Category: Writing

  • posc 124 ritgh variables lilian

    This week we are looking at what type of questions we, as comparative politics examine, what makes a good theory in explaining these questions, and how to set up a research design. You have looked at two famous studies “Why Nations Fail” and “Guns, Germs, and Steel” which use the comparative method to attempt to provide answers to big and difficult questions, specifically why are some countries more successful than others.

    For this discussion I want you to look at Acemoglu and Robinson’s Why Nations Fail and identify what are the variables of the study? The Dependent Variable is the political phenomena being explained and the independent variables are those factors that explain the specific political phenomena (outcome). In other words what explains the differences in outcomes (wealth, development, rule of law, etc). Do you agree with their argument overall, why or why not?

    Requirements: 1h

  • posc 124 variables lilian

    Okay, for this week, we have a short writing assignment that asks you to read Why Nation’s Fail and listen to his lecture and identify what his research question is, and what are his causal variables. We are building on the work of the previous weeks in identify how political scientists think about their research. Ultimately, what is his argument as to why some nations are more successful than others?

    In 3 double-space pages I want you to (1) identify Robinson’s argument and (2) do you agree with him, why or why not? To be successful, you need to identify Robinson’s terms and clearly identify his argument citing the reading or the lecture video. Second, I want to see your voices come through. You are not graded on whether you agree or disagree, but on the quality of your argument. Do you think his variables are sufficient to explain why there is liberty and freedom in some countries but not others? Are they missing something? Or are they correct? What matters is that you justify why you are making the argument you are making. Now, the literature on democracy is vast, and more vast, and we are starting out this discussion, so don’t feel overwhelmed or like you might be missing something. The debate over democracy goes back to the beginning of political time, and we have been debating it since Aristotle. I just want to know what you think!

    Requirements: 1h

  • relg 130 sg 3-4 basim

    Hindu Scriptures Guided Lecture Notes

    History and Scriptures of Hinduism

    1. Who are the Dasas and how are they connected to the formation of Hinduism?
    2. Who are the Indo-Aryans? How are they connected to the formation of Hinduism?
    3. What are the two categories of Scripture in Hinduism? What scriptures does each category contain? When was each scripture written?

    Hindu Religion

    1. Is Hinduism polytheistic, monotheistic or both?
    2. What is Samsara?
    3. What is an atman?
    4. What is karma?
    5. What is moksha?
    6. What is bhakti? And who can a Hindu show bhakti for?
    7. What are jnana and samadhi? And how would a Hindu achieve them?

    The Vedas (Knowledge)

    1. What is the origin of the Vedas?
    2. What are the Four Samhitas of the Vedas?
    3. What are some texts associated with the Vedas, and how are they associated?
    4. What are some uses of the Vedic texts? What how are the Vedas typically NOT used?

    The Upanishads

    1. What is the age of the Upanishads compared to the Vedas?
    2. How many Upanishads are there?
    3. What do the Upanishads contain?
    4. What key Hindu concepts are first introduced in the Upanishads?

    The Bhagavad Gita

    1. Where does the Bhagavad Gita text come from?
    2. How long is the Mahabharata?
    3. What is the story contained in the Mahbharata?
    4. Who are the two main characters of the Bhagavad Gita?
    5. What are some of the major themes of the Bhagavad Gita?

    History and Teachings of Buddhism

    1. Who founded Buddhism? And when did he live?
    2. What does the title Buddha mean?
    3. What did the Buddha do after he achieved enlightenment?
    4. How and where did Buddhism spread outside of India?
    5. What are some key Buddhist concepts? (list 6)

    Scriptures of Buddhism

    1. What is the Pali canon? And when was it canonized?
    2. What texts does it include?
    3. What are the Sanskrit sutras?
    4. What is the Chinese canon? And when was it canonized?
    5. What texts does it include?
    6. What is the Tibetan Canon? And when was it canonized?
    7. What texts does it include?

    Life Stories of the Buddha

    1. What was the first Life Story of the Buddha?
    2. Who wrote it and when was it written?
    3. What are the key parts of the story of the Buddha and his journey to enlightenment? (list 5)

    The Dhammapada

    1. What are contained in the Dhammapada?
    2. What does dhamma mean?
    3. What does pada mean?

    The Heart Sutra

    1. Why are we studying the Heart Sutra if it is not recognized as a teaching of the Buddha?
    2. What is Sunyata?
    3. What is the No-Self Doctrine?
    4. How does sunyata apply to all phenomena in the world?
    5. What is non-duality and how does it apply to Buddhism?

    The Lotus Sutra

    1. What is a Mahayana Sutra?
    2. What is the Parable of the Burning House? And what does it teach about Buddhism?
    3. What does the Tathagata want for all of us?

    Requirements: 1h

  • art 143 db 4 arkan

    Discussion Four: Visual Meaning

    COMPOSITION VII painting Kandisnky

    Visual Meaning

    There are three main strategies for analyzing works of art: contextual theory, formal theory, and expressive theory. Last week you used expressive theory to discuss a work of art by relating it to the life of the artist. This week you will discuss a painting in terms of formal theory; in other words, you will analyze how the meaning a work of art is shaped by its visual characteristics.

    In your post, please focus on a work of art by an artist discussed in this week’s reading. You can pick a work that is shown in your textbook or you can do a little research and choose something different. As you analyze the piece, please pay close attention to the formal choices made by the artist and consider the following questions:

    • How is color used? What is the visual impact of the color? Does it seem to have visual or psychological meaning?
    • What types of forms are evident in the work (organic, geometric, smooth, jagged, etc.)? How does this affect the way you experience the piece?
    • Is there a visual rhythm created by the repetition of forms and lines? How would you describe it?
    • Consider the composition: how does your eye move through the piece? What do you think is the focal point? How does the focal point relate to the meaning of the work as you interpret it?

    This week I am not giving you a list of artists or specific works of art, but I encourage you to focus on a work that is associated with , Expressionism ( or ), or early abstraction. . Once again, please include a picture in your post and links to your sources!

    Requirements: 1h

  • art 143 db 4 nael

    Discussion Four: Visual Meaning

    COMPOSITION VII painting Kandisnky

    Visual Meaning

    There are three main strategies for analyzing works of art: contextual theory, formal theory, and expressive theory. Last week you used expressive theory to discuss a work of art by relating it to the life of the artist. This week you will discuss a painting in terms of formal theory; in other words, you will analyze how the meaning a work of art is shaped by its visual characteristics.

    In your post, please focus on a work of art by an artist discussed in this week’s reading. You can pick a work that is shown in your textbook or you can do a little research and choose something different. As you analyze the piece, please pay close attention to the formal choices made by the artist and consider the following questions:

    • How is color used? What is the visual impact of the color? Does it seem to have visual or psychological meaning?
    • What types of forms are evident in the work (organic, geometric, smooth, jagged, etc.)? How does this affect the way you experience the piece?
    • Is there a visual rhythm created by the repetition of forms and lines? How would you describe it?
    • Consider the composition: how does your eye move through the piece? What do you think is the focal point? How does the focal point relate to the meaning of the work as you interpret it?

    This week I am not giving you a list of artists or specific works of art, but I encourage you to focus on a work that is associated with , Expressionism ( or ), or early abstraction. . Once again, please include a picture in your post and links to your sources!

    Requirements: 1h

  • art 143 db 4 hanaa

    Discussion Four: Visual Meaning

    COMPOSITION VII painting Kandisnky

    Visual Meaning

    There are three main strategies for analyzing works of art: contextual theory, formal theory, and expressive theory. Last week you used expressive theory to discuss a work of art by relating it to the life of the artist. This week you will discuss a painting in terms of formal theory; in other words, you will analyze how the meaning a work of art is shaped by its visual characteristics.

    In your post, please focus on a work of art by an artist discussed in this week’s reading. You can pick a work that is shown in your textbook or you can do a little research and choose something different. As you analyze the piece, please pay close attention to the formal choices made by the artist and consider the following questions:

    • How is color used? What is the visual impact of the color? Does it seem to have visual or psychological meaning?
    • What types of forms are evident in the work (organic, geometric, smooth, jagged, etc.)? How does this affect the way you experience the piece?
    • Is there a visual rhythm created by the repetition of forms and lines? How would you describe it?
    • Consider the composition: how does your eye move through the piece? What do you think is the focal point? How does the focal point relate to the meaning of the work as you interpret it?

    This week I am not giving you a list of artists or specific works of art, but I encourage you to focus on a work that is associated with , Expressionism ( or ), or early abstraction. . Once again, please include a picture in your post and links to your sources!

    Requirements: 1h

  • Writing Question

    ATTACHED ARE TWO FILES. ONE IS THE FILE ABOUT LEARNING FROM ONE OF THR MINORS THAT YOU NEED TO USE AND ONE IS THE RESEARCH QUESTION THAT YOU NEED TO USE

    Starting the Integrative Reflection: This is designed to

    1. take your practice of purposeful reflection to a higher level
    2. develop an initial draft of your integrative reflection
    3. provide direction-driven, feedback-supported practice in the ability to
      • integrate learning across two or more separate disciplines
      • integrate disciplinary learning with personal experience

    This is related to outcomes 1-3, learning objectives 1-3,

    outcome 1-3:

    1. Develop meaningful, research-based cross-disciplinary discourse
    2. Develop meaningful cross-disciplinary (interdisciplinary) integration of learning to create purposeful practical wholes
    3. Meaningfully synthesize specific course learning with non-academic life experiences to deepen insights into complex problems

    Learning objectives 1-3:

    1. Define Interdisciplinarity to demonstrate practical understanding of this concept
    2. Define integration in terms of the active learning manner that you will use it in this course
    3. Define integrative learning to demonstrate practical understanding of this active learning strategy

    Instructions

    The draft of your reflection must include four components: (1) it must introduce your research problem to the reader; (2) it must begin a discussion of aspects of the problem (something on the order of at least 300 words); (3) it must include at least one attempt to integrate specific learning from a course in one of your minors with specific learning from a course in a second of your minors; and (4) it must include at least one attempt to integrate specific learning from at least one of your minors with a personal experience in such a manner that the learning is illuminated.

    Use the rubric below to guide the paper. Pay attention to the wording in each box of the evaluation rubric. Notice how the descriptions change from one level to the next.

    For example, in the Cross-Disciplinary Integration section, the lowest level of competence means your reflection shows some relationships between information from at least two different disciplines. At the middle level, your writing clearly connects specific examples, facts, theories, or other information from different disciplines.

    At the highest level, you go even further. You either:

    • Create a new practical whole that strongly and clearly addresses your research problem, and/or
    • Deepen your understanding of the research problem by combining examples, facts, theories, or other information from two or more disciplines in a meaningful way.

    A practical whole means creating something new by bringing together ideas from different disciplines. It is practical because you are actively applying what you learned to address your research problem, and because the final result has real-world use or application.

    For the Integration of Disciplinary Learning with Personal Experience section, your goal is to clearly describe what you learned in your courses in life. Then, you should connect that learning to a personal experience. Your personal example should help explain or clarify the learning. It might support what you learned and show that it is strong and valid. Or, it might challenge what you learned by showing its limits or weaknesses.

    Assignment Criteria

    Maximum Points

    Introduction & Discussion of Research Problem

    Important

    Cross-Disciplinary Integration

    Important

    Integration of Disciplinary Learning with Personal Experiences

    Important

    Requirements: Meet requirements

  • Write in own words ( Ai should not be detected) don’t change…

    1. If I were a member of Congress, I would promote three main policy issues: affordable education, immigration reform, and climate resilience. First, I would support policies that reduce college costs, such as expanding federal grants and lowering student loan interest rates, because many students struggle with debt that limits their opportunities after graduation. Second, I would promote balanced immigration reform that strengthens border management while also creating clearer legal pathways for students and skilled workers, since immigrants contribute economically and culturally to the United States. Third, I would support climate resilience policies, such as infrastructure funding for flood protection and renewable energy development, because climate change is already affecting coastal areas and economies.

    Of these, I would develop a bill focused on affordable education called the College Opportunity and Debt Reduction Act. The bill would expand Pell Grant funding, cap federal student loan interest rates at a low fixed level, and provide federal-state matching funds to public universities that freeze tuition increases. The goal would be to reduce student debt and make higher education more accessible, especially for middle- and lower-income families. To gain support in Congress, I would frame the bill as an economic investment in the workforce and national competitiveness, appealing to both parties by emphasizing opportunity, skills development, and long-term economic growth

    2. About 40% of the newspaper consisted of advertisements, mainly for local businesses, real estate, healthcare services, retail sales, and community events. Roughly 65% of the remaining content was hard news (politics, housing, crime, and local policy), while about 35% was soft news such as lifestyle features, entertainment, and human-interest stories. Overall, the reporting appeared mostly fair and balanced because articles included data, expert sources, and perspectives from both officials and residents, although crime and policy stories sometimes emphasized conflict more than context.

    One story on South Florida housing affordability was helpful and informative because it explained rising rents using statistics, expert analysis, and interviews with local residents affected by costs. From this assignment, I learned that newspapers must balance advertising and journalism, and that readers should critically evaluate how stories are framed and what topics are prioritized. Overall, newspapers remain valuable for understanding local community issues, but they still require careful reading to detect bias and emphasis.

    3. I watched WPBF 25 News (ABC, West Palm Beach) evening broadcast (6:006:30 PM).

    1. How many news stories were covered and how long each one was?
    It covered 11 main local and regional stories, mostly about traffic crashes, housing costs, crime, and state policy. Most stories were about 1.53 minutes each, with shorter 1-minute human-interest segments at the end. Total news time was about 23 minutes.

    2. How much time was devoted to the weather, sports, etc.?
    Weather took about 4 minutes, showing radar, local forecast, and the weekend outlook. Sports was about 2 minutes, covering Miami Heat highlights and local high school sports. Commercials were around 67 minutes throughout the broadcast.

    3. Do you feel the broadcast was informative and balanced?
    It was moderately informative, especially on local issues like insurance and housing, using statistics and expert input. However, some stories (like school policy and crime) emphasized conflict or danger more than multiple perspectives, so it was somewhat balanced but not deeply analytical.

    Requirements: all questions

  • steve Jobs Graduation speech

    please comment on this- 10-11 minute speech as it relates to becoming a entrepreneur (agree/disagree) or anything else who want to comment about

    Requirements: one paragraph

  • Reading Respond 7

    For this week’s reading response, answer both questions fully and completely. To fully answer the question, tether your response to specific theory concepts from your chapter reading and use quotes from the chapter to help ground your argument (you do not need a full APA citation for quotes, just put which edition of the book you are using and a page number — (10th, p. 214), for example). Each question asks you to think in the specific (your personal experiences) and then tie it to the larger understanding of the theory. As we assess your responses, we will be looking to see that you understand the theory by being able to use the concepts from the theory to explain the specific examples.

    1. Dramatism

    Burke claims that guilt is an underlying motivation for all public rhetoric. Find an apology speech from a celebrity or public figure (or you may use one of the examples I include here). Using the concepts of the Dramatism theory (guilt/mortification and the pentad), analyze the apology. Use specific examples (quotes) from the apology you choose to show concepts from the theory. (If you do not choose an example below, include a link to the apology you are analyzing.)

    Tiger Woods (apology for extramarital affair):

    Will Smith (apology for slapping Chris Rock at the Oscars):

    [If anyone has watched the new docuseries on Netflix, Reality Check: Inside America’s Next Top Model, Tyra Banks’ apology would be an interesting one to analyze!)

    2. Feminist Standpoint Theory

    Assess your social location. What social group memberships influence it? Which are most influential? How do Harding and Wood define strong objectivity? How would they measure your degree of strong objectivity? Do you agree or disagree with their assessment? Why or why not?

    Requirements: answer the questions