Category: Writing

  • Research 5 resources , create annotated bibliography, and sy…

    or this project, you’ll first find 4 scholarly, peer-reviewed articles and 1 non-peer-reviewed source related to your major/field o topic you’re interested in. For example, if your major is psychology, vou might research articles about ADHI

    Next, you’ll read and compile your fve sources in an annotated bibliography. Then, you’ll synthesize the conversations happening across these articles in the genre of a literature review. Your goal will be to bring multiple perspectives and voices into conversation with one another, identifying points of overlap in theories, points of consensus, and/or specific points of difference or dissensus. You’ll be expected to paraphrase content, only using quorations when necessary to point to a specific choice made by the author, with each quotation followed by an explanation of importance and

    consequence. The challenge will be to synthesize the readings instead of merely summarizing them. Imagine the authors as real people in a room together, talking through their ideas. You’re a fly on the wall-how does that conversation go? Are they agreeing? Do they

    agree on some points, but disagree on others? How does one author’s scholarship build on or reference another’s?

    Requirements:

  • Research 5 resources, create annotated bibliography, ans sy…

    or this project, you’ll first find 4 scholarly, peer-reviewed articles and 1 non-peer-reviewed source related to your major/field o topic you’re interested in. For example, if your major is psychology, vou might research articles about ADHI

    Next, you’ll read and compile your fve sources in an annotated bibliography. Then, you’ll synthesize the conversations happening across these articles in the genre of a literature review. Your goal will be to bring multiple perspectives and voices into conversation with one another, identifying points of overlap in theories, points of consensus, and/or specific points of difference or dissensus. You’ll be expected to paraphrase content, only using quorations when necessary to point to a specific choice made by the author, with each quotation followed by an explanation of importance and

    consequence. The challenge will be to synthesize the readings instead of merely summarizing them. Imagine the authors as real people in a room together, talking through their ideas. You’re a fly on the wall-how does that conversation go? Are they agreeing? Do they

    agree on some points, but disagree on others? How does one author’s scholarship build on or reference another’s?

    Requirements:

  • topic Questions

    1. What are the meanings of mean, median, and mode, and how would you teach students when to use each? How can real-world data sets be used to help students calculate and compare these measures?

    2. How can you help students decide which type of graph (line plot, histogram, or box plot) is best for displaying different types of data? What are some benefits of comparing the same data set in multiple graph forms, and how would you guide students in interpreting patterns or trends?

    Tips for Success

  • Write as if you are explaining the concept to your future elementary students.
    Use examples, visuals, or diagrams to support your explanation.
    Ensure all formulas, symbols, and calculations are accurate.
    Include one reference in APA format with a link if possible.
    Aim for 150200 words per post.
    Be professional, respectful, and original in your tone.
  • Requirements: 300

  • Ethonograohy Proposal

    Overview The Ethnography Proposal is the first formal assignment in your course-long study of a food subculture and asks you to outline in some detail what you plan to study and how you plan to study it. You may want to review the Engaging Communities chapters assigned so far as they cover many of the terms/concepts below. (MAKE IT WRITTEN IN FIRST PERSON POV) (THE FOOD STUDY IS MY MOTHERS BUREK WHERE SHE COOKS AT HOME KITCHEN) Directions In the format of your choice (written in MLA format, a video recording, a multimodal design, etc.), introduce your proposed food subculture ethnographic study. Use the headings below to organize your responses (labeling if in written format). In total, your proposal might be around 2 pages (or the equivalent)–but please prioritize responding thoughtfully and thoroughly to all of the questions (quality) over length (quantity). Introduction. What food subculture do you want to study? Why this one? What is this food subculture’s significance to you? What do you already know about this subculture? What do you want to learn? (Be as specific as possible in naming the subculture. For example, Puerto Rican food as cooked by my family or pizza at the Village Trattoria in South Orange are both more specific choices than Caribbean food and pizza.) Position. What are your fixed positions as a researcher (i.e., gender, age, socio-economic class, nationality, ethnicity, race, etc.)? Which of your fixed positions may affect what you see in this field site/subculture? What subjective positions (life experiences) do you carry into your site? What assumptions do you already have about this subculture? Access. At what specific field site will you conduct your observations? Do you already have access to the field site? If not, what is your plan for gaining access? Again, be as specific as possible. (Note: if you are planning to conduct an online ethnographic study, you must specify which websites, hashtags, accounts, etc. that you plan to study/follow.) Schedule. You are expected to spend at least ten hours over the duration of our course directly observing your subculture and taking notes & conducting interviews. What is your plan for achieving this number of hours? How will you break up that time? Challenges. Do you anticipate any challenges fulfilling your research (primary and/or secondary) and/or writing for this ethnography project? Briefly describe these potential challenges and how you might manage or try to overcome them.
  • Compare and contrast between Servant leadership and Follwers…

    I want it clear and concise. Im in the school for the army so I want this essay to be army when you compare and contrast the servant leadership vs Followership. Start the introduction with the purpose of this essay is to compare and contrast the servant leadership and followership. I want the level of writing to be at 8grader and do not use big words. Please EVERY SENTENCE HAS TO BE IN ACTIVE VOICE. 5 paragraphs in total. Each sentence cannot pass 30 words count. APA format. At least 3 sources cited. does not need to pass 300 words in total

  • posc 124 variables duraid

    Hi Everyone,

    This week we are looking at what type of questions we, as comparative politics examine, what makes a good theory in explaining these questions, and how to set up a research design. You have looked at two famous studies “Why Nations Fail” and “Guns, Germs, and Steel” which use the comparative method to attempt to provide answers to big and difficult questions, specifically why are some countries more successful than others.

    For this discussion I want you to look at Acemoglu and Robinson’s Why Nations Fail and identify what are the variables of the study? The Dependent Variable is the political phenomena being explained and the independent variables are those factors that explain the specific political phenomena (outcome). In other words what explains the differences in outcomes (wealth, development, rule of law, etc). Do you agree with their argument overall, why or why not?

    Requirements: 1h

  • posc 124 why nations duraid

    Okay, for this week, we have a short writing assignment that asks you to read Why Nation’s Fail and listen to his lecture and identify what his research question is, and what are his causal variables. We are building on the work of the previous weeks in identify how political scientists think about their research. Ultimately, what is his argument as to why some nations are more successful than others?

    In 3 double-space pages I want you to (1) identify Robinson’s argument and (2) do you agree with him, why or why not? To be successful, you need to identify Robinson’s terms and clearly identify his argument citing the reading or the lecture video. Second, I want to see your voices come through. You are not graded on whether you agree or disagree, but on the quality of your argument. Do you think his variables are sufficient to explain why there is liberty and freedom in some countries but not others? Are they missing something? Or are they correct? What matters is that you justify why you are making the argument you are making. Now, the literature on democracy is vast, and more vast, and we are starting out this discussion, so don’t feel overwhelmed or like you might be missing something. The debate over democracy goes back to the beginning of political time, and we have been debating it since Aristotle. I just want to know what you think!

    Requirements: 1h

  • posc 147 israel druaid

    For our discussion this week, we are looking at the Six Day War of 1967 and its impact on the region.

    I want you to debate the following questions:

    1. What caused the Six Day War, and would you have launched a preemptive strike as Israel did?

    2. What is the political significance/consequence of the Six Day War?

    Requirements: 1h

  • soc 130 racial hanaa

    Write 5 paragraphs answering the following questions:

    • What is the “racial wealth gap?” Describe the extend of racialized wealth inequality in the US.
    • Is racialized wealth inequality a social problem in the USA? Why? Are you using an objective or subjective definition of a social problem?
    • Explain the historical roots of the wealth inequality between African-Americans and White-Americans.
    • How does racialized wealth inequality relate to other racial inequalities in the USA?
    • Identify and explain 2 ways of reducing the racial wealth gap.

    You must use a minimum of 3 of the following sources of information:

    Requirements: 1h