This is the last portion of the assessment, where you will put everything together and add the final components.
The full paper was broken into three parts to allow you to focus on smaller segments, receive feedback, and apply what was learned throughout our time together. As you continue at Capella, you will complete full papers as individual assessments. The goal is for you to take what you learn about business concepts and how to build a paper, gather evidence, utilize feedback, and practice APA style each time you have an assessment.
Note: This assessment is the final of three written assessments where you will put everything together and add the final components.
Using the same organization, complete the following:
Revisit the organizations website and look for evidence of teamwork or the presence of teams, including in pictures and project descriptions.
Locate the paragraphs you wrote for the prior two assessments.
Consider the following scenario:
Your chosen organization has determined that its mission statement needs to be updated accurately to reflect its strategy for the upcoming year, so you are forming a small team to work through this problem. Which functions do you want to select team members from? Why? What ethical principles does your team need to consider when making updates to a mission statement? Finally, what critical thinking questions does your team need to ask to update the mission statement? (Note: You will not be creating a new mission statement for this assessment.)
Step 1: Download and save .
Step 2: Copy your paragraphs from the prior assessments into the template.
Step 3: Write the following paragraphs (additional paragraphs can be created as needed) using POETS:
Paragraph 1: Explain reasons for choosing team members from two functional areas for developing a mission statement.
Describe the skills and characteristics that make a good team member.
Paragraph 2: Describe what ethical principles a team needs to consider when making updates to a mission statement.
Why are ethics important for updating a mission statement?
Paragraph 3: Describe the critical thinking questions a team needs to answer to update a mission statement.
Why are these critical thinking questions important for updating a mission statement?
Step 4: Add an introduction paragraph.
Step 5: Add a conclusion paragraph.
Step 6: Include all reference list citations and in-text citations.
The length of the paper should be four to five pages, using double-space type. The paper should be divided into different sections, each addressing question 1, question 2, etc, and the question being addressed needs to be written out before it is addressed. This is because I need to be clear which question is being addressed. Be sure that your online submission has a cover page (which doesnt count as a page number) that states the name of the film you are discussing, your name, your email, the date, and the title Film Discussion Paper for AMST-3100 on the cover. Choose one of the following three movies from the 1960s, watch the movie, and address the set of questions for that movie in your paper. Of course you will need to rent, purchase, stream, or check the movie out from a library. These movies should be readily available. While you may discuss these movies all you like, your paper must reflect your own ideas and your own writing. Students may not team up to write this film paper. I am also providing a link to a film analysis site that offers an excellent analysis of each of these movies to help get you into the analytical mode. The grading criteria for your paper is as follows: writing style and clarity. substantive insights to the 1960s and critical thinking skills. application of our textbooks, web notes, and outside resources to your points. Dr. Strangelove (1964) Film analysis link: Film Discussion Questions. 1. Dr. Strangelove is a dark satire made at a time when there was a very real possibility of nuclear annihilation. Who or what was parodied in this movie? (Identify as many issues or themes as you can, and much of this parody involves Cold War leaders, and assumptions, policies, etc). 2. Identify specific real events of the 1950s and early 1960s that are important backdrops to understanding Dr. Strangelove. Remember, this movie features the Cold War as the central backdrop. What are the important events that happened in the 1950s and early 60s that are relevant to this movie? 3. Before Dr. Strangelove, the public was given the notion that the two superpowers had achieved Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD), and therefore it would be irrational for either side to initiate war. Presumably we should feel somewhat secure with this notion. How does the movie Dr. Strangelove respond to the argument that nuclear war is unlikely because it is irrational? (Hint: How are the leaders depicted in this movie? Are they rational? What does this say about the assumptions behind MAD?) 4. What does this movie suggest happens to a society when its members are placed in a constant state of apocalyptic fear, such as the case of fear culture or panic culture that we saw during the Cold War in the 1950s and early 60s, air raid shelters and all? Does such fear cause people to behave differently? What kinds of social and foreign policies are people likely to lean toward in a panic culture? Who benefits from this, and who loses? (For example, why were hawkish conservatives like Joseph McCarthy and the HUAC promoting fear culture in the 1950s? What did they and the military industrial complexes of the US and the USSR have to gain by promoting such fears? How did hawkish conservatives portray reform liberals like Martin Luther King, Jr and others who sought domestic reforms? Was there a hidden agenda here?)
The length of the paper should be four to five pages, using double-space type. The paper should be divided into different sections, each addressing question 1, question 2, etc, and the question being addressed needs to be written out before it is addressed. This is because I need to be clear which question is being addressed. Be sure that your online submission has a cover page (which doesnt count as a page number) that states the name of the film you are discussing, your name, your email, the date, and the title Film Discussion Paper for AMST-3100 on the cover. Choose one of the following three movies from the 1960s, watch the movie, and address the set of questions for that movie in your paper. Of course you will need to rent, purchase, stream, or check the movie out from a library. These movies should be readily available. While you may discuss these movies all you like, your paper must reflect your own ideas and your own writing. Students may not team up to write this film paper. I am also providing a link to a film analysis site that offers an excellent analysis of each of these movies to help get you into the analytical mode. The grading criteria for your paper is as follows: writing style and clarity. substantive insights to the 1960s and critical thinking skills. application of our textbooks, web notes, and outside resources to your points. Dr. Strangelove (1964) Film analysis link: Film Discussion Questions. 1. Dr. Strangelove is a dark satire made at a time when there was a very real possibility of nuclear annihilation. Who or what was parodied in this movie? (Identify as many issues or themes as you can, and much of this parody involves Cold War leaders, and assumptions, policies, etc). 2. Identify specific real events of the 1950s and early 1960s that are important backdrops to understanding Dr. Strangelove. Remember, this movie features the Cold War as the central backdrop. What are the important events that happened in the 1950s and early 60s that are relevant to this movie? 3. Before Dr. Strangelove, the public was given the notion that the two superpowers had achieved Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD), and therefore it would be irrational for either side to initiate war. Presumably we should feel somewhat secure with this notion. How does the movie Dr. Strangelove respond to the argument that nuclear war is unlikely because it is irrational? (Hint: How are the leaders depicted in this movie? Are they rational? What does this say about the assumptions behind MAD?) 4. What does this movie suggest happens to a society when its members are placed in a constant state of apocalyptic fear, such as the case of fear culture or panic culture that we saw during the Cold War in the 1950s and early 60s, air raid shelters and all? Does such fear cause people to behave differently? What kinds of social and foreign policies are people likely to lean toward in a panic culture? Who benefits from this, and who loses? (For example, why were hawkish conservatives like Joseph McCarthy and the HUAC promoting fear culture in the 1950s? What did they and the military industrial complexes of the US and the USSR have to gain by promoting such fears? How did hawkish conservatives portray reform liberals like Martin Luther King, Jr and others who sought domestic reforms? Was there a hidden agenda here?)
You have completed the first few paragraphs in the paper we are building and received feedback.
You will now create the following paragraphs based on the course content we covered. You will align the new knowledge of business functions (operations, marketing, IT, human resources (HR), and finance) with your chosen organization.
You are encouraged to utilize the feedback you received in the prior assessment to help guide you while writing.
Note: This assessment is the second part of three written assessments that build on each other and must be completed in order.
You are encouraged to utilize the feedback you received in the prior assessment to help guide you while writing.
Using the same organization you researched for your first assessment, complete the following:
Access the organizations website and research the different departments of the organization, such as marketing, HR, IT, operations, and finance.
Identify two functional areas you feel are essential to the organizations success.
Review the QuickStart: Functional Areas of Business media piece to support your understanding of these concepts.
Before you begin writing, refer to the Assessment Illustration 2 and then complete the following:
Step 1: Download and save .
Step 2: Answer the questions on the top of the template:
Using your same organization, identify two functional areas you feel are essential to the organization’s success.
Step 3: Write the following two (24 paragraphs as needed) paragraphs using POETS:
Paragraphs 1 and 2: Evaluate the importance of two functional areas for a chosen business organization.
Describe the important critical thinking skills to drive success for each functional area.
Explain what ethical principles apply to each functional area in day-to-day work.
Note: Delete any remaining example content that is inside the square brackets.
Challenge: Using course resources, attempt APA style for your references and add in your in-text references. You will need this for the final assessment, so add it now and get feedback!
A critical insight provided by Ramannas *Managing in the Age of Outrage* (2022) book is that organizations need to recognize that often, what fuels outrage among stakeholders or the public is not purely a function of objective or technical reality but rather a function of perceived fairness and accountability. In a fast-paced crisis management scenario, stakeholders do not simply evaluate whether or not there was adherence to policy but also assess whether there was integrity and empathy involved. Ramannas argument here suggests that what leaders ought to strive for is strategic transparency, which means providing information transparently and timely but not being defensive or evasive. This framework seems especially relevant to the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) case study, where heightened scrutiny and media engagement fueled emotional reactions. In such a context, strategic transparency does not mean revealing all the details but rather revealing a willingness to be transparent and providing clarity on the decision-making process while correcting misinformation as soon as possible. This approach helps to manage any speculation that might result from a lack of information and thereby reinforce credibility.
Equally important to consider are elements like empathy and strategic messaging. Ramannas argument here suggests that leaders need to validate stakeholders emotions before attempting to defend organizational actions. In a context like CAMHs, this might mean recognizing the emotional salience of the issue at hand and delineating steps being taken to address these very issues. Strategic messaging might require maintaining consistent messaging across all channels and aligning it with organizational values to ensure interpretive outcomes within a polarized media environment. By integrating elements like strategic transparency with elements like empathy and strategic messaging, an organization can hope to secure its own reputation not by dismissing or denying negative publicity but by proving its accountability and responsiveness to stakeholders.
Need assistance verifying code for a Tetris project. Please help fixing the code if it does not compile. Only need to submit the .java files.I will attach my code and project details when the job is accepted.
This assessment is the first part of three written assessments that build on each other. You will utilize learned writing skills (POETS and APA style) and apply the concepts to a real organization. You have learned about organizational structures, mission, vision, and code of ethics. Each of these concepts is a component of this assessment.
You will start with just a few paragraphs and then continue to add content in the following two assessments. This allows you to gain feedback and make changes as you work toward putting everything together in the final assessment.
Note: This assessment is the first part of three written assessments that build on each other and must be completed in order.
Complete the following:
Choose an organization. (It can be something that interests you, where you work, or a company you are familiar with.)
Access the organizations website and research the mission and vision statements and code of ethics.
Review the QuickStart: Mission and Vision media piece to support your understanding of these concepts.
Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:
Written Communication: Your work should be free of grammar and punctuation errors that would distract the reader’s understanding of the content.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.
Convey purpose in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence.
Format: Use the Assessment 2 Template to help you organize your paper.
Length: 34 paragraphs of content, in addition to references.
Resources: Cite at least two reputable resources to support your ideas, including your chosen website, and list them on your reference page.
APA style and formatting: Follow APA style and formatting standards for citing sources that support your analysis and conclusions. Use for guidance in citing sources and formatting your paper in proper APA style. See the for more APA resources specific to your degree level.
Academic Integrity and Honesty: You must adhere to academic integrity and honesty policies and incorporate practices that support ethically sound work in your assessments. View .
Font and font size: Times New Roman, not larger than 12-point font.
Carefully read the grading criteria in the Mission, Vision, and Ethics in Organizations scoring guide to ensure you understand all of the requirements for success. Respond to all of the questions within the assessment instructions to help you obtain the Distinguished level.
View the media and read, How do I submit my assessment? before you do.
