Bright Academic Experts

Category: Writing

  • UNIT 4 JOURNAL ASSIGNMENT HA515

    Instructions:

    In 350500 words, answer each aspect of the journal prompt. The tone of the writing should be more like a diary write from the heart! References are not required, though if there are books/articles that impacted your answers to the questions, please mention them.

    Journal Prompts:

    • What is a shared vision, and how can you communicate it effectively?
    • Answer questions on pages 5355 of the LCW.

    PLEASE ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS ON the ATTACHMENT (PAGE 53-55)

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): JamesMKouzesBa_2017__TheLeadershipChalleng.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Individual project #4

    Assignment Details

    Unit 4 – Individual Project (125 points)

    Due: Sun, Feb 1 |

    Description

    Unit 4 Case Study

    You are a newly licensed registered nurse (RN) working on a busy medical-surgical unit. During a busy shift, a colleague administers the wrong dosage of a high-risk medication to a patient with multiple chronic conditions. The error was discovered shortly afterward and reported promptly, and the patient fortunately did not experience long-term harm. The patient and family were notified of the error by the physician.

    Upon investigation, it was revealed that the barcode medication administration (BCMA) system had been temporarily disabled because of a software update. Additionally, the unit was understaffed, and recent policy changes at the state level have limited overtime, making shift coverage difficult. The nurse involved followed hospital policy in documenting and reporting the error but was later reprimanded by the nurse manager, leading to concern from other staff who might otherwise report near-miss incidents. As a new nurse, you are aware of National Patient Safety Goals (NPSGs) (e.g., medication safety and communication during transitions) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Qualitys (AHRQs) Culture of Safety. You are also aware that there has been prosecution of a nurse recently who made a medication error, despite the nursing profession supporting a just culture and shared accountability of system errors. You are now wondering whether nursing is the right profession for you.

    Do not alter the template. Please submit your assignment using the template.

    Complete the following steps:

    1. Begin by restating the case study in full, using your own words to demonstrate comprehension and contextual understanding (as if you personally experienced the situation).
    2. After completing Phase 1 (Description), continue with Phases 26 of the Gibbs Reflective Cycle. In addition to identifying the domain, competency, and concept in Question 1, you are also required to include these elements in Phase 6 (Action Plan), where applicable.

    It is understood that not every competency may apply to Phases 1 or 6; however, by the end of the full analysis, all required domains and competencies from the rubric must be addressed.

    Be sure to clearly label and explain the relevant AACN domain(s), competencies, and concepts demonstrated in your responsesespecially within your Action Plan.

    Please submit your assignment.

    For assistance with your assignment, please use your textbook and all course resources.

    Individual Project Rubric

    The Individual Project (IP) Grading Rubric is a scoring tool that represents the performance expectations for the IP. This grading rubric is divided into components that provide a clear description of what should be included within each component of the IP. It is the road map that can help you in the development of your IP.

    Requirements: good explanation

  • dq2

    1.Reflect on your time in the classroom as an elementary age student. Which classes were you most engaged in and why? How did your level of engagement connect to your performance in the course?

    2.How does a well-managed classroom foster respect between the students and the teacher? Provide one example of the teachers role and one example of the student role in establishing and maintaining a well-managed classroom.

  • Writing Question

    Q: Provide me gallary/exhibition info which you visited or used in last assignment

    A: Fowler museum at UCLA. Need to find an exhibit there online.

    Now that we have talked about visitor engagement as one of the important things that museum exhibitions do in your own time. Instead of focusing on collections and provenance, answer the following 2 questions in 12 pages. You can simply answer the questionsno need to do a formal essay.

    1. Which gallery/exhibition did you visit?
    2. Please describe how the gallery engages visitors.
      a. Identify at least 2 strategies, and give specific examples. Feel free to take photos as evidence.
      b. How are these strategies supported by the academic literature you have read? Please cite specific readings.
    3. How effective do you think these strategies are? In your experience, does the content of the exhibition help visitors better understand the topic?

    Requirements: as above

  • Writing Question

    I want the plagiarism report for the paper i i will provide you once we match.

    Requirements: as long as it needs

  • Refliction

    GET OUT (Reflection)

    Note: A Plagiarism and A.I. Checker is implemented and conducted on this assignment as you turn it in.

    In this reflection, pick one of these themes from the film and analyze it.

    Microaggressions

    Liberal Racism

    Complicity of White Women

    Isolation

    In 2 pages double spaced, answer the follow questions. Please make this detailed for full credit.

    1) What drew you to picking one of these topics?

    2) How does this film address the theme you discussed. Give examples from the film. Does Peele effectively portray this, why or why not?

    3) Have you ever seen this play out in real life or your own life? Think: Social situations, social media, politics, etc.

    The film is GET OUT (2017) By Jordan Peele

    Requirements: 2 pages

  • Reflection

    GET OUT (Reflection)

    A Plagiarism and A.I. Checker is implemented and conducted on this assignment as you turn it in.

    In this reflection, pick one of these themes from the film and analyze it

    Microaggressions

    Liberal Racism

    Complicity of White Women

    Isolation

    In 2 pages double spaced, answer the follow questions. Please make this detailed for full credit.

    1) What drew you to picking one of these topics?

    2) How does this film address the theme you discussed. Give examples from the film. Does Peele effectively portray this, why or why not?

    3) Have you ever seen this play out in real life or your own life? Think: Social situations, social media, politics, etc.

    The Film is Get Out (2017) Jordan Peele

    Requirements: 2 pages

  • Reflection and Skill Assignment #1

    please read instructions

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Reflection and Skill Assignment 1 – Chapters 1 3 and 4-2.docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • IRB

    The next step is for you to submit the documents outlined below.

    Given the responses you provided, it appears you will be following the . Is that accurate? If so, then we will also need a draft of your invitation (using the template in appendix B in the manual), a draft of your consent form (using the template in appendix C in the manual), and a copy of your human subjects protection training completion certificate, please (see additional instructions at the end of this email).

    Please note, attached to this email is a copy of your Form A. Should you need to make any changes to the information in Form A, please update this Word document version with those revisions.

    Alternatively, if you prefer not to follow this manual, please reply to this email to confirm, and we can provide guidance on your next steps.

    If you are following the , please email your documents (as attachments) directly to , once your committee chair has approved for your to do so. Please ensure that your committee chair is CCd on this submission (and all future submissions).

    If you have any questions about what is needed for the next step in this review process you may email those to .

    If you have not yet completed the CITI training, when you access the site you will need to Register for an account. You will be asked to Select Your Organization Affiliation and you should enter Walden University. Then follow the steps to complete your registration.

    **Note: If you have taken the NIH training and have a copy of that certificate, you are welcome to submit that document instead. However, as of September 27, 2018, the NIH website ceased offering their training and provided no option to download previous completion certificates from their site.

    Sincerely,

  • Ethos and rhetorical analysis of lived experience

    Essay 1: Living and Framing the Actions According to Ethos (How Am I Connected?) Length: Approximately 900 words Points: 100 Due: January 30, 2026, by 11:59 PM Submission: Blackboard (.docx or .pdf) Assignment Overview In Weeks 1 and 2, we examined how writing responds to a rhetorical situation, how meaning emerges through the rhetorical triangle(writer, audience, purpose), and how ethos credibilityis established through action rather than asserted through claims. For this essay, you will apply these concepts to your own lived experience. Rather than analyzing a published text, you will analyze a specific action, decision, or sequence of actions you took and examine how that action functioned rhetorically. You will ask: How am I connected to this situation through my actionsand how does that connection shape credibility? This is not a personal narrative written for self-expression. It is a rhetorical analysis of lived experience, using storytelling as evidence and rhetorical theory as an analytical lens. Purpose of the Assignment: This assignment is designed to help you: Identify and respond to a rhetorical situation Apply the rhetorical triangle to lived experience Understand ethos as situational, relational, and action-based Practice framing experience rhetorically for an academic audience Reflect on how stakes and consequences shape credibility Ethos Framework: Framing Lived Action: Your essay must engage explicitly and intentionally with at least one of Aristotles three forms of ethos: Phronesis (Practical Wisdom): How did your actions demonstrate judgment, insight, or awareness of the situation? Arte (Ethical Character): How did your actions reflect values such as responsibility, integrity, or accountability? Eunoia (Goodwill Toward Others): How did your actions demonstrate fairness, care, or concern for others involved? You may use more than one form of ethos, but your analysis should remain focused. Ethos should be shown through action and reflection, not asserted through self-description. Your Task Write an essay of approximately 900 words that: Describes a specific action, decision, or sequence of actions you undertook Frames that action within a rhetorical situation (audience, purpose, context, and stakes) Analyzes how ethos was produced through the action Reflects on how credibility was established, challenged, or negotiated Clearly connects lived experience to rhetorical concepts from class Important: You are not being evaluated on whether your action was right or successful. You are being evaluated on how effectively you frame the action rhetorically and analyze its role in shaping credibility. Audience & Tone: Your audience includes: Your classmates Your instructor Write in a clear, reflective academic tone appropriate for a first-year writing course. First-person (I) is appropriate, but your focus should remain on rhetorical framing, not confession or opinion. Formatting & Submission Requirements Length: Approximately 900 words Spacing: Double-spaced Font: 12-point standard academic font Margins: 1 inch File format: .docx or .pdf Submission: Blackboard No outside research is required unless approved by the instructor. Note to Students: This assignment mirrors the concepts introduced in class. You are being assessed on how effectively you frame lived action through ethos within a rhetorical situation, not on having the right experience or outcome.