Bright Academic Experts

Category: uncategorised

  • Single Study Evidence Appraisal Tool

    Background

    In this assignment, you will conduct a detailed appraisal of one peer-reviewed primary research article directly related to your EBP question using Appendix E2 of the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model.

    This activity will help you evaluate the articles level and quality of evidence and determine its relevance to nursing practice.

    This assignment supports the following AACN Essentials sub-competencies:

    • 4.1b Demonstrate application of different levels of evidence
    • 4.1f Evaluate research
    • 4.2b Evaluate appropriateness and strength of the evidence

    Pre-Assignment Preparation

    Before starting:

    • Watch the and listen to the to learn how to complete the form.
    • Conduct a database search to find one primary research study, published within the last 7 years in a peer-reviewed journal, that is directly related to your EBP question.

    Note: Do not select pre-appraised evidence (e.g., systematic reviews, meta-analyses, clinical guidelines). Choose a single-study research article.

    Instructions

    • Download and complete the
    • form
    • Section I: Complete this section (required for everyone). Do not leave any items blank.
    • Section II: Choose one checklist based on your article type (Qualitative, Quantitative, or Mixed-Methods). Do not leave any items blank within your selected checklist. If an item truly does not apply, select N/A.

    Submission Requirements

    Upload the following:

    1. Completed Appendix E2 form Submit as a Word document or PDF. (doc, docx, or pdf)
    2. PDF of the research article you appraised

    Due Date: See the .

    Example

    Evaluation Criteria

    Your work will be evaluated using the grading rubric embedded in this assignment. Each requirement within the grading rubric is marked as either:

    • Met Youve fully met the expectations, or
    • Not Met Revision is needed

    To pass the assignment, you must earn a Met rating on all requirements within the grading rubric.

    Tip: Review the rubric carefully before submitting to make sure youve addressed every requirement.

    my EBP question is: for discharged patients in the emergency department, how does enhanced discharge education versus standard and quick discharge education affect patient understanding and reduce return visits?

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Appendix E2_Single Study Evidence Appraisal Tool NUR 316 Example (1).pdf, Appendix E2_Single Study Evidence Appraisal Tool NUR 316 Example.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • SOAP NOTE

    A SOAP note is a method of documentation employed by healthcare providers to record and communicate patient information in a clear, structured, and in an organized manner. This assignment will provide students with the necessary tools to document patient care effectively, enhance their clinical skills, and prepare them for their roles as competent healthcare providers.

    INSTRUCTIONS:

    SOAP is an acronym that stands for Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan. The episodic SOAP note is to be written using the attached template below.

    For all the SOAP note assignments, you will write a SOAP note about one of your patients and use the following acronym:

    S = Subjective data: Patients Chief Complaint (CC).
    O = Objective data: Including client behavior, physical assessment, vital signs, and meds.
    A = Assessment: Diagnosis of the patient’s condition. Include differential diagnosis.
    P = Plan: Treatment, diagnostic testing, and follow up
    • Your SOAP note should be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspellings.
    • You must use the template provided.
    • please provide plagiarism report
    • please provide ai report

    The patient is a black female age 54. her initials are G.G. She has these diagnosis Z00.01 – Encounter for general adult medical examination with abnormal findingse, I10. – Essential (primary) hypertension, E78.5 – Hyperlipidemia, unspecifiede, and Z21. – Asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] infection status. everything else can be made up according to these diagnosis she does see infectious disease doctor and referral was provided as well and medication refills

    Requirements: template

  • LIT1000 essay

    Directions: Compare/Contrast any two of the following stories in terms of a significant theme. Your essay

    must be well developed and include a well-developed introductory paragraph, clear thesis, several supporting

    paragraphs, and a well-developed concluding paragraph. Avoid generalities and vague references. Include

    plenty of analysis/commentary in the body paragraphs. Do not simply offer a summary of the two works.

    Incorporating direct quotes is strongly recommended. Word count: At least 750 words.

    An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge

    Young Goodman Brown

    Big Two-Hearted River

    Sonny’s Blues

    A Good Man is Hard to Find

    The Metamorphosis

    List of possible/sample themes:

    The journey/The search/The quest (search for meaning, love, fulfillment, happiness, God/faith etc.)

    Religion/Religious hypocrisy

    Family/Relationships

    Innocence and Experience/Coming of Age

    Good and Evil

    Courage/Fear

    Overcoming odds

    Decisions/Choices

  • Essay Assignment 1: Research Methods

    Using the methods discussed in the “Research Methods” section of your textbook (Module 3.3, pages 89 to 98) explain how you could design a study to find the brain basis of doing well in a physiological psychology course. In other words, using the relevant research methods described in your textbook you need to explain how the brain areas correlated with doing well in the class could be identified.

    Keep in mind that:

    • Your essays should include a title page and a references page that follow APA format, should be one full page of content (this does not include the title page, or the references page), and should be double spaced throughout with 1″ margins on all sides. Use 12 pt.
    • The entire essay should be written in your own words. DO NOT USE DIRECT QUOTES.
    • You must paraphrase and give credit to (i.e., in-text citation and reference list) the sources you use (e.g., your textbook, the notes, a documentary, etc). Follow APA for in-text citations and references. Failure to do that constitutes plagiarism and will result in a grade of zero. It may also result in a referral to the Office of Student Conduct for further action (See Sections Academic Integrity and Responses to Academic Dishonesty, Plagiarism, or Cheating in the syllabus). Note that in this course we will use turnitin.com to detect plagiarism. For more information, see section “Turnitin.com” in the syllabus.

    Grading Rubric

    This assignment will be worth 125 points. The components of your grade are:

    Content (100 points)

    • If your essay does not fully address the question, 10 points will be deducted.
    • If your essay does not incorporate relevant information from your textbook, 10 points will be deducted.

    Paraphrasing and Citing Sources (10 points)

    The entire paper should be written in your own words:

    • You are not to include direct quotes. If direct quotes are included in your paper, three points will be deducted from your grade. In addition, the quotes will be removed, and we will grade what is left after the direct quotes are removed from your paper.
    • When you use information from your textbook and other sources, make sure that you paraphrase that information and that you give credit to your sources (include in-text citations and a reference list that follow APA).
    • If the reference list is not included, three points will be deducted from your grade.
    • If you paraphrase a source (or sources) but do not include the corresponding in-text citation(s), three points will be deducted from your grade.

    APA (6 points)

    • If in-text citations do not follow APA, two points will be deducted. If they partially follow APA, one point will be deducted.
    • If the References list does not follow APA, two points will be deducted. If it partially follows APA, one point will be deducted.
    • If the title page does not follow APA, two points will be deducted. If it partially follows APA, one point will be deducted.

    Grammar and Mechanics (6 points)

    • If several grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors occur in the paper, but they do not interfere with reading the paper, 3 points will be deducted.
    • f the paper contains a lot grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that significantly interfere with reading the paper, 6 points will be deducted.

    Length (3 points)

    If your paper does not meet the length requirement (one full page of content (this does not include the title page, or the references page), 3 points will be deducted from your grade.

    Your grade will be a zero if:

    • There is indication that you used AI.
    • You plagiarize your sources. When you copy information from a particular source and either 1) do not include the corresponding in-text citation or 2) do not include what you copied inside quotation marks, you are plagiarizing that information. Plagiarism in any part of your paper will result in a grade of zero, and depending on the severity of the offense, in a referral to SCAI for further action. Note that quotes are not allowed, but it is better to use quotes (that would result in deducting points from your grade as explained above) than plagiarizing information.
    • You do not turn in a paper.

  • Module 4: Worksheet 2 – PSYCInfo Scavenger Hunt

    you are going to fill in the blanks on this paper and follow the directions on the paper on where to get the site from the pdf

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Handout2_Fall 2022.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Module 4: Worksheet 2 – PSYCInfo Scavenger Hunt

    you are going to fill in the blanks on this paper and follow the directions on the paper on where to get the site from the pdf

  • SWOT ANALYSIS

    For this task, you will write a paper on an existing organization with which you have had personal experience. The organization can be a business or a nonprofit, and you may represent any level of the organization (e.g., team, department, division, whole) in your analysis. You will first describe the chosen organization. Your description of the organization should convey personal experience, rather than information gained from secondhand sources or media coverage. You will then perform a SWOT analysis on that organization. Last, you will analyze that organization’s leadership. A. Describe an existing organization with which you have had personal experience and its objective(s). 1. Describe three leadership practices of the current leader, other than yourself, in the existing organization. Note: Leadership practices are routine actions, behaviors, functions, and responsibilities that the current leader performs. 2. Discuss how the current leader has affected organizational culture. Note: You may represent any level of the chosen organization (e.g., team, department, division, whole) and the respective current leader in your description. B. Conduct a SWOT analysis evaluating the chosen organization by doing the following: 1. Evaluate two of the organization’s current strengths. 2. Evaluate two of the organization’s current weaknesses. 3. Evaluate two of the organization’s current unmet opportunities. 4. Evaluate two of the organization’s current unresolved threats. Note: The accepted model for a SWOT analysis defines strengths and weaknesses as internal to the organization, and opportunities and threats as external to the organization. C. Conduct a leadership evaluation of the current leader discussed in part Al, using oneof the scholarly leadership theories below that is different from task 1, by doing the following: transformational leadership transactional leadership situational leadership participative leadership servant leadership behavioral leadership trait theory of leadership 1. Evaluate three strengths of the current leader, using the chosen scholarly leadership theory, including how each strength relates to the theory. Support the evaluation of the leader’s strengths with at least one scholarly source. 2. Evaluate three weaknesses of the current leader, using the chosen scholarly leadership theory, including how each weakness relates to the theory. Support the evaluation of the leader’s weaknesses with at least one scholarly source. 3. Recommend three actionable items to improve the effectiveness of the current leader, including how each actionable item relates to the chosen scholarly leadership theory. Support the recommendations of actionable items with at least one scholarly source. Note: The recommendations need to address the current leaders identified leadership weakness. Note: A scholarly source could be a reputable journal, a published book, or any source from a university faculty member or business leader. D. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. E. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of submission

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): GHL1301 Assignment 1.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • graphical Representation and Descriptive Statistics

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): ST3001 assessment template (7).docx, ST3001_Rubric.pdf, ST3001 assessment template (Blank Template.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Performance Management in Healthcare

    Please find attachments below for more instructions

    • Assignment 3 PDF for the writing order
    • Performance Management at Intermountain Healthcare (Harvard Business PDF file attached)
    • Video Link: Lincoln Electric https://vimeo.com/491027383
    • Video Link: Dan Pink TED Talk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrkrvAUbU9Y
    • Book: Organizational Behavior: Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace (Evergreen Edition) Authors: Jason Colquitt, Jeffery LePine and Michael Wesson Publisher: McGraw Hill Publication Date: 2025 ISBN 10: 126590099X ISBN 13: 9781265900991
    • PLEASE USE content and quote from the book
    • References to use are attached. Please use all of them in the writing.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): PerformanceManagementatIntermountainHealthcare_PDF.pdf, Assignment3PDF.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Homeland Security Final Paper

    APA 7 edition, title page, reference page INSTRUCTIONS ATTACHED BELOW PLEASE READ THANK YOU.