Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • INSS-675: Information Systems Project Management

    READ DELIVERABLE 1 & 2 INSS 675 and Only do Person 1 and 5. The other two documents read them over and it should help you.

    Requirements: until complete

  • powerpoint presentation

    For this assessment, you will develop an 814 slide PowerPoint presentation with thorough speaker’s notes designed for a hypothetical in-service session related to the improvement plan you developed in the uploaded document.

    Develop a PowerPoint presentation with detailed speaker’s notes representing the material you would deliver at a one-hour in-service session to raise awareness of your chosen safety improvement initiative and explain the need for it. Additionally, you must educate the audience as to their role and importance to the success of the initiative. This includes providing examples and practice opportunities to test out new ideas or practices related to the safety improvement initiative.

    Be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the rubric. Please study the rubric carefully so that you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

    • Describe the purpose and at least three goals of an in-service session for nurses.
      • Include a one-line purpose statement followed by the goals.
      • Start each goal with a verb, such as 1) Explain reasons for medication administration errors, 2) Discuss the importance of preventing medication errors, and 3) Describe strategies to prevent medication errors.
    • Explain the need for and process to improve safety outcomes related to a specific patient-safety issue.
    • Explain to the audience their role and the importance of making the improvement plan successful.
    • Create resources or activities to encourage skill development and process understanding related to a safety improvement initiative.
      • Create a resource slide OR do an activity with the audience to assist them in learning and applying a new skill. A resource slide could consist of in-house materials, posters, or credible websites. An activity slide may include a quiz, simulation, group work, a case study, and so forth.
    • Communicate with nurses in a respectful and informative way that clearly presents expectations and solicits feedback on communication strategies for future improvement.

    There are various ways to structure an in-service session; below is just one example:

    • Part 1: Agenda and Outcomes.
      • Explain to your audience what they are going to learn or do, and what they are expected to take away.
    • Part 2: Safety Improvement Plan.
      • Give an overview of the current problem, the proposed plan, and what the improvement plan is trying to address.
      • Explain why it is important for the organization to address the current situation.
    • Part 3: Audiences Role and Importance.
      • Discuss how the staff audience will be expected to help implement and drive the improvement plan.
      • Explain why they are critical to the success of the improvement plan.
      • Describe how their work could benefit from embracing their role in the plan.
    • Part 4: New Process and Skills Practice.
      • Explain new processes or skills.
      • Develop an activity that allows the staff audience to practice and ask questions about these.
      • In the notes section, brainstorm potential responses to likely questions or concerns.
    • Part 5: Soliciting Feedback.
      • Describe how you would solicit feedback from the audience on the improvement plan and the in-service.
      • Explain how you might integrate this feedback for future improvements.

    Remember to account for activity and discussion time.

    Presentation length: There is no required length; use just enough slides to address all the necessary elements. Remember to use short, concise bullet points on the slides and expand on your points in the speaker’s notes. If you use 2 or 3 slides to address each of the parts in the above example, your presentation would be at least 10 slides and no more than 15 slides (not including the title, conclusion, or references slide

    • Speaker notes: Speaker notes (located under each slide) should reflect what you would actually say if you were delivering the presentation to an audience. This presentation does NOT require audio or a transcript. Another presenter would be able to use the presentation by following the speaker’s notes.
    • APA format: Use APA formatting for in-text citations. Include an APA-formatted reference slide at the end of your presentation. See .
    • Number of references: Cite a minimum of three sources of scholarly or professional evidence to support your assertions. Resources should be no more than five years old. Use the as needed to guide your research in the Capella library.

    Requirements: 8-14 slides

  • Challenging preconceptions about art

    For this week’s assignment, your task is to identify a piece of art, an artist, or an artifact that challenges your preconceptions about what constitutes art. Drawing on the insights from this week’s lecture and your evolving understanding of the diverse nature of art, your objective is to actively defend the chosen work. Seek to appreciate and acknowledge the positive aspects or intentions behind the artist’s creation. Share your defense through a written document or a video post, accompanied by the inclusion of the selected work in the form of an image, video clip, or link. Embrace contemporary technology in delivering your response, utilizing any method that aligns with your comfort.

  • Task 1 Portfolio Assignment

    Please open up attachment it has the full task assignment as well as pictures of the rubric. Please follow all the instructions and please provide a plagiarism and aI score at the end of submission.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Instructions for Task 1 C204.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Translational Foundations for Advanced Principles in Applied…

    Conducting ABA Research in Applied Settings: Analyzing a Research Proposal

    Translational research in ABA bridges the gap between basic behavioral principles, grounded in research findings, and applied practice. In applied practice, interventions are developed based on evidence that has been produced through both basic and applied research and disseminated through peer-reviewed literature sources. For this assignment, you will familiarize yourself with the research process by reviewing a hypothetical research proposal that explores a translational area of ABA. The proposal involves applying foundational behavioral concepts to a practical problem in a way that can both advance the fields theoretical knowledge and offer practical insights for behavior change in applied settings.

    Please choose one of the two following proposals:

    • Step 1: Choose one hypothetical research proposal and summarize the research question (s).
    • Step 2: Conduct a literature review on the research topic in the proposal. Read at least five articles that are no more than 5-10 years old and write a brief literature review of all of the chosen articles, being sure to integrate citations for support.
      • Note: Be sure to review the Purdue Global Library resources linked in the Unit 9 Learning Activity to support your research. You will use your review of the literature, as well as the materials you have read throughout the term to inform an analysis of the research proposal.
    • Step 3: Using your course materials for support, develop an analysis of the proposal using the following questions:
      • Does this research proposal represent an example of applied or basic research? Why?
      • Explain how this proposal supports a translational approach in applied behavior analysis.
      • Describe the research design. Based on your readings, is it an appropriate design? Are there possible limitations or practical issues?
      • Are there any possible ethical concerns or risks involved in the proposed research?
      • Describe how this study could advance theoretical understanding of behavior and inform practical interventions in applied settings.
      • Identify potential limitations of this study and suggest directions for future research.
    • Step 4: Summarize your review of the proposal and how it demonstrates the application of research-based principles to support effective and ethical practice in applied behavior analysis.

    Please Your assignment should be a 6-8 page research proposal, not including the title and reference pages, and should include the following elements:

    • Title page: Provide your name, title of assignment, course and section number, and date.
    • Body: Answer all the questions in complete sentences and paragraphs.
      • Your responses should reflect professional writing standards, using proper tone and language. The writing and writing style should be correct and accurate, and reflect knowledge of skills and practice of the profession.
    • Reference page: Sources listed in current APA format.
      • Include a minimum of six scholarly or academic sources to support your responses and conclusions.
    • Use Arial or Times New Roman 12-point font, double-spaced and left-aligned.
    • Use standard 1″ margins on all sides.
    • Use current APA formatting and citation style.
      • If you need assistance with APA style, please visit .

    Submitting Your Assignment

    Save your file in a location and with a name that you will remember. When you are ready to submit, select the Unit 9 Assignment Dropbox and upload your file.review and follow the assignment requirements in the next tab titled Assignment Details.

    Requirements: follow instructions

  • Client Scenario

    The purpose of this discussion is to examine an assigned disease process and determine which disease process explored in the discussion Bayani, the client, is experiencing. Follow the instructions below and your faculty member will reveal which disease process Bayani is experiencing at the end of the discussion week.

    Step 1: Review the following client scenario:

    Bayani, a 62-year-old male client, presents to the NP with abdominal pain with his wife. Bayani is mildly confused, and according to his wife, he is normally fully oriented. His abdomen is soft and non-distended, and his wife states he has been urinating and drinking more water than usual. She also states he has had foul-smelling urine and is concerned he also has a urinary tract infection.

    Step 2: Review your assigned disease process from the chart below. Your assigned disease process is based on the first letter of your last name.

    Last NameDisease ProcessA – Condition: Cirrhosis

    Step 3: Review the client case scenario and answer the discussion prompts below with explanation and detail, providing complete references for all citations.

    Step 4: Reply to a peer with a different assigned disease process. (PUD Peptic Ulcer Disease)

    Include the following Sections:

    1. Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.

    1. Discuss the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of your assigned disease process. Which clinical manifestations observed in Bayanis case could be explained by the pathophysiological mechanisms?
    2. Analyze Bayanis clinical manifestations in the context of your assigned disease process. Do these findings support a diagnosis of your assigned disease process? Why or why not?
    3. Identify and justify the diagnostic tests (including labs, imaging, or other diagnostic tests) that would be most appropriate for investigating a diagnosis of your assigned disease process in Bayani. What could the results of these tests look like in your assigned disease process?
    4. Compare and contrast your response with a peer assigned a different condition. Does their condition fit Bayanis case? Why or why not?

  • The Impact of the UK Cost of Living Crisis on Mental Health…

    our research poster should set out the research study you have undertaken for your dissertation and should include three key elements:

    The background for your study you can draw on information from your proposal here. Your key aim is to provide clear rationale for the research study you have undertaken

    your methods where you set out your research design, data collection methods, and analysis, and

    your findings where you set out the results of your research study

    You should be prepared to answer questions about the research you have undertaken, the choices you have made, and what you have found out. This is also a chance to reflect on the implications of your findings with your markers and anyone else who asks about your research. As such, you may also want to think about implications/recommendations for research, policy and practice as and where this is relevant.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Poster Presentation Example(1) (1).pdf, Research Proposal.docx, Poster draft copy.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Week 5 replies

    Here are two **~200-word peer responses** written with a natural graduate-level tone and human element, each including **two references**. Proofread, no AI, NO EM DASHES, ADD HUMAN ELEMENT ### **Reply to Discussion Post 1 I appreciated how you distinguished Hofstede as showing what cultures value and Trompenaars as showing how people respond when values collide. That framing really highlights why both models matter in OD work. In my experience collaborating across teams with different work styles, conflict rarely comes from not knowing cultural differences exist. It usually comes from people being unsure how to act when expectations clash, such as when relationship building slows down a task-focused deadline. Your emphasis on Trompenaars reconciliation approach reflects the real tension practitioners face when balancing global consistency with local norms. I also agree that Hofstede provides a strong structural starting point. Understanding dimensions such as individualism or power distance gives OD practitioners a baseline for anticipating communication preferences and leadership expectations. However, Trompenaars relational lens seems more practical when facilitating change conversations because it encourages dialogue rather than labeling behaviors. Combining both frameworks can help practitioners move from diagnosis to action, which is often where change efforts succeed or fail. Overall, your comparison highlights how cultural frameworks should be used together rather than in isolation. One helps us understand the landscape, while the other helps us navigate it in real time with empathy and flexibility. **References** Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). *Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind* (3rd ed.). McGraw Hill. Trompenaars, F., & Hampden Turner, C. (2012). *Riding the waves of culture* (3rd ed.). McGraw Hill. — ### **Reply to Discussion Post 2 Your discussion did a great job explaining the theoretical and practical differences between Hofstede and Trompenaars. I especially liked your point that Hofstede is more diagnostic while Trompenaars is more dynamic. That distinction resonates because many OD professionals start with assessment models but ultimately need tools that help people work through real organizational dilemmas. In multicultural environments, leaders often struggle less with identifying differences and more with managing competing expectations, such as balancing hierarchy with empowerment or structure with flexibility. Your connection to intervention design was also insightful. Cultural awareness is not only about understanding values but also about shaping how change initiatives are communicated and implemented. For example, in higher uncertainty avoidance cultures, leaders may need clearer structure and reassurance during change efforts, while in more relationship focused environments, trust building might come first. Trompenaars emphasis on integrating opposing perspectives encourages leaders to see cultural tension as an opportunity for innovation rather than a barrier. I also appreciated how you addressed the evolving nature of culture in organizations. While Hofstede provides a valuable macro lens, Trompenaars reminds practitioners that culture is experienced through everyday interactions. Using both frameworks together can help leaders design more inclusive and adaptive OD strategies. **References** Hofstede, G. (2001). *Cultures consequences* (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. Trompenaars, F. (1996). Resolving international conflict: Culture and business strategy. *Business Strategy Review, 7*(3), 5168.

  • ASA STYLE Reference Section

    I have attached the instructions below, in the word file. YOU MUST FOLLOW ALL THE INSTRUCTIONS THOROUGHLY AND PROPERLY.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): ASA Style Reference Section.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Freewrite

    isten to the song “Rope Swing” by the old 80’s band The Wolfhounds. I have attached a transcription of the lyrics attached below that you can read as you listen. After listening, answer the following questions.

    1) What genre of music would you call this?

    2) Write a couple of sentences describing the music — I want vivid images, not flat statements like “loud.” It can be specific (naming instruments, for example), or impressionistic / fanciful (e.g. “The singer sounds like he needs a hankey”).

    3) Do the lyrics remind you of anything you read for this class? Briefly compare or contrast the song with the item of which you are reminded?

    4) Did the song provoke a reaction for you? If so, what was it? Explain, be as specific as you can. (you can have negative ones — I won’t be offended).