Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • Case Study

    You will write a paper in which you propose a research study on the topic you selected. The purpose of this assignment

    is for you to apply the knowledge and skills you have learned in Research Methods lab to create a

    quality research proposal in APA style 7th edition. You will not actually be collecting data or

    conducting an experiment the paper should be written such that you describe how you would

    conduct a study if you had the opportunity. Your research proposal should include the following

    sections (each section is discussed in lab lectures and in greater details in the lab manual posted on

    Canvas; sample proposals are available at the end of the lab manual):

    Title Page

    Abstract

    Introduction

    Method

    Discussion

    References

    Please refer to Sections 1, 2, and 3 of your lab manual for guidelines on writing each section of an

    APA-style paper. Keep in mind that some sections have required subsections. For example, the

    Method section should include four subsections: Participants, Design, Procedure, and Measures.

    This research proposal is worth 150 points. Please submit your research proposal as one file that

    includes all above sections on Canvas (Word or PDF). Please see the Research Proposal Grading

    Criteria table on the next page for specific information about how each research proposal will be

    graded.

    Please dont hesitate to email the TAs or Instructor of the course if you have any additional

    questions about the assignment.

    (See grading criteria on next page)

    Criteria Your Points Possible Points

    Title Page and General Formatting

    Including all 6 lines of required information into the

    Title page

    Page numbers (all pages)

    Correct APA formatting

    Abstract

    No longer than one page

    Provides overview of research topic, participants,

    hypotheses, and conclusions

    Keywords

    Correct APA formatting

    Introduction

    Explains the general problem/topic

    Writes a clear, helpful, accurate literature review

    Explains the proposed study

    Provides specific hypothesis

    Uses clear and precise writing style

    Correct APA formatting

    Method

    Subsections: Participants, Design, Procedure,

    Measures

    Provides clear, detailed explanation of method

    Correct APA formatting

    Discussion

    Restates hypothesis

    Discuss expected results

    Discusses potential limitations of the study

    Discusses potential implications of the study

    Suggests future directions for research

    Restate your conclusion

    Correct APA formatting

    References

    References (section title centered on first line)

    Hanging indentions

    Alphabetical order

    Use of at least 5 peer-reviewed sources

    Correct APA formatting for each reference

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Lab Manual_Intro To Methods In Psychology.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Management Question

    Complexities of Implementing AI Ethics (15 Marks)

    1. Summarize each of the three AI ethics approaches discussed in the article, Reflections on Putting AI Ethics into Practice: How Three AI Ethics Approaches Conceptualise Theory and Practice.
    2. Evaluate how each AI ethics approach bridges the gap between theoretical ethical frameworks and practical implementation in real-world AI systems.
    3. Reflect on your own perspective regarding the integration of ethics into AI development based on your analysis of the three approaches.

    In this course, you will have three Critical Thinking Assignments where you will respond to assignment questions to develop an essay. Essays have an introduction (to the topic of the assignment), a body (where you will integrate your responses), and a conclusion (your thoughts on the assignment). Please do not just answer the questions as is. It is best to use APA (7th ed) headings to capture the essence of the questions as a way to make sure you have integrated all of the responses in your essay. Also, make sure you are using an APA (7th ed) paper template as a starting point.

    Your well-written essay should meet the following requirements:

    • Be 4-5 pages in length, which does not include the title page, abstract, or required reference page, which are never a part of the content minimum requirements.
    • Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and APA (7th ed) style guidelines.
    • Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.
    • Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.

    Requirements: 5 pages

  • Assignment 1

    Assignment 1, CRJU 7370, Civil Liability in CJ

    Choose one question from each of the following four pairs. This is an open book essay exam, but it is imperative that you discuss the issues in your own words. Ive got access to the same text, and I do not want any cutting and pasting. Nor are any AI generated manuscripts allowed. Refer to the course policy on Academic Honesty and Integrity set forth in the Course Syllabus.

    1) Chapter One presents a lot of statistics related to liability claims filed against police and correctional agencies. As CJ scholars we know that it is more important to look at trends rather than one or two highly publicized cases. So, identify the most common types of civil liability incurred by law enforcement agencies. Then discuss the trends that you see in terms of who wins those claims. For this question stick to cases that involve non-CJ plaintiffs. In other words, the people filing claims do not work within the CJS.

    1A) Chapter One, take on the same issue as presented above, except this time go with claims that are filed by CJ plaintiffs, i.e., officers or staff that are suing their respective agencies.

    2) Chapter Two and Three lets begin with Torts. What type of actions are Torts? Go through the necessary elements to bring a successful case. Describe the different types that are most applicable to the CJS and use examples to illustrate. Also, in terms of bringing civil actions, which is best a state or federal court? Or does it matter?

    2a) Chapter Two, just when we were establishing Civil Law principles along comes another application of the Criminal Law. Anyway, it is clear to see that criminal liability under Title 18 U.S. Code Sections 241 & 242 (1886) may be connected to successful civil lawsuits. There are plenty of examples to demonstrate when one set of bad actions leads to both types of liability.

    3) Chapter Three, summarize the general defenses to tort actions, illustrate with examples.

    3a) In Chapter Three we see that Federal Agents and Officers are NOT immune to civil liability however, plaintiffs must choose the correct laws and procedures. Explain.

    4) Chapter Four is all about Section 1983 litigation. First, what are the elements of a Section 1983 claim? Then discuss the significance of the landmark decision Monroe v Pape, this should include the facts of the case, the Supreme Courts ruling and the impact of this decision on the CJS.

    4a) First identify the elements of a Section 1983 claim. Then present the remedies available under a Section 1983 claim.

    The textbook is Civil Liability in Criminal Justice, 8th Edition, Routledge Publishing.

  • Management Question

    Learning Outcomes:

    CLO 4: Analyze the effects of culture, politics and economic systems in the context of international business

    Critical Thinking

    International businesses operate in environments shaped by cultural norms, political institutions, and economic systems. These forces influence how firms enter markets, manage operations, and compete globally. This assignment asks you to analyze real-world international business situations using critical thinking rather than simple description.

    1.Culture and International Business (3 points)

    Choose a multinational company operating in a foreign market. Analyze how cultural differences, such as communication styles, values, consumer behavior, or management practices, affect the companys business decisions.

    Explain one challenge the company faces due to culture.

    Discuss one strategy the company uses or should use to adapt to the local culture.

    2.Political Environment and Business Risk (3 points)

    Select a country where political factors significantly influence international business operations. Analyze how government policies, political stability, or regulations affect foreign companies operating there.

    Identify one political risk.

    Explain how that risk impacts business decisions such as market entry, investment, or supply chains.

    3.Economic Systems and Business Strategy (3 points)

    Compare how two different economic systems influence international business strategies.

    Explain how the economic system shapes opportunities and limitations for firms.

    Use a specific country example to support your analysis.

    You should have a minimum of six reliable references that follow the APA citation style (1 point)

    words about




    Requirements: MGT321

  • Correlation vs. Causation

    POST INSTRUCTIONS:

    Each post should seek to address each Post Prompt thoroughly and thoughtfully. Your post should be at least 300 words and should always cite your sources (yes, even if it is just your textbook or a provided video) in APA format.

    POST PROMPT

    Chapter 2 in your textbook discusses the differences between a study that produces a correlational result and one that shows causation. Define each and discuss the differences between the two. What examples can you find in your own life or in the news, of each? How does understanding the difference affect how you personally value the data?

  • Human Resources Management 3301

    I am in a group and the topic we choose is LEGOS. My part I have to write about is HR planning in the LEGOS company. It have to be MLA format and only one page with work cited.

    Requirements:

  • Topic #4: Dilemmas in Medical Research Discussion

    1. Do you think, researchers have an obligation beyond their duty to autonomy (p. 160)? Are their circumstances where medical research can make offers that are too good to refuse? Does that matter? Why or why not?

  • Call of Duty

    About a 1000 words/ use call of duty as the game

  • Genders Studies

    Draw from at least five class readings in the unit to make your analysis, and each of you should bring at least one journal article or book chapter referenced by one of the scholars you cite. That is, there should be at least 7 entries in your bibliography section. Each essay is to be 2,000-2,400 words in length (around 8 double-spaced pages), not counting the bibliography section at the end. The topic for Unit One, Mother Goddess(es) and Gender Relations, is on the relation between the gendered ideation of the divine on the one hand, and gender relations among humans on the other. Do the gender and number of the divine affect human gender relations? In other words, does the ideation of Mother Goddess affect human gender relations differently than the ideation of God the Father, and does the ideation of Mother Goddess affect human gender relations differently than the ideation of mother goddesses? If the subordinate status of women in monotheistic religions can be attributed to the ideation of the divine as a singular father figure, what accounts for the subordination of women in cultures where Mother Goddess or mother goddesses are worshipped? What other factors contribute to the power dynamic that leads to the subordination and oppression of women and gender/sexual minorities?

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Untitled document.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Module 2 Individual Assignment: Speaking and Listening Lesso…

    4th grade missouri standards

    Module 2 Individual Assignment: Speaking and Listening Lesson and Reflection

    Assignment Overview:

    In this assignment, you will design and facilitate a discussion-based activity in your ELA classroom that provides students with an opportunity to express their understanding of a grade-level text through structured speaking and listening.

    Assignment Objectives:

    By the end of this assignment, you will be able to:

    1. Plan and implement a discussion-based ELA lesson.
    2. Reflect on how structured conversations support comprehension and academic growth.

    Assignment Instructions:

    This assignment will have THREE parts which will be submitted together.

    Part I: Plan

    Using the , design an ELA lesson that centers on a structured academic conversation. Your lesson should align with your grade level priority standards for speaking and listening and include:

    • A clear objective for the discussion.
    • Text(s) students are responding to.
    • Discussion protocols or strategies used.
    • Assessment or observation methods for student proficiency.

    Part II: Facilitate and Record

    Teach the lesson and record 5 -15 minutes of student discussion.

    Part III Reflect in Writing (2-3pages)

    Submit a reflection that includes:

    • A brief description of your lesson and discussion format.
    • How students engaged with the text and each other.
    • Insights gained about your students’ speaking and listening abilities.
    • What worked well and what you might adjust next time.
    • How this experience aligns with Missouri Speaking and Listening Standards.

    Guidelines

    • Part I (Plan) should be a completed lesson plan template for an ELA class that focuses on your grade-level’s specific priority speaking and listening standards.
    • Part II (Facilitate and Record) should be a video file of a the lesson that you planned and facilitated, with particular focus on 5 -15 minutes of student discussion.
    • Part III (Reflection) should be 2-3 double-spaced pages in length (not including the title page, references page, or appendices if applicable).

    All of what is submitted in your PDF should contain proper grammar, be free of spelling errors, and reflect critical thinking.

    Technical Support

    Provide technical support for students here. Please see the sample below.

    Need help using Canvas Assignments? If so, please review the following guide:

    Module 2 Individual Assignment Rubric: Speaking and Listening Lesson and Reflection

    Module 2 Individual Assignment Rubric: Speaking and Listening Lesson and ReflectionCriteriaRatingsPtsPart I: Completed Lesson Plan Template

    10 to >7 pts

    Accomplished

    Lesson plan is thorough, clearly aligned with grade-level speaking and listening standards. Objective, text(s), discussion protocols, and assessment strategies are well-developed and instructionally sound.

    7 to >4 pts

    Developing

    Lesson plan is mostly complete but may have one or more areas lacking clarity or development. Some alignment to standards is evident.

    4 to >0 pts

    Beginning or Incomplete

    Lesson plan is missing major components or lacks clear alignment to standards.

    / 10 pts

    Part II: Lesson Video

    6 to >4 pts

    Accomplished

    Video clearly shows student discussion that connects to the lesson plan. Discussion is structured and focused on the assigned text.

    4 to >2 pts

    Developing

    Video is present but shows limited structure, engagement, or relevance to the lesson plan.

    2 to >0 pts

    Beginning or Incomplete

    No video submitted or discussion shown is minimal, off-task, or unrelated to lesson.

    / 6 pts

    Part III: Written Reflection

    10 to >7 pts

    Accomplished

    Reflection is thoughtful, well-written, and addresses all required components in depth. Provides strong insight into student learning, instructional decisions, and alignment to standards.

    7 to >4 pts

    Developing

    Reflection addresses most required elements with some depth. Analysis may be general or missing examples.

    4 to >0 pts

    Beginning or Incomplete

    Reflection is vague, incomplete, or lacks analysis of student engagement and learning.

    / 10 pts

    Professionalism and Submission Quality

    4 to >3 pts

    Accomplished

    Submission is polished, grammatically correct, and follows all formatting and length guidelines. Shows clear attention to detail.

    3 to >2 pts

    Developing

    Submission contains minor errors in grammar or formatting but remains readable and complete.

    2 to >0 pts

    Beginning or Incomplete

    Major grammar, formatting, or completeness issues. Instructions not followed.

    / 4 pts

    Total Points: 0

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Copy of Rising Teachers-Learning Design Template (SLU_SOE).pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.