rubric

    Overview

    In this assignment, you will be able to describe different cultures views on criminal justice professionals and identify incidents of misunderstandings. You will also be able to explain the current professional practices as well as the best practices that can help create cultural sensitivity in criminal justice professionals.

    Prompt

    At the beginning of the term, you discussed Culture in Communication and the ways in which individual implicit bias and stereotyping can lead to negative interactions between law enforcement professionals and members of the community. You then developed your own diversity training to assist sworn officers in reducing these incidents. Understanding the need for cultural awareness and sensitivity in law enforcement can help bridge the gap as well as build trust between sworn professionals and the community. This will also assist you in completed Module Five Assignment One in this module.

    In Project One, you chose a civilian role. In Project Three, your success in the first project has been recognized, and you will be asked to provide a report to the Office of Accountability, which would like to hear your thoughts on other relevant issues.

    To help prepare you for this report, in this assignment you will focus on one culture or subculture and how its views of and past misunderstandings with criminal justice professionals might impact interactions between the groups. Choose a culture or subculture group other than your own that you would like to examine further. For each section below, provide the following:

    Views

    Summarize, in 150300 words, an example of each of the following:

    • Viewpoints your chosen culture or subculture group might have about criminal justice professionals
    • An explanation of why this group might hold those views

    Misunderstandings

    Provide an example of a misunderstanding this culture or subculture group has had with criminal justice professionals. You may wish to consider one of the following areas. (Hint: You will need to provide an example of each of these areas in Project Three, so you may want to choose one of them now.)

    • Language
    • Religion/Beliefs
    • Deafness
    • Illiteracy

    Professional Practices

    Next, explore each of the professional practices listed below. For each practice, in 50100 words, describe the practice and then bullet point some of the possible outcomes of instituting it. This will help prepare you to explore each of these practices and make recommendations to the Office of Accountability in Project Three. Refer to the document for expectations and formatting guidelines for this section of the assignment.

    • Understanding the public
    • Diversity training
    • Procedural justice
    • Police legitimacy
    • Diverse hiring practices

    Specifically, the following rubric criteria must be addressed:

    1. Explore the viewpoints of a culture or subculture group and why that group might hold those views.
    2. Provide an example of a misunderstanding between a culture or subculture group and criminal justice professionals.
    3. Describe professional practices and possible outcomes.

    What to Submit

    This assignment must be completed in written format. Any references must be cited in APA format. For more information on APA style, review the .

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): CJ 120 Professional Practices Example.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.