Category: Writing

  • Writing Question

    Use these 3 links

    and perform a field research report on your experience. Write a detailed and insightful essay that demonstrates a general understanding of the significance of each site within its religious tradition. Then, compare and contrast the three sites and the rituals associated with them. Do you find them to be more similar or different? DO NOT DESCRIBE WHAT THE RELIGION IS ABOUT. You must submit a 1,200-1,500 word first draft. APA, MLA, or Chicago format required. Double-spaced, 12-point size, Arial or Times New Roman font. Minimum of 3 academic sources.

    Requirements: 1,200-1,500 words

  • Writing Question

    Requirements: As required

  • Writing Question

    Requirements: As required

  • Writing Question

    Research a local building department (preferably the area you live in) that has adopted a model building code. Your Internet search might include some of the following keywords: building permit application, local building department, local building code, authority having jurisdiction, exterior door replacement codes.

    Identify the name of the building department or other governing agency and the adopted model code. Download and complete the applicable building permit application required to replace an exterior door at your property. You may choose to complete an application for other types of construction rather than a door replacement if you prefer, just keep it simple.

    Submit your response to the following assignment in a Word document and then submit it to the drop box. Follow APA guidelines if applicable.

    City: Miami

    Requirements: 1000

  • Writing Question

    This assignment is already done but it need some changes to it based off the instructor notes

    THIS IS THE ASSIGNMENT

    When writing your assessment, be sure to:

    • Use the to guide the formatting and organization of your writing.
    • Cite any references to sources in a References page.
    • Include the for Assessments 2 and 3 as an appendix, after the References section.

    Organization

    Organize your reflection with the following sections:

    Title Page

    • Include a title page with the following title: Critical Reflection and Writing Process Evaluation.

    Introduction

    • Your introduction needs to identify the focus of your reflection for readers; it should be no longer than one-half page.

    Writing Process Evaluation

    • Evaluate your personal writing process in this course.
    • Be sure to include evidence by specifying important revision choices you applied in response to feedback from your instructor or your own rethinking of Assessments 2 and 3.
    • Explain how you might apply lessons learned or strategies used during the writing of the assessments in this course to future writing tasks related to your program and your chosen profession.
    • Be sure to explain how specific writing resources can be helpful.

    Systems Thinking

    • Explain how systems thinking can provide a framework for exploring the professional issue or problem that you focused on in Assessments 2 and 3.

    Professional Growth

    • Evaluate the impact of the course on your understanding of professional goals, future courses, and strategies for program success.
    • Articulate your professional strengths and opportunities for growth.
    • Identify organizations, and other resources, services, and activities that could be used for professional development to strengthen your skills.

    Conclusion

    • Your conclusion should emphasize the main themes in your paper and include the impact of this course on your understanding of your professional goals, your thoughts about future doctoral coursework, and your strategies for success in your EdD program.

    References

    • Cite any references to sources on a References page.

    Appendix

    • Include the Writing Revision Matrix documents for Assessments 2 and 3.

    THE ASSIGNMENT IS ASSESSEMENT4 BUT I AM ATTACHING ASSSESSMENT 2 AND 3 IN CASE YOU NEED TO USE THEM

    INSTRUCTOR NOTES FROM ASSESSMENT 3

    Competency 2

    Apply information literacy skills to locate and critically evaluate scholarly data, theories, and research.

    Criterion

    Support arguments with reference to scholarly literature.

    Your Result:PROFICIENT

    Supports arguments with reference to scholarly literature.

    Faculty Comments:You have used five references from the literature to support your arguments.

    Competency 4

    Analyze the characteristics of ethical behavior and respect for diversity and civil discourse.

    Criterion

    Describe connections among issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse and a given educational specialization, including examples.

    Your Result:PROFICIENT

    Describes connections among issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse and a given educational specialization, including examples.

    Faculty Comments:You have tried to explained the connections among these issues and the specialization of educational leadership. Your content, however, is not well organized so even though there is a connection to educational leadership, it is not clear as the connection from one issue to another. You need to reorganize and use connection phrase, word, and sentences.

    Criterion

    Analyze scholarly literature focused on the connections among issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse and a given educational specialization.

    Your Result:PROFICIENT

    Analyzes scholarly literature focused on the connections among issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse and a given educational specialization.

    Faculty Comments:I can see that you tried to synthesize the information but rather than show similarities among the findings in the literature, you demonstrated the differences.

    Criterion

    Evaluate challenges posed by issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse in a professional educational setting.

    Your Result:PROFICIENT

    Evaluates challenges posed by issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse in a professional educational setting.

    Faculty Comments:Be more specific on the challenges posed by these issues and provide examples to illustrate your discussions.

    Competency 5

    Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and appropriate to purpose.

    Criterion

    Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    Your Result:BASIC

    Organizes content with some logical flow, but some transitions are missing or unclear.

    Faculty Comments:You need to add transitional sentences so that the content flows more smoothly and your ideas are linked together.

    INSTRUCTOR NOTES FOR ASSESSMENT 2

    Because this was your final submission for this assessment (you submitted the wrong paper the first time), I was a little lenient on the APA formatting. There were errors that you will want to make sure you do not make on the next assessment. Also, the Pangram report indicated that the percentage of AI generated content was still at 49%. On your next assessment it needs to be 100% human written. I am not sure how you are using AI but you need to trust your own skills and not use AI except to correct your grammar, for example. Do not let any AI program change your sentence structure or content.

    E. Waller

    Scoring Guide

    Competency 1

    Determine how action research and systems thinking apply to professional problems, challenges, or issues in education.

    Criterion

    Provide a detailed description and examples illustrating how a chosen topic relates specifically to one’s specialization.

    Your Result:DISTINGUISHED

    Provides a detailed description, examples illustrating how a chosen topic relates specifically to one’s specialization, and rationale for the chosen examples.

    Faculty Comments:First Review – You submitted Assessment 3 for Assessment 2. I emailed you but you didn’t respond so I had to return it to you. Just resubmit with the correct assessment. First Review – You resubmitted but the Pangram report indicates that it is 100% AI generated. So, we need to talk about this. Third Review – You have described how this topic relates to the specialization of educational leadership.

    Criterion

    Analyze information gathered in a literature review.

    Your Result:PROFICIENT

    Analyzes information gathered in a literature review.

    Faculty Comments:First Review – You submitted Assessment 3 for Assessment 2. I emailed you but you didn’t respond so I had to return it to you. Just resubmit with the correct assessment. First Review – You resubmitted but the Pangram report indicates that it is 100% AI generated. So, we need to talk about this. Third Review – What questions were not answered in your search of the literature. Is more research needed on this topic?

    Competency 2

    Apply information literacy skills to locate and critically evaluate scholarly data, theories, and research.

    Criterion

    Evaluate scholarly articles using principles of critical thinking.

    Your Result:PROFICIENT

    Evaluates scholarly articles using principles of critical thinking.

    Faculty Comments:First Review – You submitted Assessment 3 for Assessment 2. I emailed you but you didn’t respond so I had to return it to you. Just resubmit with the correct assessment. First Review – You resubmitted but the Pangram report indicates that it is 100% AI generated. So, we need to talk about this. Third Review – Synthesize the findings by discussing how scholars or researchers shared similar ideas.

    Criterion

    Incorporate scholarly journal articles relevant to one’s study.

    Your Result:DISTINGUISHED

    Incorporates more than five scholarly journal articles relevant to one’s study and provides rationale for the chosen articles.

    Faculty Comments:First Review – You submitted Assessment 3 for Assessment 2. I emailed you but you didn’t respond so I had to return it to you. Just resubmit with the correct assessment. First Review – You resubmitted but the Pangram report indicates that it is 100% AI generated. So, we need to talk about this. Third Review – You have incorporated five articles in support of your arguments.

    Competency 5

    Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and appropriate to purpose.

    Criterion

    Integrate appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and APA citation style.

    Your Result:PROFICIENT

    Integrates appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and APA citation style.

    Faculty Comments:First Review – You submitted Assessment 3 for Assessment 2. I emailed you but you didn’t respond so I had to return it to you. Just resubmit with the correct assessment. First Review – You resubmitted but the Pangram report indicates that it is 100% AI generated. So, we need to talk about this. Third Review – There are errors in your APA formatting that need to be corrected.

    THE MATRIX DOCUMENT HAS TO BE COMPLETE BASED OFF THE NOTES FROM THE INSTRUCTOR LISTED FOR ASSESSMENT 2 AND 3

    Requirements: READ CAREFULLY

  • Writing Question

    This assignment is already done but it need some changes to it based off the instructor notes

    THIS IS THE ASSIGNMENT

    When writing your assessment, be sure to:

    • Use the to guide the formatting and organization of your writing.
    • Cite any references to sources in a References page.
    • Include the for Assessments 2 and 3 as an appendix, after the References section.

    Organization

    Organize your reflection with the following sections:

    Title Page

    • Include a title page with the following title: Critical Reflection and Writing Process Evaluation.

    Introduction

    • Your introduction needs to identify the focus of your reflection for readers; it should be no longer than one-half page.

    Writing Process Evaluation

    • Evaluate your personal writing process in this course.
    • Be sure to include evidence by specifying important revision choices you applied in response to feedback from your instructor or your own rethinking of Assessments 2 and 3.
    • Explain how you might apply lessons learned or strategies used during the writing of the assessments in this course to future writing tasks related to your program and your chosen profession.
    • Be sure to explain how specific writing resources can be helpful.

    Systems Thinking

    • Explain how systems thinking can provide a framework for exploring the professional issue or problem that you focused on in Assessments 2 and 3.

    Professional Growth

    • Evaluate the impact of the course on your understanding of professional goals, future courses, and strategies for program success.
    • Articulate your professional strengths and opportunities for growth.
    • Identify organizations, and other resources, services, and activities that could be used for professional development to strengthen your skills.

    Conclusion

    • Your conclusion should emphasize the main themes in your paper and include the impact of this course on your understanding of your professional goals, your thoughts about future doctoral coursework, and your strategies for success in your EdD program.

    References

    • Cite any references to sources on a References page.

    Appendix

    • Include the Writing Revision Matrix documents for Assessments 2 and 3.

    THE ASSIGNMENT IS ASSESSEMENT4 BUT I AM ATTACHING ASSSESSMENT 2 AND 3 IN CASE YOU NEED TO USE THEM

    INSTRUCTOR NOTES FROM ASSESSMENT 3

    Competency 2

    Apply information literacy skills to locate and critically evaluate scholarly data, theories, and research.

    Criterion

    Support arguments with reference to scholarly literature.

    Your Result:PROFICIENT

    Supports arguments with reference to scholarly literature.

    Faculty Comments:You have used five references from the literature to support your arguments.

    Competency 4

    Analyze the characteristics of ethical behavior and respect for diversity and civil discourse.

    Criterion

    Describe connections among issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse and a given educational specialization, including examples.

    Your Result:PROFICIENT

    Describes connections among issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse and a given educational specialization, including examples.

    Faculty Comments:You have tried to explained the connections among these issues and the specialization of educational leadership. Your content, however, is not well organized so even though there is a connection to educational leadership, it is not clear as the connection from one issue to another. You need to reorganize and use connection phrase, word, and sentences.

    Criterion

    Analyze scholarly literature focused on the connections among issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse and a given educational specialization.

    Your Result:PROFICIENT

    Analyzes scholarly literature focused on the connections among issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse and a given educational specialization.

    Faculty Comments:I can see that you tried to synthesize the information but rather than show similarities among the findings in the literature, you demonstrated the differences.

    Criterion

    Evaluate challenges posed by issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse in a professional educational setting.

    Your Result:PROFICIENT

    Evaluates challenges posed by issues of ethical behavior, diversity, and civil discourse in a professional educational setting.

    Faculty Comments:Be more specific on the challenges posed by these issues and provide examples to illustrate your discussions.

    Competency 5

    Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and appropriate to purpose.

    Criterion

    Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions.

    Your Result:BASIC

    Organizes content with some logical flow, but some transitions are missing or unclear.

    Faculty Comments:You need to add transitional sentences so that the content flows more smoothly and your ideas are linked together.

    INSTRUCTOR NOTES FOR ASSESSMENT 2

    Because this was your final submission for this assessment (you submitted the wrong paper the first time), I was a little lenient on the APA formatting. There were errors that you will want to make sure you do not make on the next assessment. Also, the Pangram report indicated that the percentage of AI generated content was still at 49%. On your next assessment it needs to be 100% human written. I am not sure how you are using AI but you need to trust your own skills and not use AI except to correct your grammar, for example. Do not let any AI program change your sentence structure or content.

    E. Waller

    Scoring Guide

    Competency 1

    Determine how action research and systems thinking apply to professional problems, challenges, or issues in education.

    Criterion

    Provide a detailed description and examples illustrating how a chosen topic relates specifically to one’s specialization.

    Your Result:DISTINGUISHED

    Provides a detailed description, examples illustrating how a chosen topic relates specifically to one’s specialization, and rationale for the chosen examples.

    Faculty Comments:First Review – You submitted Assessment 3 for Assessment 2. I emailed you but you didn’t respond so I had to return it to you. Just resubmit with the correct assessment. First Review – You resubmitted but the Pangram report indicates that it is 100% AI generated. So, we need to talk about this. Third Review – You have described how this topic relates to the specialization of educational leadership.

    Criterion

    Analyze information gathered in a literature review.

    Your Result:PROFICIENT

    Analyzes information gathered in a literature review.

    Faculty Comments:First Review – You submitted Assessment 3 for Assessment 2. I emailed you but you didn’t respond so I had to return it to you. Just resubmit with the correct assessment. First Review – You resubmitted but the Pangram report indicates that it is 100% AI generated. So, we need to talk about this. Third Review – What questions were not answered in your search of the literature. Is more research needed on this topic?

    Competency 2

    Apply information literacy skills to locate and critically evaluate scholarly data, theories, and research.

    Criterion

    Evaluate scholarly articles using principles of critical thinking.

    Your Result:PROFICIENT

    Evaluates scholarly articles using principles of critical thinking.

    Faculty Comments:First Review – You submitted Assessment 3 for Assessment 2. I emailed you but you didn’t respond so I had to return it to you. Just resubmit with the correct assessment. First Review – You resubmitted but the Pangram report indicates that it is 100% AI generated. So, we need to talk about this. Third Review – Synthesize the findings by discussing how scholars or researchers shared similar ideas.

    Criterion

    Incorporate scholarly journal articles relevant to one’s study.

    Your Result:DISTINGUISHED

    Incorporates more than five scholarly journal articles relevant to one’s study and provides rationale for the chosen articles.

    Faculty Comments:First Review – You submitted Assessment 3 for Assessment 2. I emailed you but you didn’t respond so I had to return it to you. Just resubmit with the correct assessment. First Review – You resubmitted but the Pangram report indicates that it is 100% AI generated. So, we need to talk about this. Third Review – You have incorporated five articles in support of your arguments.

    Competency 5

    Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and appropriate to purpose.

    Criterion

    Integrate appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and APA citation style.

    Your Result:PROFICIENT

    Integrates appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and APA citation style.

    Faculty Comments:First Review – You submitted Assessment 3 for Assessment 2. I emailed you but you didn’t respond so I had to return it to you. Just resubmit with the correct assessment. First Review – You resubmitted but the Pangram report indicates that it is 100% AI generated. So, we need to talk about this. Third Review – There are errors in your APA formatting that need to be corrected.

    THE MATRIX DOCUMENT HAS TO BE COMPLETE BASED OFF THE NOTES FROM THE INSTRUCTOR LISTED FOR ASSESSMENT 2 AND 3

    Requirements: READ CAREFULLY

  • Writing Question

    Read the section in your textbook on Baumrind’s parenting styles (p. 98-100). This section discusses three distinct parenting styles and outcomes. Here is a very brief description of the three styles discussed:

    1. Authoritarian: strict rules, little rationale given for the rules, because I say so, rules are enforced with punishment
    2. Overly Permissive: few rules, rare punishment, child given too much autonomy and independence at too early of an age
    3. Authoritative: parent as authority figure, provides good explanations for rules, free discussion of rules with child, children more involved, tend to use reinforcement more than punishment
    For this weeks assignment, please address the following questions, making sure to include factual, properly cited information in your post:
    What parenting and discipline style(s) did your parents or caregivers use with you? Please include a rationale for your view, including an explanation of how it fits the stated parenting styles. How do you think it has impacted your life? After reading the research, would you choose the same or a different method to raise your own children? Please explain your responses.
    Directions:
    1. Write at least 250 words about this topic and be sure to answer all 3 questions listed above.
    2. Make sure to cite a source in your journal assignment using APA style. The source may be your textbook or any other source you research.

    Requirements: 1000

  • WEEK 6 DISCUSSION 1

    This discussion thread is designed to help you see how a synthesis of sources essay, or literature review, is organized.

    Please download the article, “Converging Recommendations for Culturally Responsive Literacy Practices: Students with Learning Disabilities, English Language Learners, and Socioculturally Diverse Learners,” by Susan V. Piazza, Shaila Rao, and Maria Selena Protacio. The article is available in the following link: . https://learn.umgc.edu/content/enforced/1381558-003683-01-2262-US1-6382/Converging%20Recommendations.pdf

    On pages 1-4, the authors provide an introduction to the research study they conducted including a discussion of the theoretical background and methodology. On pages 5-7, the authors discuss the review process and an analysis of the sources reviewed. On pages 8-13, the authors consider and evaluate the research findings and provide the conclusions. Please read over the literature review and take notes on the material provided.

    Then answer the following questions:

    1. In the first paragraph, do the authors ever give you their opinion on the “instructional recommendations for culturally responsive literacy practices?” How many different sources do they cite in this section?
    2. From pages 8-13, the authors discuss different best practices for a culturally responsive teaching environment. Identify the five specific strategies that they discussed. In this section, are the authors introducing original strategies for the culturally responsive classroom?
    3. Examine the section entitled “Dialogue” (pp. 8-9). What are the two recommendations discussed for the use of dialogue in culturally responsive ways? On page 8, Kim, et. al (2006) present collaborative strategic reading as a way to help students develop literacy skills. Please name some of the other recommendations for dialogue between students and teachers that follow this source. How do the other recommendations relate to the ideas proposed by Kim, et. al (2006)? Remember to cite the sources in your response.
    4. As a result of having read this article, please write a few sentences about what you might have learned about a) synthesizing sources or b) culturally responsive teaching practices for diverse populations.
  • Writing Question

    You will see an attachment with the compelling and powerfully sentence. They have to be used in the paper. One goes at the beginning and one goes at the end.

    Please include the plagarism report and please use pangram.com to include the AI report. This paper need to be 100 percentt human. I will check on my end also before submission.

    Requirements: Read the page requirement carefully

  • Writing Question

    Essay Topic:

    A World of Balance and Plenty: The interaction between humans and nature (land, water, plants, animals) in California history.

    OR

    Milestones in California History: Events and/or Movements That Shaped California History

    Directions:

    These are obviously a very broad essay topic options.

    You choose which essay topic you would like to write about. In either case, plan to write about a minimum of two, and a maximum of four specific sub-topics in your essay. You may choose from anything covered in this course, and anything covered in your class textbook. The point of this essay is for you to tie together various elements and aspects of California History, by drawing comparisons or cause and effect relationships.

    The purpose of this essay is for you to think about the material that you have studied throughout this course. Provide your own analysis of the impact and legacy of the various historical eras and events that you have studied. You are not expected to discuss every era that we covered in this course. I will be looking for your ability to tie various historical movements/eras/phenomena together and show how they are connected.

    If you would like to run by me your sub-topics that you plan to include in your essay, feel free to do so by sending me a private message.

    Suggestions for proceeding with this assignment:

    1) Look through your previous work for this class to refresh your memory on what you have learned.

    2) Look through the textbook and make note of historical sub-topics that you think you would like to include in your essay.

    4) Pick 2 to 4 sub-topic to include in your essay. Run them past me via private message if you like. Read up on those from the textbook.

    5) Draft your essay. Put an extra emphasis on showing connections between the sub-topics and relating them to each other.

    6) If you have questions for me, contact me by private message sooner than later. Don’t wait until the last minute.

    Sources: the textbook and any other readings provided within this course if and when appropriate. You do not need to conduct outside research for this essay.

    Special Note: AI generated content, and AI enhanced content (such as grammar or writing style assistance) are not allowed. I do not grade on grammar. It is more important to me that I am reading YOUR words, vocabulary, ideas and writing style.

    Length: 4 full pages to 5 pages (aim for 1500 words), typed, double-spaced, 12 font.

    Format Options:

    Your work must be submitted as an attachment, using one of these file types: .doc, .docx, .pdf, .rtf

    Requirements: however it says