Category: uncategorised

  • Nursing shortage and male representation in nursing

    &q=nurse%20shortage%20male &q=nurse%20shortage%20male For this assignment, you will submit a rough draft of the research essay you have been working on. Your essay should make an argument about a topic, issue, or problem related to your field of study or work. Before you begin, be sure you have reviewed the sample research paper walk-through lecture video from Module 4. Instructions Your research essay should be thesis-based and should develop an argument related to your topic. Your essay should be 4 to 5 pages in length and should include 4 to 5 scholarly sources from the Excelsior University Library. Although the structure of your research essay should follow a traditional organization with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, APA format should be used for the general page set up (cover page, line spacing, font, etc.) and for source documentation (in-text citations and references). For this rough draft only, you will add MEAL plan notes to one of your body paragraphs. For the first or one of the first body paragraphs in your rough draft of your research essay, you will label each section of your MEAL plan paragraph with an M for Main idea, E for Evidence, A for Analysis, and L for Lead out. You should put the letters in parentheses AFTER the corresponding section. Please see the sample. Download sample. Be sure to check your work and correct any spelling or grammatical errors before you upload it.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): EBSCO-FullText-02_09_2026.pdf, EBSCO-FullText-02_09_2026 (1).pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • An essay with the following words acceleration analogy arbit…

    it should contain all the words that were giving. it should have no abbreviations and it should look like it was done by a high schooler. thank you
  • week 7

    When preparing for the discharge of acutely ill older adults, how should APRNs navigate the distinction between treating the family as a client versus recognizing the family as a system of care? Which enduring family caregiving functions still support successful transitions from hospital to home or post-acute care facilities?

    Reflect on how changing family landscapessuch as increased caregiver burden or limited family availabilityhave shaped your discharge planning practices and patient outcomes.

    In all posts referencing personal experiences, be sure to respect and maintain patient and colleague confidentiality.

  • Argumentative essay on adopting a 4 day work week

    Argumentative essay on adopting a 4 day work week. MLA format with 4 sources. use easy words.
  • Science

    In Step 2 of your scientific essay, you will deepen your research and begin shaping your ideas into a clear, structured plan. Youll complete two deliverables: An annotated bibliography of at least three credible sources, each with a summary and explanation of relevance to your topic. A working outline of your essay, showing the structure of your argument and how your ideas will be developed across the paper. This assignment helps ensure your research is well-organized and supports a coherent, evidence-based essay. Deliverables Submit a single document that includes: A working outline that maps out your essay sections, main arguments, and supporting evidence. An annotated bibliography with at least 5 credible sources (textbook, academic journal, government or university websites, etc.). Each annotation should: Summarize the source Explain how it relates to your topic Follow APA citation style Assignment Objectives This step will help you: Locate, organize, and critically evaluate scholarly or credible scientific sources relevant to your approved topic. Synthesize research findings to explicitly connect your sources to course concepts and to realworld applications in community, environmental, or global contexts. Develop a structured, evidencebased outline that organizes your essays major sections and supports a logical flow of ideas. Learning Objective Alignment: Organize and evaluate credible scientific sources to support a focused research topic aligned with course concepts in astronomy and planetary science. (MLO-3.2, CLO-E) Develop a structured outline that demonstrates logical organization, evidence-based reasoning, and the application of the scientific method to frame scientific arguments. (MLO-3.2, CLO-F) Directions Review feedback from your approved topic in Step 1. Search for additional scholarly and credible sources. You need at least 5 total (if you listed some in Step 1, build from there). Write an annotated bibliography (about 150250 words per source) that includes: APA citation Summary of the sources key ideas Why is this source relevant to your essay Create a working outline that includes: Tentative title Major sections of your essay (e.g., Introduction, Background, Key Arguments, Conclusion) Bullet points for your key ideas and supporting evidence
  • Data analysis

    Create scatterplots and graphs with the given information and data

  • Incivility within the healthcare metaparadigm

    ncivility in the Workplace Paper

    For this assignment, you will write a 6-8 page APA Style formatted paper on incivility within the healthcare metaparadigm.

    According to the American Nurses Association (ANA):

    Nurses are required to create an ethical environment and culture of civility and kindness, treating colleagues, co-workers, employees, students and others with dignity and respect. Similarly, nurses must be afforded the same level of respect and dignity as others. Thus, the nursing profession will no longer tolerate violence of any kind from any source. (ANA, 2015)

    Planning

    Incivility in the Workplace Paper Resources & Rubric

    Review the entire criteria here to understand the full assignment.

    Please make sure your 6-8 page paper includes the following:

    1. Write an introduction with a minimum of two detailed paragraphs, and at least five in-depth sentences per paragraph, introducing incivility in the workplace within the healthcare metaparadigm. Ensure that the information demonstrates a strong understanding through clear, logical, and professional organization. All information should be relevant and accurate, based on credible sources.
    2. Write a minimum of two detailed paragraphs identifying how incivility impacts an individual nurses ability to use high-level clinical judgment. Each paragraph should contain at least five in-depth sentences. Include a minimum of two specific, in-depth examples of how incivility in the workplace impacts the nurses ability to use high-level clinical judgment, considering emotional factors, stress, and patient care needs. Ensure that the information is presented in a clear, organized, and professional manner. All information should be relevant and accurate, based on credible resources provided.
    3. Identify a minimum of two common issues that occur with workplace or clinical site incivility. Provide a minimum of three in-depth sentences for each common issue identified, explaining how and why each common issue negatively affects the workplace or clinical site and how they can be eliminated.
    4. Write a minimum of two detailed paragraphs discussing how workplace or clinical site communication is or was affected due to incivility. Consider whether patients suffered or if patient treatments were missed. Each paragraph should contain at least five in-depth sentences, providing a thorough examination of how workplace or clinical site communication is or was affected by incivility.
    5. Write a minimum of two detailed paragraphs identifying current health initiatives that organizations are implementing to decrease incivility within the workplace or clinical sites. Review relevant information from the ANA, ONA, and/or Joint Commission, as well as your organizations policies and procedures. Identify a minimum of three current health initiatives that healthcare organizations are implementing to decrease incivility within the workplace or clinical site. Provide a thorough examination, using a minimum of two in-depth sentences for each initiative, with a strong emphasis on how it relates to incivility in the workplace or clinical site.
    6. Write a closing or conclusionparagraph that ties the paper together. Provide a minimum of five in-depth sentences as a conclusion paragraph that summarizes all the important key points within the paper.
    7. Include two (2) APA Style formatted references and citations. For more information on how to cite and reference in APA Style, . Use a minimum of two research articles/resources, which should be submitted with the assignment. Ensure that all resources/references are cited and listed using appropriate APA formatting with no errors noted.
    8. Evaluate spelling and grammar, make sure the paper is in APA Style format. Use the as a guide and the to write your paper. Accurately use terminology and aim for two or fewer MUGS (Mechanics, Usage, Grammar, Spelling) errors.

    Checklists – Incivility in the Workplace Paper

    Checklists are optional resourcesdesigned to help you manage your time and check off every step in the assignment.

    File Submission

    The Week 6 Incivility in the Workplace Paper is an APA Style-formatted assignment that must be submitted in Microsoft Word (.doc, .docx).

    Assignments containing handwritten answers will not be accepted.

    Paper assignments are to be completed by each individual student, not as a group or shared assignment.

    Assignments submitted in any other format including .pdf or .pages will not be accepted and will receive a zero grade.

    In the Submit Assignment area below, click the Add File button and click Upload to browse the files on your computer to locate the document you wish to attach. Select the document, and then click Open. Verify your submission is correct, and click the Xnext to the document if you would like to remove and attach a different file. When you have the correct document, click the Add button. When you are ready to submit the file you must click the Submit button.

    Turnitin

    This assignment will be submitted through Turnitin, which checks the originality of your submission against other sources. Make sure to review your Originality Report to help ensure that you are not plagiarizing. Click the colored icon next to Turnitin Reporttoward the top of the assignment submission page to review your Turnitin report. It may take 10-15 minutes for your report to process. Remember that you can re-submit your assignment until the deadline passes. Additionally, some of your instructors may provide feedback through Turnitin; to view this feedback, open the Turnitin report, and click on the GradeMark button at the top of the page. For more information, .

    Assignment Due

    You must submit your assignment on or before 11:59 pm ET Sunday of this week.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Preview Rubric- NUR225 Incivility in the Workplace Paper Rubric – Win26-NUR225ON.pdf, APA 7th ed Paper Format Template.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • HEALTH PROMOTION PLAN

    Purpose of the Assignment

    • Identify a health issue affecting older adults
    • Design a simple, realistic health promotion plan for a community setting
    • Focus on clarity, feasibility, and practicality rather than complexity

    General Guidelines

    • Approximately 68 pages total
    • Double-spaced, 12-point font
    • Cover page, references, and reference list in correct APA format
    • Clear, organized, and professional writing
    • Include 35 scholarly or governmental sources total
    • Copy each bullet point and type your response directly underneath it.

    1. Background and Description of the Health Issue (15 points | ~11.5 pages)

    • Clear definition of the selected health issue
    • Prevalence among older adults
    • Biological, psychological, and social risk factors
    • Consequences if the issue is not addressed
    • Relevant disparities, if applicable
    • At least two scholarly or governmental sources

    2. Significance and Rationale (10 points | ~1 page)

    • Importance of the issue for older adults
    • One or two statistics demonstrating impact
    • Effect on quality of life or independence
    • Rationale for selecting this issue
    • At least one scholarly or governmental source

    3. Target Population (10 points | ~1 page)

    • Age range
    • Geographic setting
    • Cultural or socioeconomic characteristics, if relevant
    • Where the population can be reached
    • How participants will be recruited

    4. Objectives (15 points): Write 5 SMART objectives

    S Specific: Clearly states what will be achieved and by whom.

    M Measurable: Can be evaluated or measured using numbers, percentages, or clear criteria.

    AAchievable: Realistic and attainable given the time frame, resources, and population.

    R Relevant: Directly related to the health issue and meaningful for the target population.

    T Time-bound: Includes a clear time frame for when the objective will be achieved.

    • Objectives must be specific and measurable
    • Focus on outcomes, not activities
    • Ensure objectives are realistic for the population

    5. Program Design and Implementation (15 points | ~11.5 pages)

    • Brief overview of the program
    • Alignment with health issue and population
    • Program length
    • Key activities
    • Who will deliver the program

    6. Evaluation Plan (15 points | ~1 page)

    • Two to three measurable outcomes
    • How outcomes will be measured
    • Timing of evaluation

    7. Feasibility and Challenges (10 points | ~0.51 page)

    • At least two anticipated challenges
    • Practical strategies to address each challenge

    8. Writing Quality and Adherence to Guidelines (10 points)

    • Grammar and spelling
    • Organization and clarity
    • Evidence of critical thinking
    • Adherence to assignment guidelines

    No AI to complete assignment

    Reference must be 5 years old

  • Beyond the Brochure: Evaluating Real-World Health Promotion…

    WEEK 5 ASSIGNMENT: Assignment Title:

    “Beyond the Brochure: Evaluating Real-World Health Promotion Programs”

    Assignment Overview:

    In this reflection-based critical thinking task, you will evaluate a real-world health promotion program using public sources and apply evaluation models from the course. You will select a publicly visible health promotion program (national, state, or local) and assess its effectiveness using standard public health evaluation models and metrics.

    Assignment Components

    Step 1: Select a Real-World Health Promotion Program

    Choose a specific program with publicly available outcomes or data (e.g., CDCs Tips from Former Smokers, a local Move More fitness initiative, or a school-based nutrition program).

    Briefly describe:

    • The target population
    • The health issue addressed
    • The goals/objectives of the program

    Step 2: Apply an Evaluation Framework

    Use one of the following models/frameworks to structure your evaluation:

    • RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance)
    • Logic Model (Inputs, Activities, Outputs, Outcomes)
    • CDCs Framework for Program Evaluation

    Evaluate:

    • At least 2 metrics (e.g., behavior change, disease incidence, awareness)
    • Whether outcomes met the programs goals
    • Limitations or gaps in data or delivery

    Step 3: Reflection and Recommendation (300400 words)

    Write a personal analysis that reflects on:

    • The programs overall effectiveness
    • How evaluation helped you better understand real-world implementation
    • One recommendation you would make to improve or expand the program
    • How this evaluation process aligns with CHES Area 4 competencies

    Submission Format:

    • PDF or Word document with the following sections:
    1. Program Summary
    2. Evaluation Framework Application
    3. Reflection & Recommendation