Category: uncategorised

  • Topic week 4

    write 1-2 paragraphs answering the following:

    1) What are 1-2 key ideas/concepts/arguments that stood out to you from the readings? Provide a clear definition or description of each concept using direct quotes and page numbers.

    2) How are these concepts relevant or applicable in the real world? Explain using your own experience or current events. Be specific.

    3) What are two questions you have about the readings or two questions you would like your peers to discuss in class?

    • Mention 1-2 key concepts/ideas from the readings
    • Provide at least 2 direct quotes from the readings
    • Include page numbers and/or in-text citations (e.g. Fields and Fields 2012:17)
    • Provide 2 questions for discussion
    • Use all required readings in your post

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Fields and Fields – Racecraft Introduction.pdf, Scientific Racism and Eugenics in the Classroom.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • DB6

    write the information needed for a 1:45 video. see attachments. I am in the Miltary if that helps

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): db6.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Cryptocurrency trading platform development and market analy…

    I need to change my Capstone Project to meet requirments of my jurys. CONDITIONAL PASS: Justify and verify finantial assumptions (At the moment are too optimistic) and forecast for user adoption. Deepen regulatory analysis per country is needed. Use academic frameworks PESTEL – PORTER’s 5 Forces. Competitors analysis required. The current report is really descriptive, please introduce more objective elements and specific conclusions. More academic rigor is required in the report. I attached my report, please look into it
  • GENDER AND Sl

    Looking at the topic of gender, we have seen how people’s views of gender, gender norms, gender expectations, and etcetera vary. Although each sociological perspective has interesting things to say about the topic, Symbolic Interactionism (SI) offers a particular strength in how gender is defined and responded to by us.

    For this DB:

    • Make a post about how SI explains our understanding of gender and what gender means for us.
    • Look at the major institutions/topics covered in the chapter (that are not included in the lecture) and discuss how our understanding of gender is shaped by that topic (e.g. mass media, family, etc.)
    • Offer an example of how that topic/institution has tried to reshape the views of gender/gender expectations. Is it effective?
    • Offer an example about what else could be done to reshape gender norms/expectations through that topic.

    Remember that we are studying sociological views on gender. Be respectful and kind, and professional!

    Your response should reflect a clear understanding of the theory and the topic/institution’s influence over defining gender.

  • Discussion

    Group Discussion

    Use this discussion area to address the issues presented in the article, Based on your research and reflections, what do you see as the future for Title VII? Remember that you are working as a team and that you will need to research the question and prepare a written report detailing your team’s response to the question. Each team member should provide at least two scholarly articles from journals available through the SUNY Empire library for the team to consider in formulating its position. For help in finding appropriate references, you can review the SUNY Empire library’s .

    Your team will then write up your group’s position in a 500 word written assignment format making sure to properly cite all sources using the APA citation method. Submit the assignment in the Group Written Assignment drop box and make sure you post your group’s number in the subject line.

    Please note, the article’s citation is below:

    King, E., Avery, D., & Sackett, P. (2013). Journal Of Business And Psychology, 28(4), 375-382.

    Once there, select the link for PDF: Full Text

  • MICU Bernie

    Briefly discuss the things you learned, validated or found enlightening after participating or watching the case study.

  • Midterm CRJ

    This midterm is a short-answer essay exam covering Modules 14.

    The questions are straightforward and similar in format to the review questions at the end of the chapters. Each answer should be about two substantive paragraphs long. Strong responses will clearly reference specific concepts, terminology, arguments, or examples drawn directly from the course materials. Write clearly and directly and demonstrate familiarity with the assigned readings and learning materials.

    Essay Questions

    1. Define criminal justice/criminology research and explain why research is considered central to the development of knowledge in this field. Include discussion of who conducts research and why.
    2. Explain the idea that research generates power and power generates research. Provide at least one example of how this dynamic plays out in criminal justice or criminology.
    3. Discuss the major purposes of research exploratory, descriptive, explanatory, and evaluative and explain how each contributes to knowledge development.
    4. Explain how social science research differs from alternative ways of knowing such as authority, tradition, common sense, media narratives, or personal experience. Include discussion of social science norms.
    5. Explain Thomas Kuhns ideas about the progression of knowledge and discuss how those ideas apply to research in criminal justice or criminology.
    6. Compare Positive Social Science, Interpretive Social Science, and Critical Social Science. Discuss their underlying assumptions, goals, and typical research approaches.
    7. Explain the concept of theory in social science research and distinguish it from ideology. Include discussion of hypotheses and levels of analysis.
    8. Discuss research ethics in criminology/criminal justice research. Include historical examples of unethical research and address issues such as informed consent, privacy, deception, and IRB oversight.
    9. Explain the importance of literature reviews in research. Discuss their purposes, different types, and the role they play in shaping research questions.
    10. Define triangulation and explain how combining qualitative and quantitative approaches can strengthen research findings.
    11. Explain causal reasoning in research. Include discussion of variables, hypothesis testing, and at least two common errors in causal explanation.
    12. Compare probability and nonprobability sampling. Explain when each might be appropriate and discuss challenges in studying hidden populations.
    13. Explain the role of experimentation in criminology/criminal justice research. Include discussion of randomization, internal and external validity, and practical challenges.
    14. Discuss the strengths and limitations of experimental research in our field. Provide examples where experimental designs are especially useful.
    15. Explain the purposes and logic of survey research in criminology/criminal justice. Include discussion of questionnaire construction and principles of good question writing.
    16. Discuss the challenges involved in collecting accurate survey or interview data. Include issues related to interpretation, communication, and meaning.

    BOOK: (Criminal Justice and Criminology Research Methods)

    Chapters 1 through 8

    https://reader2.yuzu.com/reader/books/9780429649264/epubcfi/6/2%5b%3Bvnd.vst.idref%3Dcover%5d!/4/2%4050:76″ rel=”noopener noreferrer” target=”_blank”>https://reader2.yuzu.com/reader/books/9780429649264/epubcfi/6/2[%3Bvnd.vst.idref%3Dcover]!/4/2%4050:76

  • Midterm CRJ

    This midterm is a short-answer essay exam covering Modules 14.

    The questions are straightforward and similar in format to the review questions at the end of the chapters. Each answer should be about two substantive paragraphs long. Strong responses will clearly reference specific concepts, terminology, arguments, or examples drawn directly from the course materials. Write clearly and directly and demonstrate familiarity with the assigned readings and learning materials.

    Essay Questions

    1. Define criminal justice/criminology research and explain why research is considered central to the development of knowledge in this field. Include discussion of who conducts research and why.
    2. Explain the idea that research generates power and power generates research. Provide at least one example of how this dynamic plays out in criminal justice or criminology.
    3. Discuss the major purposes of research exploratory, descriptive, explanatory, and evaluative and explain how each contributes to knowledge development.
    4. Explain how social science research differs from alternative ways of knowing such as authority, tradition, common sense, media narratives, or personal experience. Include discussion of social science norms.
    5. Explain Thomas Kuhns ideas about the progression of knowledge and discuss how those ideas apply to research in criminal justice or criminology.
    6. Compare Positive Social Science, Interpretive Social Science, and Critical Social Science. Discuss their underlying assumptions, goals, and typical research approaches.
    7. Explain the concept of theory in social science research and distinguish it from ideology. Include discussion of hypotheses and levels of analysis.
    8. Discuss research ethics in criminology/criminal justice research. Include historical examples of unethical research and address issues such as informed consent, privacy, deception, and IRB oversight.
    9. Explain the importance of literature reviews in research. Discuss their purposes, different types, and the role they play in shaping research questions.
    10. Define triangulation and explain how combining qualitative and quantitative approaches can strengthen research findings.
    11. Explain causal reasoning in research. Include discussion of variables, hypothesis testing, and at least two common errors in causal explanation.
    12. Compare probability and nonprobability sampling. Explain when each might be appropriate and discuss challenges in studying hidden populations.
    13. Explain the role of experimentation in criminology/criminal justice research. Include discussion of randomization, internal and external validity, and practical challenges.
    14. Discuss the strengths and limitations of experimental research in our field. Provide examples where experimental designs are especially useful.
    15. Explain the purposes and logic of survey research in criminology/criminal justice. Include discussion of questionnaire construction and principles of good question writing.
    16. Discuss the challenges involved in collecting accurate survey or interview data. Include issues related to interpretation, communication, and meaning.

    BOOK: (Criminal Justice and Criminology Research Methods)

    Chapters 1 through 8

    https://reader2.yuzu.com/reader/books/9780429649264/epubcfi/6/2%5b%3Bvnd.vst.idref%3Dcover%5d!/4/2%4050:76″ rel=”noopener noreferrer” target=”_blank”>https://reader2.yuzu.com/reader/books/9780429649264/epubcfi/6/2[%3Bvnd.vst.idref%3Dcover]!/4/2%4050:76

  • HCAD HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT

    Answer the following two prompts (1 & 2) SEPARATELY. Answer each one with 250 words.

    1. For this discussion assignment, take the opportunity to reflect on how the concepts reviewed in this week’s required readings (Chapters 9 and 10 of your textbook) can be used and applied to circumstances and challenges in your work setting. (Chapter 9/10 reading attached) ***ONLY USE CHAPTER 9/10 FOR PROMPT #1***
    2. Discuss the importance of the following concepts in healthcare leaders compared to other industries, and how one can demonstrate the following:
    • Cooperation and Sharing
    • Cohesiveness and Collaboration

      Requirements: 500 words

    • Self evaluation

      Reflect on your progress and experience so far, addressing:

      • Strengths demonstrated
      • Challenges encountered
      • Adjustments made
      • Insights gained about yourself as a leader

      So far in the class I am grasping all the theories we have learned in the leadership development class. I am having to make adsjustements on how to use these new leadership roles in my day to day life as i am used to taking command and not listening to everyone. I have learned i am a good leader but just need to take into account of everyone else surrounding me to have a positive impact on every assignment or goal needed to meet.

      Please have no resources on this assignment.