Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): MBA 687 Employee Engagement Surveys 3.pdf, MBA 687 US Branch Overview (1).pdf, MBA 687 Leaders Self-Evaluations 3.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): MBA 687 Employee Engagement Surveys 3.pdf, MBA 687 US Branch Overview (1).pdf, MBA 687 Leaders Self-Evaluations 3.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): MBA 687 Employee Engagement Surveys 3.pdf, MBA 687 US Branch Overview (1).pdf, MBA 687 Leaders Self-Evaluations 3.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Lab 0: Planning and Teamwork of a Research Expedition
Instructions
In this online lab assignment, you will take on a scientific or engineering role to simulate the decision-making process of an oceanographic research expedition. You will independently inventory and categorize scientific equipment, develop research objectives, assemble and analyze instrumentation, plan an expedition route with designated research stations, and justify your expedition.
During this lab assignment you will:
Inventory the available equipment.
Develop research objectives based on your assigned scientific role.
Plan an expedition route that accommodates multiple scientific interests.
Justify your choices and reflect on the decision-making process.
After completing this lab you will be able to:
Identify and categorize oceanographic equipment used for sampling and measurement.
Develop research objectives related to marine biology, chemistry, geology, and engineering.
Come up with collaborative ideas for working with interdisciplinary teams to assemble and utilize scientific tools.
Design and justify an expedition route that meets diverse research needs.
Analyze logistical challenges involved in marine fieldwork.
Communicate and defend scientific decisions.
Tools and materials used:
Photos of various oceanographic instruments and a variety of engineering tools. Some are complete instruments used for sampling and measurement, while others are components that can be combined to create solutions tailored to research needs.
1. Complete the lab assignment
. I suggest opening it in
,
which allows you to fill in the blanks. Most modern PDF readers should
also work. Alternatively, you can print the handout and complete it by
hand.
2. Take and submit a photo as proof of your lab work
In this online lab assignment, you will take on the role of a scientist or engineer conducting an oceanographic research expedition. Many of you have never been on an expedition like this before, which is exactly the reason we do this assignment. Your goal is to design an expedition that collects a variety of samples, including water, sediment, and marine life. Start by watching the following video on research expeditions:
1.1. Role Assignment
2.1. Research Planning
3.1. Designing Your Expedition Plan
After completing your expedition plan, reflect on the following topics, as you will need to respond to them on Canvas:
Requirements: depends on what is required
Part 1:
Nonverbal communication, self-awareness, expressing emotions, building relationships, and resolving conflict are all affected by your interpersonal communication (how you talk to yourself) and interpersonal communication (how you talk to others). Think about your most recent conversation at work. How did these elements affect the success or failure your communication exchange?
Be sure to respond to at least two peers with substantive paragraphs by the due date.
This discussion aligns with the following:
Rubrics
reply to:
El Hadj Diop posted Feb 10, 2026 8:19 AM
In a recent conversation at work, I had to address a recurring issue regarding a missed project deadline with a direct teammate. Before the meeting began, I consciously engaged in intrapersonal communication, which is the internal dialogue we have with ourselves. This was a vital step in developing the self-awareness necessary to manage my own frustrations. I recognized that if I entered the room feeling purely accusatory, the communication exchange would likely fail due to a defensive reaction from my colleague. By “talking to myself” first, I shifted my internal narrative from one of blame to one of curiosity and support. This mental preparation allowed me to prioritize building the relationship over winning an argument, ensuring that the foundation of our interpersonal exchange was rooted in mutual respect rather than hostility.
Once the actual conversation commenced, nonverbal communication became the most influential factor in the exchange’s success. I was mindful of my “silent language,” ensuring that my posture remained open and my eye contact was steady but not aggressive. Research suggests that nonverbal cues often carry more weight than the actual words spoken, and in this high-stakes scenario, my calm demeanor helped de-escalate my teammate’s visible anxiety. When expressing emotions, I used “I” statements to convey my concerns about our collective progress. For instance, instead of saying “You are making us late,” I stated, “I feel concerned about our timeline because I value the quality of our output.” This approach to interpersonal communication allowed us to focus on resolving conflict constructively. Because my nonverbal signals matched my verbal transparency, the teammate felt safe enough to explain the bottlenecks they were facing. Ultimately, the alignment of my intrapersonal thoughts and interpersonal actions transformed a potential failure into a successful strategy for future collaboration.
2 Unread
2
Unread
2 Replies
2
Replies
3 Views
3
Views
View profile card for Zachary Abbott
Last post 4 hours ago by Zachary Abbott
Contains unread posts
Eric Konnight posted Feb 10, 2026 4:54 PM
In my most recent conversation at work, nonverbal communication, self-awareness, emotional expression, relationship-building, and conflict management all played important roles in determining the success of the interaction. My nonverbal communication, including eye contact, posture, facial expressions, and tone of voice, helped reinforce that I was engaged, respectful, and open to discussion. Maintaining calm body language and a steady tone helped prevent the conversation from becoming tense, even when the topic required problem-solving or clarification.
Self-awareness was especially important during this exchange. Internally, I paid close attention to how I was talking to myself and managing my emotions throughout the conversation. By recognizing feelings of stress or frustration early, I was able to regulate my responses instead of reacting impulsively. This internal dialogue helped me remain professional, patient, and focused on finding solutions rather than expressing frustration.
Expressing emotions appropriately also contributed to the success of the communication. Instead of suppressing my feelings or becoming defensive, I communicated my concerns respectfully and clearly. This allowed the other person to better understand my perspective without feeling attacked or misunderstood. Building and maintaining the relationship was another key factor. Because there was already a foundation of mutual respect and trust, the conversation felt more collaborative than confrontational.
Finally, effective conflict resolution skills helped guide the interaction toward a positive outcome. Rather than assigning blame, I focused on shared goals, compromise, and constructive solutions. By actively listening and acknowledging the other persons point of view, we were able to reach an understanding. Overall, this experience reinforced how intentional interpersonal communication directly influences workplace effectiveness, professionalism, teamwork, and long-term collaboration.
Part 2:
Create a Johari Window for each of the following individuals: your supervisor, a co-worker, an adult family member, and a young family member (17 years old or younger). Useas a resource.
Note: You may substitute individuals of these do not apply to you. For example, if you have no co-workers you may include a client or business partner or a business contact. If a substitution is made please include their title or relationship.
Steps:
Additional Instructions:
For example under Open Area in parentheses put the person selected (supervisor, etc.) do not include personal names.
Analysis Instructions:
This assignment aligns with the following:
My chosen method is ( Descriptive ecological study/Epidemiology ). Please ask questions when confused.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): 2026_GH 3011 – Lecture 3_DZ.pdf, GH 3011_Assignment 1 Research Project Part 1_Instructions Rubric.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Essay #2 will focus on literary critics ideas only (not your personal opinions).
This assignment teaches you how to:
Length: 7501000 words
Choose one short story from “The Paper Menagerie” by Ken Liu; Then write an essay where you explain what several critics are saying about one specific topic related to that story.
You are not interpreting the story yourself.
You are showing that you can understand and explain published scholarship about the story.
Ask:
Some examples of common critical topics:
(Choose whatever topic your articles point you toward. The articles dictate the topic, not you. Think of it like a treasure hunt!)
For this assignment, you will:
Choose one story
Find three scholarly articles that analyze the same topic
Explain what each critic argues
Show how their ideas connect (similarities or differences in emphasis)
Do NOT add your own interpretation of the story
The research leads the papernot your personal opinion.
=> find thesis and three topic sentences and critics
Use the following structure to keep your paper clear and focused:
Write one paragraph per critic:
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): The-Paper-MenageriebyKenLiu.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.