Competencies In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competencies: Conduct research for specific writing situations Integrate qualified evidence from research into ones own writing Articulate an evidence-based position in a written communication Overview Persuasive essays are a staple of writing. A persuasive essay has multiple goals. One is to demonstrate certain skills like research, proper citation, and critical thinking. These skills benefit us any time we need to take a position on a topic. This could be to present information for a suggested change at work or to help change someones mind about a global issue affecting our society. The skills that you will develop in writing your persuasive essay with research are transferable to all aspects of life and career. When writing a persuasive essay, a writer must consider multiple communication elements and persuasive writing techniques such as strategically using introductions and conclusions, refuting an opposing viewpoint, among others. These elements of writing matter in everything we write, not just in essays. Persuasive essays organize your ideas by stating a thesis, followed by key points backed up by citations from credible sources, and examine diverse perspectives. All the skills that you will develop while working on your persuasive essay with research will help you when trying to persuade someone to consider your perspective. Directions There are two parts to this assignment: creating a collection of sources and writing a persuasive essay supported by research. For Part One, you will list the sources you will use in your persuasive essay. You will also include a description of each source and other information about your research process. Please note that the information in Part One must be included in your submission and is in addition to the traditional References (APA) section that will appear at the end of your paper. For Part Two, you will write an essay that states your position on a topic, integrates evidence from the sources you listed in Part One to support your key points, and uses different writing techniques to engage and persuade your audience. You will use at least one source from the Project Resources and two sources that you find through your own research using the Shapiro Library to support your project. Your final draft of Part Two should include a minimum of three sources. Part One: Collection of Sources In Module Three, you will collect sources to create an annotated bibliography. In Module Seven, you will apply instructor feedback to revise your collection of sources and resubmit it for Part One of the project. Your sources will help you organize your research as you prepare to write a persuasive essay in Part Two of the project. This part of your project should be 2 to 4 pages long. Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria: Purpose: State the purpose of your research. Consider the purpose of your research in relation to your topic. Research Question: State your research question. State your revised research question. Based on your research, what is your potential answer to your question? Considering the potential answer to your research question now will help you write a thesis statement for your persuasive essay in a future assignment. The thesis statement will be an essential part of your essay. Biased Sources: Describe the impact of using biased sources to support your topic. How does the presence of bias in each source impact your argument? Diverse Perspectives: Describe how diverse perspectives from sources support your position. Consider the following questions: How do the multiple voices in the sources give evidence for your argument? How do these diverse perspectives from your research support your topic? Relevant Sources: List three relevant sources to support your persuasive essay. Include one source from the Project Resources and two sources that you find through your own research using the Shapiro Library. Include a citation entry for each source. Supports: Describe how each source supports your topic. Briefly summarize each source and state why it is credible. Explain how each source is relevant to your research question. Part Two: Persuasive Essay With Research In Part Two, you will write a persuasive essay that is supported by the sources you listed in Part One. To write your essay, revise the draft you wrote in Module Five using the instructor and peer feedback you received in Modules Five and Six. This part of your project should be 2 to 3 pages long. Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria: Thesis Statement: Compose a thesis statement that addresses your position. Key Points: Support key points in your persuasive essay with evidence from your research. These are the key points presented in your thesis statement. Quotes or Paraphrases: Use quotes or paraphrases to integrate evidence from research into your persuasive essay. Include at least one quote or paraphrase for each body paragraph. Strategies: Include strategies to meet the needs of an audience. In your response, include the following content: An introduction with relevant background information that appeals to your chosen audience A conclusion that summarizes your key points and includes a call to action for your chosen audience Persuasive Writing Techniques: Use persuasive writing techniques in the body of your persuasive essay. Address and refute an opposing viewpoint to your position. Attribution Conventions: Use attribution conventions throughout your persuasive essay. Use APA attribution conventions for all in-text citations or paraphrases. Include a References page at the end of your persuasive essay. What to Submit Your submission should be a 4- to 6-page Microsoft Word document with 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins (with an additional title page and References page). Sources should be cited according to APA style both throughout and at the end of your project. Use at least one source from the Project Resources and two sources that you find through your own research using the Shapiro Library to support your project. Supporting Materials The following resource supports your work on the project: Resource: Project Resources This webpage contains resources for the project. Project Rubric Criteria Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Partially Meets Expectations Does Not Meet Expectations Value Part One: Purpose N/A States the purpose of research (100%) Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include clearly stating the purpose of research (75%) Does not attempt criterion (0%) 7.5 Part One: Research Question N/A States research question (100%) Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include clearly stating the research question or stating a research question related to the topic of the essay (75%) Does not attempt criterion (0%) 7.5 Part One: Biased Sources Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner (100%) Describes the impact of using biased sources to support the topic (85%) Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include describing in greater detail the impact of using biased sources to support the topic (55%) Does not attempt criterion (0%) 7.5 Part One: Diverse Perspectives Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner (100%) Describes how diverse perspectives from sources support the position (85%) Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include describing in greater detail how diverse perspectives support the position (55%) Does not attempt criterion (0%) 7.5 Part One: Relevant Sources Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner (100%) Lists three relevant sources to support the essay (85%) Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include listing relevant sources, including a citation for each source, or including required number of sources (55%) Does not attempt criterion (0%) 7.5 Part One: Support Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner (100%) Describes how each source supports the topic (85%) Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include describing in greater detail how the sources support the topic, including a summary of each source, stating why it is credible, or explaining how it is relevant to the research question (55%) Does not attempt criterion (0%) 7.5 Part Two: Thesis Statement Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner (100%) Composes a thesis statement that addresses the position (85%) Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include composing a more precise thesis statement that addresses your position on a topic (55%) Does not attempt criterion (0%) 7.5 Part Two: Key Points Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner (100%) Supports key points in the essay with evidence from research (85%) Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include supporting all key points with evidence from research (55%) Does not attempt criterion (0%) 7.5 Part Two: Quotes or Paraphrases Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner (100%) Uses quotes or paraphrases to integrate evidence from research into the persuasive essay (85%) Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include using quotes or paraphrases to integrate evidence or including a quotes or paraphrases in each body paragraph (55%) Does not attempt criterion (0%) 7.5 Part Two: Strategies Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner (100%) Includes strategies to meet the needs of an audience, including an introduction with relevant background information that appeals to the audience and a conclusion that summarizes key points and includes a call to action for the audience (85%) Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include including an introduction with relevant background information, summarizing key points in the conclusion, or providing a call to action for the audience (55%) Does not attempt criterion (0%) 7.5 Part Two: Persuasive Writing Techniques Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner (100%) Uses persuasive writing techniques in the body of the essay to persuade the audience when addressing and refuting an opposing viewpoint (85%) Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include addressing and refuting an opposing viewpoint to persuade the audience (55%) Does not attempt criterion (0%) 7.5 Part Two: Attribution Conventions Exceeds expectations in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner (100%) Uses attribution conventions throughout the essay (85%) Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include using APA conventions for all in-text citations and paraphrases or including a References page at the end of the essay (55%) Does not attempt criterion (0%) 7.5 Citations and Attributions Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with few or no minor errors (100%) Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with consistent minor errors (85%) Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with major errors (55%) Does not use citations for ideas requiring attribution (0%) 5 Clear Communication Exceeds expectations with an intentional use of language that promotes a thorough understanding (100%) Consistently and effectively communicates in an organized way to a specific audience (85%) Shows progress toward meeting expectations, but communication is inconsistent or ineffective in a way that negatively impacts understanding (55%) Shows no evidence of consistent, effective, or organized communication (0%) 5 Total:

Writing Assignment #1 Critical Annotated Bibliography of Five Sources Summary of assignment Task: In this assignment you will write a list of at least 5 sources in alphabetical order in APA format. In addition, each reference will be followed by a short analytical summary of 150-200 words. At the end of the short summary, you will include a sentence or two that critically analyzes the source and that mentions distinctive features about the article and why it may or may not be useful for you in pursuing more research. Length: Each annotation should be 150-200 words. Format: APA Sources: Five sources, all of which you will find through UMGCs OneSearch o All of your articles should be from scholarly journals or credible trade journals. They should not be from popular journals. Strategies in Selecting a Topic for your Annotated Bibliography You may select a topic of your choice. However, when selecting a topic, keep in mind that it should be a topic on which a number of studies or scholarly articles have been published. Examples of topics students have chosen in the past or that would be workable for this assignment are the following: The impact of the Internet on research methods of students and plagiarism in student papers The impact of The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act on primary school education. The impact of mobile devices on cybersecurity Overall, in considering a topic, you might consider your major, topics that will be covered in future classes you plan to take at UMGC, and your interests. For example, please examine the following ideas: If your major is criminal justice, you might consider researching the different types of CSI effects that have been explored in the literature or researching what studies have noted about body cameras for law enforcement officials. If your major is psychology, you might consider researching counseling strategies, consumer behavior in online shopping, decision-making in upper-management positions, etc. If your major is history, you might consider researching theories on the Civil War, studies on labor patterns in the United States, an aspect of military history, etc. If your major is social science, you might consider researching community responses to health care threats, co-parenting patterns after divorce, etc. If your major is cybersecurity, you might consider researching different studies that analyze the training of employees on cyber issues or researching the Agile and Waterfall methods of project development. Whatever topic you consider, keep in mind that it should be a topic on which a number of studies or scholarly articles have been published. You will conduct all or most of your research using UMGCs OneSearch function in finding scholarly articles or articles from credible trade journals. Approach This assignment will be an analytical/critical annotated bibliography. The difference between the descriptive/informative annotated bibliography and the analytical/critical annotated bibliography is explained in the following video: The transcript is at: Moreover, the following website from UMGCs Information and Library Services provides more information on how to complete this assignment Critical thinking and A.I. for this assignment When creating an annotated bibliography, its important to read and think critically about your sources to ensure that your work is accurate, thoughtful, and useful. First, careful reading helps you fully understand the sources main arguments, evidence, and conclusions, which prevents misrepresentation. Critical thinking also allows you to evaluate a sources credibility by considering the authors credentials, the quality of the evidence, and how current or relevant the information is. In addition, it helps you recognize any bias or perspective the author may bring, which is essential for using the source appropriately and fairly. Another key reason for critical engagement is determining the sources relevance to your specific research question; not every source on your general topic will support your goals. By thinking deeply about your sources, youre also better able to make connections between them, identify patterns or gaps in the research, and build a strong foundation for your own argument. Finally, the process of writing an annotation requires more than just summarizingit involves evaluating and reflecting on how the source fits into your project. All of this is only possible if youve read and analyzed your materials with care and attention. If you plan to use a Large Language Model, or A.I., please use the following information to guide your use: 1. Use AI as a support tool, not a replacement for your own thinking and writing. AI can help summarize or explain sources, but your synthesisthe combining of ideas and your own analysisshould be your work. 2. Always read and understand your sources yourself. Dont rely on AI to tell you what a source says. Use it to clarify language or check your interpretation but engage directly with each source. 3. Avoid having AI generate your annotations. Its okay to ask for help brainstorming or organizing, but writing entire sections with AI and submitting them as your own is plagiarism. 4. Cite AI if it contributed to your thinking. When using AI to help generate ideas, summaries, or outlines, acknowledge that in a note or comment. Example: “I used ChatGPT to help brainstorm connections among my sources, but all analysis and writing are my own.” 5. Check AI-generated content against your sources. AI can hallucinate (make things up) or misrepresent information. Always verify any summaries or facts it provides. 6. Do not fabricate sources or citations with AI. Generating fake quotes, authors, or studies is academic dishonesty. Submitting the assignment: You will submit an initial draft of the essay to the assignment folder. The first draft will not be graded. The instructor will provide comments to it. After receiving comments from the instructor, you will submit a revised draft to the same assignment folder. The final draft will be graded. APA Style The paper should be formatted in APA style. The link APA 7th edition example student paper from Week 3 will be a helpful resource. In summary, you should observe the following: Use one-inch margins. Double space. Use size 12 Times New Roman font. Include a running head. Include page numbers. Include a title page. Include a References page on which you list the articles in APA style Include working links to all sources, or copies of pdfs of all sources Include acknowledgment of any AI/LLM use. Describe how the tool was used. Helpful Resources and Websites The following are some links to sample Annotated Bibliographies. Some of them give examples in APA format. You may want to observe these examples and perhaps model your work after them. A variety of samples from The University of North Carolina Writing Center, including these specific examples of APA-style annotations. You can find that at the following page: Some instruction from Cornell University. The website also provides more information on the process of writing an annotated bibliography. You can find that at the following page: Some instruction from East Carolina University. You can find it at the following page: &p=98192 PS: My major is in Homeland Security would like my assignment to focus on it

I need your help to finish my assignment