Category: Writing

  • Responding to classmates 7.1

    Each response to a peer should be (at least) approximately 100 words in length and should contribute to the discussion in progress.with ne reference each

    JENN

    The behavior I chose is overeating, and this one really hits close to home for me. I didnt fully understand how strong food addiction could be until I had bariatric surgery. The first time I was allowed to eat solid food, I had a very small piece of chicken. I took a few bites and started crying because I physically couldnt finish it. That moment made me realize that eating wasnt just about hunger for me, it was emotional, and thats when I realized it was an addiction, I used food for comfort.

    In the precontemplation stage, someone may not see overeating as a problem at all. I used to tell myself I just loved food or that stress made me eat more. At this stage, learning how emotional eating affects health and emotions can help someone slowly start thinking differently (DiClemente et al., 2004).

    In the contemplation stage, the person starts to realize overeating might be an issue but feels unsure about changing. This is where I was before surgeryknowing something wasnt right but not knowing how to fix it. Motivational interviewing can help by letting people talk through their feelings instead of being pressured to change (Miller & Rollnick, 2002).

    During preparation and action, people start making changes, like planning meals or learning new coping skills. Therapy like CBT can help break emotional eating habits. In maintenance, the focus is staying consistent and understanding that setbacks happen and dont mean failure (Prochaska & Norcross, 2001).

    This model shows that overeating, like other addictions, takes time, support, and self-awareness to change.

    The Transtheoretical Model (TTM), or Stages of Change model, provides a useful framework for understanding how individuals modify addictive behaviors, including behavioral addictions such as excessive online shopping. According to Prochaska and DiClementes model, behavior change unfolds across a series of stages rather than occurring all at once (Gold, 2006; Zimmerman et al., 2000). Using online shopping addiction as the focus, each stage can be illustrated through realistic examples. PreContemplation- In this stage, the individual does not recognize their online shopping as problematic. For example, someone may justify frequent purchases as treating myself or insist that online shopping is harmless entertainment. As Sholl (2011) notes, individuals in this stage often feel resistant or defensive when others express concern. Contemplation- Here, the person begins acknowledging that their behavior may be harmful. An individual might notice increasing credit card debt or feelings of guilt after impulse purchases. They may say, I know I spend too much online, but Im not sure how to stop. This aligns with Zimmerman et al.s (2000) description of ambivalence as the hallmark of this stage. Preparation- The individual intends to take action soon and begins planning small steps. For example, they may set a goal to reduce online shopping or explore budgeting apps. Gold (2006) emphasizes that preparation involves commitment and identifying strategies for change. Action- The person actively modifies their behavior. This could include deleting shopping apps, unsubscribing from promotional emails, or setting spending limits. According to Sholl (2011), this stage requires sustained effort and conscious decisionmaking. Maintenance- In maintenance, the individual works to prevent relapse and solidify new habits. Someone might continue tracking expenses, practice alternative coping strategies (e.g., exercise, social activities), or seek support when urges arise. Zimmerman et al. (2000) highlight that maintenance is an ongoing process rather than a final endpoint.

  • critical reasoning fallacy

    • Find an example of a fallacy used in popular advertising or any persuasive text. Upload the image/words or provide a link.
    • Identify the fallacy and why you think that this particular type of advertisement represents the fallacy that you have chosen.

    In addition to your initial post, respond to at least two of your peers posts. These responses should address questions, problems, or issues presented in their ad analysis. Please remember to be respectful and appropriate with your analysis of their work. Dont just agree or disagree; continue the conversation!

    please ask me wha the advertisment is before hand

    Requirements: 350 words

  • VH English DA ART

    PART 1

    Essay Frames

    It’s our third Discussion Board (DB) assignment for the semester! Once you finish this post and replies, you will have completed 1/5 of the class Discussions!

    In this Module, we reviewed the parts of an essay so that we can ensure that our essays have said parts when we write them. When people think of essays, they typically focus on the paragraph level since that is the “bigger” part, and it is in terms of size. However, in terms of importance, there are two types of sentences that are far more crucial in the construction of the essay: the thesis statement and the topic sentences. Without these “frames,” the paragraphs are meaningless. For this DB assignment, we are going to practice these sentence types so that we start to build “muscle memory”; in other words, we are going to practice writing these types of sentences so often this semester that writing them will be almost automatic every time you start a new essay.

    AI Vision Pro Goggles on a stand

    Instructions:

    Read “” by Ashwini Tad Patrikar (this topic is another possibility for Essay 1).

    Add your initial reply post to this discussion by Wednesday night at 11:59 pm (to do so, just select the “reply” button, below). In your post please include the following:

    (Kevin Doyle/Unsplash)

    1. Assume that you will be writing an essay on the topic of Technology and Its Addictive Tendencies.
    2. Take a stance; is technology addiction a “real” problem and then:
      • Write a thesis stating your viewpoint;
      • Write two to three topic sentences that would build that thesis statement;
      • Offer an example to prove one of the topic sentences (it can be a personal example of a quote or summary from the essay);
      • If you quote or summarize, then be sure to offer an in-text, as well as bibliographic citation.
    • ***The post must be at least 100 words.

    By Saturday night at 11:59 pm, please reply to at least two of your peer’s posts. In each reply, please do at least one of the following:

    1. Note an idea that you and your peer shared or agreed upon.
    2. Share some feedback or commentary about something interesting he/she shared that you may not have considered.

    ***The replies must also be at least 100 words each.

    Grading:

    This assignment is worth 10 points. Your grade is comprised of both the post and the replies.

    Rubric

    The associated rubric will be used to provide feedback–please be sure to review the rubric before starting and before submitting your assignment.

    More Options

    Please select the “more” icon in the upper right hand corner of this page to show the grading rubric for this assignment. If accessing this course by using the Canvas Student App, you will not see the icon. Instead, please use the menu to locate the rubric.

    PART 2

    SketchesLines in Design Sketches

    Lines and directional forces are all around us. Look to SEE where you can find lines to enhance a design.

    Create 5 line based compositions of the same subject (a representational subject that is made of or suggests line) using any method you wish, drawing, photography, computer, etc. Be sure it is well designed employing line, value, positive/negative shapes rules of composition and balance.

    Explore the subject to its fullest potential. For example: How many different ways can you photograph a telephone pole and it’s wires? Poles and wires can represent lines in a composition, like branches, railings, etc. Get creative!

    Each composition should be different from the next. The more you work with one subject and get to know it the more you see it objectively. So you can do 10-20 photos or drawings and pick the best 5 to present. You should never just settle on the first composition you create. Always consider all the possibilities! At least 4 x 5″ or larger.

    Critique at least 2 other student’s sketches by Friday end of day of the same week so that the notes can be referenced while preparing the final art.

    Stairs1.pngStairs5.pngStaris3.pngStairs4.pngStairs2.png

    Requirements: Please place each part in a different attachment. NO AI USE.

  • BO art 120 cd 131

    PART 1

    SketchesLines in Design Sketches

    Lines and directional forces are all around us. Look to SEE where you can find lines to enhance a design.

    Create 5 line based compositions of the same subject (a representational subject that is made of or suggests line) using any method you wish, drawing, photography, computer, etc. Be sure it is well designed employing line, value, positive/negative shapes rules of composition and balance.

    Explore the subject to its fullest potential. For example: How many different ways can you photograph a telephone pole and it’s wires? Poles and wires can represent lines in a composition, like branches, railings, etc. Get creative!

    Each composition should be different from the next. The more you work with one subject and get to know it the more you see it objectively. So you can do 10-20 photos or drawings and pick the best 5 to present. You should never just settle on the first composition you create. Always consider all the possibilities! At least 4 x 5″ or larger.

    Critique at least 2 other student’s sketches by Friday end of day of the same week so that the notes can be referenced while preparing the final art.

    Stairs1.pngStairs5.pngStaris3.pngStairs4.pngStairs2.png

    PART 2-

    This discussion board is part of your Attendance and Participation grade. To earn full credit, you must: **Reminder you can not make this discussion board up after Sunday 2/22

    • By Wednesday (2/18): Post your original response to the prompt (2 points)
    • By Friday (2/20): Reply with inquiry-based, constructive comments to all of your group mates posts (2 points)
    • By Sunday (2/22): Complete at least one discussion loop by responding back to a classmate who commented on your post (1 point)

    Discussion Prompt

    In Chapter 1 of the Berns text, you will begin to explore what makes the child. Development is shaped by many factors, brain development, temperament, family, culture, and the broader environment. Children both influence and are influenced by their surroundings, and this dynamic relationship is central to their growth.

    Traditionally, childrens environments are fairly stable and guided by parents and close relationships. However, in todays world, rapid social and technological changes, along with global events like the COVID-19 pandemic,have reshaped how children grow, learn, and socialize.

    For this discussion, reflect on:

    • How do you see todays changing world (technology, societal shifts, pandemic effects, etc.) impacting how children are socialized?
    • How might these changes influence major aspects of development such as:
      • Self-concept
      • Self-esteem
      • Self-image

    Use your readings, observations, and experiences to support your response.


    Group Discussion Expectations

    • You will be placed in a small group of about 68 classmates.
    • By Wednesday: Post your response to the prompt.
    • By Friday: Reply with inquiry-based comments to ALL your group mates posts to further their thinking.
    • By Sunday: Complete the discussion loop by replying back to your group mates comments on your own post.
    • If a group member does not post by Wednesday, you are not required to respond to their late entry but if you see it do not exclude from discussing either.

    Be a good group mate, post early so your peers have time to interact with your ideas. Early and thoughtful contributions help create deeper, richer discussions for everyone.

    To unlock the next page in this module you must view this page and check the “next” button at the bottom of this page.

    Requirements: Please place each part in a different attachment. NO AI USE.

  • Comparative Rhetorical Prcis: Debates and Hearings for MWA 2…

    For this assignment, I am asking you to:

    1. watch one of the following debates/hearings below to write about for your second essay
    2. take time stamped notes on your chosen debate/hearing in MLA formatting (header, page numbers, title, 12pt TNR double spaced)
    3. create a comparative rhetorical prcis for the debate hearing

    These are rather long debates/hearings. If you’re choosing one of the 4 hour debates/hearings and plan on tapping out before it ends, I’m telling you to watch at least an hour and a half + the end of the debate/hearing you chose.

    Here are the debates/hearings you may choose from:

    • note that this debate features Mamdani, Cuomo, and Curtis Sliwa, but you are only be asked to analyze current Mayor Mamdani & former Mayor Cuomos argumentation/performancesnot Sliwa]
    • Bondi & Committee supporters vs. Epstein survivors & Committee opponents
      note that this hearing was set to focus on the Epstein Files and Bondis handling of the Epstein situation
    • The Palestinian Debate: v.
      note that this debate between these two former co-hosts was set to focus on Palestine
      (in the case that you cant hear a speaker at a given point, I have provided you with both streams – the Piker stream allows for better audio of both sides, but the Klein stream has the full debate)

    Here is the outline for the comparative rhetorical prcis

    In the [title of debate, hearing, or texts], A argues that A while B argues that B. A supports their argument through [2 strategies] while B supports their argument through [2 fallacies]. While [identification of appeals for strategies of each party], A is [value statement – who is more successful] in their argumentation as As argument is based in A while B bases their argumentation on B.

    Here is a comparative rhetorical prcis based on the silly video ” if you need an example:

    In the video Wow, Everyones Flirting with Me, Marovitch argues that everyone wants her while The Boys argue the opposite. Marovitch supports her argument through false equivalency & slippery slope conclusions while The Boys support their argument through the use of direct statements and physical avoidance. While Marovitch attempts to appeal to her audiences pathos, The Boys attempt to appeal to their audiences ethos. Marovitch is less successful in her argumentation as her argument is based in delusion and lack of proof, while The Boys base their argumentation on personal experience with Marovitch in their storied history of friendship.

    If you can’t remember rhetorical fallacies, take a look at the list here:

    Requirements: as much as the directions is asking for

  • Writing Question

    • You are writing to inform a specific audience for this essay: You should specify the audience appropriate for your focus–be very specific: write directly to a single individual in the second person who is meaningfully involved with your topic.
    • Write in the second person this time around
    • Thesis – The person Ive become is because of my mom, whose strength, support, and guidance have shaped my life in many ways.
    • My mom taught me at a young age to be responsible. I have 2 younger sisters. My mom taught me how to take care and be there for them
    • I learned as I grow up how close I get to my mom
    • MAKE SURE 0% Ai, send me a file to show its 0 ai
    • 3-4 pages.
      • MLA format (including Normal margins, Times New Roman, etc.). Use the link to Purdue Owl in Modules as an example for proper formatting.
      • cover page displaying your thesis. MLA doesn’t call for a cover page, but I do; use it to show me your thesis.

      Requirements:

    • Writing Question

      READ THE INSTRUCTOR NOTES AND MAKE CHANGES TO THE PAPER AS NEEDED

      Thank you for your submission but your paper is only being returned for revision (considering available attempts and course end date) – this is not a 0 grade nor do you have to start over. You need to provide at least 3 academic references – you only provided 2. See the Assessment 3 feedback and new course video (link listed below) for additional support with developing the required criterion for this paper as well.

      Watch the Assessment development video Announcement for insight into developing your Assessment submissions:

      ——————————-
      Reason 1)
      TO EFFECTIVELY UPDATE YOUR PAPER: Using the template provided in the directions (including the section headings provided with adding the other criteria requirements as section headings as well) while also applying the Scoring Guide requirements under Distinguished. Applying the insight provided below will help towards earning a Distinguished grade For Assessment 4 grading criteria, I recommend you provide the following content identified by appropriate section headings:

      • Identify the specific team members who will join the team for developing the mission statement
      • Identify each team member’s skills that will make each valuable and why, and then
      • Explain the ethical decisions for updating the mission statement
      • Describe critical thinking decisions (not just including questions) to consider when updating the mission statement

      Then add an overall Introduction at the beginning and a Conclusion at the end focusing on the Assessment 4 criteria presented for this Assessment. Then provide APA formatted academic references with citations (from Capella Library recommended) specifically supporting the required criteria from the Scoring Guide. Providing solid research to support your points, especially resources from the Capella library (not just the web), will also go a long way in supporting the overall value these organizational departments provide within the structure of the company.

      NOTE: See the attached PDF I previously emailed to everyone – scroll to the end of this PDF for assistance with developing your template for each Assessment.

      Reason 2)
      You did not present and utilize at least 3 unique academic references, along with citations, in proper APA format (see Capella library for examples and assistance) that support the required criteria as stated in the Scoring Guide. It is also best to avoid generic company websites, such as About pages, as they do not provide academic information to specifically support the graded criteria as directed in the Scoring Guide. You can still use company references, but you still need at least 3 different academic references to support the criteria in your paper you can use as many references as you choose so you are not just limited to 3. However, this paper is not about a company review but rather is based on business concepts with then using a company to show how these business concepts are applied. Each reference listed should be used at least once as a citation to support the specific criteria as required that is stated in the Scoring Guide within your updated submission. Providing solid research to support your points, especially resources from the Capella library (not just the web), will also go a long way in supporting the overall value these organizational departments provide within the structure of the company.
      Also, If you utilize a textbook as a reference, be sure to also include the chapter and page number as well – however, best to avoid using textbooks in favor of the library journals instead. Utilizing Capella library journal references (not just web references) and presenting your references in proper APA format will add value to your writing, utilizing each of these references within your paper as citations (recommend at least one citation per section) to support the required criteria in the Scoring Guide.
      ——————————-

      IMPORTANT: Be sure to carefully review the course Announcements for details about preparing your Assessment writing. Use the template (including the section headings) provided in the directions and pay close attention to detail to the required criteria provided in the Assessment Scoring Guide to see exactly what you need to include in your writings, especially for a Distinguished grade. The section headings will help keep your content focused on the required criteria for that section, instead of scattered throughout your paper. I suggest you provide at least 2 solid paragraphs (4-5 sentences each) supporting each concept as directed to maximize your credit – I recommend you consider using one of these paragraphs to focus on the specific Distinguished criteria as directed. You may include up to one additional page over the stated maximum page count requirement listed. Once you become comfortable applying the Scoring Guide grading rubric, writing becomes much easier because the rubric provides the outline of your paper for you and then just include a solid Introduction and Conclusion just be sure to include all the criteria under Distinguished. add

      Keep in mind that this is not just about reviewing a selected company – the goal is to explain the business concepts that could apply to any business through the use of the references you select (preferably some from the Capella library for Distinguished), and then apply how your selected company applies these concepts in their business practice.

      Be sure to provide at least 3 different academic references (not just company resources) to support the required criteria as stated in the Scoring Guide (not from the same resource nor the same company website) as directed (recommend utilizing Capella library journal referencing whenever possible to be eligible for Distinguished) – each reference listed should be used as a citation within your paper. Some website use is OK but avoid using any pedia sites as well as blogs.

      Should you have any further questions about developing your paper for this Assessment, you can contact the Graduate Assistant Course Tutor Team (see Announcement) for additional assistance. For additional insight about the feedback I provided, you can reach me via text message. Your updated grading rubric score will replace this one.

      Requirements: make changes

    • ljh 900words

      The four films we have watched are the four that I circled in red in the two screenshots: Marcel Camuss Black Orpheus (1959), Roberto Farias Assalto ao Trem Pagador (1962), Anselmo Duartes Pagador de Promessas (1962), and Macunama (1968).You may choose Week 4s Macunama (1968) and Vidas Secas, Deus e Diabo na Terra do Sol, Terra em Trans as one film and one clip. Clip is the audiovisual material screened in class. If you choose to write the third question, you may also compare two films or compare one film with one clip. Based on the requirements, you must cite at least 2 of the readings assigned so far to support your points. and I have put all the reading materials in the files.

      Requirements: 900words

    • Undefined

      I need help writing a breif case assignment. On county of Onondada vs State

    • Writing Question

      The class book: Johnson & Stoskopf’s Comparative Health Systems by Leiyu Shi and Richard G Greenhill

      Requirements: Bjs