Slave Letters Analysis

For this assignment you are to use the methodological framework in 11.5 “How to Analyze a Primary Source” to examine the primary source documents you just read. Specifically, you are to do the following:

1. Select one of the correspondences (Letters) and oneof the narratives and memoirs.
2. Use the framework for analyzing primary sources on letters to break down the two you selected.
3. Make sure to answer all parts to the analysis, which is listed again below, 12 points in all:
   1. Answer the following questions as you begin to analyze the sources:
      1. Look at the physical nature of your source. This is particularly important and powerful if you are dealing with an original source (i.e., an actual old letter, rather than a transcribed and published version of the same letter). What can you learn from the form of the source? (Was it written on fancy paper in elegant handwriting, or on scrap-paper, scribbled in pencil?) What does this tell you?
      2. Think about the purpose of the source. What was the authors message or argument? What was he/she trying to get across? Is the message explicit, or are there implicit messages as well?
      3. How does the author try to get the message across? What methods does he/she use?
      4. What do you know about the author? Race, sex, class, occupation, religion, age, region, political beliefs? Does any of this matter? How?
      5. Who constituted the intended audience? Was this source meant for one persons eyes, or for the public? How does that affect the source?
      6. What can a careful reading of the text (even if it is an object) tell you? How does the language work? What are the important metaphors or symbols? What can the authors choice of words tell you? What about the silences what does the author choose NOT to talk about?

      Now you can evaluate the source as historical evidence.

      1. Is it prescriptive telling you what people thought should happen or descriptive telling you what people thought did happen?
      2. Does it describe ideology and/or behavior?
      3. Does it tell you about the beliefs/actions of the elite, or of ordinary people? From whose perspective?
      4. What historical questions can you answer using this source? What are the benefits of using this kind of source?
      5. What questions can this source NOT help you answer? What are the limitations of this type of source?
      6. If we have read other historians interpretations of this source or sources like this one, how does your analysis fit with theirs? In your opinion, does this source support or challenge their argument?

      .

      .

      Reading:

      11.5 Analyzing Primary Source Documents (Read)

      Primary Source Analysis Methodology

      A very important aspect to history is the ability to examine primary source documents. In order to examine primary sources, we need to establish some sort of methodological framework for analyzing primary sources. In this case we will look at letters. The following is an excerpt taken from the Carleton College Department of History, you can find the website here:

      How to Analyze a Primary Source

      When you analyze a primary source, you are undertaking the most important job of the historian. There is no better way to understand events in the past than by examining the sources whether journals, newspaper articles, letters, court case records, novels, artworks, music or autobiographies that people from that period left behind.Each historian, including you, will approach a source with a different set of experiences and skills, and will therefore interpret the document differently. Remember that there is no one right interpretation. However, if you do not do a careful and thorough job, you might arrive at a wrong interpretation.In order to analyze a primary source you need information about two things: the document itself, and the era from which it comes. You can base your information about the time period on the readings you do in class and on lectures. On your own you need to think about the document itself. The following questions may be helpful to you as you begin to analyze the sources:

      1. Look at the physical nature of your source. This is particularly important and powerful if you are dealing with an original source (i.e., an actual old letter, rather than a transcribed and published version of the same letter). What can you learn from the form of the source? (Was it written on fancy paper in elegant handwriting, or on scrap-paper, scribbled in pencil?) What does this tell you?
      2. Think about the purpose of the source. What was the authors message or argument? What was he/she trying to get across? Is the message explicit, or are there implicit messages as well?
      3. How does the author try to get the message across? What methods does he/she use?
      4. What do you know about the author? Race, sex, class, occupation, religion, age, region, political beliefs? Does any of this matter? How?
      5. Who constituted the intended audience? Was this source meant for one persons eyes, or for the public? How does that affect the source?
      6. What can a careful reading of the text (even if it is an object) tell you? How does the language work? What are the important metaphors or symbols? What can the authors choice of words tell you? What about the silences what does the author choose NOT to talk about?

      Now you can evaluate the source as historical evidence.

      1. Is it prescriptive telling you what people thought should happen or descriptive telling you what people thought did happen?
      2. Does it describe ideology and/or behavior?
      3. Does it tell you about the beliefs/actions of the elite, or of ordinary people? From whose perspective?
      4. What historical questions can you answer using this source? What are the benefits of using this kind of source?
      5. What questions can this source NOT help you answer? What are the limitations of this type of source?
      6. If we have read other historians interpretations of this source or sources like this one, how does your analysis fit with theirs? In your opinion, does this source support or challenge their argument?

      Remember, you cannot address each and every one of these questions in your presentation or in your paper, and I wouldnt want you to. You need to be selective.

   11.6 Primary Documents – Slave Letters (Read)

   Humanity and Slave Letters

   Here is a link to several short narratives, primary sources of Slaves in their own words. When you open the web page you will see on the bottom right a list of Narratives and Memoirs. In this list of documents on the website you are encouraged to read all. As you read these, keep in mind the framework to analyze primary sources provided in 11.5. You are required to read the following:

   • All 4 letters under correspondence.
   • All 4 excerpts under narratives and memoirs.

   Link to HTML website: Here is the link also just in case:

Struggling with your essay and deadlines?

Get this or a similar paper done in as fast as 4 hours, 24/7.

NB: We do not sell prewritten papers. All essays are written from scratch according to specific needs and instructions

✔Secure Service ✔ Plagiarism Free ✔On-time Delivery

WRITE MY PAPER