Category: Writing

  • 6.4 Refinement and Reinforcement

    You have spent the past several weeks learning about lesson planning and creative strategies to convey knowledge to students. Throughout your learning you have probably had thoughts about your ability as a teacher. For this assignment, take a few minutes to reflect on what you think your strengths will be as a teacher. Could you be an organized and detailed planner? Maybe you think you will be a good disciplinarian. Next think about the areas you think may prove difficult. Maybe you have trouble coming up with questions that challenge students or perhaps you fear meeting all the diverse needs of your students.

    For this assignment, submit a word document consisting of two paragraphs. The first paragraph should reflect on your area of reinforcement, the area that you believe you will succeed in. The second paragraph should reflect on your area of refinement, the area that you believe you will struggle with. Each paragraph should consist of 5-7 well-constructed sentences.

    Requirements: 2 paragraphs

  • Techincal report

    Following these guidelines and taking into account your classmate discussions as well as my feedback, please submit a document that describes the topic of your technical report work. I will be your audience for this assignment; please use the description, paragraphing, precise & concise, and if appropriate, citing skills you’ve practiced in your exercises this semester so far.

    Generally, this description will take 600-900 words, but every situation is different (some require more detail and explanation than others, so this is just a guideline rather than a requirement).

    Your document should include the following:

    1. Context Name and description — provide additional detail beyond your board posts so I understand this fully; location, size, and what is done here would be information I would find useful, for example; please note I am not looking for your responsibilities & experiences here in this section;

    2. Problem description (you can also include solutions/solution avenues, if appropriate);

    3. Decision-maker audience full name & title, as well as some descriptive text beyond your observations — here, I’m looking for facts (information that would be on a resume or LinkedIn profile, for instance) — education, publications, years in the industry are some examples; please do not include job responsibilities and general or soft traits (i.e., hard working) at this stage;

    4. Potential specific research avenues (name journals, researchers, experts and/or authors you want to investigate; at least one UMD database search should be reflected here); and

    And, very briefly:

    5. Your professional connection to the audience & context, if not already discussed in relation to the other points.

    Please use subheadings and then organize your information so it fits smoothly under the subheading you are using. Please use full sentences and not numbered or bulleted lists for this particular assignment. This is a paper, not a worksheet, so therefore, make sure you are using full paragraphs that flow smoothly together.

    In addition to the content you provide, I will be assessing you on the elements of writing we’ve practiced so far this semester: description; attention to audience; citing; paragraphing; and precise and concise writing.

    ——————

    This semester, the majority of the writing you will do in this class will be related to your Major Writing Assignment, the Technical Report. Below are the general steps you will consider as you approach this assignment.

    II. TECHNICAL REPORT

    Major Writing Assignment

    Summary

    Identify a real problem and provide a researched solution

    Steps:

    1) Identify a professional context preferably one you are familiar with (examples: workplace, internship, team, nonprofit/volunteer organization, local business such as a food truck, independent restaurant or coffee shop). Ideally, this will be a small, accessible-to-you context.

    2) Identify a problem within that context that could use solving.

    3) Identify a decision-maker audience: someone who is accessible to you who can take your advice and enact change the manager of the workplace, the owner of the food truck, the volunteer coordinator at the nonprofit, the team leader.

    4) Learn enough about the three above items context, problem, audience to describe them concisely and precisely in your

    5) Research potential solutions to the problem by using (at least 10) primary, popular, and scholarly sources (specifically, read scholarly articles about the big-picture problems; explore popular articles and websites detailing other organizations who have successfully tackled similar problems; talk to your audience and other people who work in the context to get their experiences with the problem, find out what theyve tried already and what they think is feasible; talk to experts in the solutions you identify beyond your context and ask them questions about your ideas for solving the problem).

    6) Write a cohesive document to the audience focusing on the solutions you recommend. This will involve some problem and research description, but the emphasis here should be on the steps you are suggesting that your audience should take description, logistics, evidence from research showing why these solutions should work.

    In some cases, your final document will resemble a guide — a specific set of instructions that are written directly for a small, identified, accessible audience. This is a rare solution that will need to be discussed with and approved by me specifically. Please see

    ———–

    my topioc

    Student organizations, including social fraternities, professional fraternities, and campus clubs, play an important role in university communities by providing opportunities for leadership development, networking, community service, and philanthropy. At large universities, these organizations vary in size from small groups of 20 members to larger organizations with over 100 active participants. They are typically led by student executive boards that oversee operations, event planning, budgeting, and member engagement.

    A major component of many student organizations is philanthropy and fundraising. Groups often host charity events such as donation drives, social events, community partnerships, and awareness campaigns to support nonprofit organizations and social causes. These events not only raise funds but also help organizations build a positive reputation on campus and strengthen member involvement.

    Because student organizations operate with leadership that changes frequently, usually on a yearly basis, planning processes and organizational knowledge are often passed down informally. While many groups are successful in hosting events, there is often little standardization in how philanthropy efforts are planned, executed, and evaluated. This creates an opportunity to examine how structured planning systems could improve efficiency and overall impact across different types of student organizations.

  • Health Care Disparities in LGBTQ

    Discuss how to close the health care disparities gap in the LGBTQ community?

    Submission Instructions:

    • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
    • You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)
  • Final Project Draft

    This is a continuation of all the weeks assignments all in one. It is a rough draft.

    I have attached the template. You should be able to copy the previous weeks assignments in the designated areas.

    The only change is about Chapter Four. I did not receive a favorable grade, unfortunately. The professor left this comment: “The chapter presents a coherent structure and includes the essential components of an evaluation plan. However, several areas need deeper explanation, clearer justification, and stronger alignment with research standards.”

    Requirements: See Template

  • Undefined

    Minimum Submission Requirements Proper notification of any resubmission, repurposing, or reworking of prior work per the Purdue Global Student Coursework Resubmission, Repurposing, and Reworking Policy Resource. This assessment should be a Microsoft Word. Respond to the questions in a thorough manner, providing specific examples of concepts, topics, definitions, and other elements asked for in the questions. Your submission should be highly organized, logical, and focused. Your submission should provide a clearly established and sustained viewpoint and purpose. Your writing should be well-ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful. Your submission must be written in Standard English and demonstrate exceptional content, organization, style, and grammar and mechanics. A separate page at the end of your submission should contain a list of references in APA format. Use your textbook, the Library, and the internet for research. Be sure to include references for all sources and to cite them using in-text citations where appropriate. Your sources and content should follow current APA citation style. Review the writing resources for APA formatting and citation found in Academic Tools. Additional writing resources can be found within the Academic Success Center. Your submission should: Include a title page. Be double-spaced. Be typed in Times New Roman, 12 -point font. Be free of spelling or punctuation errors. If the work submitted for this competency assessment does not meet the minimum submission requirements, it will be returned for revision. If the work submitted does not meet the minimum submission requirements by the end of the term, you will receive a failing score. Plagiarism Plagiarism is an act of academic dishonesty. It violates the Universitys Code of Student Conduct, and the offense is subject to disciplinary action. You are expected to be the sole author of your work. Use of another person’s work or ideas must be accompanied by specific citations and references. Whether the action is intentional or not, it still constitutes plagiarism. For more information on plagiarism and the Universitys Code of Student Conduct, refer to the current University Catalog.

    Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): 1Competency Assessment – GB580M1 Strategic Management Principles.pdf, GB580_Unit_1_2_3_M1_Assignment__Template (1).docx

    Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.

  • Writing Question

    Details will be shared.

    Requirements: As above

  • Contemporary Trends and Developments in Player Behavior in G…

    Contemporary Trends and Developments in Player Behavior in Game Theory Games

    I have uploaded the literature review for the paper. Now i need someone to do the continuation for the paper.

    For my thesis, my professor told me the following:

    We should analyze papers on the following topics at a research level:

    1) Distribution prisoner dilemma

    2) Minority games

    3) Alice and Bob in cryptography

    He gave me the specific template that I have attached so that the thesis would be in the correct format.

    The other thing that was emphasized in the discussion was that we should avoid talking about the

    And that the analysis of the articles should be more research-based and not so much based on social criteria.

    Translated with (free version)

    Requirements: 5000

  • WRTG: Advanced Writing

    Step #1: Read any three (3) of the five articles listed below on the movie CODA (2021). (You can find these articles at the links below. Pdf. copies are also attached at the end of the discussion prompt.)

    • Amanda Morris, New York Times Review:
    • Ann Hornaday, Washington Post Review:
    • Richard Brody, New York Post Review:
    • Owen Glieberman, Variety Review,
    • Tomris Laffly, Ebert Review,

    Step #2: Review the worksheet on using a synthesis matrix featured in this week’s Content.

    Step #3: Complete a synthesis matrix (attached below) for the three articles you’ve read. This includes:

    • Identify at least three (3) main ideas or topics covered by the reviews (e.g., plot, actors, bias, etc.)
    • Take notes on what the critics write about these main ideas (e.g., “Critic 1 praises the plot as interesting” and “Critic 2 finds the plot too contrived”)
    • Jotting down quotes that support your observations (e.g., “Critic 3 writes, ‘The story has movie-goers at the edge of their seats the whole three hours”)

    Step #4: Identify at least two key issues or questions that are particularly problematic or controversial or striking or worthy of exploring. These would be issues/questions that can be supported by at least two of the articles. They may be points on which the critics agree or disagree, issues that weren’t adequately addressed, or ideas that are explored in the reviews (e.g., “What did the critics think about the actors’ performances?” or “Discussion of bias in the movie’s portrayal of deaf culture”). Ask yourself, what ideas/issues that are shared among the articles might be interesting to pursue further? Using specific quotations and transitional phrases, discuss how the reviewers’ opinions are similar or different.

    Step #5: Explain how the reviews play out these issues (1-2 sentences). What are the critics’ positions on these issues? What was stated/not stated? What other questions does this issue introduce? (For example, for “Why didn’t the critics recognize the cinematography?” you might write about how one critic barely mentioned the cinematography, while another stated how it was overrated, focusing more on the acting. Remember to cite the authors using APA in-text citations. ) In a paragraph, discuss how reviewers approached topics and themes in the films. You can use specific quotes and cite the reviews in text using APA guidelines.

    Note that a sample response to this discussion, based on three reviews of Danny Boyle’s _Steve Jobs_, appears in the Content for this week.

    Step #6: Post your matrix, your two issues/questions, and your 1-2 sentence analysis.

    Requirements:

  • Writing Question

    Objectives

    This part aims for each student to gain practice in evaluating and interpreting their Intercultural Effectiveness Scale competencies.

    Upon completion of this assignment, the student will be able to:

    Demonstrate understanding the meaning of the competencies through personal or professional examples.

    Diagnose personal strengths and weaknesses and make recommendations for short term development

    Instructions

    Read Mendenhall et.al. (PDF)

    Read personal survey report thoroughly. Reflect on the accurateness/fit of the results.

    Discuss strengths and how you might build upon your intercultural competence. In addition, highlight 1-2 strength areas and make suggestions for 1 weakness to improve.

    Do not simply state that competencies are high or low; rather, discuss the implications for developing intercultural competence. There may be inter dependencies among the competencies. For example, do you rely on one strength area to mask a weakness elsewhere? The overall objective is to analyze your own patterns.

    Grading Criteria

    Your assignment should conform to the following criteria:

    FAIL PASS OUTSTANDING

    Demonstrates meaning of competencies Restates definitions. Does not differentiate between dimensions. Provides a satisfactory understanding of three main dimensions and sub-dimensions Interprets competencies and provides examples. Illustrates understanding of the competency model.

    Analyzes the overall results Restates results high/low and does not interpret outcomes to intercultural competency Provides satisfactory broad overview and analysis. Identifies specific implications of results to intercultural competency development. Discusses interactions among competencies

    Recommends suggestions for development Restates competencies and does not articulate how to achieve development Provides satisfactory suggestions that broadly contribute to the development plan Identifies specific activities that will contribute to experiential learning and development

    Part Two & Three (10%, max. 750 words)

    Objectives

    This part aims to apply an intercultural mindset to leadership development

    Upon completion of this assignment, the student will be able to:

    Identify leadership intercultural competencies that influence organizational culture, perceptions, and actions.

    Better understand the scale of the intercultural challenge in international business.

    Develop reflective and mindful leadership practices

    Instructions

    Read

    Nardon, L. (2019). Reflection and Intercultural Competence Development. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management.

    Summary of four step reflection

    This exercise is based upon an excerpt from: Nardon, L. (2017). Working in a multicultural world: A guide to developing intercultural competence. University of Toronto Press.)

    Briefly recount a personal leadership example in an organizational setting. This is about a time when you encountered an intercultural situation and how the encounter unfolded. Keep it simple. This is about your own reflection.

    Follow steps in the link above and write your reflection observations. This part should form most of part two.

    Identify where competencies overlap with those identified in Mendenhall et al.

    FAIL PASS OUTSTANDING

    Identifies and understands competencies

    in an organizational example Restates terms. Does not show appreciation of impact for intercultural competence in leaders. Fails to provide a clear example from personal experience. Provides a satisfactory understanding of competencies and their impact for leadership. Provides personal experience example, but

    fails to provide sufficient detail and reflection Interprets competencies and provides a cogent example of an intercultural experience in the organizational setting. Illustrates understanding of the importance for intercultural competence development in leaders

    Links to IES competences and research on intercultural competence for leaders Fails to identify connection in the IES model framework Satisfactorily identifies links from personal reflection example and similarities to IES model Powerfully provides deep reflection and makes the connection to IES framework and also to Intercultural competence improvements for leadership development. Provides additional academic references competencies along with those identified in Mendenhall et. al.

    Recommends suggestions for development Restates competencies and does not articulate how to achieve development in business setting Provides satisfactory suggestions that broadly relate competency to organizational performance Critically discusses activities and actions that may contribute to cross-cultural learning and development in the business organization

    Writing, APA, references poor references, grammatical or APA errors. No references to sources or concepts covered in the course Minimal errors, clear writing, sufficient credible references from academic sources/journal articles Logical flow, no grammatical or APA errors, sufficient credible references from academic sources/journal articles

    Part Three (max. 300 words)

    This part aims to apply an intercultural mindset to the teamwork model.

    Upon completion of this assignment, the student will be able to:

    Identify intercultural competencies that influence and support development of teamwork competencies and skills.

    Develop strategy to reflect and improve teamwork competencies

    Instructions

    Read RRU Teamwork Competencies and Skills Framework_Feb 2023 (PDF)

    Identify and discuss which team competencies and skills you would like to focus on developing and the relationship with your IES results/profile.

    Include a team section in your personal development plan.

    Requirements: As required