Category: Writing

  • need help answering the question

    Please answer:

    1) From Paris is Burning to #dragrace, Felman and Hakim (2020), how has drag culture impacted the way that drag queens understand, perform themselves, and question drag identity politics?

    Requirement: This reading response is asking to only refer to one weekly article, Felman and Hakim (2020), in connection with class video, Paris is Burning, 1990. Only 500 words.

  • Writing Question

    You cannot complete this assignment until after you have completed the final project!

    Please write a 2.5-3 page paper (doubled spaced) explaining how your final project demonstrates best practices in public history.

    Think about the decisions that you and your group made, and why you made them.

    Think about how you have applied theories and practices of public history learned in the course to this practical project.

    You may wish to talk about how you would do things differently if you did not have the constraints of this course.

    You should draw upon and cite at least three sources, using Chicago-style footnotes.* You can and should use course readings as your sources. It is ok to use additional sources, but it is not a requirement. Don’t turn this assignment into a research project!

    This paper should be written in an academic style, but use of the first person is ok. This means that:

    First person statements like “our group chose to structure the exhibition in this way because…” or “I selected this image because…” are ok

    Statements about your feelings, like “I enjoyed this project” are NOT OK

    Statements about your group dynamic or complaints about other group members are NOT OK

    Do not simply describe what you did. Explain why you did it.

    *Three sources means three different sources by three different authors. Multiple chapters within the same book count as one source. All parts of the History, Past and Public Culture survey count as one source.

    Its re this project

    Its a proposal : ask for proposal file

    Course reading and sources are here: ask for syllabus

  • Writing Project 4: Steps 1 and 2 Research Your Agent of Chan…

    Instructions

    Step 1 Watch this video

    Step 2 Read this Lecture

    Step 3 Visit the Library

    Our library is a strong source for academic articles. Please use the search engine explained in the above video to find your research.

    To complete this research, please follow our carefully.

    Visit the to conduct your search. You will be asked for your log in information, which will be the same as WebAdvisor.

    Step 3 Locate 1 News Article on Your Agent of Change

    Locate a Newspaper article or scholarly article about the actual person (Agent of Change) from a reputable source.

      • New York Times
      • Washington Post
      • NPR

    For example: Cesar Chavez

        • News article (from a reputable source) on Person

    Step 4 List the Characteristics of Your Agent of Change

    After reading the news article on your Agent of Change and doing some further research, please list at least 10 attributes that made him/her a solid and successful Agent of Change in a Word doc.

    Step 5 Locate 1 Scholarly Article on His/Her Cause

    Locate a scholarly article on his/her cause.

    For example: Cesar Chavez

          • Scholarly Article on Migrant Workers (Cause)

    Carefully read and annotate your chosen article(s). Keep your notes, as you will fill out the annotation worksheet for submission.

    Step 6 Complete Reading Response Annotation Worksheet for the Scholarly Article

    • Perform each step as directed in the handout
    • Provide MLA citations as needed

      Step 7 Save and Submit Both Documents

    • Annotation worksheet in the scholarly article
    • List of attributes about your Agent of Change Note: The actual person that I want to write about is “Malala Yousafzai”
  • Harry Potter, The boy who lived

    Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone (1997) by J.K. Rowling follows a young wizard, Harry, who discovers his magical identity and attends Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. Along with friends Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger, Harry navigates school life, uncovering mysteries like the Philosopher’s Stone while facing dark wizard Lord Voldemort, who killed his parents.

    Key Aspects & Notes:

    • Characters: Harry Potter (The Boy Who Lived), Hermione Granger (intelligent, loyal friend), Ron Weasley (loyal friend, comic relief), Albus Dumbledore (wise headmaster), Severus Snape (hostile potions master), Draco Malfoy (rival student), and Lord Voldemort (villain, wants immortality).
    • Setting: Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, a magical boarding school, is the primary setting, along with the Dursleys’ house on Privet Drive (the Muggle world).
    • Themes: Friendship, bravery, good vs. evil, and identity are core themes.
    • Key Plot Points: Harry discovers he is a wizard (thanks to Hagrid), faces Voldemort’s return in several forms, and grows from a neglected child into a courageous hero in a seven-book arc.

    Musical Notes (Hedwig’s Theme – Piano):

    • Opening Sequence: E – A – C – B – A – E – D – B – A – C – B – G – B – E.
    • Alternative Part: E G F# D# F B G B.
  • Lab 5: Properties of Seawater

    Instructions

    In this lab, we will investigate water properties including temperature, salinity, and density. We will examine temperature variations at different depths and latitudes, observe how ocean water forms distinct layers, and explore the relationship between salinity and density using measurement instruments. Additionally, we will analyze water samples from an estuary to determine salinity levels and assess potential sources of pollution. By the end of the lab, we will gain a better understanding of how seawater properties are measured and the valuable oceanographic information they provide.

    After completing this lab you will be able to:

    • Examine the properties of seawater, including temperature, salinity, and density.
    • Analyze temperature and salinity variations to understand ocean layering.
    • Work with temperature, salinity, and density data measured using analytical instruments and explore the relationships of these water parameters.
    • Assess estuarine water samples for salinity levels and potential pollution sources.

    Equipment and Supplies:

    • Pencils and rulers

    Tools and materials used:

    • Mobile phone, tablet, or computer.

    Instructions

    1. Complete the lab assignment

    • Review the instructions and begin answering the questions. The questions are embedded within the instructions for reference and will also appear when you start the untimed quiz. Your progress is saved, allowing you to continue your work at any time.
    • You will be provided with a digital handout. You may download the fillable PDF file by . I suggest opening it in , which allows you to fill in the blanks. Most modern PDF readers should also work. Alternatively, you can print the handout and complete it by hand.

    2. Take and submit a photo as proof of your lab work

    • Take a photo of your handwritten notes, a drawing, or a screenshot of your work to document your lab progress.

    Part 1 – Temperature Variations in the Ocean

    The temperature of ocean water is not uniform at all latitudes or depths. Instead, it has a layered structure. These layers can be identified by measuring the temperature at different depths, creating what is known as a temperature profile of the water column (Figure 1). These profiles vary across different regions of the globe, classified as low latitudes (near the equator), mid-latitudes, and high latitudes (polar regions). The main factor controlling temperature in these profiles is the amount of sunlight reaching the ocean surface, which varies by latitude. Low latitudes receive direct sunlight year-round, warming surface waters, while high latitudes receive less energy, resulting in cooler temperatures.

    Figure 1. Idealized temperature profiles for different latitudes and seasons

    Watch the following video on how temperature and salinity are measured in the ocean:

    Activity 1. Interpreting Ocean Temperature Profiles

    In this activity, you will examine how temperature changes with depth and varies with latitude by using the provided figures to answer the questions.

    Procedure:

    • Examine the typical temperature profiles for different latitudes (Figure 1) and use your interpretations and the internet to answer the questions in this section.

    Question 1: What temperature profile has the warmest water in the ocean and why?

    Question 2: How does temperature change with depth in profiles A and B?

    Question 3: What is the name of the vertical zone where temperature changes rapidly?

    Question 4: How does the temperature profile B differ from profile A?

    Question 5: Why do you think there is seasonal variation in profile B?

    Question 6: How does the temperature profile C compare to A and B?

    Part 2 – Warming of the Surface Ocean

    Activity 2. Ocean Temperature Experiment

    In this activity, we will simulate ocean heating by using a container of water with thermometers placed at various depths to measure temperature changes. A source of light heated the water for 60 minutes and temperature changes were continuously monitored at each depth. You may observe the experimental setup in Figure 2.

    Figure 2. Water container being heated by a light source

    Procedure:

    • Review the temperature readings for each time interval (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 minutes) and depth (0 cm, 4 cm, 8 cm, and 16 cm) recorded by the digital thermometers and presented in Lab 5 Worksheet 1.
    • Using the data in Lab 5 Worksheet 1, calculate the average, minimum, and maximum temperatures for each depth and enter your results in the table.
    • On the grid paper in Lab 5 Worksheet 2, plot and label the data for each time interval. The graph should display seven curves, one for each recorded time point.
    • Analyze the trends shown in your graph and answer the interpretation questions that follow.

    Question 7: What was the highest and the lowest temperature measured in the ocean temperature experiment?

    Question 8: Briefly describe the results. Did a thermocline develop in the water tank?

    Question 9: Compare the lab experiment to real ocean conditions. How do they differ?

    Question 10: What does the lamp in our experiment symbolize in a real ocean scenario?

    Part 3 – Seawater Salinity

    Salinity refers to the concentration of dissolved salts in seawater and plays a key role in determining water density. Higher salinity increases density, while lower salinity decreases it. This relationship affects ocean circulation, stratification, and marine ecosystems. Salinity is expressed in permil () and is equivalent to parts per thousand (ppt), which represent the amount of dissolved salts in water per thousand parts. For example, a salinity of 35 means there are 35 grams of dissolved salts per 1,000 grams of seawater. Coastal environments experience changing salinity due to the mixing of freshwater and seawater. In an estuary, freshwater from a river flows into the ocean, creating a salinity gradient. Near the river mouth, salinity is low (0 to 3 ), but as water moves toward the ocean (salinity of 35-38 ), it gradually increases as freshwater and seawater mix. This gradual variation in salinity strongly influences the coastal environment.

    Watch the following video on how water is sampled in estuaries:

    Activity 3. Determining Salinity of Water Samples

    In this activity, you will act as an oceanographer studying the Coyote Estuary. This is a fragile environment where freshwater mixes with seawater. High toxin levels have been detected, and there is strong evidence of damage to the ecosystem. Griffin Chemical Company, located upriver, denies responsibility, suggesting toxins come from the Pacific Ocean. To test this claim, seawater samples were collected from different locations (Figure 3).

    Figure 3. Sampling map of the Coyote Estuary

    We will use the following methods to determine salinity:

    Method 1: Hydrometer

    A hydrometer is used to measure the density and temperature of a sample (Figure 4). When placed in water, it sinks lower in low-salinity samples and floats higher in high-salinity samples. Using the density and temperature measurements, salinity can be estimated by finding their intersection on the graph provided in Figure 5.

    Method 2: Refractometer

    Salinity and temperature affect seawater density. A refractometer measures how light bends through water, allowing to determine salinity (Figure 6). A few drops of the sample are placed on the prism and the transparent cover is gently closed to spread the liquid evenly. The salinity reading is obtained by looking through the eyepiece toward a light source.

    Procedure:

    First, we will measure density, temperature, and salinity of the provided water samples.

    • Seawater samples were stored in labeled plastic containers and placed next to labeled graduated cylinders that were used for the measurements.
    • The hydrometer and refractometer were always rinsed with deionized water before and after measuring each sample to prevent contamination. The wash bottle was used to direct deionized water at the instruments, and the waste was collected in a glass beaker.

    Question 11: Could a higher salinity sample contaminate a lower salinity sample?

    Question 12: Could a lower salinity sample interfere with the readings of a higher one?

    • The density and temperature for each sample were measured directly from each graduated cylinder using the hydrometer (Method 1), and the results were recorded in Lab 5 Worksheet 3.
    • Salinity was measured by using the plastic pipette to place a few droplets of each sample on the refractometer (Method 2). The results of each refractometer reading is shown in Figure 7. Record your results in Lab 5 Worksheet 3.

    Then, we will analyze our data in order to find out if the Griffin Chemical Company is the source of pollution of the estuary.

    • Calculate the average salinity for each sample and record it in Lab 5 Worksheet 4.
    • Refer to the map in Figure 3 to determine the distance (in kilometers) of each sample location from the chemical company, measuring from the point where chemicals would potentially enter the water near the chemical company.
    • Complete Lab 5 Worksheet 4 and plot the data in Lab 5 Worksheet 5 to analyze trends. You will create two graphs on the same plot using two datasets from the table:
      • One dataset would be salinity vs distance from the chemical company.
      • Another dataset will be toxin count vs distance from the chemical company.
      • Clearly label each data set and color differently to differentiate between the two.

    Question 13: After studying your data, explain why salinity vary across the estuary.

    Question 14: According to your results, is there enough evidence to affirm that
    Griffin Chemical Company is responsible for high toxin levels in the estuary?

    Question 15: What further studies or analyses would you suggest conducting to fully confirm your conclusion?

    The Quiz:

    Q1. What temperature profile has the warmest water in the ocean and why?
    Q2. How does temperature change with depth in profiles A and B?
    Q3. What is the name of the vertical zone where temperature changes rapidly?
    Q4. How does the temperature profile B differ from profile A?
    Q5. Why do you think there is seasonal variation in profile B?
    Q6. How does the temperature profile C compare to A and B?
    Q7. What was the highest and the lowest temperature measured in the ocean temperature experiment?
    Q8. Briefly describe the results. Did a thermocline develop in the water tank?
    Q9. Compare the lab experiment to real ocean conditions. How do they differ?
    Q10. What does the lamp in our experiment symbolize in a real ocean scenario?
    Q11. Could a higher salinity sample contaminate a lower salinity sample?
    Q12. Could a lower salinity sample interfere with the readings of a higher one?
    Q13. After studying your data, explain why salinity vary across the estuary.
    Q14.According to your results, is there enough evidence to affirm that
    Griffin Chemical Company is responsible for high toxin levels in the estuary?
    Q15. What further studies or analyses would you suggest conducting to fully confirm your conclusion?
    Q16. Upload the photo you took as proof of your completed lab work, which can be your handwritten notes, a drawing, or a screenshot of your work.

  • Writing Question

    ANSWER ONE QUESTION FROM SECTION A AND ONE QUESTION FROM SECTION B. EACH PAPER SHOULD BE THREE PAGES LONG.

  • lead405 work

    Complete all steps required so that it can be submitted when it returns!


    Assignment SUMMARY: This assignment asks you to use AI as a starting tool, not a shortcut, to explore leadership theories. First, you use AI to generate a short literature review connecting at least two leadership modelssuch as Transformational Leadership, Servant Leadership, Kouzes & Posners Leadership Model, or Adaptive Leadershipand relate them to your teams client, Dr. Gates, who leads the Leadership Studies Department and is exploring issues of employee and coworker burnout. Then, you fact-check everything yourselfby finding real scholarly sources, confirming they exist, and evaluating whether the AI was accurate using an audit table with quotes and page numbers. After that, you write your own independent analysis (no AI allowed) explaining how those leadership theories can help address burnout and support your teams consulting recommendations. Overall, the goal is to build research skills, critical thinking, and responsible AI use while applying leadership concepts to a real-world problem.

    RUBRIC & ASSIGNMENT DETAILS BELOW

    • Individual AI-Generated Literature Review, Source Verification Audit, & Original Application Analysis

      (Individual Submission 50 points)This assignment invites you to experiment responsibly with generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT) to curate a brief literature review that connects at least two leadership theories or models to the leadership challenge your team is consulting on. You will then independently verify the accuracy of the AI-generated content by locating and reviewing original scholarly sources. Finally, you will provide your own original analysis on how this knowledge can inform your teams intervention design for the client.This exercise supports research fluency, critical thinking, consulting credibility, and ethical AI literacy all essential skills for emerging leaders and leadership consultants.Important Guidelines:

      • You may use generative AI to help produce the literature review section only.
      • You may NOT use AI to write your application analysis or verification reflection.
      • You are responsible for verifying the credibility and existence of all cited sources.
      • You must locate and review at least one original scholarly source per leadership theory discussed.
      • Use AI as a tool not as a substitute for scholarly rigor or critical thinking.

      Component 1: AI-Generated Literature Review (Approx. 300400 words) 10 points

      Use a generative AI tool to assist in producing a short literature review that synthesizes insights from at least two different leadership theories or models (e.g., Transformational, Servant, Kouzes & Posner, Adaptive Leadership, etc.).To maximize learning and breadth of analysis, team members are encouraged to use different leadership theories or models from one another.You may need to prompt the AI multiple times to produce accurate and useful content. You are responsible for verifying the credibility of all cited sources.


      Component 2: AI Thread Submission (Copy/Paste) 5 points

      Include the entire AI conversation used to generate your literature review. This should show:

      • Your initial prompt
      • Any follow-up prompts or clarifications
      • The AIs full responses

      This transparency allows us to assess your prompting process and responsible use of AI tools.


      Component 3: AI Source Verification & Accuracy Audit 10 points

      Because generative AI tools may fabricate, distort, oversimplify, or misattribute leadership scholarship, you are required to independently verify the accuracy of the AI-generated literature review.For each leadership theory included, you must:

      1. Locate and review at least one original foundational or peer-reviewed scholarly source (e.g., original books, seminal journal articles).
      2. Confirm that the cited works actually exist.
      3. Evaluate whether the AI accurately represented the theory.

      Submit an AI Accuracy Audit Table that includes:

      AI Claim or Summary Statement Source AI Cited Full Original Source (APA) Accurate / Inaccurate / Misleading? Evidence from Original Text (Direct Quote + Page #)

      You must include:

      • At least one verified original source per theory
      • At least one direct quotation with page number per theory
      • A clear judgment about AI accuracy

      Failure to verify sources or identify fabricated citations will result in significant point deductions.


      Component 4: Self-Written Application Analysis (23 pages) 20 points

      Write an original, thoughtful analysis in your own voice that addresses:

      1. How the verified literature enhances your understanding of your client’s leadership challenge.
      2. How the theories/models reviewed can be applied to meet your clients needs.
      3. Any limitations or considerations in applying these frameworks in a real organizational context.
      4. How fact-checking the original sources influenced or deepened your understanding of the theory.

      You may NOT use AI for this portion of the assignment unless discussed with and approved by Dr. Aros.Your analysis should demonstrate critical thinking, applied leadership insight, and consulting-level reasoning.


      References 5 points

      Include a properly formatted APA reference list that contains:

      • At least two original scholarly sources (one per theory minimum)
      • Any additional peer-reviewed sources used
      • No fabricated or unverifiable citations

    RUBRIC

    1? AI-Generated Literature Review (10 points)

    You will be evaluated on:

    • Clear synthesis of at least two leadership theories/models
    • Accurate representation of core concepts
    • Evidence of thoughtful prompting and refinement of AI output
    • Coherent, academically framed writing

    Strong work moves beyond summary and shows conceptual connection between theories.


    2? AI Thread Transparency (5 points)

    You must submit your complete AI conversation, including:

    • Initial prompt
    • Follow-up prompts
    • Full AI responses

    Incomplete or edited threads will result in point deductions.


    3? AI Source Verification & Accuracy Audit (10 points)

    You must independently verify the accuracy of the AI-generated content.

    Strong submissions will:

    • Locate at least one original scholarly source per theory
    • Confirm that all cited sources actually exist
    • Include direct quotations with page numbers from original texts
    • Clearly evaluate whether AI representations were accurate, misleading, or incomplete
    • Fully complete the AI Audit table

    Failure to verify sources or inclusion of fabricated citations will significantly impact your grade.


    4? Self-Written Application Analysis (20 points)

    AI may NOT be used for this section.

    Your analysis should:

    • Demonstrate strong understanding of the verified theories
    • Apply leadership frameworks clearly and specifically to your clients challenge
    • Show consulting-level reasoning (feasible, strategic, contextualized recommendations)
    • Address limitations and real-world considerations
    • Reflect on how fact-checking influenced your understanding

    Strong submissions are thoughtful, applied, and professionally written.


    5? References & Scholarly Accuracy (5 points)

    • Proper APA formatting
    • Inclusion of original scholarly sources
    • No fabricated or unverifiable citations
  • s 4012 assess 5

    use pangram.com to check the percentage. IT NEED TO BE 100 PERCENT HUMAN WRITTEN NO AI AT ALL.

    Write a leader guidebook of best practices for new supervisors in your current organization or an organization with which you are familiar.

    This assessment provides you with the opportunity to demonstrate a solid theory of leadership in a practical application that you can use in your organization.

    The resources provided in this assessment cover both change renewal and chaos. Even though we fear change and long for the comfort of equilibrium, this closed and insulated stance means choosing to wear down and decay. When allowed to grow and evolve, living systems integrate diverse information through open feedback loops. Through self-referencing of values, traditions, aspirations, competency, and culture, systems recreate themselves in similar shapes. A leader’s role is to invite disturbance, to create dangerously, because disturbance leads to disequilibrium and, therefore, growth and resilience.

    By choosing to openly engage with change and remembering identity, leaders can increase speed to market and shape consumer preference. Although counterintuitive, the more freedom allowed in a self-organizing system, the more creative and adaptive it can be. Most innovation to the marketplace occurs through the adaptation to a customer’s request by one or two individuals. Information, rather than needing to be managed, needs to be shared and processed to increase awareness and consciousness of complexity and ambiguity. In the absence of information, people make it up. They will make their own meaning.

    It seems the leader’s role is to openly invite new and disturbing information and to allow the organization to learn, make sense of, and respond or adapt to a changing environment, trusting self-referencing and stressing long-term identity.

    The resources in this assessment also explore the paradox of order and chaoshow, over time and with a perspective toward wholeness, what might appear as chaos begins to build up a repeatable pattern of the strange attractor. In human systems, meaning, purpose, and mission are the organizing principles. Even a small change may result in a big impact on the whole system, and it is sometimes the slow but constant factor that is the unseen danger. So it is a combination of a leader holding tightly to vision and values while allowing individuals the freedom to act.

    Imagine it is your job to write a leader guidebook for new supervisors in your current organization or an organization with which you are familiar, based on a leadership theory. Your guide should include the following:

    • Descriptions of effective best practices and day-to-day behaviors that leaders should follow for planning, measuring, motivating people, managing change and information, designing jobs, and encouraging relationships.
    • Descriptions of ineffective practices that leaders should avoid in order to be successful.
    • Explanation of the importance and implications of the leadership theory to the success of the enterprise.
    • Examples and explanations for the positions you take.

    • Length: Your leader guidebook should be double-spaced and long enough to meet the expectations of the assessment and scoring guide criteria.
    • Font and size: Use a standard fonteither Times New Roman or Arial. The font size must be 12 point.
    • Margins: The paper margins should be 1 inch on each side.
    • Components: Include a title page, table of contents, and reference page.
    • Formatting: APA format is required for all aspects of your guidebook, including citations and references. Your writing should be well organized and clear. Writing structure, spelling, and grammar should be correct as well.
  • s 4012 assess 4

    MAKE SURE IT IS 100 HUMAN WRITTEN NO AI USE PANGRAM.COM TO CHECK YOUR PERCENT

    Create a 79 page leadership analysis using the narrative and summary of the leadership interviews you conducted.

    This assessment gives you the opportunity to synthesize and demonstrate your understanding and experience interviewing leaders and how the leadership characteristics you analyzed relate to leadership theories, the New Business Realities, and the Thinking Habits.

    The resources provided in this assessment explore how theory occurs in the human systems arena through culture, values, and ethics. Imagine purpose or direction working like gravity or a magnetic field to organize messy human behavior toward a unifying direction. A leader’s role is to state, clarify, discuss, model, and embody the values and purposes as a way to subtly create order and direction.

    The resources in this assessment also address the idea that what you see is what you get, meaning that we create self-fulfilling prophecies and shape reality just by deciding what to measure. It is important for leaders to understand that people support what they help create, and if the leaders want implementation, they have to promote ownership through participation. When leaders begin promoting ownership, they view job descriptions and organization charts differently. Their perspective moves toward a holistic approach to the interactions and connections between managers and employees or between departments. In the end, they serve all stakeholders better.

    Analysis of Interviews

    After you have written the interviews in narrative format and made the necessary adjustments based off of the feedback provided to you in Assessment 4, you will analyze the experience in the context of leadership theory and the common learning themes of the program: New Business Realities and The Thinking Habits of Mind, Heart, and Imagination.

    Topics to be addressed in your analysis include the following:

    1. : Did the interview reflect the dynamics of transformational change in complex systems in the change mastery questions?
    2. : Did the interview encourage professional self-development through conversational reflection in the questions on Personal Mastery?
    3. Leadership theory: Summarize the leadership theory that you used to develop your questions. Analyze how the questions and the data support your chosen leadership theories. You might use Servant Leadership, Kevin Cashman, Margaret Wheatley, or articles from the Center for Creative Leadership, Leadership stage theory, from Novatons, and other sources. Demonstrate your understanding of your chosen Mastery (Personal, Purpose, Change, Interpersonal/Being, Resilience, or Coaching). Use examples from your interviews to demonstrate your mastery topic.
    4. What did you learn as an interviewer? Write a section on your learning as an interviewer. What seemed to work? What did not work? And what would you do differently next time? How would you change your contract or your explanation of your leadership topic, the medium you chose, or your behavior during the interview, to enhance the quality of your data?
    5. Common Learning Themes: Reread the New Business Realities and The Thinking Habits of Mind, Heart, and Imagination. Select one topic from each and discuss its relevance to your experience interviewing leaders.
    6. Summary Statement. Think about your experience interviewing leaders at this level. Describe the primary lessons you gained from this experience, the value of interviewing leaders and the impact this approach has on leadership development. Include your recommendations to your organization about the development of leaders at this level and on this mastery topic and the use of interviews to propel personal development.

    Your paper should meet the following requirements:

    • Written communication: Should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
    • APA formatting: Use current APA style and formatting, paying attention to citations and references. Refer to for citing and referencing tips.
    • Length: 79 double-spaced pages, not including the title page or reference page.
    • References: Leader interviews with additional scholarly or professional resources optional.
    • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

    Edit and spell check your work before submitting.

  • s 4012 assess 3

    USE PANGRAM.COM TO MAKE SURE THE PAPER IS 100 PERCENT HUMAN WRITTEN AND NO AI WRITTEN

    Based on the interviews you completed in Assessment 2, write a report that describes your interview experiences, summarizes your findings, and analyzes your interviewees’ personal characteristics as they align with effective leadership.

    The purpose of this assessment is to consolidate your experience interviewing two leaders and to incorporate what you have learned thus far about the personal characteristics of effective leaders. Your assessment will reflect your insights about integrity, purpose, change, interpersonal skills, and maintaining balance (resilience), and will embody a meaningful leadership story at different levels of an organization’s leadership.

    Much of the traditional literature on organizations has been based on Newtonian images of the world as a mechanical operation where the manager’s task is to control outcomes, determine truth, and make sure things are right. New research has challenged many of these underlying assumptions, changing the thinking about organizations and the role of leaders. More emphasis is given to the importance of identity and evolving assumptions, such as the recognition of interconnectedness. The importance of relationship in providing the patterns of order and integrity is being recognized. Living systems are chaotic and constantly adapting, but out of the chaos a new order is created.

    Through dialogue, deep listening, and facilitating, leaders help followers create new knowledge and understanding of system patterns that allow a value-guided organization to let go of old patterns and reemerge adapted to a new reality. There is more recognition of the “boundary-less” nature of adaptive systems to their environments. Moreover, there is also an appreciation that values, mission, purpose, relationship, and accessibility of leaders play critical roles in the survival of their systems. Living systems will naturally respond and adapt to their environments, making the leader’s job much more one of empowering, encouraging relationships, and facilitating the conversation about adaptation.

    Execute your plan. Interview two leaders. Write up your notes, including examining interviewees’ personal characteristics and respond to the following:

    • What worked?
    • What did not work?
    • What would you do differently next time?
    • What did you learn about interviewing?
    • What did you learn about your topic and its potential for helping leaders examine their leadership skills and characteristics?
    • How might the alignment to effective leadership be used in your own career progression?
    • Summarize interview findings that contribute to effective leadership.

    Your paper should meet the following requirements:

    • Written communication: Should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
    • APA formatting: Use current APA style and formatting, paying attention to citations and references. Refer to for citing and referencing tips.
    • Length: 56 double-spaced pages, not including the title page or reference page.
    • References: Leader interviews with additional scholarly or professional resources optional.
    • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

    Edit and spell check your work before submitting.