Category: uncategorised

  • Smart Goals Chart

    The specific instructions are in the documents even an example is provided if youre able to create the project for me please let me know thanks

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): MODULE TWO ASSIGNMENT N.pdf, SMART GOALS OVERVIEW AND EXAMPLE.pdf, SUPPLEMENTARY DOCUMENT.pdf, SMART GOALS CHART.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Evidence Based Research Paper

    • Analyze and critique a Peer-Reviewed EBP Research Study from a professional advanced practice journal (< 5 years old). Please make sure it’s a primary research study and not just an article or literature review. Review the rubric prior to choosing a study to ensure you are able to meet all of the requirements.
    • Assess the implications and relevance of research findings to your specific APN track.
    • Identify and discuss the alignment with MSN Essentials demonstrated in the assignment.

    Task Overview:

    • Paper Requirements:
    • Compose a 4-5 page APA paper (7th edition) excluding the title and references. Students must expound on the paper’s topics and not just answer the questions to receive full credit. Work must be reflective of graduate-level work.
    • All assignments that include references must provide either a functional hyperlink to the source or upload the full journal article. Failure to include a working link or the article will result in a grade of zero for the assignment. Broken or inaccessible links will also receive a zero.

    Assignment Guidelines:

    1. APN Track Identification: ***FNP***
    • Clearly state your specific APN track at the beginning of the paper.
    1. Article Selection Details:
    • Describe the methodology used to locate the chosen article (e.g., databases like PubMed, CINAHL, search terms utilized, etc.).
    • Specify the journal name, publication year, article title, and all authors.
    1. Research Study Details:
    • Define the research topic and the specific question under study, utilizing PICOT if provided.
    • Outline the subject selection process, detailing how subjects were identified.
    • Analyze and discuss the research methods and methodology employed in the study.
    1. Research Findings:
    • Summarize and synthesize the main findings presented in the research paper.
    • Interpret the findings, including statistical analyses (e.g., p-values, significance levels).
    1. Professional Practice Significance:
    • Discuss the practical implications and significance of the research findings within your specific APN track.
    1. Submission and Links:
    • Submit the paper to the Canvas assignment site for grading.
    • Provide a link to the chosen research article at the conclusion of your paper.
    1. MSN Essentials Alignment:
    • Reflect on and identify which Domain(s) of the MSN Essentials are addressed or demonstrated through this assignment.

    This site is helpful for Evidence Based Practice Resources:

    **FNP TRACK***

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): research rubric.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Bagaimana mengatasi lingkungan yang kurang sehat

    Mengatasi kerusakan lingkungan memerlukan upaya bersama dan tindakan nyata. Berikut beberapa cara untuk mengatasi kerusakan lingkungan:

    1. *Mengurangi penggunaan plastik*: Kurangi penggunaan plastik sekali pakai, gunakan tas belanja kain, dan pilih produk yang tidak menggunakan plastik.

    2. *Menghemat energi*: Matikan lampu, elektronik, dan air ketika tidak digunakan untuk menghemat energi dan mengurangi emisi gas rumah kaca.

    3. *Menggunakan energi terbarukan*: Gunakan energi terbarukan seperti panel surya, turbin angin, atau energi hidro untuk mengurangi ketergantungan pada bahan bakar fosil.

    4. *Mengurangi emisi gas rumah kaca*: Kurangi penggunaan kendaraan bermotor, gunakan transportasi umum, atau beralih ke kendaraan listrik.

    5. *Mengelola sampah*: Pisahkan sampah organik dan non-organik, daur ulang, dan kompos untuk mengurangi jumlah sampah yang masuk ke tempat pembuangan akhir.

    6. *Melindungi hutan*: Lindungi hutan dan ekosistem lainnya dari penebangan liar, perburuan, dan per

    Requirements:

  • Theory paper

    Only do part on which is a draft this is a theory paper please choose two theories that interest you Newman, B. M., & Newman, P. R. (2018). Development through life: A

    psychosocial approach (13th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.

    Only use this source and chapter 5

    MARY LIVERMORE

    LIBRARY use this too look up articles

  • Service line development 2

    A community health assessment is a developmental process that is added to and amended over time. It is not an end in itself, but a way of using information to plan healthcare and public health programs. In the Service Line Development Case Study, there is a community health needs assessment that describes the state of local individuals health. This assessment allows the major risk factors, the causes of ill health, and the actions required to address these health risks to be identified.

    A. Analyze the community health needs assessment in the case study by doing the following:

    1. Discuss major risk factors identified in the assessment.

    2. Discuss whether the healthcare facility in the case study is addressing the needs identified in the assessment.

    B. Develop a health planning summary outlining recommendations of how to resolve any outstanding community health needs.

    C. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.

    D. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Trinity Community Hospital Brochure.pdf, Trinity Community Hospital Board Profile.pdf, Trinity Community Hospital Fact Sheet.pdf, Trinity Community Hospital Strategic Plan.pdf, CEO Position Overview.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • The change we want to use is MTSS In an elementary school

    Purpose of Assignment: Each student will identify one significant change effort to improve student achievement that has been undertaken during the past three years in their organization. Each student will then study the process conducted to implement the identified change and make recommendations for improvement.

    Use the lectures provided , please (3 pages )

  • (a) Define cell. (b) Difference between unicellular and mult…

    Cell is derived from a Latin word cellula which means small apartment or room.

    Definition:

    1) It is the basic unit of structure and function of an organ.

    2) Cell is the functional unit means that cell form the structure of organ.

    3) Cell is the functional unit means that cell performs various functions of the body.

    4) Cell is the smallest unit of life which carry all the activities of life.



    Requirements:

  • PRE-COURSE ASSIGNMENTS

    Must be submitted in Canvas at the start of

    class, Tuesday, March 10, 2026.

    1. Drawing upon (and citing) concepts and

    categories as prove helpful from the

    required readings define and distinguish

    missional disciple-making. Based

    upon this definition, evaluate your

    current practice of ministry for making

    disciples that includes contextual,

    David M. Gustafson,

    DMin, PhD, Professor

    of Evangelism and

    Missional Ministry,

    Chairman of the

    Department of

    Missions and

    Evangelism, TEDS,

    Deerfield, IL

    missional engagement, with the goal of

    mission in the world. What has

    happened? What has proved effective?

    What do you envision happening in the

    future? 5-6 pages. This will form the

    basis of a 5-minute oral presentation in

    class.

    2. Review Hirschs The Forgotten Ways

    and Vanderstelts Saturate in light of

    Wilkinss Following the Master. What

    are the strengths and potential

    weaknesses of Hirschs and

    Vanderstelts practices of disciple-

    making in light of a biblical theology of

    disciple-making? 5-6 pages.

    Required Readings: Breen, Michael J., and David M.

    Gustafson, eds. Missional Disciple-

    making. Pawleys Island, SC: 3DM

    Publishing, 2019. ISBN-13: 978-

    1945455001 (348 pages)

    2. Hirsch, Alan. The Forgotten Ways:

    Reactivating the Missional Church,

    Grand Rapids: Brazos Press, 2016.

    ISBN-10: 1587433869 (230 pages)

    3. Vanderstelt, Jeff. Saturate: Being

    Disciples in the Everyday Stuff of Life.

    Wheaton: Crossway, 2015. ISBN-10:

    1433545993 (220 pages)

    4. Wilkins, Michael J. Following the

    Master: A Biblical Theology of

    Discipleship. Grand Rapids: Zondervan,

    1992. ISBN-10: 0310521513 (343

    pages)

    5. Zscheile, Dwight J., ed. Cultivating Sent

    Communities: Missional Spiritual

    Formation. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,

    2012. (Canvas, chapter 1, 28 pages)

    *** For my current practice of Ministry in Disciple-making, I am a member of a local church (Harvest Intercontinental, Delaware) in New Castle, Delaware, USA. I’m a Sunday service conductor and an evangelism team member for 3 years. I am building a church in Liberia, West Africa since 2023 to take my discipleship overseas.

  • BUS 754-Advanced Health Care

    Prompt: Healthcare spending in the United States is high and continues to increase, as does the spending for prescription drugs in general. For example, pharmaceutical spending accounts for about 10 percent of total healthcare spending in the United States.

    o Requirements: Write a paper responding to the following:

    When a large percentage of healthcare spending comes from pharmaceutical costs, what are some of the strategies that policymakers, providers, and insurers can do to slow prescription drug spending?The paper must be three (3) pages, APA-compliant, double-spaced, and in 12-point font. The paper should include references from the assigned reading(s) and any additional scholarly sources used to prepare the paper Please include Abstract

    Rubric is attached

    Requirements: 3 pages

  • PowerPoint Presentation: Theoretical Framework to Support Ev…

    Goal:

    The purpose of this assignment is to identify a theory or model which can be used as a framework for a future evidence-based project

    Content Requirements:

    1. Review literature regarding issues or concerns within your selected area of advanced practice nursing.
    2. Select a theory or model which is relevant to your selected area of advanced practice nursing.
    3. Offer a meaningful context for evidence-based practice surrounding the issue or concern which you identified.
    4. Identify and describe a theory or model, and explain its relevance to the issues or concerns within your selected area of advanced practice
    5. Explain how the theory or model can be used as a framework to guide evidence-based practice to address the issue or concern, and discuss the unique insight or perspective offered through the application of this theory or model.

    Submission Instructions:

    • The PowerPoint presentation is original work and logically organized. It should consist of 10-15 slides excluding the title and reference.
    • The PowerPoint presentation should be clear and easy to read. Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.
    • The PowerPoint presentation should be formatted per APA guidelines and references should be current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions)
    • Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles and books should be referenced according to current APA guidelines (the library has a copy of the 7th Edition APA Manual).

    Grading Rubric

    Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.

    Presentation Rubric

    Presentation Rubric

    CriteriaRatingsPointsIdentification of Main Issues/Problems

    Distinguished

    Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.

    4 pts

    Excellent

    Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.

    3 pts

    Fair

    Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

    2 pts

    Poor

    Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.

    1 pts

    /4 pts

    Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms

    Distinguished

    Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

    4 pts

    Excellent

    Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.

    3 pts

    Fair

    Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

    2 pts

    Poor

    Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.

    1 pts

    /4 pts

    Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding

    Distinguished

    Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.

    4 pts

    Excellent

    Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

    3 pts

    Fair

    Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

    2 pts

    Poor

    Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.

    1 pts

    /4 pts

    Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature

    Distinguished

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.

    4 pts

    Excellent

    Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

    3 pts

    Fair

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.

    2 pts

    Poor

    Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.

    1 pts

    /4 pts

    Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines

    view longer description

    Full Marks

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.

    4 pts

    Excellent

    Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

    3 pts

    Fair

    Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.

    2 pts

    Poor

    Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.