Bright Academic Experts

Category: Writing

  • Writing Question

    I will attach photos of the specific instructions. Read this article and come up with points as it says in the instructions, to later write the essay based off these points. No writing full essay today, just complete this assignment.

  • Writing Question

    PLEASE REVISE THE ATTACHED PAPER. IT SUPPOSE TO BE NO AI USUAGE AND IT IS SHOWING 100 PERCENT AI. PLEASE USE PANGRAM TO MAKE SURE NO AI IS IN THE ATTACHMENT

    THIS IS WHAT THE ORIGINAL ASSIGNMENT SUPPOSE TO BE ABOUT

    In your previous communication challenge, you resolved a situation that became negative and was getting in the way of a team functioning.

    In this challenge, youve been given a task by your leader, and you need to bring your team along, not only to get past the previous negative communication but to buy into whats needed to move forward.

    To do that, you will think about what positive qualities support strong communication and effective teamwork. Youll need to decide what you want to advocate for. And then youll need the communication skills to bring others along on your plan. You will do that via video.

    Remember that a communication policy should be a formal, enforceable document that reinforces ethical behavior and acceptable methods for communication within and about the team. The policy should clearly define all actions and consequences, and you will need to present it in a way that encourages acceptance of the policy by the team. Your goals for this communication include the following:

    • Explain the communication issues that have led to the need for a new policy.
    • Create a communication policy that you will introduce to improve communications and assure people are working with a unified purpose.
    • Define your expectations, or contract, for ethical discourse in team communications.
    • Provide a rationale that addresses the importance of defining appropriate communication channels.

    Choose one of the following for your communication and be sure to cite all sources using APA reference style.

    • Record and submit a 45 minute video message using Kaltura to address each aspect of the scenario.
    • Create a presentation of 68 slides with speaker’s notes, not including title page and references.
    • Write a 23 page paper.

  • Writing Question

    My Social Problem topic is about the Juvenile justice system and how youth are trapped in cycles of punishment instead of receiving support. I dont need anything excessive for the presentation but just enough to answer the questions. Also the Orgin says lancaster pa but I will be focusing on PA in general. Also Please only use Google Scholar Sources. I have added all the files you may need and i will also add the presentation guidelines

  • Writing Question

    THIS ATTACHMENT NEED TO BE REVISED, IT IS SHOWING 100 PERCENT AI AND IT NEED TO SHOW 0 PERCENT AI

    THESE ARE THE ORIGINAL INSTRUCTIONS. USE PANGRAM TO CHECK TO MAKE SURE NO AI IS DETECTED

    In your previous communication challenge, you resolved a situation that became negative and was getting in the way of a team functioning.

    In this challenge, youve been given a task by your leader, and you need to bring your team along, not only to get past the previous negative communication but to buy into whats needed to move forward.

    To do that, you will think about what positive qualities support strong communication and effective teamwork. Youll need to decide what you want to advocate for. And then youll need the communication skills to bring others along on your plan. You will do that via video.

    In the CapraTek: Organizational Communication Policy activity, you observed more difficulties, indicating that the team needs your help overcoming their communication challenges. You have resolved to reset the team members attitudes so that they clearly understand your approach to future communication strategies and feel invested in the vision that you are laying out for them.

    Remember that a communication policy should be a formal, enforceable document that reinforces ethical behavior and acceptable methods for communication within and about the team. The policy should clearly define all actions and consequences, and you will need to present it in a way that encourages acceptance of the policy by the team. Your goals for this communication include the following:

    • Explain the communication issues that have led to the need for a new policy.
    • Create a communication policy that you will introduce to improve communications and assure people are working with a unified purpose.
    • Define your expectations, or contract, for ethical discourse in team communications.
    • Provide a rationale that addresses the importance of defining appropriate communication channels.

    Choose one of the following for your communication and be sure to cite all sources using APA reference style.

    • Record and submit a 45 minute video message using Kaltura to address each aspect of the scenario.
    • Create a presentation of 68 slides with speaker’s notes, not including title page and references.
    • Write a 23 page paper.

    Be sure your video meets the following requirements:

    • Communication: Although this is not performance art, you will be judged on the communication skills that you have studied in this course including your consideration of audience and content.
      • Organize content for ideas to flow logically with smooth transitions.
    • Format and length: Address all items defined in the scenario and instructions. Organize ideas to flow logically and with smooth transitions.
      • If you choose to submit a standard PowerPoint presentation, your presentation should consist of 68 slides, not including the title and references slides.
        • Use the speaker’s notes section within the PowerPoint slides to provide all the information relevant to each slide, which you would otherwise present verbally.
        • Each slide must have no more than 45 bullets and each bullet should summarize your point in 46 words.
        • Use graphics throughout the presentation, but ensure they are appropriate for the content provided and provide value.
      • If you choose to write a paper, it should be 23 pages, not including the title and reference pages.
    • Quality: Audio and visual quality should approximate that of a properly functioning video conference.
    • Visuals (if used): Create visuals that are easily read and interpreted. Use colors, fonts, formatting, and other design principles that make the information clear and generally add to the aesthetic of the presentation.
    • APA style and formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting standards.
      • Use for guidance in citing sources and formatting your paper in proper APA style. See the for more APA resources specific to your degree level.
      • Also refer to the , which provides basic formatting and APA guidelines you should follow to create attractive and usable documents not just within your business program but in the workplace as well.
    • Cited resources: Use a minimum of two scholarly sources. All literature cited should be current, with publication dates within the past five years.
    • Academic integrity and honesty: You must adhere to academic integrity and honesty policies and incorporate practices that support ethically sound work in your assessments. View .

    Before you submit your assessment, carefully read the grading criteria in the Communicating a Team Policy Scoring Guide to ensure you understand all of the requirements for success.

  • OMSW 681 ethics in addiction

    Overview and Purpose:

    Ethical practice, in alignment with the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) Code of Ethics, is an expectation for competent professional social work practice. This assignment is designed to enable the student to apply an ethical decision-making model to a specific ethical dilemma encountered during social work practice.

    Required Readings:

    Allen, K. (2012). What is an ethical dilemma? The New Social Worker, 19(2), 4-5. Retrieved from:

    Congress, E. (2000). What social workers should know about ethics: Understanding and resolving practice dilemmas. Advances in Social Work, 1(1), 1-22. Retrieved from:

    Assignment Instructions: (please use the below WORD document to complete both parts of the assignment)

    WORD document:

    Part One: Summary of Ethical Dilemma (about 1 page)

    Through dialogue with your colleagues and/or supervisors, identify a current or prior ethical dilemma you encountered in your social work practice. In about 1 page, provide a summary of the ethical dilemma.

    Part Two: ETHIC Model Table (about 5-7 pages)

    Apply the Congress (2000) model of ethical decision making (the ETHIC model) to the current or prior ethical dilemma by completing the ETHIC table. By the time the table is complete, it is usually 5-7 pages.

  • professional writing

    In this discussion post, you will explore two important aspects of report writing. First, reflect on how report writers can maintain objectivity and credibility when presenting information. Consider the strategies writers use to avoid bias, how they incorporate reliable sources, and the role that tone, formatting, and transparency play in building trust with readers. Think about challenges that may arise when trying to remain neutral, especially when dealing with controversial or emotionally charged topics.

    Second, examine the differences between solicited and unsolicited proposals in professional settings. Consider which type of proposal is generally more likely to be approved or funded and explain why. Reflect on the expectations that come with each category, the advantages of responding directly to a request, and the potential risks and rewards of submitting a proposal without being asked. You may draw from personal experience or observations in academic, nonprofit, or business environments to illustrate your points.

    Your response should address both parts of the prompt in a 200250-word well-developed post. Focus on clear, professional writing, and provide specific examples to support your analysis.

  • Informative Essay Revision

    A. Directions Step 1: Revise the Informative Essay All writers revise their work as part of the writing process. For Touchstone 3, submit a revised version of your Touchstone 2.2 informative essay. The process of revising involves re-thinking your essay. Your revision should reflect your attention to the following: Rhetorical situation Focus Organization Flow Style Clarity As you review the graders suggestions and feedback of your draft, evaluate how your essay can be improved in each of the areas above. Focus your attention on the areas that would benefit most from revision. You can add, delete, or move text as you revise your essay. Note the following revision guidelines: Do not draft a new essay on a new topic. You must revise your Touchstone 2.2 draft using the feedback provided. Allow time between drafts so that you can see your original work from a new perspective. Revision is different from editing and proofreading; however, be sure to edit and proofread your revised essay before you submit it. Step 2. Think About Your Writing Include answers to all of the following reflection questions below your completed revision. How much time did you spend revising your draft? Which revision strategies did you use, and which of them worked best for you? (2-3 sentences) Sophia says: A good revision takes time. This is your opportunity to re-think, rearrange, and re-evaluate your writing. Which revision strategies did you use? Do you still agree with your thesis? Do you believe that your evidence supports your thesis and that you have met the requirements of the assignment? How did the revision process improve your essay? (2-3 sentences) Sophia says: Compare your draft to your revision. Have you added relevant details or removed irrelevant ones? Have you changed the order of details or paragraphs? Have you added transitions for better flow? In which ways is your revision better than your draft? What did you learn about your writing process or yourself as a writer? (2-3 sentences) Sophia says: Think about the entire process of drafting and revising this essay. Did any part of the process surprise you or reveal something unexpected? Step 3. Review Rubric and Checklist Your essay and reflection will be scored according to the Informative Rubric, which considers your revision and edits, effectiveness in addressing the writing prompt for either the advertisement image analysis essay OR the extended definition essay, the working thesis, organization, style and tone, focus, conventions and proofreading, and your responses to the Think About Your Writing questions. Refer to the checklist below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines. Editing and Revising Have you significantly revised your essay, making adjustments in areas that include organization, focus, and clarity? Have you made comprehensive changes in word choice, sentence variety, and style? Have you made revisions that are based on the feedback provided by your evaluator? Essay Prompt: Image Analysis If you chose the image analysis prompt, have you revisited your analysis and interpretation of the images use of design components to ensure that you’ve done more than describe the ad? Have you revisited your conclusions about the audience and effectiveness of the ad? Did you include the image in your essay? Is your draft 800-1300 words long? Essay Prompt: Extended Definition If you chose the extended definition prompt, did you make sure that your definition extends the definition and doesnt rely too heavily on the traditional definition? Did you revisit the examples and explanations that support your definition? Is your essay 800-1300 words in length? Thesis Have you revised your thesis statement? Did you make sure that your thesis states the overall claim of the essay? Is your thesis one sentence that is located toward the end of the introductory paragraph? Focus and Organization Have you reviewed your body paragraphs and made sure that each one has a clear topic sentence restating the subject and main point covered in that body paragraph? Have you revisited your conclusion paragraph and final thoughts? Have you reviewed the sequence of your ideas? Have you improved your transitions to connect ideas between sentences and paragraphs? Have you improved the flow of your essay? Does your revision have a clear focus? Have you maintained a clear focus and included only relevant details? Style and Tone Have you ensured that the tone of your essay is unbiased and informative? Have you informed the reader about your topic avoiding the first person and/or framing personal examples in an objective way? Have you reconsidered your word choices? Conventions Have you checked your draft for grammatical errors? Have you used spell-check or another method to check spelling? Have you punctuated your essay correctly? Before You Submit Have you included your name, date, and course at the top left of the page? Have you completed the Think About Your Writing questions? Is your essay between three and five pages (approximately 800-1300 words) in length?

  • 9779: APG5365 – Principles of global media and communication…

    The order includes two tasks:

    1. Task 1: Critical review (1400 words) – due March 8
    2. Task 2: Essay (2000 words) – due April 5

    Task 1: Critical review (1400 words) – due March 8

    Instructions

    This is a written assignment requiring you to read scholarly articles and/or book chapters and to write a 1400-word paper responding to three questions about them. The purpose of the assignment is to help you develop foundational skills in scholarly reading, writing, analysis, citing and referencing.

    • Step 1: Choose a focus article

    Choose ONE focus article from the official required reading list for this unit from Week 1Connections or Week 2Disruption.

    • Step 2: Find and read two or three further recent scholarly sources

    Using the Monash Library search function, find TWO or THREE further scholarly articles or book chapters from 2024, 2025 or 2026 that you can connect to your focus article. The articles/chapters must be from publications within the media or communications discipline, or a closely associated discipline (e.g. NOT psychology, medicine, or engineering).

    • Step 3: Write a 1400-word paper responding to the following questions

    Write a discussion incorporating answers to the questions below. You should also write an introduction and conclusion to your paper, each about 10% of the word limit (i.e. 140 words each).

    Questions:

    • What is the purpose and main argument of the focus reading and how does it relate to principles of global media and communications that we have looked at in Weeks 1 and/or 2 of this unit?
    • Compare and contrast your focus reading with the two or three further scholarly articles/chapters you have found and read. What theoretical concepts or principles seem most important? How do the arguments support or refute each other?

    What are some real-world examples you can think of to illuminate your discussion? These should be examples from media sources, not just repeating those in the chosen scholarly readings themselves. Incorporate your examples through your discussion to illustrate your points.

    Task 2: Essay (2000 words) – due April 5 (7-10 references)

    Step 1: Choose ONE of the following questions.

    1. How have globalisation and transnational borders affected media and/or communications practices? Focus on a major current challenge or issue.

    2. Why is it important for a wide variety of voices to be included in media and/or communications spheres? What factors need to be taken into account in connection to offering alternatives to mainstream voices?

    3. Discuss generative AI use in professional media and/or communications practices, and how widespread accessibility to AI might affect such practices in future.

    note

    • The references must be academic and within 10 years
    • replace with a suitable title
    • Must use some courses in reading- see”Course reading”

  • 9776: APG5458 – Digital technology, policy and governance

    The order contains 2 tasks

    Task 1:1.Reflective Essay (700-800 words)- 6 references (due march.10)

    Task 2: Policy Brief(group ) (900 words)-(due April .12)

    Task 1:1.Reflective Essay (700-800 words)- 6 references

    Which idea(s) or perspective(s) introduced in Weeks 13 have you found most helpful for deepening your understanding of digital technologies and their associated policy and governance challenges? In your response, you must reflect on how these ideas have changed or shaped the way you think about digital technologies and regulation, and draw on contemporary examples to illustrate and support your discussion.

    You must also show that you’ve engaged with unit materials (readings, lecture videos, and tutorial discussions/activities) for this assessment, and you are expected to include 3-5 references to demonstrate your engagement with unit materials. Where you use contemporary examples, these should be supported by appropriate media sources (e.g. news articles or industry reports). You are expected to include 2-3 media sources for these examples. Compile your reference list according to the Harvard referencing style (https://guides.lib.monash.edu/harvard).

    Supplementary reading materials (web link, some PDFs uploaded)

    Week 2 reading

    Week 3 reading

    Napoli, PM and Caplan, R (2017) Why media companies insist theyre not media companies, why theyre wrong, and why it matters. First Monday. [Online] Available from:

    note

    • The references must be academic and within 10 years
    • replace with a suitable title
    • Must use some courses in reading- see”Course reading”

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): week 2 reading(2).pdf, week 3 reading.pdf, week 2 readingRamon Lobato.pdf, week 2 lecture.pdf, Week 3 lecture.pdf, week 1 lecture.pdf

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Engaging Employees in the Change Process

    Assessment Description

    If an organization is not prepared for change, then any change initiative is likely to fail. Therefore, to increase the probability of a successful change initiative, leaders need the ability to determine if an organization is ready to implement change.

    General Requirements:

    Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

    • Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
    • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
    • Refer to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association for specific guidelines related to doctoral level writing. The Manual contains essential information on manuscript structure and content, clear and concise writing, and academic grammar and usage.
    • This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
    • You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

    Directions:

    Write a paper of 1,200-1,500 words that discusses how to engage employees in the change process and how to benchmark the progress of a change initiative. Include the following in your paper:

    1. An analysis of the factors used to determine if change is needed in a given organization.
    2. A discussion of how to determine if an organization is structurally ready to support change leading to a culture of continuous learning, improvement, and adaptation.
    3. A critique of several tactics that can be used to engage employees in the change process.
    4. An evaluation of the effects of change on individual, social, financial, and corporate concerns.