English 105 assignment. Full detailed outline 500-700 words in length. No AI usage. I have attached pictures and also my proposal from assignment 1 to reflect on. Which she gave me a 18/50 for my proposal lol. All the pictures didnt add if I need to add more I will.

2,000 word paper, less then 5% or no AI detection. APA format

I provided documents that give instructions. Its due at 11:59 but I would need it at least 15 minutes before to make any required changes.

• Individual AI-Generated Literature Review, Source Verification Audit, & Original Application Analysis

  (Individual Submission 50 points)This assignment invites you to experiment responsibly with generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT) to curate a brief literature review that connects at least two leadership theories or models to the leadership challenge your team is consulting on. You will then independently verify the accuracy of the AI-generated content by locating and reviewing original scholarly sources. Finally, you will provide your own original analysis on how this knowledge can inform your teams intervention design for the client.This exercise supports research fluency, critical thinking, consulting credibility, and ethical AI literacy all essential skills for emerging leaders and leadership consultants.Important Guidelines:

  • You may use generative AI to help produce the literature review section only.
  • You may NOT use AI to write your application analysis or verification reflection.
  • You are responsible for verifying the credibility and existence of all cited sources.
  • You must locate and review at least one original scholarly source per leadership theory discussed.
  • Use AI as a tool not as a substitute for scholarly rigor or critical thinking.

  ---

  Component 1: AI-Generated Literature Review (Approx. 300400 words) 10 points

  Use a generative AI tool to assist in producing a short literature review that synthesizes insights from at least two different leadership theories or models (e.g., Transformational, Servant, Kouzes & Posner, Adaptive Leadership, etc.).To maximize learning and breadth of analysis, team members are encouraged to use different leadership theories or models from one another.You may need to prompt the AI multiple times to produce accurate and useful content. You are responsible for verifying the credibility of all cited sources.

  ---

  Component 2: AI Thread Submission (Copy/Paste) 5 points

  Include the entire AI conversation used to generate your literature review. This should show:

  • Your initial prompt
  • Any follow-up prompts or clarifications
  • The AIs full responses

  This transparency allows us to assess your prompting process and responsible use of AI tools.

  ---

  Component 3: AI Source Verification & Accuracy Audit 10 points

  Because generative AI tools may fabricate, distort, oversimplify, or misattribute leadership scholarship, you are required to independently verify the accuracy of the AI-generated literature review.For each leadership theory included, you must:

  1. Locate and review at least one original foundational or peer-reviewed scholarly source (e.g., original books, seminal journal articles).
  2. Confirm that the cited works actually exist.
  3. Evaluate whether the AI accurately represented the theory.

  Submit an AI Accuracy Audit Table that includes:

  AI Claim or Summary Statement	Source AI Cited	Full Original Source (APA)	Accurate / Inaccurate / Misleading?	Evidence from Original Text (Direct Quote + Page #)

  You must include:

  • At least one verified original source per theory
  • At least one direct quotation with page number per theory
  • A clear judgment about AI accuracy

  Failure to verify sources or identify fabricated citations will result in significant point deductions.

  ---

  Component 4: Self-Written Application Analysis (23 pages) 20 points

  Write an original, thoughtful analysis in your own voice that addresses:

  1. How the verified literature enhances your understanding of your client’s leadership challenge.
  2. How the theories/models reviewed can be applied to meet your clients needs.
  3. Any limitations or considerations in applying these frameworks in a real organizational context.
  4. How fact-checking the original sources influenced or deepened your understanding of the theory.

  You may NOT use AI for this portion of the assignment unless discussed with and approved by Dr. Aros.Your analysis should demonstrate critical thinking, applied leadership insight, and consulting-level reasoning.

  ---

  References 5 points

  Include a properly formatted APA reference list that contains:

  • At least two original scholarly sources (one per theory minimum)
  • Any additional peer-reviewed sources used
  • No fabricated or unverifiable citations

RUBRIC

1? AI-Generated Literature Review (10 points)

You will be evaluated on:

• Clear synthesis of at least two leadership theories/models
• Accurate representation of core concepts
• Evidence of thoughtful prompting and refinement of AI output
• Coherent, academically framed writing

Strong work moves beyond summary and shows conceptual connection between theories.

---

2? AI Thread Transparency (5 points)

You must submit your complete AI conversation, including:

• Initial prompt
• Follow-up prompts
• Full AI responses

Incomplete or edited threads will result in point deductions.

---

3? AI Source Verification & Accuracy Audit (10 points)

You must independently verify the accuracy of the AI-generated content.

Strong submissions will:

• Locate at least one original scholarly source per theory
• Confirm that all cited sources actually exist
• Include direct quotations with page numbers from original texts
• Clearly evaluate whether AI representations were accurate, misleading, or incomplete
• Fully complete the AI Audit table

Failure to verify sources or inclusion of fabricated citations will significantly impact your grade.

---

4? Self-Written Application Analysis (20 points)

AI may NOT be used for this section.

Your analysis should:

• Demonstrate strong understanding of the verified theories
• Apply leadership frameworks clearly and specifically to your clients challenge
• Show consulting-level reasoning (feasible, strategic, contextualized recommendations)
• Address limitations and real-world considerations
• Reflect on how fact-checking influenced your understanding

Strong submissions are thoughtful, applied, and professionally written.

---

5? References & Scholarly Accuracy (5 points)

• Proper APA formatting
• Inclusion of original scholarly sources
• No fabricated or unverifiable citations

In the prompt we need to follow these criterias: Double space times new 1inch margin,

I got more of the policy in terms of the quote and respond tot hte three pints what does he need to kow what does he need t know and include policy in there right now we are going alll over the place in various points and it is hard to follow the first page for example we dont get to the ducational point at the end we ned tog et it a little faster to help with length and shorten it get to the point faster under the point we talk about policy and we need to get to policy faster anad we get to the second point and got the poliand we dont get to antohr polcy we need to be more effceint with the use of space and more policy reference and anything realted to black families and black mandatory reproting and madnatoring supporting the nature of the system and how it has replciated what we have done to black familes and antive familes and talk about these things in the fficent way to move on. I want to see more

These are rhe comments she made during the zoom theres a lot of misspelling becusde I was speed typing

Maximum points: 35

o Writing style/presentation grammar, spelling, use of language,

persuasive and compelling; written in accordance with page limits and

organizational instructions; professional in tone (5)

o Organization well thought out, clear, concise, logical and orderly (10)

o Effort demonstrates thoughtfulness, care and creativity (5)

o Relationship to the class ties to our material, shows substantial

understanding of the material, includes substantial references to course

content (15)

UCLAs policies pertaining to academic integrity apply. Please do not submit a

paper written by AIAI papers get an automatic 0.

Assignment

Throughout our class we have discussed an array of topics, including the origins of the

child welfare system, the processes by which the child welfare system operates, and

various special issues impacting youth and families involved in the child welfare

system. We have reviewed federal, state and local laws and policies. Finally, we have

discussed other ways we can arrive at policy reform, such as individual advocacy and

the press. To that end, Andrea Elliotts book, Invisible Child, offers lawmakers,

advocates, students and our communities much to consider with respect to the child

welfare system and ongoing policy reform.

In 2013, Andrea Elliott and the New York Times covered Dasani and her family in a

5-part feature story. New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a policy maker,

later commented on the story and Dasanis family. As mayor, Bloomberg oversaw

the child welfare system among other relevant systems.

With the full extent of Dasanis story (as told in Invisible Child) in mind, please

prepare a letter to Mayor Bloomberg, in response to his remarks, citing relevant

concepts, law/policy from class and content from the book to support your

response. Specifically, please address Bloombergs points:

1. Hopefully the education she is getting will make a big difference and allow her to

realize the incredible potential and break the cycle of poverty that she was born

into.

2. This kid was dealt a bad hand, I dont quite know why, but its just the way God

works.

3. … the family situation is extremely atypical. The article implied that all people are

treated this way or all have the same problems and that just is not true.Given relevant concepts explored in class, including law and policy, your letter

should address:

– What does Mayor Bloomberg get right/wrong or overlook?

– What does he need to know about Dasanis family and others facing similar

circumstances?

– Do you suggest he reframe his remarks, and if so, how and on what basis?

Details

Your paper should be:

4 pages (not 3, not 5 or more 4!)

Double-spaced

Times New Roman 12pt font

1 inch margins

You MUST make reference to class slides, lectures, reading assignments, videos we

watched, and other class materials.1 Do not include outside research. Do not write a

paper about the housing crisis/homelessness.

This is not a book reportthis is an analysis of a policymakers response to system

failure. Please tie together course content with the book to demonstrate your

understanding of the class content as applied to a real world scenario.

Read Chapter 8: Children with Specific Learning Disabilities. Examine ways to facilitate the inclusion of all children into the childcare setting, with a clear understanding of the factors affecting the potential of each individual child and their family.

The textbook gives 16 guidelines that can be useful when including children with specific learning disabilities.

• Choose 6 that YOU feel are most important. List and briefly describe.
• List and briefly describe the 9 basics of RTI for students who need more structure and individualized learning tasks.

For this assignment you will research or visit others of another culture, religion, sexual orientation, ethnicity, organizations such as AA, BLM, LGBTQ+, Veterans, etc. or a combination of these. Share what you have learned using a Power Point, please indicate the following in your reflection:

1. What experience/place are you plan to research/visit?
2. What were your expectation before researching/visiting this experience?
3. What did you learn about while researching/visiting?
4. What are your thoughts about yourself, and your own identity based of what you have learned from this experience?

You may check with me if you are not sure what to research or where to visit or if you want to confirm if your choice is appropriate for this assignment. The goal of this assignment is for you to have a novel experience and get out of your comfort zone.

Cultural Plunge Assignment/Reflection

For this assignment you will research or visit others of another culture, religion, sexual orientation, ethnicity, organizations such as AA, BLM, LGBTQ+, Veterans, etc. or a combination of these. Share what you have learned using a Power Point, please indicate the following in your reflection:

1. What experience/place are you plan to research/visit?
2. What were your expectation before researching/visiting this experience?
3. What did you learn about while researching/visiting?
4. What are your thoughts about yourself, and your own identity based of what you have learned from this experience?

You may check with me if you are not sure what to research or where to visit or if you want to confirm if your choice is appropriate for this assignment. The goal of this assignment is for you to have a novel experience and get out of your comfort zone.

I am a student my hobbies article writing contest