Category: uncategorised

  • Significance of Stakeholder Analysis

    Scenario As the HR consultant contracted to resolve issues related to miscommunication and workforce discontent at the U.S. branch of the Singaporean software solutions provider, you are expected to present a change readiness report and then submit a change management plan. You have read that stakeholder analysis is an important requirement for change management. You know that you will soon need critical information from the VP of the U.S. unit to complete this activity. To convince the VP and the leadership team at both locations to share this critical information with you, you decide to send out a memo on the significance of stakeholder analysis in change management. Prompt Write a short memo explaining the significance of stakeholder analysis. Specifically, you must address the following criteria: Describe the use of stakeholder analysis in organizational change management. How will the identities of different stakeholders influence their views on change initiatives? How can stakeholders encourage or inhibit change in an organization? Identify and explain at least three benefits of conducting a stakeholder analysis. Identify the key people in the organization: Reference the Leaders Self-Evaluations to document your analysis. Who are the critical stakeholders in the organization? Refer to the U.S. Branch Overview to identify the critical stakeholders. Who could be interested in enabling change in the organization? Why do you think these stakeholders will be interested in enabling change? Include at least two valid questions or additional information you will need from the company leadership to complete your stakeholder analysis. Reference the Leaders Self-Evaluations and Employee Engagement Surveys to document your analysis. What to Submit Submit a 3- to 5-page Word document using double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Sources, including course materials, should be cited in APA format and listed on a separate reference page. Consult the Shapiro Library APA Style Guide for more information on citations.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): MBA 687 Employee Engagement Surveys 3.pdf, MBA 687 US Branch Overview (1).pdf, MBA 687 Leaders Self-Evaluations 3.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Significance of Stakeholder Analysis

    Scenario As the HR consultant contracted to resolve issues related to miscommunication and workforce discontent at the U.S. branch of the Singaporean software solutions provider, you are expected to present a change readiness report and then submit a change management plan. You have read that stakeholder analysis is an important requirement for change management. You know that you will soon need critical information from the VP of the U.S. unit to complete this activity. To convince the VP and the leadership team at both locations to share this critical information with you, you decide to send out a memo on the significance of stakeholder analysis in change management. Prompt Write a short memo explaining the significance of stakeholder analysis. Specifically, you must address the following criteria: Describe the use of stakeholder analysis in organizational change management. How will the identities of different stakeholders influence their views on change initiatives? How can stakeholders encourage or inhibit change in an organization? Identify and explain at least three benefits of conducting a stakeholder analysis. Identify the key people in the organization: Reference the Leaders Self-Evaluations to document your analysis. Who are the critical stakeholders in the organization? Refer to the U.S. Branch Overview to identify the critical stakeholders. Who could be interested in enabling change in the organization? Why do you think these stakeholders will be interested in enabling change? Include at least two valid questions or additional information you will need from the company leadership to complete your stakeholder analysis. Reference the Leaders Self-Evaluations and Employee Engagement Surveys to document your analysis. What to Submit Submit a 3- to 5-page Word document using double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Sources, including course materials, should be cited in APA format and listed on a separate reference page. Consult the Shapiro Library APA Style Guide for more information on citations.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): MBA 687 Employee Engagement Surveys 3.pdf, MBA 687 US Branch Overview (1).pdf, MBA 687 Leaders Self-Evaluations 3.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Regulatory Drivers

    Explore the forces of change as predicted by FEMA in social and technological drivers, environmental drivers, and economic and political drivers. In your opinion, which regulatory driver will be the most influential within our national emergency management system? Which will be the most important or influential within your own community’s emergency management posture? Justify your selection with additional research and examples.
  • Regulatory Drivers

    Explore the forces of change as predicted by FEMA in social and technological drivers, environmental drivers, and economic and political drivers. In your opinion, which regulatory driver will be the most influential within our national emergency management system? Which will be the most important or influential within your own community’s emergency management posture? Justify your selection with additional research and examples.
  • Ocean Lab Research

    Lab 0: Planning and Teamwork of a Research Expedition

    Instructions
    In this online lab assignment, you will take on a scientific or engineering role to simulate the decision-making process of an oceanographic research expedition. You will independently inventory and categorize scientific equipment, develop research objectives, assemble and analyze instrumentation, plan an expedition route with designated research stations, and justify your expedition.

    During this lab assignment you will:
    Inventory the available equipment.
    Develop research objectives based on your assigned scientific role.
    Plan an expedition route that accommodates multiple scientific interests.
    Justify your choices and reflect on the decision-making process.

    After completing this lab you will be able to:
    Identify and categorize oceanographic equipment used for sampling and measurement.
    Develop research objectives related to marine biology, chemistry, geology, and engineering.
    Come up with collaborative ideas for working with interdisciplinary teams to assemble and utilize scientific tools.
    Design and justify an expedition route that meets diverse research needs.
    Analyze logistical challenges involved in marine fieldwork.
    Communicate and defend scientific decisions.

    Tools and materials used:
    Photos of various oceanographic instruments and a variety of engineering tools. Some are complete instruments used for sampling and measurement, while others are components that can be combined to create solutions tailored to research needs.

    Instructions

    1. Complete the lab assignment

    • You will be provided with a digital handout. You may download the fillable PDF file by

    . I suggest opening it in

    ,

    which allows you to fill in the blanks. Most modern PDF readers should

    also work. Alternatively, you can print the handout and complete it by

    hand.

    2. Take and submit a photo as proof of your lab work

    • Take a photo of your handwritten notes, a drawing, or a screenshot of your work to document your lab progress.

      Lab Introduction

      In this online lab assignment, you will take on the role of a scientist or engineer conducting an oceanographic research expedition. Many of you have never been on an expedition like this before, which is exactly the reason we do this assignment. Your goal is to design an expedition that collects a variety of samples, including water, sediment, and marine life. Start by watching the following video on research expeditions:

    • Stage 1 – Itemizing

      1.1. Role Assignment

    • You will pick one of the following roles:
      • Marine Biologist
      • Marine Chemist
      • Marine Geologist
      • Marine Engineer
    • Imagine you are part of a small interdisciplinary team with at least one representative from each profession. Think about how all team members would collaborate.
    • 1.2. Equipment Inventory
    • Review the provided photos of scientific equipment that can be downloaded by
  • . Some photos may contain multiple items. Research and document the name and function of each tool using the internet, if necessary.
  • List the tools in the Lab 0 Worksheet 1 section of the downloadable handout.
  • Categorize equipment into Sampling Tools (used for collecting physical samples) and Measurement Tools (used for recording scientific data).

    Stage 2 – Setting Up Research Objectives and Assembling Instrumentation

    2.1. Research Planning

    • Based on your selected role, develop at least three research objectives for your expedition. Some examples:
      • Marine Biologist: Study marine species, food web interactions, or biodiversity.
      • Marine Chemist: Analyze ocean salinity, nutrients, or pollution levels.
      • Marine Geologist: Investigate underwater volcanoes, sediment layers, or seafloor structures.
      • Marine Engineer: Design or optimize tools to support data collection.
      • 2.2. Selecting and Understanding Instruments
      • Identify the equipment most relevant to your research objectives.
      • If any tools require assembly or setup, outline how they should be configured.
      • 2.3. Documentation
      • Choose three scientific tools or instruments related to your hypothetical research.
      • Draw a schematic of each tool and outline all the parts you can recognize.
      • Write a brief manual (a few sentences) describing how each tool or instrument operates and how it will be used for data collection. Please include these three manuals in the Lab 0 Worksheet 2 section of the handout.

        Stage 3 – Planning Expedition Routes and Stations

        3.1. Designing Your Expedition Plan

      • Analyze the map provided in Lab 0 Worksheet 3 section of the handout and mark 10 oceanographic stations that your research cruise will visit. Try to justify why each location was selected based on scientific objectives, accessibility, and logistical considerations.
      • Create a short, free-form presentation using the tools of your choice to defend your expedition plan. Make sure it is no longer than 3 pages. Explain why your chosen route is effective and how it balances various research needs. If you choose to record yourself, you do not need to create a presentation. Instead, you can pitch your objectives and research plan in under 2 minutes. Keep it simple and don’t spend too much time making it all perfect.

        Final Reflection and Wrap-Up

        After completing your expedition plan, reflect on the following topics, as you will need to respond to them on Canvas:

      • The importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in oceanographic research.
      • The logistical challenges of conducting marine fieldwork.
      • The role of flexibility in adapting research plans.
      • How this simulation helped you understand real-world research expeditions.
      • Lab Submission and Questions:

      • Q1.What was your role during the expedition?
      • Q2. What were the biggest challenges in planning the expedition?
      • Q3. How do different scientific disciplines collaborate? Do you expect conflicts to occur, or would the process always run smoothly?
      • Q4. If you were to design a real expedition plan, how would you ensure a more inclusive environment where all researches’ voices are heard and valued, especially considering that cruises navigate both international waters and the exclusive economic zones (EEZs) of multiple countries?
      • Q5.Reflect on the importance of teamwork in oceanographic research, especially considering the logistical complexity, physically and mentally draining environment, as well as harsh and unpredictable environmental conditions at sea during expeditions.
      • Q6. Upload the completed PDF handout with all worksheets filled out.
      • Q7. Upload the photo you took as proof of your completed lab work, which can be your handwriting notes, a drawing, or a screenshot.
      • Q8. Upload your short presentation (max three slides). Explain your route and how it meets research needs.
      • Q9. If you are unable to upload your recorded presentation due to space limitations, please upload it somewhere and paste the link to your video.

  • Requirements: depends on what is required

  • s.t wk2

    Part 1:

    Discussion Prompt:

    Nonverbal communication, self-awareness, expressing emotions, building relationships, and resolving conflict are all affected by your interpersonal communication (how you talk to yourself) and interpersonal communication (how you talk to others). Think about your most recent conversation at work. How did these elements affect the success or failure your communication exchange?

    Peer Reply Guidance:

    Be sure to respond to at least two peers with substantive paragraphs by the due date.

    This discussion aligns with the following:

    Rubrics

    • BSB Discussion Board Rubric

    reply to:

    El Hadj Diop posted Feb 10, 2026 8:19 AM

    In a recent conversation at work, I had to address a recurring issue regarding a missed project deadline with a direct teammate. Before the meeting began, I consciously engaged in intrapersonal communication, which is the internal dialogue we have with ourselves. This was a vital step in developing the self-awareness necessary to manage my own frustrations. I recognized that if I entered the room feeling purely accusatory, the communication exchange would likely fail due to a defensive reaction from my colleague. By “talking to myself” first, I shifted my internal narrative from one of blame to one of curiosity and support. This mental preparation allowed me to prioritize building the relationship over winning an argument, ensuring that the foundation of our interpersonal exchange was rooted in mutual respect rather than hostility.

    The Execution: Nonverbal Cues and Expressing Emotions

    Once the actual conversation commenced, nonverbal communication became the most influential factor in the exchange’s success. I was mindful of my “silent language,” ensuring that my posture remained open and my eye contact was steady but not aggressive. Research suggests that nonverbal cues often carry more weight than the actual words spoken, and in this high-stakes scenario, my calm demeanor helped de-escalate my teammate’s visible anxiety. When expressing emotions, I used “I” statements to convey my concerns about our collective progress. For instance, instead of saying “You are making us late,” I stated, “I feel concerned about our timeline because I value the quality of our output.” This approach to interpersonal communication allowed us to focus on resolving conflict constructively. Because my nonverbal signals matched my verbal transparency, the teammate felt safe enough to explain the bottlenecks they were facing. Ultimately, the alignment of my intrapersonal thoughts and interpersonal actions transformed a potential failure into a successful strategy for future collaboration.

    2 Unread

    2

    Unread

    2 Replies

    2

    Replies

    3 Views

    3

    Views

    View profile card for Zachary Abbott

    Last post 4 hours ago by Zachary Abbott

    Contains unread posts

    Eric Konnight posted Feb 10, 2026 4:54 PM

    In my most recent conversation at work, nonverbal communication, self-awareness, emotional expression, relationship-building, and conflict management all played important roles in determining the success of the interaction. My nonverbal communication, including eye contact, posture, facial expressions, and tone of voice, helped reinforce that I was engaged, respectful, and open to discussion. Maintaining calm body language and a steady tone helped prevent the conversation from becoming tense, even when the topic required problem-solving or clarification.

    Self-awareness was especially important during this exchange. Internally, I paid close attention to how I was talking to myself and managing my emotions throughout the conversation. By recognizing feelings of stress or frustration early, I was able to regulate my responses instead of reacting impulsively. This internal dialogue helped me remain professional, patient, and focused on finding solutions rather than expressing frustration.

    Expressing emotions appropriately also contributed to the success of the communication. Instead of suppressing my feelings or becoming defensive, I communicated my concerns respectfully and clearly. This allowed the other person to better understand my perspective without feeling attacked or misunderstood. Building and maintaining the relationship was another key factor. Because there was already a foundation of mutual respect and trust, the conversation felt more collaborative than confrontational.

    Finally, effective conflict resolution skills helped guide the interaction toward a positive outcome. Rather than assigning blame, I focused on shared goals, compromise, and constructive solutions. By actively listening and acknowledging the other persons point of view, we were able to reach an understanding. Overall, this experience reinforced how intentional interpersonal communication directly influences workplace effectiveness, professionalism, teamwork, and long-term collaboration.

    Part 2:

    Create a Johari Window for each of the following individuals: your supervisor, a co-worker, an adult family member, and a young family member (17 years old or younger). Useas a resource.

    Note: You may substitute individuals of these do not apply to you. For example, if you have no co-workers you may include a client or business partner or a business contact. If a substitution is made please include their title or relationship.

    Submission Instructions:

    Steps:

    1. Read Chapter 3: Begin by thoroughly reading Chapter 3 of Fujishins book, focusing on the concepts of verbal communication and the Johari Window model.
    2. Understand the Johari Window: Familiarize yourself with the four quadrants of the Johari Window:
    • Open Area: Known to self and others.
    • Blind Area: Known to others but not to self.
    • Hidden Area: Known to self but not to others.
    • Unknown Area: Unknown to both self and others.
    1. Select Individuals: Choose one person from each category: supervisor, co-worker, adult family member, and young family member.
    2. Gather Information: Reflect on your interactions with each individual. Consider their communication style, behaviors, and any feedback youve received or observed.
    3. Construct the Johari Windows and label each area:
    • Open Area: List traits and behaviors known to both you and the individual.
    • Blind Area: Identify traits and behaviors that others might see in the individual but they might not recognize in themselves.
    • Hidden Area: Note traits and behaviors that the individual knows about themselves but keeps hidden from others.
    • Unknown Area: Speculate on traits and behaviors that neither you nor the individual might be aware of.
    1. Clearly label each area by category for each Johari Window: supervisor, co-worker, adult family member and young family member.
    2. You should have a total 4 separate Johari Window’s. Each should have 4 Windows labelled: Open Area, Blind Area, Hidden Area and Unknown Area.

    Additional Instructions:

    1. Construct your Johari Window using Microsoft Word or Microsoft PowerPoint. Or, you can hand draw, take a photo and submit it as a PDF or JPEG.
    2. Each box of the Johari Window should be clearly labelled.
    • With Name of Area
    • With Title of selected person in parentheses ( )

    For example under Open Area in parentheses put the person selected (supervisor, etc.) do not include personal names.

    Analysis Instructions:

    1. Write Your Analysis:
    2. Prepare a 200-word response for each of the following questions:
    • What are your initial perceptions of the windows? What do they tell you about yourself and how you communicate?
    • What would you change in each of these windows? If you would not change anything, please explain why.
    • Are they equally or more open with you? How would you like these relationships to evolve over time?
    • What have you gained from this exercise and what will you do differently moving forward?
    1. Analysis should be submitted in APA, 7th edition format. (Title Page, Proper paragraph formatting, and Reference Page) using Microsoft Word.
    2. Cite Your Source: Ensure you properly cite Fujishins book in your assignment.
    3. Must include at least one reference/source.
    4. Save your analysis as your First Name Last Name – Window. For example: the file name would be: Erica Willis – Window
    5. Remember to submit your Johari Window & your Analysis. You may either submit them as two separate files/documents or have your Johari Window on the very last page of your written analysis. Use creative elements; your Johari Window can include creativity by using appropriate creative elements – additional clipart or changing the font color or size to make it more appealing.
    • Be sure to review the following prior to submitting your assignment:
    • Assignment Rubric
    • If you do not see the rubric, in the blue horizontal navigation bar select Course Tools, then Assignments. Select the appropriate assignment, and the rubric will be located near the bottom of the page.

    This assignment aligns with the following:

    Resources & Supports

    • You have free access as an APUS student. Sign in with your MyCampus Email credentials.
    • : Watch this 3-minute video if you need guidance on submitting your assignment.
  • Part 1 Scientific rationale, study design, sample and ethic…

    My chosen method is ( Descriptive ecological study/Epidemiology ). Please ask questions when confused.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): 2026_GH 3011 – Lecture 3_DZ.pdf, GH 3011_Assignment 1 Research Project Part 1_Instructions Rubric.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • ABS Hosea

    Applied Biblical Studies Exercises – ABS (CLO: 1 and 3) 20%. For each book of the Minor Prophets, you will be asked to submit a 1-page biblical studies summary of the book. The summary will consist of (1) a brief statement on the main theme of the book; (2) a brief statement on the time of composition; (3) a brief statement to whom the prophecy was directed (the audience); (4) a brief outline of the book; and (5) a bibliography of the source(s) used. You may only consult the sources on the list following (all the sources at the Smith Library have been placed on reserve for this course). You will submit your exercises through Moodle. At the end you will have a summary page on all twelve books that will serve you well in your future ministry. The sources you may use are: a) Your textbook b) Shank, Harold. Minor Prophets v. 1 (Smith Library) c) Hahlen, Mark Allen. Minor Prophets v.2 (Smith Library) d) McComiskey, Thomas Edward. The Minor Prophets (all three volumes) (Smith Library) e) Boice, James Montgomery. The Minor Prophets (Smith Library) f) Calvin, John. The Minor Prophets (Smith Library) g) Achtemeier, Elizabeth. Minor Prophets / (eBook) h) Goldingay, John. Minor Prophets II (eBook) i) Longman, Tremper. Old Testament Commentary Survey (eBook) j) IVP Bible Background Commentary: Old Testament (eBook) k) Limburg, James. Hosea-Micah (eBook) Baker, David. Obadiah, Jonah and Micah (eBook) m) Barton, John. Joel and Obadiah: A Commentary (eBook) n) Jeremias, Jorg. The Book of Amos (eBook) 0) Baker, David. Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah (eBook) p) Petterson, Anthony R. Haggai, Zechariah and Malachi (eBook)
  • ABS Hosea

    Applied Biblical Studies Exercises – ABS (CLO: 1 and 3) 20%. For each book of the Minor Prophets, you will be asked to submit a 1-page biblical studies summary of the book. The summary will consist of (1) a brief statement on the main theme of the book; (2) a brief statement on the time of composition; (3) a brief statement to whom the prophecy was directed (the audience); (4) a brief outline of the book; and (5) a bibliography of the source(s) used. You may only consult the sources on the list following (all the sources at the Smith Library have been placed on reserve for this course). You will submit your exercises through Moodle. At the end you will have a summary page on all twelve books that will serve you well in your future ministry. The sources you may use are: a) Your textbook b) Shank, Harold. Minor Prophets v. 1 (Smith Library) c) Hahlen, Mark Allen. Minor Prophets v.2 (Smith Library) d) McComiskey, Thomas Edward. The Minor Prophets (all three volumes) (Smith Library) e) Boice, James Montgomery. The Minor Prophets (Smith Library) f) Calvin, John. The Minor Prophets (Smith Library) g) Achtemeier, Elizabeth. Minor Prophets / (eBook) h) Goldingay, John. Minor Prophets II (eBook) i) Longman, Tremper. Old Testament Commentary Survey (eBook) j) IVP Bible Background Commentary: Old Testament (eBook) k) Limburg, James. Hosea-Micah (eBook) Baker, David. Obadiah, Jonah and Micah (eBook) m) Barton, John. Joel and Obadiah: A Commentary (eBook) n) Jeremias, Jorg. The Book of Amos (eBook) 0) Baker, David. Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah (eBook) p) Petterson, Anthony R. Haggai, Zechariah and Malachi (eBook)
  • Research Essay (Critics Ideas Only)

    Essay #2 will focus on literary critics ideas only (not your personal opinions).

    This assignment teaches you how to:

    • locate peer-reviewed scholarly articles,
    • summarize critics arguments,
    • synthesize multiple sources around a shared topic,
    • and document everything using correct MLA style.

    Length: 7501000 words

    Choose one short story from “The Paper Menagerie” by Ken Liu; Then write an essay where you explain what several critics are saying about one specific topic related to that story.

    You are not interpreting the story yourself.

    You are showing that you can understand and explain published scholarship about the story.

    -What to Do

    Ask:

    • What are critics interested in?
    • What idea or symbol do many scholars keep returning to?
    • What debate or focus seems to appear across multiple articles?

    Some examples of common critical topics:

    • symbolism (quilts, setting, mirrors, photographs)
    • identity (race, culture, gender, heritage)
    • trauma, memory, silence
    • narrative structure
    • time
    • stereotypes & representation
    • family conflict
    • coming-of-age themes

    (Choose whatever topic your articles point you toward. The articles dictate the topic, not you. Think of it like a treasure hunt!)

    -Write an Essay Based on Three Critics

    For this assignment, you will:

    Choose one story

    Find three scholarly articles that analyze the same topic

    Explain what each critic argues

    Show how their ideas connect (similarities or differences in emphasis)

    Do NOT add your own interpretation of the story

    The research leads the papernot your personal opinion.

    => find thesis and three topic sentences and critics

    Essay Organization

    Use the following structure to keep your paper clear and focused:

    Introduction

    • Introduce the topic with a personal connection.
    • Transition to the topic in literature and the short story (author + title)
    • End with a thesis that:
    • names the three critics
    • and states the shared topic they all analyze.

    Body Paragraphs

    Write one paragraph per critic:

    • Summarize their argument fairly and accurately.
    • What is the critics main claim?
    • What evidence or reasoning do they use?
    • How does their approach contribute to understanding the shared topic?
    • Integrate 2 quotes in each paragraph, but mostly focus on explaining their ideas in your own words (with citations).

    Conclusion

    • Summarize what the three critics collectively help readers understand.
    • Make meaningful personal connection or reflection on why this topic matters.

    Requirements Checklist

    • Length: 7501000 words
    • Use three peer-reviewed scholarly sources
    • Use MLA citations (in-text + Works Cited page)
    • Summarize/paraphrase/quote accurately and ethically
    • Do not give your own interpretation of the storys meaning

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): The-Paper-MenageriebyKenLiu.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.