Category: uncategorised

  • discussion

    Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the discussion. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

    General instructions:

    Review the scenario and address the questions below.

    You are a nurse practitioner employed in a busy primary care office with responsibilities for managing the office staff, including the medical assistants who aid in client care as well as filing, answering calls from clients, processing laboratory results, and taking prescription renewal requests from clients and pharmacies. The office is part of a larger hospital system. One of the medical assistants has worked in the practice for 10 years and is very proficient at her job. She knows almost every client in the practice and has an excellent rapport with all the providers.

    During an office visit, a client requested a refill for an amoxicillin prescription. When examining the empty bottle, you noted that the date on the bottle was 1 week ago. You also noted your name printed on the label as the prescriber though you did not see the client last week. The client explained that she called last week concerned about her cough and spoke to the medical assistant, who assured her that a prescription would be sent to the pharmacy for the concern. You do not recall having discussed this client with the medical assistant; the other providers in the practice deny speaking to or consulting about the client.

    Include the following sections:

    1. ApplicationofCourseKnowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.
      • Based on the situation above, what are the ethical and legal implications for the practice at the micro-, meso-, and macro-level of the system?
      • What changes do you recommend to prevent further episodes of the problem behavior? What coaching and feedback skills can be used to discuss the event with the medical assistant?
      • Which change model would you use to implement the identified change and why: Lewins Theory of Planned Change, Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA), or Kotters 8-Step Process for Leading Change?
      • Identify and discuss one barrier to implementing the change process. Identify and discuss one factor that facilitated the change process.
    1. Integration of Evidence: Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by :
      • Cite a scholarly source in the initial post.
      • Cite a scholarly source in one faculty response post.
      • Cite a scholarly source in one peer post.
      • Accurately analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles from evidence with no more than one short quote (15 words or less) for the week.
      • Include a minimum of two different scholarly sources per week. Cite all references and provide references for all citations.

    Requirements: 300 words

  • Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs) and patient pr…

    Discussion board reply. Please reply to this writers’ post: Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs) are electronic databases used by health practitioners and pharmacists to monitor controlled-substance prescriptions. They aim to decrease prescription drug misuse, diversion, and overdose in addition to supporting safer prescribing practices. After watching the video “Patients, Privacy, and PDMPs,” I think PDMPs are valuable for public health, but they also raise essential questions about patient privacy, trust in health information, and the proper use of health data. Elevated patient safety and clinical decision-making are among the great advantages of PDMPs. It has been found that PDMP utilization is connected to lowered prescribing of risky medications and is able to assist clinicians in noticing potential abuse or dangerous drug interactions (e.g., opioids with sedatives) prior to the occurrence of damage (Oliva, 2024). The value of PDMPs as a tool of public health is also supported by their application as a national intervention in combating substance misuse and overdose. Yet patient privacy remains a major concern. PDMPs store extremely sensitive health data, and people must wonder who can access it and how secure its storage is. It is also reported that there exist concerns about the scope of authorized access, the occurrence of unauthorized data breaches, and whether patient data might be disclosed outside clinical care, including to law enforcement (Adalbert et al., 2023). Moreover, researchers caution that current PDMP systems grant enhanced surveillance capabilities and cross-jurisdictional data exchange, thereby increasing the risk of mission creep and misuse of personal health data. The balance between these matters is essential. On the one hand, PDMPs help prevent medication misuse and protect communities. Conversely, they have to maintain patient autonomy, confidentiality, and trust in the healthcare system. Unless patients are confident that their prescription history will not be tracked or exchanged without explicit protections, they might be reluctant to accept treatment or be open with their providers (Gunadi & Shi, 2023). Effective privacy, explicit policies, and restricted, ethical access to data are necessary to ensure that PDMPs facilitate, rather than hinder, care. Overall, PDMPs are useful tools for improving prescribing safety and reducing substance misuse, but their effectiveness depends heavily on maintaining strong privacy protections and ethical principles. Medical institutions should continue to ensure that policies protecting patient confidentiality are further refined and that providers use PDMP data appropriately to improve patient care. References Adalbert, J. R., Syal, A., Varshney, K., et al. (2023). The prescription drug monitoring program in a multifactorial approach to the opioid crisis: PDMP data, Pennsylvania, 20162020. BMC Health Services Research, 23, 364. Oliva, J. D. (2024). Expecting medication surveillance. Fordham Law Review, 93, 509. Gunadi, C., & Shi, Y. (2023). Prescription drug monitoring programs use mandates and prescription stimulant and depressant quantities. BMC Public Health, 23, 1326.
  • Political Competence

    I need to respond to each student discussion post following the rubric. Also respond to the question the teacher asked. I have proved the topic. How I answered it and what the teacher asked. you can respond to each student with positive feedback with reference. Topic: Political Competence 1. Can you identify areas in your own political competence that require growth? 2. What will you do to address these areas? 3. What two policy activities can you plan to achieve within the next 18 months? What barriers might hinder your progress? My response Political Competence Nurse leaders must be politically competent, especially those pursuing advanced roles. Over the years, I have developed an unwavering pillar in evidence-based practice and organizational change. However, I still appreciate that some areas require growth. Areas in Political Competence that Require Growth I need to consider building my policy advocacy skills, particularly at the legislative level. Despite my comfort and confidence in engaging in policy discussions at the organizational level, there is still room for improvement. I have limited experience collaborating directly with policymakers. I find it challenging to lobby for policy initiatives. Additionally, I have limited experience in coalition building across departments and interdisciplinary teams. According to Crowder et al. (2022), to effectively manifest political competence, one must forge coalitions and alliances beyond the nursing niche and consider seeking administrators, physicians, and community stakeholders. However, I have not consistently interacted with professionals outside of nursing. Efforts to Address these Areas I am eager to participate in any workshops and webinars offered by professional organizations. Wright et al. (2024) observe that such organizations provide virtual, in-person, and on-demand formats that I can rely on to support my professional development and advocacy skills. Moreover, I will seek mentorship programs from nurse leaders who are active in legislative advocacy. They would guide me to navigate the political landscape by providing practical insights. Knowledge of how to build interdisciplinary coalitions will mean I engage in intentional networking through active participation in community health boards and hospital committees. Policy Activities to Achieve Within the next 18 months, I plan to draft and submit a policy brief calling for improved access to wound care services for marginalized and underserved populations. I will also take part in the nursing advocacy day at the state level, during which I will interact with legislators to discuss issues affecting nurses. Besides, this activity would allow me to discuss patient care and workforce issues. Through these activities, my visibility as a nurse leader will be evident, thereby reinforcing my political competence. In most cases, time constraints hinder pursuing nursing advocacy. For instance, I may find it challenging to balance my clinical and clerical duties. Other stakeholders may also resist these initiatives (Cheraghi et al., 2023). To tackle the time management challenge, I will prioritize daily tasks and use clustering care to reduce distractions. Nonetheless, I will set strict boundaries and adhere to them to protect my personal time. Moreover, I would embrace persuasive communication and strategic management supported by evidence-based practices (Sallam et al., 2025). Upon addressing these challenges, I would be better positioned to advance my professional growth. References Cheraghi, R., Ebrahimi, H., Kheibar, N., & Sahebihagh, M. H. (2023). Reasons for resistance to change in nursing: An integrative review. BMC Nursing, 22(1), 310. Crowder, S. J., Tanner, A. L., Dawson, M. A., Felsman, I. C., Hassmiller, S. B., Miller, L. C., … & Toney, D. A. (2022). Better together: Coalitions committed to advancing health equity. Nursing Outlook, 70(6), S48-S58. Sallam, M., Stanley, A., Snygg, J., Jelley, D., & Sajwani, A. (2025). Empowering Healthcare Leadership Through Facilitators of Evidence-Based Management: A Narrative Review and Proposed Conceptual Framework. Frontiers in Management Science, 4(2), 39-63. Wright, M. M. M., Kvist, T. A., Imelinen, S. M., & Jokiniemi, K. S. (2024). Continuing education for advanced practice nurses: A scoping review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 80(8), 3037-3058. DOI: 10.1111/jan.15911 Teacher response: you give a clear and focused reflection on the areas where you want to grow politically, especially in legislative advocacy, coalition building, and direct engagement with policymakers. You show strong insight in recognizing that while you are confident with organizational policy, you want to expand your influence beyond nursing and into broader interdisciplinary and legislative spaces. Your plan for growth is practical. Seeking workshops, webinars, and mentorship from nurse leaders active in advocacy will help you build both skill and confidence. Your commitment to intentional networking through community boards and hospital committees is an excellent way to strengthen coalition building. Your policy goals for the next eighteen months are well chosen. Drafting a policy brief on wound care access and participating in state level advocacy day will increase your visibility and reinforce your development as a nurse advocate. You also acknowledge realistic barriers and outline thoughtful strategies to manage them through prioritization, boundary setting, and persuasive communication. As you begin this work, which planned step feels like the best place to start building momentum in your advocacy journey? Student 1: Can you identify areas in your own political competence that require growth? I live in a community where my political views differ significantly from the majority, and the same is true in my workplace. To avoid conflict, Ive learned to stay quiet about my beliefs. As a nurse practitioner, I rely on evidence based, science driven decision making, but my attempts to encourage critical thinking have sometimes backfired. These tensions become even sharper around healthcare issues. I work in pediatrics with children who have Type 1 diabetes, which is a chronic, incurable disease, and many of my patients cant access lifesaving medications such as insulin because they lack insurance or have inadequate coverage. Insulin has been available for over a century, but its price has continued to increase in recent years (Feldman, 2023). Furthermore, insulin is priced approximately ten times higher in the U.S. than in any other country, highlighting a substantial disparity in global affordability (American Diabetes Association, 2022). This has made me a strong advocate for universal healthcare, especially for children fighting a chronic illness without a cure. I often struggle to disagree gently because, to me, opposing universal coverage feels like saying my patients dont deserve the chance to be healthy. What will you do to address these areas? I recognize that I need to strengthen my ability to present my perspectives in a clearer and more relatable manner. People often interpret the same issue through very different personal, cultural, or ideological lenses, and I want to be more intentional about acknowledging those differences. Even when I share little common ground with someone who disagrees with me, the conversation is more productive when I can use examples or analogies that connect the issue to aspects of their own life. I also want to improve my capacity to explain complex topics in a non partisan, balanced way. Asking thoughtful clarifying questions can help both me and the other person reflect more deeply on our assumptions and reasoning. Developing these skills will allow difficult discussions to remain respectful, constructive, and grounded in mutual understanding. What two policy activities can you plan to achieve within the next 18 months? What barriers might hinder your progress? I plan to join a professional organization focused specifically on pediatrics. An article by Castanos and Bowden (2024) stated professional nursing organizations (PNOs) are vital for pediatric nurses, offering resources that enhance clinical skills, career growth, and advocacy efforts. Becoming part of a community of clinicians who care for similar patient populations will provide a stronger sense of support and shared purpose. It will also allow me to learn how colleagues in other regions are addressing challenges similar to those I encounter in my own practice and to consider how their strategies might be adapted to my local context. My top choice so far is the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD). In addition, I intend to submit an abstract for presentation on a health equity project I have been developing, which highlights disparities within the type 1 diabetes community. I am preparing to submit this work to an endocrinology conference in Chicago scheduled for July of this year. My goal is to raise awareness of these inequities, contribute to broader discussions on access to care, and learn how larger metropolitan centers are addressing similar issues and advocating for their patients. A significant barrier to accomplishing these activities is the challenge of balancing my full time professional career with caring for two young children while simultaneously completing a DNP program. The combined demands on my time and energy can limit my capacity to fully engage in additional policy or professional development initiatives. Reference American Diabetes Association. (2022). American Diabetes Association Announces Support for INSULIN Act at Senate Press Conference | ADA. Diabetes.org. Castaos, L., & Bowden, V. R. (2024). Knowledge-to-action. Advancing nursing excellence: the role of professional nursing organizations. Pediatric Nursing, 50(5), 254259. Feldman, R. (2023). Leading with the trailing edge: facilitating patient choice for insulin products. Journal of Law & the Biosciences, 10(2), 134. Student 2: I must admit that I am a bit ignorant about my competence in the political arena of nursing. Recognizing this lack of awareness is an important step toward identifying my areas for growth. Acknowledging my limited experience and understanding of nursing politics, I can begin to assess what knowledge and skills are needed to become more competent in this aspect of my profession. Over my years in nursing leadership, I have increasingly prioritized policies and procedures. The impact of COVID and the adjustments in CMS nurse and technician ratios heightened my interest in legislative matters and policy development. As a result, I became a member of the ANA (American Nurses Association), GNA (Georgia Nurses Association), and ANNA (American Nephrology Nurses Association). It has become evident that nurses’ active participation in policymaking is essential to improving healthcare outcomes. When nurses engage in the legislative process and contribute to the development of health policies, they help ensure that the needs and perspectives of both patients and healthcare professionals are considered. This involvement not only strengthens the voice of the nursing profession but also leads to more informed decisions that positively affect the quality of care delivered within the healthcare system. Over the next 18 months, I intend to take a more active role in the professional nursing associations to which I belong. Specifically, I aim to join an advocacy committee and attend local chapter meetings. I believe that increasing my involvement in these organizations will deepen my understanding of nursing politics and policy development and enable me to contribute meaningfully to the profession. While I am committed to this plan, I recognize that time constraints pose a significant challenge. Balancing the demands of school, work, and family means I must be intentional about setting aside dedicated time for these advocacy activities. By prioritizing my participation and scheduling accordingly, I hope to overcome this barrier and fulfill my professional development goals. Rasheed, S. P., Younas, A., & Mehdi, F. (2020). Challenges, Extent of Involvement, and the Impact of Nurses Involvement in Politics and Policy Making in the Last Two Decades: An Integrative Review. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 52(4), 446455. Wilson, D. M., Underwood, L., Kim, S., Olukotun, M., & Errasti-Ibarrondo, B. (2022). How and why nurses became involved in politics or political action, and the outcomes or impacts of this involvement. Nursing Outlook, 70(1), 5563.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Rubric Assessment – NU733 Ethics Policy and Advocacy for Population Health – Purdue University Global.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Internet Research Assignment

    Please check the file I have attached. thank you

    If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to ask me.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Internet Research.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Thinking Like a Historian

    In this course, you have been introduced to the skills of historical thinking by examining events in modern U.S. history with attention to the Five Cs: change over time, context, causality, contingency, and complexity. Recall each of these historical thinking skills from the lesson.

    • Change Over Time: History happens over a period of time. During any given period of time, people, events, and ideas can change.
    • Context: Think about historical events in terms of their greater context. Nothing occurs in a vacuum, isolated from the social, cultural, economic, or political setting of the day.
    • Causality: All historical events have multiple causes and effects. Before the first shot of World War II was fired, a long history of political, economic, and social unrest set the stage.
    • Contingency: Everything is related. Historians think about the ways in which historical trends and events are related to other trends and events, making connections between them.
    • Complexity: We live in a complex world. Historians understand this and create historical narratives that reflect a world of different meanings and perspectives.

    Historians apply these critical thinking skills when creating accounts of the past. Now, its your turn to apply these skills of historical thinking by analyzing topics or events using the same framework.

    To complete this assignment, you will use the template provided below. You will return the completed template as your Touchstone submission. A sample assignment is also provided.

    Choose Topic and Time Period

    From the chart below, choose a combination of one topic and one time period. Within that topic, you will identify and describe something that changed and something that stayed the same throughout that period.

    EXAMPLE You might choose to write about U.S. foreign policy between 1970-2016, or immigration between 1877-1920, or the U.S. economy between 1890-1945. You may select any combination of topic and time period that interests you.

    Choose One TopicChoose One Time PeriodWestern Expansion

    U.S. Foreign Policy

    National Politics

    Race Relations

    U.S. Society and Culture

    Technology and Innovation

    Immigration

    The U.S. Economy1877-1920

    1890-1945

    1940-1990

    1970-2016

    Once youve selected a topic and time period, prepare to respond to the prompts in Part 1 of the template.

    HINT

    Revisit the US History II tutorials. Navigate to the most relevant course units and explore the tutorials related to your selected topic.

    Step 3: Record Your Responses

    Record your responses in Part 1 of the template. Responses to each prompt should be roughly 5-6 sentences.

    Part 2: Context, Causality, and Contingency

    Step 1: Choose a Primary Source

    Review the and choose one for your assignment. You can choose a source from any time period. Study the source and prepare to respond to the prompts in Part 2 of the template.

    Step 2: Record Your Responses

    Record your responses in Part 2 of the template. Responses to each prompt should be roughly 5-6 sentences.

    Part 3: Complexity and Reflection

    Step 1: Reflect

    Answer the reflection questions in Part 3 of the template.

    Step 2: Review the Rubric

    Review the rubric (Section B) to ensure you understand how your Touchstone will be evaluated, and revise as needed.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): US History II Touchstone 4 Template.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • discussion post 3

    Discussion Board #3

    Review the objective and discussion question. Your initial discussion post should answer the following question following. This discussion post should be a minimum of 250 words and include a minimum of 2 scholarly references according to the discussion

    Objective: Students will be able to analyze different types of systolic murmurs.

    Discussion Question: What are the different types of systolic murmurs? Compare and contrast the signs, symptoms and diagnostic studies of pathological murmurs.

    In your responses:

    • Ask a probing question or ask your colleague for a clarification or an explanation of a point made in the post.
    • Agree or disagree (respectfully) and explain why. Provide evidence to support your opinion.
    • Expand on your colleague’s post to reinforce or support their ideas.
    • Explain how someone’s post helped you understand the material or made you rethink your own views.
  • construction project

    6. Construction Project Examples (~500 words)

    Mentioning each tool:

    • One or more real or representative project examples (if possible choose just 1 mega project where all 4 tools were used or can be reasonably assumed to have been used)
    • Project sector and context
    • How the tool influenced outcomes (cost, schedule, risk, quality)
    • Lessons learned or observed constraints

    7. Cross-Tool Synthesis and Integration (~300-400 words)

    • How the selected tools complement one another across project stages
    • Role of BIM and static data as foundational enablers
    • Importance of good data, and how tools can be integrated into existing project management workflows

    here is the outline for my part in the project, and the overview written by my teammate.

    Requirements: about 800 words

  • Frankenstein

    Use Frankenstein by Mary Shelley. This assignment asks you to examine, interpret, and explain a piece of literature from our course readings. Your goal is not to summarize the plot. Instead, you will think critically about how and why the author wrote the work and present an argument about its meaning, purpose, or effect on the reader.

    Assignment Requirements

    1. Choose Your Text

    Select a text that meets all of the following requirements:

    The text must be more than 20 words in length.

    The text must not be a poem.

    The text should provide enough depth to support a sustained literary analysis.

    Choose a work that allows you to examine literary elements, develop a clear thesis, and support your ideas with evidence from the text.

    2. Thesis Statement

    Develop a clear and arguable thesis that answers a meaningful question about the text. Your thesis should explain one of the following:

    How a literary element creates meaning

    How a theme develops

    How a character, historical moment, or social issue is revealed

    Your thesis should appear in the introduction and guide the entire essay.

    3. Textual Evidence

    Use direct quotations and specific references from the text to support your ideas.

    Each quote must be introduced, explained, and clearly connected to your thesis.

    Avoid placing quotations into your writing without context or analysis.

    4. Analysis

    Explain how your evidence supports your thesis.

    Focus on meaning, purpose, and effect rather than summarizing the text.

    Your analysis should demonstrate thoughtful engagement and critical thinking.

    5. Organization

    Your essay should include:

    An introduction with a clear thesis

    Multiple body paragraphs, each focused on one main idea

    A conclusion that explains why your analysis matters and what the reader should take away

    Each paragraph should clearly connect back to your thesis.

    6. Length

    Your essay must be at least 1000 words.

    The Works Cited page does not count toward the word total.

    7. MLA Formatting

    Use MLA format throughout your essay, including:

    In-text citations using author and page number

    A Works Cited page

    12-point Times New Roman font

    Double spacing

    Possible Literary Elements or Devices to Analyze

    You may focus on one or more of the following:

    Literary elements:

    Theme

    Characterization

    Setting

    Tone

    Point of view

    Literary devices:

    Symbolism

    Irony

    Imagery

    Allusion

    Motif

    Narrator reliability

    Foreshadowing

    Diction

    Syntax

    Juxtaposition

    Figurative language

    What a Literary Analysis Is Not

    This assignment is not:

    A plot summary

    A personal opinion piece, such as stating whether you liked or disliked the text

    A biography of the author

    A general research paper

    Checklist Before You Submit

    Before submitting your essay, review the following questions:

    Do I have a clear and arguable thesis?

    Did I use direct evidence from the text?

    Did I explain how each piece of evidence supports my argument?

    Is my analysis clearly organized and easy to follow?

    Did I use MLA format correctly for citations and the Works Cited page?

    Is my essay at least 1000 words, not including the Works Cited page?

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): 169-170.pdf, 170-171.pdf, pg1-2.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • research prompt

    YOU MUST USE THE SOURCES I HAVE FOUND AND USE WEST LAW AND LEXIS NEXIS, CITE THE PAPER CALIFORNIA STANDARD MANUAL

    NO AI

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): TREAT Editing Checklist_Updated.pdf, dog bite.pdf, Slides_Handout_92625 copy.pdf, Research Memo_Prompt.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.