Category: Writing

Write 5 paragraphs answering the following questions:

• What is the “racial wealth gap?” Describe the extend of racialized wealth inequality in the US.
• Is racialized wealth inequality a social problem in the USA? Why? Are you using an objective or subjective definition of a social problem?
• Explain the historical roots of the wealth inequality between African-Americans and White-Americans.
• How does racialized wealth inequality relate to other racial inequalities in the USA?
• Identify and explain 2 ways of reducing the racial wealth gap.

You must use a minimum of 3 of the following sources of information:

This week we are looking at what type of questions we, as comparative politics examine, what makes a good theory in explaining these questions, and how to set up a research design. You have looked at two famous studies “Why Nations Fail” and “Guns, Germs, and Steel” which use the comparative method to attempt to provide answers to big and difficult questions, specifically why are some countries more successful than others.

For this discussion I want you to look at Acemoglu and Robinson’s Why Nations Fail and identify what are the variables of the study? The Dependent Variable is the political phenomena being explained and the independent variables are those factors that explain the specific political phenomena (outcome). In other words what explains the differences in outcomes (wealth, development, rule of law, etc). Do you agree with their argument overall, why or why not?

Okay, for this week, we have a short writing assignment that asks you to read Why Nation’s Fail and listen to his lecture and identify what his research question is, and what are his causal variables. We are building on the work of the previous weeks in identify how political scientists think about their research. Ultimately, what is his argument as to why some nations are more successful than others?

In 3 double-space pages I want you to (1) identify Robinson’s argument and (2) do you agree with him, why or why not? To be successful, you need to identify Robinson’s terms and clearly identify his argument citing the reading or the lecture video. Second, I want to see your voices come through. You are not graded on whether you agree or disagree, but on the quality of your argument. Do you think his variables are sufficient to explain why there is liberty and freedom in some countries but not others? Are they missing something? Or are they correct? What matters is that you justify why you are making the argument you are making. Now, the literature on democracy is vast, and more vast, and we are starting out this discussion, so don’t feel overwhelmed or like you might be missing something. The debate over democracy goes back to the beginning of political time, and we have been debating it since Aristotle. I just want to know what you think!

Teacher feedback came from assignment done before. Can you please read the teacher edits and fix what needs to be fixed. Thank you.

Okay, for this week, we have a short writing assignment that asks you to read Why Nation’s Fail and listen to his lecture and identify what his research question is, and what are his causal variables. We are building on the work of the previous weeks in identify how political scientists think about their research. Ultimately, what is his argument as to why some nations are more successful than others?

In 3 double-space pages I want you to (1) identify Robinson’s argument and (2) do you agree with him, why or why not? To be successful, you need to identify Robinson’s terms and clearly identify his argument citing the reading or the lecture video. Second, I want to see your voices come through. You are not graded on whether you agree or disagree, but on the quality of your argument. Do you think his variables are sufficient to explain why there is liberty and freedom in some countries but not others? Are they missing something? Or are they correct? What matters is that you justify why you are making the argument you are making. Now, the literature on democracy is vast, and more vast, and we are starting out this discussion, so don’t feel overwhelmed or like you might be missing something. The debate over democracy goes back to the beginning of political time, and we have been debating it since Aristotle. I just want to know what you think!

This week we are looking at what type of questions we, as comparative politics examine, what makes a good theory in explaining these questions, and how to set up a research design. You have looked at two famous studies “Why Nations Fail” and “Guns, Germs, and Steel” which use the comparative method to attempt to provide answers to big and difficult questions, specifically why are some countries more successful than others.

For this discussion I want you to look at Acemoglu and Robinson’s Why Nations Fail and identify what are the variables of the study? The Dependent Variable is the political phenomena being explained and the independent variables are those factors that explain the specific political phenomena (outcome). In other words what explains the differences in outcomes (wealth, development, rule of law, etc). Do you agree with their argument overall, why or why not?

Identify several full-run and partial-run magazine editions. Study the ads in each. Compare and contrast the advertising and advertisers that you find in each type. What are the advantages and disadvantages of each platform?

Report your findings in a 1-2 page paper, double-spaced, 12-point font, and 1-inch margins. Be sure and include citations as needed.

After studying the course content assigned for this Module, explain the ideas presented in the paragraph above discussing Marion Cotillards acting performance in La Vie En Rose (2007), and answering the following questions:

• What was Cotillards process in creating her acting performance?
• How does she use her voice, body movements, gestures and facial expressions to tell the film story?

The students MUST refer to at least two different resources from the Module content to support the ideas presented.

MPORTANT: The purpose of this course is to learn how artists communicate ideas. Each module shares this information in the video-lectures, and articles and videos about the film. The students should always refer to this information (what they learned in the module about the film and how the artists’ decisions communicate ideas) and develop their work using this information.

The students ought to develop on the topic proposed showing knowledge and familiarity with the course materials, the ability to discuss such content, and demonstrating an appreciation of the film experience.

The post has a minimum of 300 words.

USE MLA format to cite sources

Please used the attached links as resources from the module.

One course is 18 weeks and other 8 weeks but almost 2-2.5 weeks have already gone by. You need to do some overdue ones if by chance teacher opens them. Please put 105 days

One course is 18 weeks and other 8 weeks but almost 2-2.5 weeks have already gone by. You need to do some overdue ones if by chance teacher opens them. Please put 105 days