Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • Qualitative Inquiry Technique Paper

    In this assessment, you will write a paper to demonstrate an understanding of the qualitative inquiry technique. You might consider using the qualitative inquiry technique to conduct your DBA Capstone Project. Employers expect DBA graduates to be familiar with a variety of problem-solving techniques. You will use the course materials and articles you find in the Capella Library to demonstrate an understanding of the qualitative inquiry technique. This activity will give you an opportunity to locate and analyze scholarly literature regarding appropriate application of research techniques for conducting research and workplace projects.

    Locate and read two qualitative inquiry studies.

    Review the results to identify two studies in which the authors addressed and researched business problems, and not social, health-related, or government problems.

    Some qualitative inquiry studies are included in the reading lists that you are welcome to review and use as well for this paper.

    Download and read the two articles.

    In a 35 page paper (excluding the title page and references page), describe the following:

    • The business problem studied.
    • The data collection technique.
    • The number of participants.
    • The professional qualifications of the participants.
    • An overview of the findings of the study.
    • The practical implications derived from the study.

    End your paper with a concluding paragraph regarding how you might use the qualitative inquiry technique to conduct your project.

    Use the following heading structure:

    • Study 1.
    • Business Problem.
    • Data Collection Technique.
    • Participants.
    • Overview of the Findings.
    • Practical Implications.
    • Study 2.
    • Business Problem.
    • Data Collection Technique.
    • Participants.
    • Overview of the Findings.
    • Practical Implications.
    • Conclusion.

    Scholarship: Use two scholarly sources to support your main points and analysis.

  • The Value of Planning

    Many nonprofit organization leaders understand the importance of strategic planning in terms of capacity building for an organization. Part of this strategic plan can include advocacy and lobbying. For this journal assignment, you will look at the value of a strategic plan.

    Prior to beginning work on this journal,

    • Read Chapter 7 and Chapter 11 of the textbook.

    In your journal,

    • Discuss your opinion about the value a strategic plan brings to an organization.
    • Argue whether you believe advocacy and lobbying can enhance a strategic plan.

    The Value of Planning journal

    • Must be one to two double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages and formatted according to
    • as outlined in the Writing Centers
    • resource.
    • Must include a separate title page with the following:
    • Title of paper in bold font
    • Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page.
    • Students name
    • Name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus)
    • Course name and number
    • Instructors name
    • Due date
    • Must cite sources if any are referenced in the journal assignment.

    Text

    Worth, M. J. (2021). (7th ed.). SAGE Publications.

    • The full-text version of this ebook is available through the VitalSource platform.

  • Module 2 Group Discussion

    1. . ( https://www.commonwealthfund.org/ ) Click on Tools and Data Resources, using the dropdown information, find your state on one the various maps and compare the state in which you practice to another state. Select one of the maps to analyze closely. ( Compare Alabama to Texas )
    2. Identify the map you analyzed. Describe what part of the map is the most alarming to you or the most reassuring. Why?
    3. How does the state where you practice compare to the comparison state? (e.g. How are they similar or Different?)
    4. Are there any socioeconomic, political, cultural, and ethical issues surrounding the information gleaned from the interactive map you chose?
    5. Respond to at least two of your classmates using the ABC approach when composing your reply:
    6. Acknowledge your classmates’ posts.
    7. Build upon these posts by providing additional details, statistics, ideas, personal perspectives, or links to interesting, relevant articles.
    8. Conclude with a question or new idea to further stimulate the discussion.
    9. Use APA format to include in text and reference listing. The discussion post should be at the graduate level and in a prose format (paragraphs and complete sentences).
    10. Define acronyms prior to using them alone.

    Please use the website from part one as a source

    Also, I am a psychiatric RN working as a CoCM in PCMHI at VA Hospital

    Respond to posts:

    Austin Grube

    Feb 9, 2026 4:30 PM

    (Edited by Austin Grube on Feb 9, 2026 5:54 PM)

    NEW

    Childhood Vaccination Rates

    Since the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019, childhood vaccination has become a frequent topic of debate in the United States and worldwide. As public controversy surrounding vaccines has increased, vaccination rates have declined. Going into the 20242025 academic year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, 2025a) reported lower vaccination rates among kindergarten-aged children across all routinely recommended vaccines compared with the previous year. More recently, the CDC adjusted its recommended childhood immunization schedule, reducing coverage from 17 diseases to 10 (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2026). This change has been followed by another rise in vaccine mistrust and hesitancy. To better understand these declining trends, particularly in Idaho, this discussion compares Idahos immunization rates with those of its neighboring state, Utah.

    Commonwealth Fund Map Analysis on Childhood Vaccinations

    The Commonwealth Fund map showing children who have received all recommended vaccinations highlights a clear downward trend in childhood immunization rates across the United States (The Commonwealth Fund, 2026a). It shows that vaccination coverage has steadily declined since 2018. In that year, 72.8% of children aged 1935 months received all seven key recommended immunizations, compared with 69.5% in 2023.

    Idaho and Utah, as neighboring western states, rank similarly in the Commonwealth Funds 2025 state health rankings, with Idaho ranked 19th and Utah ranked 17th (The Commonwealth Fund, 2026b). Despite these similar rankings, meaningful differences exist in childhood immunization coverage between the two states. In 2021, both states were considered top performers, with vaccination rates of 75.9% in Idaho and 78.9% in Utah. By 2023, Utah maintained a relatively high coverage rate of 74.7%, while Idaho dropped to 66.7%, placing it among the lower-performing states. Idaho experienced its largest decline between 2022 and 2023, with a 7.6% decrease, compared with a smaller 3% decline in Utah during the same period.

    Socioeconomic, Political, Cultural, and Ethical Considerations

    Income level continues to be a major factor influencing childhood vaccination status nationwide. In 2023, 77.9% of children living at or above 300% of the federal poverty level received all recommended vaccines, compared with only 62.3% of children living between 0% and 199% of the federal poverty level (The Commonwealth Fund, 2026a). This gap is concerning, particularly given the availability of the Vaccines for Children (VFC) Program, which provides recommended immunizations at no cost to eligible families who cannot afford them (CDC, 2025b).

    Political messaging and media influence have also contributed to declining vaccination rates. Changes to the CDCs immunization schedule may further increase hesitancy, as parents question which vaccines are truly necessary for their children. This concern has been amplified by public criticism from professional organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, which has cautioned that these changes may lead to increased confusion and reduced trust in vaccination recommendations (American Academy of Pediatrics, 2026).

    Conclusion

    Declining childhood vaccination rates remain an ongoing public health concern in the United States. While some states, including Idaho, have seen significant drops in vaccination coverage in recent years, otherssuch as Utahhave been more successful in maintaining stable immunization rates. Understanding the factors contributing to these differences is essential for developing strategies to rebuild trust and improve vaccination uptake moving forward.

    References

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025a). Vaccination coverage and exemptions among kindergartners (SchoolVaxView). https://www.cdc.gov/schoolvaxview/data/index.html#cdc_data_surveillance_section_2-new-findings-on-vaccination-coverage-and-exemptions-among-kindergartners-2024-2025-school-year

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025b). About the Vaccines for Children (VFC) Program. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines-for-children/about/index.html

    The American Academy of Pediatrics. (2026, January 5). AAP: CDC plan to remove universal childhood vaccine. AAP News. https://publications.aap.org/aapnews/news/34104/AAP-CDC-plan-to-remove-universal-childhood-vaccine

    The Commonwealth Fund. (2026a). Children with all recommended vaccines. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/datacenter/children-all-recommended-vaccines

    The Commonwealth Fund. (2026b). Data Center. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/datacenter

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2026, January 5). Fact sheet: CDC childhood immunization recommendations. https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/fact-sheet-cdc-childhood-immunization-recommendations.html

    Post 2:

    Jamie Hutcheson

    Jan 30, 2026 9:03 AM

    NEW

    Analysis of the Commonwealth Fund State Health System Performance Map

    The Commonwealth Fund offers interactive tools for evaluating and comparing health system performance among U.S. states. Drawing on the 2025 State Scorecard on Health System Performance from the Tools and Data Resources section, I examined Alabamas health system performance, where I practice, and compared it to Massachusetts, a state recognized for consistently high performance. The Scorecard assesses states across key domains such as access to care, quality, health outcomes, and equity (Commonwealth Fund, 2025).

    Most Alarming and Reassuring Findings

    A particularly alarming aspect of the Scorecard map is the pronounced disparity in health system performance among states. Alabama ranks 42nd overall, which reflects lasting challenges including higher uninsured rates, limited access to primary care, and elevated rates of preventable mortality (Commonwealth Fund, n.d.-a). These findings show ongoing barriers to timely and preventive health services.

    Conversely, the strong and steady performance of Massachusetts is reassuring. Massachusetts ranks among the top states in health system performance, particularly in access and health outcomes. This suggests that effective policy implementation and sustained investment in health infrastructure can result in improved population health (Commonwealth Fund, 2025).

    Comparison of Alabama and Massachusetts

    Alabama and Massachusetts show considerable differences in health system outcomes. Alabama demonstrates lower performance in insurance coverage, preventive care utilization, and health outcomes, while Massachusetts achieves higher access to care and better overall health indicators (Commonwealth Fund, 2025). A primary factor playing a role in these disparities is Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), a federal law designed to expand health insurance coverage and improve access to care. Massachusetts adopted Medicaid expansion early, whereas Alabama has not, resulting in a larger uninsured population and reduced access to routine care in Alabama.

    Socioeconomic, Political, Cultural, and Ethical Considerations

    Socioeconomic factors, including income, employment, and insurance availability, influence the disparities observed on the Scorecard map. Political decisions at the state level, particularly regarding Medicaid expansion and public health funding, are central to shaping health system performance. Medicaid is a joint federal and state program that provides health coverage to low-income individuals. From an ethical perspective, the disparities highlighted by the Scorecard raise major concerns about health equity, since limited access to care disproportionately influences vulnerable populations and contributes to preventable adverse health outcomes.

    Conclusion

    The Commonwealth Funds 2025 State Scorecard shows substantial differences in health system performance between Alabama and Massachusetts. These disparities underscore the influence of policy decisions, socioeconomic conditions, and health system structure on population health, and highlight the need for targeted interventions to improve access and equity in lower-performing states.

    References

    Commonwealth Fund. (2025). 2025 scorecard on state health system performance. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/scorecard/2025/jun/2025-scorecard-state-health-system-performance

    Commonwealth Fund. (n.d.-a). State health data center: Alabama. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/datacenter/alabama

  • Theo Mod 5

    Discuss the principles of research and evidence-based practice and how to effectively implement them for advanced practice nurses. Submission Instructions: Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

  • unit 3 ps311

    PAPER

    Your assignment should be a 23 page paper, not including the title and reference pages, and should include the following elements:

    • Title page: Provide your name, title of assignment, course and section number, and date.
    • Body: Answer all the questions in complete sentences and paragraphs.
    • Your responses should reflect professional writing standards, using proper tone and language. The writing and writing style should be correct and accurate and reflect knowledge of the profession.
    • Reference page: Sources listed in current APA format.
    • Support the assignment with a source related to one of the decision-making models, at least one code of ethics in the psychology field, and one additional scholarly source.
    • Use Arial or Times New Roman 12-point font, double-spaced and left aligned.
    • Use standard 1″ margins on all sides.
    • Use current APA formatting and citation style.

    Ethical Decision-Making in Substance Use Counseling: The Case of Ms. Jackson

    I. Introduction

    • Ethical dilemmas frequently arise in substance use counseling when personal morals conflict with professional responsibilities.
    • In this scenario, Ms. Jackson must decide whether to report a drug dealer after learning about her clients involvement in a situation that led to an overdose.
    • This paper applies the Forester-Miller and Davis (2016) Practitioners Guide to Ethical Decision-Making Model to determine the most ethical course of action.
    • A structured decision-making model is beneficial because it separates emotional reactions from professional ethical obligations (Forester-Miller & Davis, 2016).

    II. Identification of the Ethical Decision-Making Model

    Chosen Model:

    Forester-Miller and Davis (2016) Practitioners Guide to Ethical Decision-Making Model

    Why This Model Is Beneficial:

    • Provides step-by-step structure for resolving ethical dilemmas.
    • Encourages consultation and reflection.
    • Helps counselors differentiate between personal values and professional ethics.
    • Emphasizes alignment with professional codes of ethics (Forester-Miller & Davis, 2016).
    • Reflection reduces impulsive decision-making influenced by emotion (Burkholder et al., 2020).

    III. Step 1: Identify the Problem

    • Core dilemma: Confidentiality vs. perceived duty to protect the community.
    • Ms. Jackson knows the drug dealers identity through client disclosure.
    • Mr. Anderson did not express intent to harm others or continue illegal activity.
    • Police are investigating, but Ms. Jackson has no legal mandate to report.
    • Ms. Jackson is experiencing moral outrage and emotional distress.
    • Ethical issue: Would anonymous reporting violate confidentiality?

    Reflection is critical at this stage because emotional reactions can influence ethical reasoning (Burkholder et al., 2020).

    IV. Step 2: Apply the ACA Code of Ethics

    A. Confidentiality

    • ACA Code of Ethics (2014), Section B.1.c: Counselors protect confidential information.
    • Disclosure is permitted only when there is serious and foreseeable harm or legal requirement (ACA, 2014).
    • No evidence of imminent danger in this case.

    B. General Ethical Principles

    1. Autonomy
    • Respecting Mr. Andersons right to self-determination (ACA, 2014).
    • Reporting would undermine his trust and therapeutic agency.
    1. Nonmaleficence
    • Obligation to do no harm.
    • Breaching confidentiality could harm the client legally and therapeutically.
    1. Fidelity
    • Maintaining trust and honoring commitments in the counseling relationship (ACA, 2014).
    • Confidentiality is foundational to fidelity.

    V. Step 3: Determine the Nature and Dimensions of the Dilemma

    • Ethical dimension: Confidentiality vs. public safety.
    • Legal dimension: No mandatory reporting requirement.
    • Moral dimension: Personal sense of injustice regarding opioid crisis.

    Cottone (2001) emphasizes that ethical decisions should be contextual and collaborative rather than reactive.

    Consultation with a supervisor is recommended in the Forester-Miller and Davis (2016) model to ensure ethical compliance.

    VI. Step 4: Generate Potential Courses of Action

    1. Make an anonymous police report.
    2. Maintain confidentiality.
    3. Consult with supervisor or legal counsel.
    4. Continue addressing substance use and relapse prevention.
    5. Provide overdose education and harm-reduction strategies.

    Structured decision-making prevents action based solely on personal values (Forester-Miller & Davis, 2016).

    VII. Step 5: Consider Potential Consequences

    If Ms. Jackson Reports:

    • Possible violation of confidentiality (ACA, 2014).
    • Damage to therapeutic relationship.
    • Potential legal and professional consequences.
    • Ethical complaint or licensure issues.

    If She Maintains Confidentiality:

    • Upholds ethical standards.
    • Preserves trust.
    • Continues treatment and support.
    • Maintains professional integrity.

    Value-based conflicts often occur when counselors personal beliefs conflict with ethical duties (Grunhaus et al., 2018).

    VIII. Step 6: Evaluate and Choose the Best Course of Action

    • Maintain confidentiality.
    • Seek supervision for consultation.
    • Continue therapeutic work and address safety planning.
    • Monitor for any future threats of imminent harm.

    There is no ethical justification to report under current circumstances (ACA, 2014; Forester-Miller & Davis, 2016).

    IX. Personal Reflection

    • My professional values emphasize protecting vulnerable individuals and supporting recovery.
    • Personally, I would likely feel anger and concern due to the opioid crisis.
    • However, ethical practice requires separating moral outrage from professional responsibility (Burkholder et al., 2020).
    • As a behavioral health professional, I recognize that trust is central to effective treatment.
    • I would prioritize confidentiality unless legally mandated otherwise.

    X. Conclusion

    • Ethical dilemmas require structured decision-making.
    • The Forester-Miller and Davis (2016) model provides a systematic process.
    • The ACA Code of Ethics prioritizes confidentiality unless serious and foreseeable harm exists (ACA, 2014).
    • Ms. Jacksons most ethical action is to maintain confidentiality, consult supervision, and continue supporting her client.
    • Ethical integrity sometimes requires tolerating personal discomfort to uphold professional standards.

    References

    American Counseling Association. (2014). ACA code of ethics. Author.

    Burkholder, D., Hall, S. F., & Chao, R. C. (2020). The role of decision-making models and reflection in navigating ethical dilemmas. Counseling and Values, 65(1), 418.

    Cottone, R. R. (2001). A social constructivism model of ethical decision making in counseling. Journal of Counseling & Development, 79(1), 3945.

    Forester-Miller, H., & Davis, T. (2016). A practitioners guide to ethical decision making. American Counseling Association.

    Grunhaus, D., et al. (2018). A counselor education case study: The counselor values-based conflict model in action. Counselor Education and Supervision, 57(1), 3448.*

  • Writing Question

    This is the last portion of the assessment, where you will put everything together and add the final components.

    The full paper was broken into three parts to allow you to focus on smaller segments, receive feedback, and apply what was learned throughout our time together. As you continue at Capella, you will complete full papers as individual assessments. The goal is for you to take what you learn about business concepts and how to build a paper, gather evidence, utilize feedback, and practice APA style each time you have an assessment.

    Note: This assessment is the final of three written assessments where you will put everything together and add the final components.

    • Step 1: Download and save .
    • Step 2: Copy your paragraphs from the prior assessments into the template.
    • Step 3: Write the following paragraphs (additional paragraphs can be created as needed) using POETS:
      • Paragraph 1: Explain reasons for choosing team members from two functional areas for developing a mission statement.
        • Describe the skills and characteristics that make a good team member.
      • Paragraph 2: Describe what ethical principles a team needs to consider when making updates to a mission statement.
        • Why are ethics important for updating a mission statement?
      • Paragraph 3: Describe the critical thinking questions a team needs to answer to update a mission statement.
        • Why are these critical thinking questions important for updating a mission statement?
    • Step 4: Add an introduction paragraph.
    • Step 5: Add a conclusion paragraph.
    • Step 6: Include all reference list citations and in-text citations.

    Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

    • Written Communication: Your work should be free of grammar and punctuation errors that would distract the reader’s understanding of the content.
      • Address all components of prompt, including introduction and conclusion, and use the assessment description to structure text.
      • Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.
    • Format: Use the Assessment 4 Template to help you organize your paper.
    • Length: 46 paragraphs, in addition to references, plus include prior work from the last two assessments.
    • Resources: Cite at least three reputable resources to support your ideas, including your chosen website, and list them on your reference page.
    • APA style and formatting: Follow APA style and formatting standards for citing sources that support your analysis and conclusions. Use for guidance in citing sources and formatting your paper in proper APA style. See the for more APA resources specific to your degree level.
    • Academic Integrity and Honesty: You must adhere to academic integrity and honesty policies and incorporate practices that support ethically sound work in your assessments. View .
    • Font and font size: Times New Roman, not larger than 12-point font.

    Carefully read the grading criteria in the Building Effective Teams scoring guide to ensure you understand all of the requirements for success. Respond to all of the questions within the assessment instructions to help you obtain the Distinguished level.

    View the media and read, How do I submit my assessment? before you do.

    Requirements: read carefully

  • Creating a Cohesive Composite

    Must have and be proficient at using Adobe Photoshop 2026 for this assignment Before You Start 1. Review previous lessons on selections, masks, and adjustment layers. 2. Watch the provided video demos on masking and using the Move Tool. 3. Open the provided PSD file which contains a table background and three separate objects/subjects on individual layers. Instructions 1. Open the provided PSD file in Photoshop. 2. Use selection tools (e.g., Magic Wand, Lasso, or Polygonal Lasso Tool) to isolate each subject/object from its background. 3. Apply layer masks to non-destructively hide unwanted backgrounds. 4. Use the Move Tool to arrange all three objects on the table in a realistic or creative way. 5. Use adjustments (e.g., brightness/contrast, hue/saturation, or levels) to match the color and lighting of each object to the background image. 6. Save your progress throughout as a PSD with all layers intact. Submission Guidelines Submit your final Photoshop (.PSD) file. Make sure all layers, masks, and adjustments are visible and not merged. This allows the instructor to review your workflow and provide accurate feedback on your process.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): 21-WDD110-assignment-1.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Discussion post

    For your initial post, select a recent experience from your practicum and provide a reflective analysis that includes:

    1. A description of the experience, including your thoughts and feelings.
    2. An evaluation and analysis of the situation.
    3. Conclusions drawn and lessons learned from the experience.
    4. An action plan based on your reflections.

  • Med Cards

    Please complete medication cards

    Please use the Medication Card template provided in classes.

    Sources for filling out your drug cards:

    Free App: Epocrates

    Acetaminophen

    325 MG; Tablet

    Dose: 650 mg

    Frequency: Every

    6 Hours (Q6H)

    PRN

    Route: Oral Schedule:

    Give for Headache or

    Temperature

    >101.0F

    Ampicillin

    500 MG; Capsule

    Dose: 1g

    Frequency: Every

    12 Hours (Q12H)

    Route: Oral Schedule:

    1000mg by mouth every 12 hours

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Medication Card Template.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Week 4 Assignment: Roman Empire Essay

    This week, you have examined the rise and development of the Roman civilization with particular attention given to the divergent views of the Roman Empire. The glory of the Roman Empire led to many to ask, What is a good society? Drawing evidence from the lectures, but especially the historical readings for this week, compose an essay on the varying views of the Roman Empire. There are a range of issues you may choose to focus on such as what qualities made Rome great, whether God or the gods had chosen Rome for greatness, and so forth.

    This essay should be based on the historical readings from the course. There are no outside sources required for this paper. Based on your reading and analysis of the historical documents, write an essay based on your thesis statement. A thesis is a focused argument based on your reading of the historical documents. The essay should use evidence from the historical documents to support your thesis (please see helpful hints below on writing this assignment). Be sure to develop a strong, specific thesis and provide evidence to support your argument.

    Requirements: The essays should be 1000-1250 words in length. While lectures may be utilized, the paper should primarily rely on the historical documents to support your thesis.

    Citation: Any form of citation (e.g., APA, Turabian) is allowed as long as you remain consistent throughout the paper. Citations, including in-text citations, do not count towards the overall word total.