Category: uncategorised

  • Wk2 E1 Abe Coven

    After completing the assigned reading, write an APA-formatted essay of at least 500 words where you will explore the biblical figure of Abraham and the covenant God establishes with him in Genesis 12, 15, and 17. You will examine how Abrahams story fits into the larger biblical narrative and what it reveals about Gods plan to restore His kingdom.

    Essay Prompt:

    Explain the significance of Gods covenant with Abraham in the context of the broader biblical story. Address the following questions:

    The Call and Covenant of Abraham

    Briefly summarize the key moments in Genesis 12, 15, and 17.

    What promises does God make to Abraham?

    How do these promises relate to the earlier story of creation and the fall?

    Theological Significance of the Covenant

    Evaluate what it means to be in covenant with God. How does Gods covenant with Abraham help re-establish what was lost in Eden?

    Abrahams Place in the Story of Israel

    Analyze why Abraham is such a central figure in Israels history and theology.

    Conclusion

    Summarize why the Abrahamic covenant is essential to understanding the Bibles big picture. How does this covenant connect to the coming of Jesus and the restoration of Gods kingdom?

    Include at least one citation from Gods Big Picture, Chapter 3, at least one citation from Discovering the Bible, Chapter 4, at least one citation from The Epic of Eden, Chapter 3, and at least one citation from the biblical text, Genesis 12, 15, or 17.

    Please add pg # to cited work, and refernce page do not be vague, whatever that means. Words from my professor.

    Their are 4 different readings but will only use three, the Epic of Eden, just ignore because it’s to late to find that book.

    Also read Genesis Chap. 12, 15, & 17

  • Assignment 1

    please strictly follow the instructions in the file,

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Untitled spreadsheet – Sheet1 (1).pdf, BIO271 Lab 1 assignment 2026.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Week 5 Discussion: Feasibility

    Introduction

    Greenwood and Levin (2007) stated:

    Action research (AR) is a cogenerative process through which professional researchers and interested members of a local organization, community, or specially created organization collaborate to research, understand, and resolve problems of mutual interest. Action research is a social process in which professional knowledge, local knowledge, process skills, research skills, and democratic values are the basis for cogenerated knowledge and social change. (p.115)

    The authors go on to describe the skills and abilities needed by the action researcher in order to successfully plan and carry out an action research process. The role of the researcher can be summed up through four major tasks:

    • Facilitator.
    • Educator.
    • Activist.
    • Advocate.

    Peter Park (1993) states, “The researcher participates in the struggle of the people . . . The researcher works with the community to help turn its felt but unarticulated problem into an identifiable topic of collective investigation” (Park, Brydon-Miller, Hall, & Jackson, p. 9).

    Stringer and Aragon (2021) discuss resistance to change as another issue that the researcher must deal with. This reality factors into the matter of viability/feasibility. Is the community open to change? If not, can the researcher navigate and demonstrate the rationale behind the change plan? Such is the nature of feasibility in action research studiesdoes the researcher have the skill to facilitate, educate, and advocate for the group? Can the researcher turn the communitys unarticulated problem into a research study?

    To determine the feasibility of an action research study, the following steps are followed:

    • A problem is identified by a researcher or the people experiencing the problem.
    • The problem is social in nature and calls for collective action to reach a solution.
    • The researcher may initiate a collective approach to problem, or the group experiencing the problem may seek out a researcher to assist them.

    Applying this litmus test to an identified problemit is social in nature and calls for collective action to reach a solutionhelps the researcher to determine if pursuing the study of this issue is feasible. In addition, it is important to envision the future desired state sought by the group or community through the study of this problem. Is that future state possible? Can this group collectively achieve the goals it seeks? Greenwood and Levin (2007) imply that all social problems have the potential for study and improvement through action research and encourage action researchers to create possibilities rather than enforce limits. Feasibility, then, rests with the skill of the researcher. Therefore, it becomes critical for action researchers to do a self-assessment of their skills to determine how well they are likely to do with the tasks of supporting an action research process. In this week, we explore the concept of feasibility by exploring and assessing our own skills. How ready to you feel to take on an action research process?

    References

    Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research (2nd ed.). Sage.

    ASSIGNMENT

    In Week 2, you submitted the central focus for a possible action research study along with a rationale for that study. Remind us about your topic by describing the study in a sentence or two and then talk about how you see the feasibility for such a study by applying the questions posed in this week’s overview:

    • A problem is identified by a researcher or the people experiencing the problem.
    • The problem is social in nature and calls for collective action to reach a solution.
    • The researcher may initiate a collective approach to problem, or the group experiencing the problem seeks out a researcher to assist them.

    What would it take to make this study happen?

    WEEK 2 ASSIGNMENT ATTACHED

    RESEARCH TOPIC: What strategies do social workers use to support African American men living in urban areas with access to mental health services?

    OCCUPATION: Social Work Mental Health Therapist

    THEORETICAL PRACTICE: Critical Race Theory

    METHODOLOGY: Qualitative

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): WEEK FIVE CH 8.docx, WEEK FIVE CH 6.docx, Week_2_Discussion_-Building_Relationships_and_Positive_Climate_Settings-1769199808 (1).docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Discussion 3

    Hello Class, We have reached Module #3 of the semester which focuses on Chapter 5: Manufacturing and Chapter 6: Integrated Operations Management. Chapter 5 goes in-depth on manufacturing for businesses and the quality imperative that is associated with it. Any time we purchase a product it has already been evaluated in areas that have explored their dimensions of quality, total quality management and tested against quality standards set forth by the company (and regulators). Major names in the business world (for example, Nike) implore manufacturing perspectives such as brand power, volume, variety, constraints and lead time. As mentioned in previous discussion boards, a strategy of manufacturing must be broached which could include the following: basic manufacturing processes, matching (strategy to requirements), alternative manufacturing strategies and evaluating the total cost of manufacturing. As manufacturing has evolved over the years businesses have become more proficient in areas such as mass customization, lean systems, flexible manufacturing, six sigma, requirements planning, design for manufacture and logistics. Chapter 6 discusses the importance of integrations operations planning. Supply chain planning must have visibility, simultaneous resource consideration and resource utilization. Applications of supply chain planning are many, but this chapter focuses on demand planning, production planning, logistics planning and inventory deployment. The S&OP (sales and operations planning) process is discussed in detail thus focusing on the process itself and how to go about making it work to a company’s benefit. The APS (advanced planning and scheduling) overview breaks down the various components of APS, as well as, exploring the supply chain planning benefits, the supply chain planning considerations and integrated business planning. Lastly, the all important topic of forecasting comes to light. There are 5 important aspects of forecasting: requirements, components, process, techniques and the all important accuracy of the practice. Once again, think of the pandemic and how forecasting could make or break a business. After you read chapters 5 & 6 in the textbook, please answer the following questions: Why would a company’s cost of manufacturing and procurement tend to increase as the firm changes from MTP to an MTO strategy? Why would inventory costs tend to decrease? (Page 115, Study Question #3) Describe the S&OP process. What are the major trade-offs that must be considered? (Page 145, Study Question #2)

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): 18363417-Discussion Board Requirements – Professor Kolmos (1).docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Nursing 101

    15-20 minutes on test taking strategies with a PowerPoint

    • ATI: Prioritization Frameworks: (Systemic before local, acute before chronic, actual before potential, and Maslow’s hierarchy of needs).
    • Elimination Strategy: Eliminating obviously wrong answers.
    • Keyword Analysis: Identifying key words in the question stem.
    • “Listen” Technique: Using clues within the question to avoid making assumptions.
    • “Default” Strategies: Specific approaches for nursing-related scenarios.
  • Discussion Post

    Read the instructions and watch the video. Please do not write nothing above 200 words. No source citing required. Thank you.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): DiscussionPost.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Super Bowl religious significance

    Write about the Super Bowl as a sports spectacle. What does it say about American religion and culture. Your assignment is to do a short write-up (no more than 300 words) explaining its religious significance. Please make sure to use key course concepts
  • Chapter 13 discussion post

    Process

    In the prior assignment, you did research on a specific streaming platform. After learning more about the company, what was a controversy that surprised you? Were there any ethical issues in streaming that arose for you? Knowing what you know, would you buy stock in any of the publicly traded music-related companies? Why or why not?

    Craft a 200-300 word response and submit below

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): On-Demand Streaming.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Close Reading

    This is a 500750-word close-reading of ONE page of any course text. You must make an observation about the meaning of the page (message, atmosphere, implication, etc.) and analyze devices to support your observation. You may focus on literary devices or any relevant detail in the text. This assignment requires direct quotes; you can only quote material from one page. The objective of this assignment is to make connections between the specific details and overarching meaning of a short text.

    https://www.gutenberg.org/files/42324/42324-h/42324-h.htm

    this is the link to the reading.

  • Argumentative Essay

    ASSIGNMENT: Write a argumentative essay arguing one side or stance of an academically appropriate debate using the classical model supported by evidence and research. If the writing exceeds the 1500 word maximum, it will be returned back for revision.A. Directions

    Step 1. Choose a Topic

    Today, there are many different debates being had all around the world about topics that affect our personal, professional, civic, and/or academic lives. Some of these debates have been such hot topics for so long that it has become very difficult to add to the conversation with new and original ideas or stances to take. To move beyond this trend, we have created a list of topics that may not be written about for this Touchstone. This includes example topics that are used in Unit 4. Feel free to access a tutor if you would like support choosing a topic for this essay.

    Please AVOID choosing any of the following topics:

    • Abortion Rights
    • Animal Testing (Unit 4 example)
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Climate Change (Unit 4 example)
    • Belief in God(s) or Afterlife(s)
    • Death Penalty / Capital Punishment
    • Euthanasia / Assisted Suicide
    • Fad Diets (e.g., Keto, etc.)
    • Funding/Defunding Law Enforcement
    • Greatest of All Time Topics
    • Immigration
    • Legal Alcohol/Tobacco Age
    • Legalization of Marijuana
    • Legalization of Sex Work
    • Paying Student Athletes
    • Second Amendment Rights (i.e., Gun Control)
    • Social Medias Impact on Mental Health
    • Universal Healthcare
    • Vaccines

    Choosing to write about any of the above topics will result in returned Touchstone for a single chance to resubmit.

    Step 2. Write an Argumentative Essay

    Remember the word argument does not mean a fight in a writing context. An academic argument is more like a thoughtful conversation between two people with differing viewpoints on a debatable issue. However, you are required to take a position on one side of a debatable issue that is informed by academically appropriate evidence.

    For the purposes of this assignment, expressing or relying on your personal opinion of a debate is discouraged. Rather, the essay must argue one side or stance of the debate using the rhetorical appeals (logos, ethos, and pathos) and be supported by academic or scholarly sources. These include physical sources in public libraries, digital sources in academic libraries, online sources (excludes unreliable sources like procon.org and wikipedia.org, which are discouraged), and published expert reports, preferably peer-reviewed by experts in the field to maintain utmost credibility. Consider revisiting the tutorial for more information on appropriate sources for argumentative writing.

    Your submission must include an APA style in-text citations and a reference page following the essay. In your research, you will need at least 2 and no more than 4 credible primary or secondary sources to use as support in your essay.

    • All sources cited in the writing submitted must be locatable by a grader; include hyperlinks to the sources in the reference page.
    • The use of any source that requires payment for access is strictly prohibited for this assignment.
    • Avoid using sources that exceed 20 pages in length, as they may be overly extensive for the purposes of this assignment.
    • Including more than four sources may cause delays, and you might be asked to provide additional evidence of the credibility for each source.

    Thia will be helpful to you as you work on this assignment.

    Step 3. Think About Your Writing

    On a separate page, below your reference page, include thoughtful answers to the Think About Your Writing questions. References and Think About Your Writing questions are NOT included in the word count for this essay.

    Below your reference page, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.

    1. What have you learned about how to present a strong argument? How could/will you apply this knowledge in your professional or everyday life (3-4 sentences)? Sophia says: Think about the specific skills and techniques that you used while developing and writing your essay. What tools will you take with you from this experience?
    2. Consider the English Composition I course as a whole. What have you learned about yourself as a writer (5-6 sentences)? Sophia says: What did you learn that surprised you? Is there anything that you have struggled with in the past that you now feel more confident about?

    Step 4. Review Rubric and Checklist

    Your composition and reflection will be scored according to the Touchstone 4 Rubric, which evaluates the argumentative topic and thesis statement, argument development and support, organization, flow, research, style, use of conventions (grammar, punctuation, etc.), and your answers to the Think About your Writing questions above.

    Refer to the checklist below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.

    Argumentative Topic and Thesis Statement

    Have you included a thesis that takes a clear, specific position on one side of an academically appropriate, debatable issue?

    Argument Development

    Are all of the details relevant to the purpose of your essay?

    Is the argument supported using rhetorical appeals and credible, academic source material?

    Is your essay 4-6 pages (approximately 1000-1500 words)? If not, which details do you need to add or delete?

    Research

    Have you cited outside sources effectively using quotation, summary, or paraphrase?

    Are the sources incorporated smoothly, providing the reader with signal phrases and context for the source information?

    Are the sources explained with regard to your topic and how they relate to the argument?

    Have you referenced at least 2 and no more than 4 credible sources?

    Have you included an APA style reference page below your essay?

    Have you included a hyperlink to each source in the reference page?

    Organization and Flow

    Is there an introduction, conclusion, adequate body paragraphs, and a counterargument?

    Do the topic and concluding sentences reiterate the argument to maintain a sharp focus on the purpose of the essay?

    Is the argument presented in a logical order and easy for the reader to follow?

    Are there transitions within and between paragraphs?

    Style

    Are the word choices accurate and effective?

    Are the sentence structures varied?

    Conventions and Formatting

    Have you properly cited your sources according to APA style guidelines?

    Have you double-checked for correct grammar, punctuation, spelling, formatting, and capitalization?

    Have you proofread for typos?

    Before You Submit

    Have you answered all of the Think About Your Writing questions on a separate page below your reference page? Are your answers thoughtful and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?

    Does your submission include your essay, followed by your reference page, followed by your Think About Your Writing questions?

    B. Rubric Advanced (100%)Proficient (85%)Acceptable (75%)Needs Improvement (50%)Non-Performance (0%)Argumentative Topic and Thesis Statement

    Take a clear position on a debatable topic. (5%)

    Includes an argumentative thesis that takes a well-articulated, clear, specific position on one side of a debatable issue.Includes an argumentative thesis that takes a clear, specific position on one side of a debatable issue.Includes an argumentative thesis that takes a clear position on one side of a debatable issue; however, it lacks specificity.Includes an argumentative thesis on a debatable topic; however, it lacks specificity and/or does not take a clear position.Does not include a thesis, includes a thesis that does not take a position, and/or the topic is not debatable.Argument Development and Support

    Have a clear argument on a debatable topic and sufficient support. (20%)

    Details are highly relevant and clearly support the argument of the essay. Argument is thoroughly developed; the argument is consistently and effectively supported using rhetorical appeals and source material.Details are relevant and support the argument of the essay. Argument is well developed; the argument is supported using rhetorical appeals and source material.Details are predominantly relevant and generally support the argument, though some details may be irrelevant and/or distracting. Argument is not fully developed; the argument is supported by rhetorical appeals and source material; however, some aspects of the argument or support are neglected.Details are often irrelevant and frequently distract from the argument of the essay. Argument is poorly developed; there is little evidence of rhetorical appeals and/or source material support.Details are irrelevant and distract from the argument. Argument is not developed and/or the composition is not argumentative.Organization

    Exhibit competent organization and writing techniques. (20%)

    Includes all of the required components of an argumentative research paper, including an introduction with relevant and engaging background information and an argumentative thesis, an adequate number of body paragraphs each with a topic sentence, a body paragraph addressing counterargument(s), and a conclusion with a concluding statement.Includes all of the required components of an argumentative research paper, including an introduction with background information, an argumentative thesis, an adequate number of body paragraphs each with a topic sentence, a body paragraph addressing counterargument(s), and a conclusion with a concluding statement.Includes nearly all of the required components of an argumentative research paper; however, one component is missing.Includes most of the required components of an argumentative research paper, but is lacking two components. Sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are sometimes unclear and the reader may have difficulty following the progression of the argument.Lacks several or all of the components of an argumentative research paper. Sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are often unclear and the reader has difficulty following the progression of the argument.Flow

    Establish and maintain a logical flow. (10%)

    Sequences ideas and paragraphs logically and uses smooth transitions (within and between paragraphs) such that the reader can easily follow the progression of ideas.Sequences ideas and paragraphs logically and uses transitions (within and between paragraphs) such that the reader can easily follow the progression of ideas.Primarily sequences ideas and paragraphs logically and uses sufficient transitions (within and between paragraphs) such that the reader can generally follow the progression of ideas.The progression of ideas is often difficult to follow, due to poor sequencing, ineffective transitions, and/or insufficient transitions.The progression of ideas is consistently difficult to follow, due to poor sequencing and lack of transitions.Research

    Incorporate sources through effective quotations, paraphrases, and summaries. (10%)

    Incorporates sources smoothly and effectively through direct quotation, paraphrase, or summary. References at least 2 and no more than 4 credible primary or secondary sources.Primarily incorporates sources effectively through direct quotation, paraphrase, or summary. References at least 2 and no more than 4 credible primary or secondary sources.Acceptably incorporates sources through direct quotation, paraphrase, or summary. References at least 2 and no more than 4 credible primary or secondary sources.Generally incorporates sources through direct quotation, paraphrase, or summary. References at least 2 and no more than 4 primary or secondary sources, but some sources may not be effective or appropriate for the essays argument.Does not reference sources and/or sources are not credible or appropriate.Style

    Establish a consistent, informative tone and make thoughtful stylistic choices. (10%)

    Demonstrates thoughtful and effective word choices, avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a wide variety of sentence structures.Demonstrates effective word choices, primarily avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a variety of sentence structures.Demonstrates generally effective style choices, but may include occasional redundancies, imprecise language, poor word choice, and/or repetitive sentence structures.Frequently includes poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures.Excessively demonstrates poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures.Conventions

    Follow conventions for standard English. (10%)

    There may be a few negligible errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are occasional minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are some significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are frequent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are consistent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.Formatting

    Execute formatting according to requirements. (10%)

    Consistently adheres to APA formatting requirements for in-text citations and the References page.Primarily adheres to APA formatting requirements for in-text citations and the References page, such that formatting errors are minimal.Adequately adheres to APA formatting requirements for in-text citations and the References page, such that formatting errors are occasional.Inadequately adheres to APA formatting requirements for in-text citations and the References page, such that formatting errors are common.Does not adhere to APA formatting requirements for in-text citations and the References page, such that formatting errors are pervasive.Think About Your Writing

    Reflect on progression and development throughout the course. (5%)

    Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; consistently includes insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses. Answers all reflection questions effectively, following or exceeding response length guidelines.Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; includes multiple insights, observations, and/or examples. Answers all reflection questions effectively, following response length guidelines.Primarily demonstrates thoughtful reflection, but some responses are lacking in detail or insight. Answers all reflection questions, primarily following response length guidelines.Shows limited reflection; the majority of responses are lacking in detail or insight. Answers reflection questions inadequately: may not answer all of the questions and/or may not follow response length guidelines.Does not answer the majority of reflection questions or the majority of answers do not follow response length guidelines.

    C. Requirements

    • Your essay should be 4-6 pages (approximately 1000-1500 words), double-spaced, with one-inch margins.
    • Argumentative essay guidelines must be followed or submission will not be graded.
    • Use a readable 12-point font.
    • Composition must be original and written for this assignment and all writing must be appropriate for an academic context, including academically credible sources.
    • Use of generative chatbot artificial intelligence tools (ChatGPT, Bing Chat, Bard) in place of original writing is strictly prohibited for this assignment.
    • Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
    • Submission should include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your essay.
    • Submission must include the argumentative essay, reference page, and your answers to the reflection questions.
    • Include all of the assignment components in a single .doc or .docx file.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Touchstone 4 Argumentative Sample Essay.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.