Category: uncategorised
-
No title
this is a social work class . I will send information on the instructions for this class. Reply 2 classes . I will upload 2 classmates post -
Bsm480 wk4 mini case
Mini-Case Sany Heavy Industry Co., Ltd
The Sany Heavy Industry Co., Ltd is Chinas largest producer of heavy equipment. In fact, it is the fifth largest producer of this type of equipment globally. In 2014, its revenue was decreasing because of the downturn of overall GNP in China. Sanys total sales revenue in 2012 was $12.9 billion, well behind industry leader Caterpillar at $65.9 billion. However, Sany has a goal of eventually unseating Caterpillar as the industry leader. Sany plans to achieve $47 billion in annual sales within 10 years. Sany has already surpassed Caterpillar as a leader in its Chinese domestic markets.
Sany has four core businesses: (1) cranes, (2) road construction machinery, (3) port machinery, and (4) pumpover machinery. While each is distinct, some similar technologies are used in the production and equipment. Furthermore, similar technologies allow similarities in production processes and equipment for certain parts. Therefore, there is a transfer of knowledge across these businesses. In addition, customers and markets share some similarities because all relate to some form of construction. For this reason, in the United States, Sany has become a major sponsor of a Chevrolet on the NASCAR auto racing circuit. Sany Americas marketing director, Joe Hanneman, said that research showed NASCAR racing events to be the primary recreation event for people in the U.S. construction industry.
Sany invests 5 percent of its annual sales in R&D to continuously improve the quality of existing products, identify new technologies, and develop new products. Through the end of 2012, Sany held 3,303 patents as a result of its R&D efforts. Indicative of its intent to be a technological leader in its industry, Sany has developed new postdoctoral research centers to attract top research scientists. In 2013, the company was awarded Chinas National Technology Invention Prize for its super-length-boom technology.
Although it has been pursuing technological innovations, Sany was recently accused of patent violations by Manitowoc, a diversified producer of equipment including large cranes. In 2014, a judgement went against Sany concluding one Sany crane product infringed one of Manitowocs patents and that six trade secrets of Manitowoc were both protectable as trade secrets and misappropriated. This is a negative signal for Sany as it seeks to pursue more diversified growth outside of China.
Sany continues to grow organically and through acquisitions. For example, in 2012, it acquired Putzmeister, a well-known concrete pump manufacturer. In addition, it has established subsidiaries in many countries, including the United States, Germany, and Brazil, to enhance its international equipment sales and broaden its market reach. Largely because of its major goal of internationalization, it is moving its corporate headquarters from Changsha to Beijing for enriched international connections.
Sources: 2015, Sany Heavy Industry Co. Ltd., www.sanygroup.com, accessed on June 12; 2015, www.manitowoc.com, press release, The Manitowoc Company receives favorable final determination in Sany patent infringement lawsuit, April 17; R. Flannery, 2014, Profit drops by 48% at Chinese billionaires equipment flagship Sany Heavy, Forbes, www.forbes.com, August 31; 2015, www.manitowoc.com, 2013, Yellow Table Survey: Sany ranks no. 5 among construction machinery manufacturers in 2013, China Construction Machinery Online, www.cmbol.com, April 15; M. Barris, 2013, Sany turns to NASCAR to fuel sales, China Daily, www.chinadaily.com, April 4; 2013, Awarded National Technology Invention Prize, Get to Know Sany, 15th issue, February 15; L. Hooks, P. J. Davis, & N. Munshi, 2013, Caterpillar digs into trouble in China, Financial Times, www.ft.com, February 12; J. R. Hagerty & C. Murphy, 2013, Sany tries to gain traction in the U.S., Wall Street Journal, www.wsj.com, January 28; 2013, Sany Heavy Industry Co. Ltd: Sany Groups top 10 events in 2012, $-traders, www.4-traders.com, January 22; Z. Yangpeng & F. Zhiwei, 2012, Sany to move HQ to Beijing from Changsha, China Daily, www.usa.chinadaily.com, November 11.
Case Discussion Questions
1. What corporate diversification strategy is being pursued by Sany? What evidence do you have that supports your position?
3. Why does a firm such as Sany (in the heavy equipment industry) spend so much of its revenue on R&D and innovation?
4. Given that it is now seeking international expansion, how do you expect the judgement against it (patent and trade secret infringement case) to affect its growth prospects outside of China?
-
Interdisciplinary team approach in healthcare
Assessment 4: Capella flex path RN-BSN NURS-FPX4005 , 2 part assignment .This assessment consists of two interconnected parts that must be submitted together. Part 1: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal (Template) Using the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template [DOCX], create a comprehensive plan that addresses an organizational or patient care issue through an interdisciplinary team approach. Template Completion Guidelines: Complete each section of the template thoroughly and concisely. Apply APA format to all in-text citations for evidence and best practices that inform your plan. Include an APA-formatted reference list at the end of the template. A title page is optional since you are using a template. Your plan proposal should address: The specific organizational or patient issue requiring attention. Why an interdisciplinary team approach is most appropriate for this issue. Evidence-based strategies and interventions to address the issue. Implementation considerations and resource requirements. Evaluation criteria and success metrics. Part 2: Stakeholder Presentation (PowerPoint) Create an 812 slide PowerPoint presentation designed to generate interest and buy-in from stakeholder or leadership groups for your interdisciplinary plan proposal. Presentation Structure: Your presentation should include the following components (use one or two slides per section as needed): Part 1: Organizational or Patient Issue Explain the issue you are trying to solve or improve. Articulate why the audience should care about addressing this issue. Describe how a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal. Part 2: Relevance of an Interdisciplinary Team Approach Justify why using an interdisciplinary team is relevant or the best approach. Explain how this approach will help achieve improved outcomes or reach the goal. Part 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Summary Summarize your evidence-based interdisciplinary plan. State the objective clearly. Discuss the likelihood of success. Describe what the interdisciplinary team will do. Part 4: Implementation and Resource Management Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented. Describe how human and financial resources would be managed. Explain how the plan ensures effective use of resources and prevents waste. Justify the resource expenditure. Part 5: Evaluation Propose evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree to which the project achieves the improvement goal. Describe what a successful outcome would look like. Explain how these criteria could measure and demonstrate the degree of success. Part 6: References Include a final reference slide in APA format. Presentation Development Guidelines: Create slides that are easy to read, visually appealing, and error-free. Use concise talking points on slides (bullet points, not full sentences). Include detailed speaker notes that flesh out the bullet points on each slide. Remember that another person may ultimately deliver this presentation, so your speaker notes should be comprehensive. Organize content with clear purpose and goals. Support your content with relevant, evidence-based sources. Tailor language and messaging to your specific stakeholder audience. Both parts must be submitted together: Submit your completed Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template AND your PowerPoint Presentation. PowerPoint Specifications: Slide count: 812 content slides (not including title and reference slides). Speaker notes: Include thorough speaker notes for each content slide. Visual design: Follow Capella Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint Presentations. Technical assistance: If needed, refer to Capella University Library: PowerPoint Presentations. Source Requirements: Minimum of three sources of scholarly or professional evidence. Sources must be published within the past 5 years. See the Bachelor of Nursing (BSN) Program Library Guide for assistance. APA Formatting: Apply current APA style to in-text citations on slides and in speaker notes. Include an APA-formatted reference list on the final slide of your presentation. Include an APA-formatted reference list at the end of your template. See the APA Module for formatting guidance.Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): cf_interdisciplinary_plan_proposal (1)docx.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
Discussion 4 Crm Pro
Chapter 4
Step 1: Review the Case
- Review the
- The Scene: Imagine you are a legal consultant reviewing Officer Millers bodycam footage and arrest report. We are at the very beginning of the State v. Thorne case. Everything that follows in this investigation depends on whether these first sixty seconds were legal. If the stop is bad, the whole case might crumble.
- Keep Chapter 4 of your textbook in mind and use it to justify any answers you provide.
Step 2: Submit
- In your initial post, analyze the “Critical Moment” of the initial encounter between Officer Miller and Thorne by addressing the following:
- The Stop: Does the “Triple Threat” of evidencean anonymous tip, a high-crime area, and Thornes “headlong flight”add up to Reasonable Suspicion? Cite Terry v. Ohio to justify your position.
- The “Plain Feel” Conflict: Officer Miller pat-down Thorne and felt a “hard, rectangular object.” Based on the Plain Feel Doctrine (Minnesota v. Dickerson), did Miller have the right to reach into that pocket? Was that object “immediately apparent” as a weapon or contraband, or did Miller go on a “fishing expedition”?
- The Legal Verdict: At this specific moment, were Thorne’s Fourth Amendment rights violated?
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): CRM PRo Final Project (Pt 1).docx, -criminal-procedure-10th-edition-original-pdf-1701772898.pdf, -criminal-procedure-10th-edition-original-pdf-1701772898.pdf, CRM PRo Final Project (Pt 1).docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
Five paragraph paper
Make sure your not using hard unknown words, don’t use any other languages other than English, make sure it sounds like a writing for political science student so a beginner not a perfassional.
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): POLS 2090_5 Para_Guide.pdf, POLS 2090_5 Para Example Paper.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
Client education
look at details, rubric upload, and requirementsAttached Files (PDF/DOCX): SampleClientEducationPlan.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
Client education
look at details, rubric upload, and requirementsAttached Files (PDF/DOCX): SampleClientEducationPlan.pdf
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
-
Literature Search on your PICOT Question
1. Perform a literature search for the PICOT question identified from your assignment that you completed for Module 1. Use Chapter 3 and the PubMed Search Example document as a guide to conduct your search.
a) Complete the Search Strategy Development Worksheet and submit it with this assignment.
b) List the names of the databases you used to perform your literature search.
c) Provide a list of 7-8 references related/relevant to your PICOT question.
2. Create and complete an Evaluation Table (as presented in Appendix D Evaluation Table Template of your textbook) for the 7-8 references selected. In a separate column in your table, rate the level of evidence (LOE) for each reference and provide a rationale for the rating you chose. Use a specific evidence rating scale. See the following example:
https://www.essentialevidenceplus.com/product/ebm_loe.cfm?show=oxford
Note. The resources in Appendix C (Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists) of your textbook may be helpful.
3. In 500-750 words, summarize the evidence found in the literature related to your topic. Your reflection should address the patterns/trends in the findings, what answered questions remain in the evidence that is currently available, a critique of the overall quality (LOE) of the evidence found, and implications for practice, policy, or future quality improvement projects.
i am also including a sample assignment for guidance/reference
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): SAMPLE ASSIGNMENT.docx, SearchStrategyDevelopment_Worksheet.pdf, revised_Module 2 Individual Assignment_Spring-2025_12-16-2024.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.