Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • Multiple sclerosis (MS)

    If the assignment instructions do not require you to complete all examples, leave those items blank. Upload your completed map below. The template must be saved as a Word document (.doc or .docx). Do not save it as a PDF or .pages, as the assignment must be submitted through Turnitin before it can be graded. If it is not submitted through Turnitin, it will not be graded, and the late policy will apply. Attached is the copy of the first concept map, along with how it was graded according to the rubric, please look over that. citation Giddens, J. F. ([Insert Year of Publication]). Concepts for Nursing Practice (4th ed.). Elsevier – Evolve. Topic.condition is Multiple sclerosis (MS)

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): DFC Concept Map Template (Level 3) (2).docx, DFC Concept Map Instructions Levels 2 and 3 ASN BSN V1 (3).docx, BSN 346 Concept Map Assignment 1.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • BUSI745 – Discussion Thread: Place

    For this module’s discussion, you will select peer-review journal articles on one of the 4Ps – Place. Keyword search terms might include one of the following: marketing channel strategy, distribution, retailers, internet, or supply chain. Once you have selected your peer-reviewed journal articles, post a synopsis of the major points from the research you read.

    The student will post one thread of at least 750 words not to exceed 1,250 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 2 scholarly authored citations in current APA format, plus at least one new reference from a Marketing Journal to support the topic researched. That is a minimum of 3 scholarly sources. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years, except for the Bible. Students should also integrate a minimum of three scripture verses into the discussion.

    Please make sure the APA references are verifiable and credible as my professor researches each and every one.

    Here are some other notes from professor to keep in mind from my last discussion:

    Incorrect use of italics in your References. Missing use of quotation marks in your original post surrounding the Bible verses.

    Ensure your section headers are in BOLD in your responses as well.

    Requirements: 750-1250 words

  • Wait, What

    Active reading is an important tool to help you gain new knowledge and build on your existing knowledge. As you read the chapters in this module complete the Wait What document. You must have at least 4 of the bullet points completed for each chapter of your readings. There are three chapters in this module so that would be a total of 12 Wait What? Be sure to complete both columns in the document. REFERENCE NEEDS TO BE IN ALPHABETICAL

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): REQUIRED SOURCES.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Presentation – Marfan Syndrome

    Create a PowerPoint slide for each of these topics:

    • Introduction: What are we discussing? Why is it important?
    • Define your topic
    • Discuss mechanism of disease
    • Discuss risk factors for disease
    • Discuss signs and symptoms
    • Provide 2 diagnostic ultrasound images demonstrating the topic
    • Discuss ultrasound findings and descriptions
    • Explain diagnostic criteria to determine disease
    • Discuss differential diagnosis, include images as appropriate
    • Discuss treatment for disease or condition
    • Conclusion: summary of information
    • Reference slide

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): REQUIRED SOURCES.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Essay 1 topic proposal

    hi this is my assignment for my writing class i already choose the subject i want the proposal to be i’m gonna send it to you it’s (baraye) a persian song about protest so i need a draft 1 and also 1 final so i need to pdf please ask any question needed

  • John Locke Institute Essay Prize 2026 Key Information & Bri…

    Dear Writer,

    I am writing to seek your expert collaboration in preparing a submission for the John Locke Institute Global Essay Prize 2026. My chosen question for the Economics category is:

    Technology now allows personalised pricing. If this came to be widely used, what effects should we expect?

    I am committed to producing an essay that is competitive at the very top tier of this prestigious competition. To ensure we share a clear vision and methodology, I have prepared this comprehensive brief based on extensive research into the competition’s winning strategies.

    1. Competition Ethos & Assessment Framework

    This competition, judged by senior academics from Oxford, Cambridge, Harvard, and others, evaluates essays as works of independent scholarly argument, not displays of memorised knowledge. As per the Institutes own criteria and analysis of past winners, success hinges on:

    • Intellectual Depth & Originality: Cultivating a unique, insightful perspective.
    • Analytical Rigour & Dialectical Reasoning: Building a thesis that survives serious critique through a “Point-Counterpoint-Reinforcement” structure.
    • Persuasive Force: The ultimate goal is to craft an essay capable of changing a sceptical reader’s mind. Essays that are descriptive, one-sided, or fail to engage the strongest objections will not succeed.

    2. Our Core Argumentative Strategy

    To meet this standard, our essay must move beyond a simple list of effects. I propose we adopt a framework emphasised by successful entrants and tutors:

    • Precision Dissection: We must first define the scopee.g., distinguishing between first, second, and third-degree price discrimination enabled by technologyand set clear boundaries for our analysis.
    • Dialectical Thesis: Our central claim should be robust and nuanced. For example: While widespread personalised pricing promises significant gains in allocative efficiency and firm profitability, its net effect is contingent on regulatory frameworks capable of mitigating profound risks to equity, competition, and privacy; without such guardrails, the societal costs will likely outweigh the benefits.
    • Mandatory Engagement with Counter-Arguments: Each major claim (e.g., efficiency gains from perfect price discrimination) must be immediately stress-tested with its strongest objection (e.g., equity concerns, consumer surplus extraction, algorithmic collusion) and then reinforced with reasoned analysis.

    3. Required Research & Preparation Methodology

    I am prepared to undertake 100+ hours of structured work, following a model derived from past winners experiences.

    • Phase 1: Foundation (Weeks 1-2): Finalise argument angle and gather 40+ high-quality sources. This will include seminal economic texts on price discrimination (Pigou, Tirole), contemporary academic papers on algorithmic pricing, and real-world case studies (e.g., dynamic pricing in travel/e-commerce, regulatory responses like the EU’s Digital Markets Act).
    • Phase 2: Construction (Weeks 3-4): Develop a detailed outline adhering to the winning structural template:
    • Introduction: Hook, precise definitions, and a clear dialectical thesis.
    • Body: Paragraphs following the “Claim-Evidence-Counter-Rebuttal” model.
    • Conclusion: A synthesising restatement that offers a forward-looking insight, not mere summary.
    • Phase 3: Refinement (Weeks 5-6): Successive edits focused on logical flow, clarity, and persuasive language. I will arrange for review by a critical third party to identify gaps.

    4. Mandatory Benchmarks & Resources

    To align our work with the competitions unique style, the following are essential references:

    • Video Analyses: You must actively use these channels to understand the expected analytical depth and structural finesse:
    • https://www.youtube.com/@viptutorsco/search?query=economics
    • https://www.youtube.com/@qingyingyu
    • https://www.aralia.com/helpful-information/guide-to-john-locke-essay-competition/
    • https://doxa.co.uk/undergraduate-mentors/karimphil
    • https://mypaperexperts.co.uk/john-locke-how-to-write-a-winning-essay-2025/
    • https://www.universityadmissionstutors.co.uk/post/how-to-use-the-john-locke-essay-competition-in-your-university-application
    • https://www.lumiere-education.com/post/the-ultimate-guide-to-the-john-locke-essay-competition
    • https://www.career-lane.com/blog/7-writing-tips-to-submit-a-winning-entry-for-the-john-locke-essay-competition/
    • https://www.tokyoacademics.com/blog/blog-john-locke-essay-competition-guide/
    • https://thedegreegap.com/exploring-the-2025-john-locke-essay-competition-what-you-need-to-know
    • https://qconsult.org/au-uni/how-to-excel-in-the-john-locke-essay-competition-a-tactical-theory-driven-guide/
    • https://doxa.co.uk/undergraduateresources/johnlocke
    • https://www.polygence.org/blog/john-locke-institute-essay-competition-guide
    • Exemplar Essays: I have attached winning essays from prior years. These are the primary benchmarks for tone, sophistication, and argumentative quality. Please study their approach to using evidence, integrating theory, and structuring complex arguments.
    • Substantive Depth: The essay must be rigorously economics-focused. Key areas for analysis include:
    • Theory: Price discrimination (1st/2nd/3rd-degree), consumer/producer surplus, deadweight loss, game theory models of competition.
    • Risks & Trade-offs: Equity vs. efficiency, behavioural exploitation (nudges, price walking), data privacy as an externality, algorithmic tacit collusion.
    • Evidence & Examples: Empirical studies on dynamic pricing outcomes, regulatory approaches from different jurisdictions.

    5. Compliance & Final Standards

    • Format: 2000 words (excluding bibliography). No footnotes; author name omitted. Clean, academic presentation.
    • Originality & AI Policy: The essay must be entirely original. AI can be used only for brainstorming and identifying objections, not for generating prose, structure, or arguments. This is a strict competition rule.
    • Goal: To produce a work of undergraduate-plus standard that stands out for its clarity, originality, and compelling force.

    I will manage the primary research, sourcing, and drafting, seeking your expertise to shape the argument’s rigour, economic precision, and structural power. Please confirm your availability for this collaboration and your agreement with this detailed approach.

    Thank you for your consideration.

    Kind regards.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): 43b920_7312a1d5bd424ea58e07043a9905a7f0.pdf, 43b920_2797114132ec4bdda3ec0257776e55d1.pdf, 43b920_40ecdba38119493f8aab2648768e012a.pdf, 43b920_ef25c1fb2cb6436e8941a207d8aedf10.pdf, 43b920_c37d59e8cc334c6d9e64d36b4ee08e0a.pdf, 43b920_e1824c216f8e4c3b9508fc3dc2fee0dd.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • 165+198-32?

    tplong bantu jawab!!

    Requirements:

  • Week 2 Assignment: Today in the History of Psychology

    Instructions

    In this assignment, select three dates of importance to you from the Calendar.

    Using the attached worksheet, complete the following:

    1. Summarize the event (minimum word count 150 words).

    2. Identify and explain 3 examples of how each event influenced the current practice of psychology (each example minimum word count 150 words). You may consider using the following sites for your examples:

    Please include a minimum of 4 academic resources. These sources should be cited in APA format.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): PSYC305 Week 2 Assignment Worksheet Today in the History of Psychology-1 (1).docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Texas constitutional amendment on bail reform

    How do we change the Texas Constitution (Links to an external site.?) As you’ve read in your text, changes to the Texas Constitution are proposed by the state legislature but can only be approved by a majority vote in a statewide election. To place a proposal before voters requires a 2/3 supermajority in the Texas House and the same in the state senate. In 2021, legislators proposed ten changes to the state constitution for consideration, all of which were approved by voters. In 2023, legislators approved 13 proposed amendments. Voters approved all but one – rejecting a proposal to increase the mandatory retirement age for judges. Earlier this year, legislators voted to place 17 proposed amendments before voters this fall, one of which would change a provision in the Texas Constitution about bail. Article I of the Texas Constitution is a Bill of Rights – a more sweeping and specific list of rights than in the U.S. Constitution. As approved by voters in 1876, the Texas Bill of Rights says “All prisoners shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, unless for capital offences, when the proof is evident; but this provision shall not be so construed as to prevent bail after indictment found upon examination of the evidence, in such manner as may be prescribed by law.” This required judges to allow bail for persons accused of anything less than a death penalty crime. Provisions approved by voters in the 1950s and 1990s added some exceptions, allowing judges to deny bail after multiple convictions for violent and/or sexual felonies under certain circumstances. Voters approved additional exceptions in the 2000s for those accused of domestic violence who assault or threaten their victims while out on bail for the original offense. Last year, legislators approved S.J.R. 5 (Links to an external site.,) which would add a much more sweeping exception. With voter approval, judges would be required to deny bail to those accused of any of a long list of serious crimes if the prosecutor is able to show “…by clear and convincing evidence after a hearing that the granting of bail is insufficient to reasonably ensure the safety of the community, law enforcement, and the victim of the alleged offense.” On the one hand, many law-abiding Texans are increasingly, and understandably, alarmed about crimes committed by those out on bail for previous crimes. Houston Fox 26’s Breaking Bond (seriesLinks) to an external site. features examples of this regularly, and victims’ rights advocate Andy Kahan (Links to an external site.) has repeatedly warned Houstonians of the dangers associated with violent criminals out on bail. On the other hand, those accused of crimes are just that – accused. They haven’t been convicted of anything yet. Bail, in theory, is only supposed to guarantee that the accused person shows up for trial – that person being presumed innocent in our system until proven guilty. Write our usual 2 – 5 page essay (double-spaced, normal margins, font no bigger than 12, etc.) about this amendment. Make sure your essay tells your reader: 1. How did this get to be Proposition 3 on our November ballot? (Here’s where you take your reader through the process for amending the state constitution) 2. What is this proposal designed to do? 3. Who do you think might be for and against this? 4. How would you have voted on this if you were a state legislator, and why? 5. What did voters decide last November? Submit in Word (.docx). Cite your sources. Additional Resources Here’s S.J.R.. 5: &Bill=SJR5Links to an external site. By looking at the witness list for the Senate hearing, you can get an idea what groups were for and against this: to an external site. Texas Policy ResearchLinks to an external site., a pretty conservative group, is opposed: to an external site. The Texas Tribune talks about the issue: to an external site. Fox 26 covered the governor signing related legislation in Houston: to an external site. Houston Public Media has a good article: to an external site. Here’s a good overview of all 17 amendments proposed for this November’s ballot from the House Research Organization: to an external site. Also just for reference, Texas’ Legislative Reference Library has information on all 714 amendments that have been proposed since the Constitution was adopted in 1876 (530 have been adopted): to an external site. LINKS To correlate with the ones that are seen throughout the text in order. &Bill=SJR5

  • Pollen Expert Witness Presentation

    There is no word minimum, but all questions must be answered from the writing assignment instructions. Please use APA format and cite all courses. ACTIVITY 5-2: POLLEN EXPERT WITNESS PRESENTATION Act 5-2 WKST: WRITING ASSIGNMENT Directions: Research what qualifies someone as an expert witness in pollen identification and then either complete an essay or prepare a PowerPoint presentation. Part A: Your research into the qualifications of an expert witness should prepare you to do the following: 1. Introduce yourself and list your credentials as an expert witness in pollen. (Your introduction should include what qualifies someone as an expert in pollen identification.) 2. Educate the jurors about pollen. a. What is pollen? b. Where is it produced? c. What does it look like? d. How big is pollen? e. When is it produced? f. What is its function? g. How is pollen transferred? h. How does pollen differ from plant to plant? 3. Background information about marijuana pollen a. Describe the structure of marijuana pollen when viewed under the microscope. b. Describe how to prepare a microscope slide of marijuana pollen. 4. Pollen and crime-solving background a. Review Locard’s Principle of Exchange. b. How can pollenlink a person or object to a crime scene? 5. Pollen evidence and this case a. What is the evidence that marijuana pollen was collected from this apartment? b. Describe where in the room the marijuana pollen evidence was obtained. c. Describe when and how the evidence was collected, labeled, documented, and stored. d. Describe how this pollen evidence was examined and verified to be marijuana. e. Discuss the reliability of the evidence. 6. Conclusion: Based on the evidence observed and your expertise, can you testify that evidence collected from this apartment at the time of the search was indeed marijuana pollen?